Palestinians accuse Israeli troops of using civilians as human shields in Gaza

Several Palestinians and soldiers told the AP that Israeli troops are systematically forcing Palestinians to act as human shields in Gaza, sending them into buildings and tunnels to check for explosives or militants. read more
Palestinians run for cover during an Israeli drone strike in Jabalia, in the northern Gaza Strip on May 23, 2025. AFP Photo
The only time the Palestinian man wasn't bound or blindfolded, he said, was when he was used by Israeli soldiers as their human shield.
Dressed in army fatigues with a camera fixed to his forehead, Ayman Abu Hamadan was forced into houses in the Gaza Strip to make sure they were clear of bombs and gunmen, he said. When one unit finished with him, he was passed to the next.
'They beat me and told me: 'You have no other option; do this or we'll kill you,'' the 36-year-old told The Associated Press, describing the 2 1/2 weeks he was held last summer by the Israeli military in northern Gaza.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Orders often came from the top, and at times nearly every platoon used a Palestinian to clear locations, said an Israeli officer, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal.
Several Palestinians and soldiers told the AP that Israeli troops are systematically forcing Palestinians to act as human shields in Gaza, sending them into buildings and tunnels to check for explosives or militants. The dangerous practice has become ubiquitous during 19 months of war, they said.
In response to these allegations, Israel's military says it strictly prohibits using civilians as shields — a practice it has long accused Hamas of using in Gaza. Israeli officials blame the militants for the civilian death toll in its offensive that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians.
In a statement to the AP, the military said it also bans otherwise coercing civilians to participate in operations, and 'all such orders are routinely emphasized to the forces.'
The military said it's investigating several cases alleging that Palestinians were involved in missions, but wouldn't provide details. It didn't answer questions about the reach of the practice or any orders from commanding officers.
The AP spoke with seven Palestinians who described being used as shields in Gaza and the occupied West Bank and with two members of Israel's military who said they engaged in the practice, which is prohibited by international law. Rights groups are ringing the alarm, saying it's become standard procedure increasingly used in the war.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'These are not isolated accounts; they point to a systemic failure and a horrifying moral collapse,' said Nadav Weiman, executive director of Breaking the Silence — a whistleblower group of former Israeli soldiers that has collected testimonies about the practice from within the military. 'Israel rightly condemns Hamas for using civilians as human shields, but our own soldiers describe doing the very same.'
Abu Hamadan said he was detained in August after being separated from his family, and soldiers told him he'd help with a 'special mission.' He was forced, for 17 days, to search houses and inspect every hole in the ground for tunnels, he said.
Soldiers stood behind him and, once it was clear, entered the buildings to damage or destroy them, he said. He spent each night bound in a dark room, only to wake up and do it again.
Rights groups say Israel has used Palestinians as shields in Gaza and the West Bank for decades. The Supreme Court outlawed the practice in 2005. But the groups continued to document violations.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Still, experts say this war is the first time in decades the practice — and the debate around it — has been so widespread.
The two Israeli soldiers who spoke to the AP — and a third who provided testimony to Breaking the Silence — said commanders were aware of the use of human shields and tolerated it, with some giving orders to do so. Some said it was referred to as the 'mosquito protocol' and that Palestinians were also referred to as 'wasps' and other dehumanizing terms.
The soldiers — who said they're no longer serving in Gaza — said the practice sped up operations, saved ammunition, and spared combat dogs from injury or death.
The soldiers said they first became aware human shields were being used shortly after the war erupted on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, and that it became widespread by the middle of 2024. Orders to 'bring a mosquito' often came via radio, they said — shorthand everyone understood. Soldiers acted on commanding officers' orders, according to the officer who spoke to the AP.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He said that by the end of his nine months in Gaza, every infantry unit used a Palestinian to clear houses before entering.
'Once this idea was initiated, it caught on like fire in a field,' the 26-year-old said. 'People saw how effective and easy it was.'
He described a 2024 planning meeting where a brigade commander presented to the division commander a slide reading 'get a mosquito' and a suggestion they might 'just catch one off the streets.'
The officer wrote two incident reports to the brigade commander detailing the use of human shields, reports that would have been escalated to the division chief, he said. The military said it had no comment when asked whether it received them.
One report documented the accidental killing of a Palestinian, he said — troops didn't realize another unit was using him as a shield and shot him as he ran into a house. The officer recommended the Palestinians be dressed in army clothes to avoid misidentification.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He said he knew of at least one other Palestinian who died while used as a shield — he passed out in a tunnel.
Convincing soldiers to operate lawfully when they see their enemy using questionable practices is difficult, said Michael Schmitt, a distinguished professor of international law at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. Israeli officials and other observers say Hamas uses civilians as shields as it embeds itself in communities, hiding fighters in hospitals and schools.
'It's really a heavy lift to look at your own soldiers and say you have to comply,' Schmitt said.
One soldier told the AP his unit tried to refuse to use human shields in mid-2024 but were told they had no choice, with a high-ranking officer saying they shouldn't worry about international humanitarian law.
The sergeant — speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal — said the troops used a 16-year-old and a 30-year-old for a few days.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The boy shook constantly, he said, and both repeated 'Rafah, Rafah' — Gaza's southernmost city, where more than 1 million Palestinians had fled from fighting elsewhere at that point in the war.
It seemed they were begging to be freed, the sergeant said.
Masoud Abu Saeed said he was used as a shield for two weeks in March 2024 in the southern city of Khan Younis.
'This is extremely dangerous,' he recounted telling a soldier. 'I have children and want to reunite with them.'
The 36-year-old said he was forced into houses, buildings and a hospital to dig up suspected tunnels and clear areas. He said he wore a first-responder vest for easy identification, carrying a phone, hammer and chain cutters.
During one operation, he bumped into his brother, used as a shield by another unit, he said.
They hugged. 'I thought Israel's army had executed him,' he said.
Palestinians also report being used as shields in the West Bank.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hazar Estity said soldiers took her from her Jenin refugee camp home in November, forcing her to film inside several apartments and clear them before troops entered.
She said she pleaded to return to her 21-month-old son, but soldiers didn't listen.
'I was most afraid that they would kill me,' she said. 'And that I wouldn't see my son again.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

18 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Israeli military finds bodies of 3 hostages held by Hamas in Gaza

The Israeli military has recovered the bodies of three hostages, including the 21-year-old Yonatan Samerano, who were held in the Gaza Strip. Yonatan's father expressed gratitude towards the the Israel government, and the country's security forces.(via REUTERS) "Yesterday was Yonati's Hebrew birthday. On his 23rd birthday, the day he was born, our Yonati was rescued in the heroic operation of the IDF and the heroic GSS soldiers,' Yonatan's father, Kobi Samerano, said in a Facebook post. 'From the first moment, I believed, with all my heart, that our army would return my son. I didn't stop believing, and so it happened,' added Kobi Samerano on his Facebook post, as he further expressed gratitude towards the Israeli government, the Prime Minister, the country's security forces and the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) soldiers. The other two bodies have been identified as those of Ofra Keidar (70), and Shay Levinson (19). All of them were killed during Hamas' attack on Israel on Oct 7, 2023, that triggered the ongoing war-like situation. According to a report by The Jerusalem Post, Levinson was a tank commander in the 77th "Oz" Battalion in the 7th Armoured Brigade, and was taken by Hamas when the terrorists crossed the border in the early hours of Oct 7. His tank managed to kill around 15 terrorists with shells before being overwhelmed. Hamas is still believed to hold around 50 hostages, more than half of which are assumed to be dead. 'The campaign to return the hostages continues consistently and is happening alongside the campaign against Iran,' said Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a statement. According to a report by AP, on the Oct 7 attack, militants from Hamas had abducted around 251 and killed over 1,200 people, that comprised mostly civilians. A large number of the hostages were returned during the past ceasefire agreements.

Scroll.in

22 minutes ago

• Scroll.in

How the Israel-Iran conflict could impact India

On June 13, the Israeli military began striking what it claimed were nuclear targets and other sites in Iran, with the aim of stalling Tehran's nuclear programme. Iran retaliated with missile attacks on Israel. The official toll in Iran is at least 430 so far, while at least 25 persons have died in Israel. The continued exchange of fire has led to concerns of a wider regional conflict that the United States could get drawn into. Washington is an ally of Israel and acts as a guarantor of the country's security. Tehran has rejected US President Donald Trump's demand for an ' unconditional surrender ' and vowed to fight back. The prevailing uncertainty has led to a spike in global oil prices. The price of benchmark Brent crude had jumped to $78 per barrel by Thursday from $69 per barrel on June 12, the day before the conflict began. But the spike was not because of Israeli military's strikes reportedly on the Shahran oil depot in Tehran and one of Iran's largest refineries in Shahr Rey. These actions have little impact on Iranian energy exports. Instead, the spike in prices primarily stem from concerns about the possible blocking of the Strait of Hormuz amid the conflict. The closure could threaten global energy security. The chokepoint The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterbody that connects the Gulf to the Arabian Sea. In 2024, an average 20 million barrels of oil was transported through the strait every day. That was about one-fifth of global petroleum liquids consumption. This makes the Strait of Hormuz one of the most strategically important chokepoints. Iran has in the past threatened to block the waterbody in retaliation to pressure from the West. On Sunday, the Iranian Parliament decided that the Strait of Hormuz should be closed, state-run Press TV quoted lawmaker Major General Kowsari as saying. The final decision will be taken by the Supreme National Security Council, the member of the parliamentary national security commission added. Unlike other chokepoints such as the Suez Canal or the Strait of Malacca, there is no practical alternative for fuel supplies to bypass the Strait of Hormuz in large volumes. Cargo ships are already sailing closer to the Omani coast and have been advised by maritime agencies and governments to avoid Iranian waters in the Strait of Hormuz, Reuters reported on Wednesday. An attempt to shutter the strait will not go unchallenged because of the regional powers' strategic interest in keeping fuel supply open. But the ensuing military confrontation may still disrupt supplies to some extent. India's interest When Tel Aviv and Tehran last exchanged missile fire in October, former Indian diplomat Navdeep Suri had told Scroll that if the conflict escalated and became an all-out war, Iran, feeling threatened, had the capacity to block the Strait of Hormuz. In that case, New Delhi will be staring at a scenario that will 'directly impact India's energy security', he had said. 'A very large chunk of India's energy supplies come from there and that could really be serious for us,' explained Suri, who served as India's ambassador to the United Arab Emirates. 'It's in our interest that it doesn't get out of hand.' India consumes 5.5 million barrels of crude per day for refining. Of this, 1.5 million barrels come through the Strait of Hormuz, according to Union Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri. If the strait gets blocked, Amena Bakr, the head of Middle East and OPEC+ insights at analytics firm Kpler, told CNBC International on June 13 that oil prices could jump to three-digits. To put the impact of such a scenario into context: a spike of every $10 per barrel drives up inflation in India by about 0.5%, financial services company Morgan Stanley had estimated in April 2024. But Puri told NDTV that closing the strait was not in Iran's own interest. Yet, he said, India remained comfortably placed to meet its fuel needs, adding that New Delhi can tap into alternative supplies if needed. Here is a summary of the week's other top stories. Countering Trump's claims. Prime Minister Narendra Modi told United States President Donald Trump that India will never accept mediation to resolve tensions with Pakistan. The topic came up during a phone call when Trump asked for the details about India's military strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on Pakistan in May, said Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri. Trump was told that India had agreed to the ceasefire only on Islamabad's request, said Misri. The 'halt to military action was directly between India and Pakistan', the foreign secretary quoted Modi as having reiterated. The call between the two leaders came against the backdrop of the US president repeatedly claiming that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan. New Delhi has rejected Trump's assertions. , writes Rohan Venkataramakrishnan A thaw in relations. India and Canada agreed to reinstate high commissioners in each other's capitals. This was announced after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Canadian counterpart Mark Carney met on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit. Other diplomatic steps 'to restore stability in the relationship' will 'follow in due course', said New Delhi. In October, New Delhi and Ottawa expelled several diplomats amid frosty bilateral relations. Ties between India and Canada strained in September 2023 after Justin Trudeau, the Canadian prime minister at the time, told his country's Parliament that intelligence agencies were actively pursuing 'credible allegations' tying agents of the Indian government to the murder of Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada. New Delhi has rejected Canada's allegations. The language debate. Opposition leaders criticised Union Home Minister Amit Shah for saying that those who speak English in India will soon feel ashamed. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi said that English was 'not a barrier, but a bridge', adding that the language provides employment and boosts people's self-confidence. Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam MP Kanimozhi said to Shah that 'the only thing to be ashamed of is imposing your will on the people and trying to destroy the pluralism of India'. Shah's comment on Thursday came against the backdrop of several state governments and regional parties accusing the Union government of imposing Hindi through the National Education Policy's three-language formula. Also on Scroll this week for a curated selection of the news that matters throughout the day, and a round-up of major developments in India and around the world every evening. What you won't get: spam.

India Today

23 minutes ago

• India Today

Decoding the US strikes on Iran

US President Donald Trump embarked on the riskiest move of his presidency thus far by striking at Iran's uranium enrichment sites at Natanz, Fordow and said that a 'full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site Fordow'.A full payload for the six B-2/A Spirit stealth bombers would mean a total of 12 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOP). Each B-2 carries two MOPs, the only weapons that can penetrate the Fordow uranium enrichment site buried nearly 90 metres below the Each 14-ton MOP has over 2 tons of explosives. The US also fired 30 other Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles (TLACMs) from submarines in the Arabian Sea. Each Tomahawk has a range of 1500 kilometres and carries a 450 kg explosive warhead. These would have been fired at the Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites, which are not that deeply buried and can hence be targeted by conventional B-2s flew enormous distances to target Iranian sites - over 40 hours of continuous flying time from the continental United States and possibly, multiple refuels in the air from aerial is not known whether the mission was carried out by the six B-2s that took off from the US and flew over the Pacific and were tracked by commercial flight trackers, or whether it was another six B-2s which perhaps took off in the dark and struck from the Atlantic are the biggest US air strikes on any country since the 2017 MOAB attack on ISIS insurgents in damage assessments of these attacks have not been circulated yet, and it is too early to judge the impact of these strikes - but this quantum of ordnance will mean that Iran's nuclear enrichment programme has been set back by over a few would likely have spirited away the HEU for use in a handful of bombs, or for building a Radiologically Dispersed Device aka a 'dirty bomb'. It will not have the capacity to produce enriched uranium for full-fledged nuclear weapons capability. That option is now off the HAPPENS NOW?Israel is the biggest winner from this present conflict. Post Hamas' horrific October 7, 2023 massacre of Israeli civilians, Israel embarked on a war of attrition which targeted Hamas, Hezbollah and the three are Iranian proxies. On June 13, Israel launched direct air strikes on Iran after IAEA assessments said Iran was enriching uranium close to weapons-grade levels. Israel's air strikes killed several Iranian scientists and military leaders, but could not derail Iran's nuclear weapons programme. For that, Israel needed the US to intervene. Which it did on June IRAN REACT?advertisementThis is the biggest question being asked now. The joint US-Israeli attacks have posed an existential challenge to Iran's Islamic regime unlike any it has faced in 45 years - not the bloody eight-year war with Iraq which ended in 1988 and not even the massive street protests in 2021-22. Israeli and American jets have pounded targets at US has defanged its nuclear capabilities. Iran says it will retaliate, but the space for such attacks is extremely constricted. It can shoot a few ballistic missiles at the eight permanent US bases in and around West so would bring down immediate US retaliation from the carrier strike groups and fighter aircraft massing in the Central Command war theatre. Iran could fire anti-ship ballistic missiles in an attempt to shut down the Straits of Hormuz, through which a quarter of the world's oil and 20 per cent of the world's LNG passes through. But this move too will invite US began building the Fordow uranium enrichment site around 2006, some years after the US invaded Iraq and unseated Saddam Hussein. With the US on a rampage after the 9/11 strikes, knocking down the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and Saddam, Iran believed it was of the US striking at Iran quickly evaporated when the US became entrenched in fighting twin insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2025, with the US and Israel staring down gunsights at Iran, the options before Ayatollah Khamenei are bleak. He could choose the path of least resistance. Launch symbolic strikes at the US and Israel, come back to peace talks and focus on rebuilding Iran's shattered military capabilities.(Sandeep Unnithan is an author and senior journalist. He is the Editor-in-Chief of Chakra Newz, a digital media platform.(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Tune InMust Watch