Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge vs. Shark HydroVac Floor Cleaner — which one wins?
BISSELL CrossWave OmniForce Edge
Not only can this Bissell vacuum and mop hard floors and area rugs, but can switch to vacuum-only mode. This also comes with an anti-tangle brush head, zerogap edge tech, and a self-cleaning/charging feature. It's also easy to use with intuitive controls and LED display to show real-time information.
Shark HydroVac MessMaster
This 3-in-1 floor cleaner can vacuum, mop and self-clean at the same time. It also has the option to clean area rugs. With its powerful suction to tackle dirt and debris, wet messes, and stains in no time. It also comes with an antibacterial brush roller and odor neutralizing solution to eliminate lingering smells.
When it comes to ensuring our floors are clean and spotless, having one of the best vacuum cleaners is essential. And if you have mainly hard flooring, wet-and-dry vacuum cleaners can do all the hard work for you, saving you the back-breaking task of traditional mopping.
As Homes editor at Tom's Guide, I've tested my fair share of wet and dry vacuums, including the Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge and Shark HydroVac MessMaster 3-in-1 Floor cleaner on my hard floors. And while these are both popular brands on the market, which wet-and-dry vacuum is better?
In fact, choosing between the two will all depend on your needs and budget. And despite only having a $100 price difference, you'll find that both have unique functions.
The Bissell stands out for having a separate vacuum-only mode, while the Shark HydroVac MessMaster has odor neutralizer technology. Both have self-cleaning functions which are always handy for hygiene, convenience and long-term maintenance.
To help you decide which wet-and-dry cleaner is right for your home however, here's our Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge vs. Shark HydroVac Floor Cleaner verdict.
The Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge cleaner is available for $399 on Amazon. In contrast, the Shark HydroVac Messmaster currently costs $249 on Amazon and on Shark's website.
That's not a huge price difference, however, so you'll need to consider both specs, and types of flooring. Also, look out for deals, as these models are often on sale.
Shark HydroVac
Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge
Price
$299
$399
Weight
8 pounds
10 pounds
Water tank capacity
0.38 quarts
1 quart
Battery runtime
Up to 35 minutes
Up to 30 minutes
The Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge has a sleek, slimline design and smallish floorhead. It comes with a motorized wet/dry roller heads that pick up liquids and debris.
The handle is easy to grip, with four push buttons that include the power, dry-vac mode, hydration mode and self-cleaning cycle.
There's also an intuitive LCD screen that gives you real-time information about when to fill the water tank, levels of hydration and battery indicator.
Perhaps, the only downsides are that the CrossWave OmniForce Edge doesn't come with extra accessories, such as a spare brush roller —just a charging pad. And it doesn't have any smart features. However, this isn't a real deal breaker.
Despite its slim appearance though, Bissell's vacuum is heavier than the Shark HydroVac, weighing in at 10 pounds.
On the other hand, the Shark HydroVac cleaner has a more attractive, sturdy design with a nice rose-gold color. It also comes with two, antibacterial brush rollers, and there's an odor neutralizer feature to banish lingering odors.
Like all wet-and-dry vacs, both come with a two-tank system — one for clean water and the dirty water canister.
Bissell's tank is noticeably larger than the Shark's, which you might want to consider if you have a lot of heavy-duty cleaning to do.
What's more, they both have a self-rinse system, that ensures the vacuums remain clean and always in top-notch condition. This also means you'll never have to get your hands messy, when handling dirty water.
In addition, it's simple to detach the brush rollers should you need to deep clean or replace.
In terms of who wins, however, the Shark HydroVac MessMaster floor cleaner is certainly more eye-catching, and appealing.
Winner: Shark HydroVac MessMaster
Setting up the Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge was super easy, and took just minutes.
You simply detach the water canister from the vacuum body, fill to the line with clean water, and add the cleaning solution that is provided.
The power button on the handle turns on the LCD display that gives you basic indicators like the battery indicator, hydration levels and when to fill or empty the water tanks.
It also took me by surprise with its signature "chime," as you power it on and off.
Unlike the Shark floor cleaner, the clear, dirty tank is located at the front of the cleaner, and it's easy to detach the tank and empty out after use.
The Shark HydroVac is also easy to set up with a simple click-and-lock. Bear in mind the water tank is located at the front of the cleaner, and it also comes with Shark's own multi-surface solution to add.
Similarly, the power button on the handle turns on the LCD display's handy indicators like the battery level, but lacks any advanced settings like hydration levels or Max mode in comparison.
What's more, the Shark HydroVac felt more comfortable to handle and tilt back with ease.
Perhaps, my favorite feature is the HydroVac's self-propelled function, that gives it a little "boost," making it easier to push across hard floors.
The Shark HydroVac is also lighter to carry around the home compared to the Bissell — which is ideal for those with stairs.
Winner: Shark HydroVac MessMaster
I'll admit, this was a close call, as both models had sufficient power to clean my hardwood and tiled floors. However, which cleaner ultimately out-performed the other?
Firstly, the Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge has the edge (no pun intended) of including an option to dry-vacuum only, which is a good selling point for me. This meant that I could use it for sucking up heavy-duty messes (without making a sopping mess), before deep washing the floors.
While I was impressed that the CrossWave OmniForce was able to remove light dust, dirt and minor marks, it struggled to remove stubborn stains like dried mud from the yard,or even a coffee stain.
I found that I often needed to go over these areas a few times to ensure they were spotless.
In any case, its "Zero Gap" edge cleaning, tackled the edges of baseboards and along kitchen units better than expected. Plus, the cleaner didn't leave behind any dirty streaks.
Perhaps the only caveats are that the Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge lacked a swivel head mechanism, and struggled getting into awkward angles.
And it's noisier than the Shark HydroVac (and louder on Max mode). For that reason, you might have to consider the time and household members before cleaning your floors.
On the other hand, the Shark HydroVac swivel head and self-propelled feature made it far easier to maneuver across floors, easily tackling marks and dirt with minimal effort.
In comparison, it seemed to give a quicker clean, removing dirt and stubborn stains in less time. In just one or two sweeps, my white tiles were looking spotless and brand new.
Again, the Shark HydroVac didn't leave behind any dirty streaks, and floors were dry in less than a minute.
Another feature I liked was that the Shark HydroVac comes with odor neutralizers and an antibacterial roller to eliminate germs, and musty lingering odors in the air.
I also preferred the model's "refresh" mode to clean my bathroom rug thoroughly, without soaking it. That makes it a convenient feature, especially if your rugs are not machine washable.
Since both have self-cleaning features, this process takes about a minute. However, the Shark HydroVac's was noisier while in operation — so it's best to refrain from having a conversation! Still, it's a small sacrifice to make for refreshed floors.
Overall, I was impressed by the Shark HydroVac cleaner's performance and versatility at tackling heavy-duty dirt on all types of flooring. As for drying time, both didn't leave behind wet streaks or patches, and floors seemed to dry fast.
Winner: Shark HydroVac MessMaster
For those with mainly hard flooring, both of these wet-and-dry vacuum cleaners prove to be great contenders.
The Bissell CrossWave OmniForce Edge scores top marks for its pick-up power, dry-vacuum mode, and versatility. But while it did a decent job for light clean-ups, it struggled with heavy-duty mess and tricky corners/angles.
However, the Shark HydroVac impressed me with its power and speed at quickly removing stubborn, sticky stains. It could also handle ridged tiles with ease, and did a great job at cleaning area rugs. What's more, it is lighter to carry around the home, and looks stylish, too.
Bear in mind that neither floor cleaner comes with an app or smart features. But if these are things you're after, the Tineco Floor One S5 Extreme is a good option.
However, if you're simply after a powerful clean, and fuss-free operation, I'd recommend the Shark HydroVac Floor floor cleaner to get the job done well.
Winner: Shark HydroVac MessMaster
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
My 3 Favorite Stocks to Buy Right Now
Roku is a long-term growth play with recent volatility and a promising ad partnership with Amazon. Costco continues to deliver market-beating returns, justifying its premium price tag. Target is a risky turnaround story, priced for pessimism but showing signs of a strategic comeback. 10 stocks we like better than Roku › The stock market has been less predictable than usual lately. As I'm writing this on June 20, the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) index is up only 1.5% year to date. But this mellow return included a deep dip in April, so the index has gained 24% from the bottom of its 52-week low. So, things are extra volatile this year, and I understand if you'd rather keep some cash on hand right now. But even now, a few stocks can inspire me to put my extra cash to work. Read on to see why my hand hovers over the "buy" button for Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU), Costco (NASDAQ: COST), and Target (NYSE: TGT) in June 2025. Media-streaming technology veteran Roku has had quite a ride lately. Its stock price shot up by 50% over the past year but has taken a slight detour more recently, dropping 3% in the last six months. The growth story is still alive and well, with excitement over new deals, such as the recent Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) ad partnership, keeping optimism afloat. However, the company still isn't showing a profit, so valuation ratios based on profitability don't make any sense. Instead, you can look at Roku's price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which sits at a reasonable 2.8. That metric floated in double-digit territory four years ago. For now, Roku is acting a bit like the kid in class who has tons of potential but hasn't quite turned in the homework -- yet. The platform is growing, and recent partnerships could be a game changer, but the market wants to see proof that all these moves will translate to real, scalable profits. That's why Roku's stock looks cheap in this period of growth-focused operations and limited profits. If you're in it for the long haul and don't mind a few twists and turns, Roku still looks like a compelling candidate for a growth-focused portfolio. It's one of the few stocks I don't mind buying right now since its short-term price moves tend to be unpredictable anyway. This is a long-term growth idea. Wholesale warehouse retailer Costco is a different story. The stock has been soaring for years, lifting the P/S ratio to a lofty 1.6. That would be low in the high-growth media-streaming market, but Costco's valuation looks luxurious next to other large-scale retailers. But the stock is rising for good reasons. The company has more cash and less debt than sector giant Walmart (NYSE: WMT). Trailing sales are up 61% over the last five years, while Walmart's sales increased by only 26%. Costco's return on invested capital is 26%, nearly twice that of Walmart's 14% reading. Long story short, Costco runs a superior business, and its stock deserves a price premium. This stock looked expensive five years ago, with a 5-year price gain of 114% at the time. By comparison, the S&P rose 47%, and Walmart gained 65% over the same time span. But if you cashed in your Costco gains or sat on your hands in 2020, you've missed out on a market-beating 227% return in the last 5 years: Costco's stock isn't cheap, but you get what you pay for -- a world-class retailer with a history of great shareholder returns. Last but not least, fellow big-box retailer Target tells another compelling story. Target's stock is down 21% in 5 years, and the P/S ratio stands at a skimpy 0.4. If investors are paying extra for Costco's incredible performance, they're stuffing Target shares in Wall Street's bargain bin. This is a turnaround story, not a march to ever greater heights. Turnarounds are risky, but this one should have a happy ending. The company is no longer competing against Walmart and Costco on lower prices, but is refocusing on the affordable-luxury status it once held. The new strategy leans on the nearly forgotten "Tar-zhay" branding. "In a world where shopping has become less inspiring, consumers expect us to be the place they can recapture the joy of retail," CEO Brian Cornell said in the fourth-quarter 2024 earnings call. "Our guests are looking for Tar-zhay. Consumers coined that term decades ago to define how we elevate the everything, every day to something special, how we add unexpected fun into shopping that would be otherwise routine." So, Target is betting the barn on a better shopping experience. The stores need to feel friendlier than Costco's or Walmart's low-cost emporiums. Nobody likes an empty shelf, so popular items must always be in stock -- even if it costs more to run a more complete supply chain. And the Target Circle loyalty program can't be all about discounts, which is why it also offers personalized product recommendations and extended product returns. Target's stock is priced for absolute disaster, but I see good things happening in the turnaround effort. It's a risky bet, but one worth making in the summer of 2025. Before you buy stock in Roku, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Roku wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anders Bylund has positions in Amazon, Roku, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Costco Wholesale, Roku, Target, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. My 3 Favorite Stocks to Buy Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
If I Could Buy Only 1 "Magnificent 7" Stock Over the Next Year, Alphabet Would Be It, but Here's the Key Reason
Alphabet shares have dipped 2% over the past year, while most "Magnificent Seven" stocks posted double-digit percentage gains. Market leaders like Nvidia and Microsoft may look flashier, but Alphabet could offer better value. A tasty combination of affordable shares and artificial intelligence (AI) expertise sets this stock apart from the rest. 10 stocks we like better than Alphabet › The "Magnificent Seven" moniker was originally intended as a warning to long-term investors. Remember, the movie by the same name doesn't have the happiest of endings, and the tragedy made sense as a metaphor for potential market bubbles. Still, the Magnificent Seven group keeps setting the tone for the overall stock market, and most of these stocks are market darlings in 2025, with double-digit price gains over the last 52 weeks. But Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) is lagging behind with a 2% price dip over the last year, and the stock looks downright undervalued in many ways. It's the only Magnificent Seven stock I have bought this year, for one simple reason: It's the best combination of affordable shares and unbeatable artificial intelligence (AI) expertise in this elite group. The other Magnificent Seven companies may have a leg up on Alphabet in the AI market so far. Nvidia's (NASDAQ: NVDA) profitable sales growth is unbeatable. Revenue-based market shares suggest that the cloud computing solutions from Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) are running circles around Google Cloud. But those proven and promised results are firmly baked into the stock prices. Nvidia stock trades at 47 times earnings and 49 times free cash flows today. Microsoft and Amazon have P/E ratios in the mid-30s and cash flow multiples well above Nvidia's. At the same time, Alphabet stock looks affordable at 19 times earnings and 28 times free cash flows. The numbers never tell the whole story, and there's more to say about Alphabet's long-term growth opportunities. From AI services to quantum computing systems, the company was built to thrive amid ever-changing markets and unexpected economy jolts. But the modest stock valuation is a great starting point for further research. Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anders Bylund has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. If I Could Buy Only 1 "Magnificent 7" Stock Over the Next Year, Alphabet Would Be It, but Here's the Key Reason was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
CEOs Using AI to Terrorize Their Employees
As artificial intelligence becomes the corporate buzzword du jour, executives are finding more and more ways to shoehorn the trendy tech into their everyday business operations. That has a lot of workers anxious about automation, income inequality, and increased workloads — something c-suite bigwigs are all too happy to take advantage of. Though AI — really just a fun name for large language models (LLMs), or predictive chatbots — in its current state isn't likely to bring a labor revolution anytime soon, CEOs find that the threat of AI automation works just as well. As Axios highlighted this week, CEOs are increasingly using AI adoption as a cudgel to justify layoffs, or to manufacture consent for layoffs in the future. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy, for example, recently said AI is likely to "reduce our total corporate workforce," while JPMorgan executives told investors that AI will allow for a "10 percent headcount reduction." Others, like Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke, are threatening workers directly, saying that AI is now the "baseline expectation." Per Axios, Shopify managers hiring human workers now have to explain to top brass why AI wouldn't be a better choice for any given job. This kind of doomsday messaging goes hand in hand with increased expectations for workers' productivity. A recent survey found that 77 percent of workers reported that AI adds to their workload. Of that, a staggering proportion — 39 percent — involves fixing the buggy tech's sloppy mistakes. While AI is a pretty recent phenomenon, these kinds of scare tactics aren't new. "Disciplining labor" is a concept that occasionally gets thrown around discussions of supply side economics. It's a term used to describe broad economic measures that keep workers in line, in order to keep corporate profits high — suppressing unions, keeping wage growth low, and dangling the threat of unemployment over their heads. In this sense, AI in its current form is simply a new whip for CEOs to use on their employees. It's having what Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a professor at the Yale School of Management, calls an "inculcation effect" on workers. It's a "warning with an anticipatory alert that preempts later trauma going viral," he told Axios. Plus, now that the job market has been devastated by AI spambots, finding a new gig is harder than ever. With AI, workers are forced onto their back foot as their corporate overlords demand more productivity for less pay. If the choice is to either work harder or clear out their desk, employees are then less likely to ask for quality of life improvements, or to organize for unions that could win them. And that, of course, means corporate honchos get an even bigger piece of the pie. More on Labor: CEO of Anthropic Warns That AI Will Destroy Huge Proportion of Well-Paying Jobs
