Intelligence panels set to get more powers
The Punjab government has prepared a draft of legislation to provide enhanced powers to intelligence committees at the district, divisional and provincial levels to combat threats to public security.
According to the Punjab Home Department, the proposed Mehfooz Punjab Act 2025 is aimed at strengthening law and order in the province through the comprehensive legal framework designed to tighten the noose around disruptive elements while ensuring constitutional safeguards.
The draft law introduces sweeping changes to the existing security apparatus by empowering the intelligence committees with unprecedented authority.
Under the proposed act, individuals deemed threats to public order can be placed in preventive detention for up to 90 days.
The legislation also allows for blocking of passports and national identity cards of such persons, along with recommendations to freeze their bank accounts and place them on no-fly lists. In more severe cases, the committees may recommend seizure of immovable properties and forwarding cases to federal agencies for further action.
A three-tiered intelligence committee structure forms the backbone of the proposed system. At the provincial level, the committee will be headed by the Punjab home secretary and include the inspector general of police, special aecretary for interior, additional IG of special branch, additional IG of counter-terrorism department (CTD) and representatives from sensitive federal agencies.
The divisional committees will be led by the commissioners with representation from regional police officers, SP of apecial branch, divisional CTD officers and federal agencies' representatives. District committees will operate under deputy commissioners with district police officers, DSPs of special branch, CTD officers and federal representatives as members.
The draft legislation proposes strict penalties for violations, with imprisonment ranging from three to five years and fines worth Rs5 million to.Rs10 million for non-compliance with directives.
To ensure checks and balances, the act proposes the formation of a provincial review board headed by the Lahore High Court chief justice and comprising current or former judges. The board will oversee detentions exceeding three months, providing judicial oversight to prevent potential misuse of powers.
One of the most significant provisions involves the authority to proscribe organisations and list their members in the 'Fourth Schedule'.
The district intelligence committees will have powers equivalent to the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) law of1960, but with an expanded scope and stricter enforcement mechanisms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Ensure translation of evidence into Urdu simultaneously: LHC
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) remarked that Urdu had been declared as the language of subordinate courts since 2015 but the same has not been implemented in Punjab till now. The court said the Supreme Court on September 8, 2015, had directed the government to implement Urdu as an official language but unfortunately no significant steps have been taken and up-till now evidence is being recorded in English in sessions courts. The court directed all the sessions' judges, additional sessions' judges, as well as, judges of special courts to ensure translation of the evidence of a witness recorded in English into Urdu simultaneously. The court passed this order in murder reference of Irfan alias Pomi after noting that the translation of the prosecution evidence and the statements of the accused have been made by the reader of the court after recording the whole evidence. The court said that law is very much clear on the point that the evidence should be taken down in the language of witnesses by the magistrate or judge himself or be recorded in his presence, hearing and superintendence. However, the translation of the evidence of a witness recorded in English should be translated into Urdu simultaneously at the same sitting, as well as, in the presence of witnesses, accused and the presiding officer, the court added. The court said this is necessary as if any ambiguity in the evidence recorded in English comes on the surface, the same can be removed in the light of translation of evidence in Urdu. The court said normally the witnesses during the trial depose in Urdu and the presiding officer, while transcribing the same in English, dictates to his stenographer and hence Urdu transcript of such deposition is not prepared. The court said this practice diminishes the very purpose of preparing and keeping Urdu translation of evidence recorded by the presiding officer in English. The court; therefore, directed the registrar to send copies of this judgment to all the sessions judges and judges of special courts, as well as, the secretary, ministry of law and justice Islamabad and the secretary ministry of law and parliamentary affairs Punjab for compliance. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960: LHC asks federal Law Ministry to review detention provisions
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Thursday asked the federal law ministry to review the preventive detention provisions of Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960. A full bench headed by Chief Justice Aalia Neelum heard the petitions of PTI former MPA Zainab Umair and others challenging detention orders of the party/workers. Earlier, the petitioner's counsel argued that several provisions of the law were in conflict with the Constitution and that hundreds of people had been detained under its cover. He said the law had been misused politically and arbitrarily by the government. He pointed out that before detaining a citizen, the government must satisfy itself with justifiable grounds. However, he alleged that dozens or even hundreds of people had been detained under a single order. The chief justice remarked, 'The courts are awake, not asleep, that's why the system functions.' The chief justice observed, 'Everyone wants peace but if peace is disturbed, who will be held responsible? What happens if a protest is not peaceful?' The Chief Justice also remarked that laws are framed on the foundation of the Constitution. The bench, while concluding the proceedings, decided to forward two of the petitions to the law ministry and disposed of two others as being withdrawn. Last year, a report submitted by the Punjab chief secretary in the court revealed that the provincial government had delegated its powers under section 26 of the MPO Ordinance 1960 to the DCs to issue detention orders subject to reasonable restriction. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
May 9 riot cases: LHC adjourns proceedings of IK's bail pleas
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Thursday adjourned the proceedings of bail petitions filed by former prime minister Imran Khan in eight May 9 riot cases to June 23 after prosecutor concluded its arguments. The prosecutor also submitted detailed records of co-accused individuals in the Corps Commander House attack and other related cases. The court questioned the basis of treating Imran Khan differently from other accused who had already secured bail. The prosecutor submitting the details of the cases said an accused Sheikh Imtiaz Mahmood was granted pre-arrest bail in the Corps Commander House case on August 6, 2024, whereas Zain Qureshi's bail was dismissed. In the Askari Tower arson case, which includes murder charges, no accused has been granted bail so far, he told the court. He, however, responding to a court query said that Imran Khan being the PTI chairman held a commanding position at the time of the riots. He claimed that Imran Khan's conduct has been based on a pattern of hide and seek from the beginning. In response, Khan's lawyer argued that individuals cannot be held responsible for others' actions. He maintained that the presence of PTI supporters at protest sites due to their admiration for Imran Khan does not constitute a crime under Pakistan's Penal Code. He said the trial court will determine the actual facts. The court directed both the sides to conclude their arguments on next hearing and rose for the day. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
