How is Tesla expected to remotely control its robotaxis, and what are its limitations?
Tesla tiptoed into its long-awaited robotaxi service in Austin, Texas on Sunday with about 10 of its Model Y SUVs that will operate within strict limits.
The rides were being offered on Sunday for a flat fee of $4.20, CEO Elon Musk said in an X post, and social media influencers were seen booking and taking rides in the robotaxis in several Austin locations, according to videos reposted by Musk.
Musk has said the company is being "super paranoid" about safety and that humans will remotely monitor the fleet, which also have safety monitors in front passenger seats.
Remote access and control, known in the industry as "teleoperation," is used in varying degrees by the handful of robotaxi startups operating around the globe. The technology has clear advantages and important limitations.
Here are some details of how it works:
What is tele-operation?
Teleoperation is the control of machines by humans in a different location, usually over a wireless network.
It is used to train robots to operate autonomously, monitor their autonomous activity, and take over when required.
The global robotaxi industry is still in test mode, as companies deploy the vehicles in limited geographic areas and continually adjust the artificial intelligence software that controls them. Teleoperation is often used to intervene when a vehicle is unsure of what to do.
Alphabet's Waymo, for example, has a team of human "fleet response" agents who respond to questions from the Waymo Driver, its bot.
"Much like phone-a-friend, when the Waymo vehicle encounters a particular situation on the road, the autonomous driver can reach out to a human fleet response agent for additional information," Waymo said in a blog post last year.
Former Waymo CEO John Krafcik told Reuters, "the cars aren't being actively monitored," adding that the software is "the ultimate decision-maker."
A Waymo video shows a car asking a remote operator whether a street with emergency response vehicles is open to traffic. When the human says yes, the vehicle proceeds. In contrast, other companies, such as Baidu's Apollo Go in China, have used fully remote backup drivers who can step in to virtually drive the vehicles. Baidu declined to comment.
What are the limitations?
Driving vehicles remotely on public roads has a major potential problem: it relies on cellular data connections that can drop or operate with a lag, disconnecting the vehicle from the remote driver in dangerous situations.
Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and autonomous-vehicle safety expert, said that approach could work for a small test deployment of 10 vehicles, such as Tesla's initial effort in Austin, but he called teleoperation "inherently unreliable technology."
"Eventually you will lose connection at exactly the worst time," he said. "If they've done their homework, this won't ever happen for 10 cars. With a million cars, it's going to happen every day."
Former Waymo CEO Krafcik agreed, adding that the time delay in cell signal makes remote driving "very risky."
On the other hand, relying on the vehicle to reach out for help and allowing the vehicle to be the decision-maker are risky as well, Koopman said, as it does not guarantee the vehicle will make the right decision.
Waymo declined to comment on the limitations of its approach.
Koopman also noted there are limits to how many vehicles one person can safely monitor.
A group of Democratic Texas lawmakers had asked Tesla on Wednesday to delay its robotaxi launch until September, when a new autonomous-driving law is scheduled to take effect. The Austin-area lawmakers said in a letter that delaying the launch "is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations."
Musk for years has promised, without delivering, that its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) advanced driver assistance software would graduate to completely self-driving and control robotaxis. This year, he said Tesla would roll out a paid service in Austin underpinned by an "unsupervised" version of the software.
"Teslas will be in the wild, with no one in them, in June, in Austin," Musk told analysts and investors in January. In May, he told CNBC that the robotaxi would only operate in parts of Austin that are safe for it, would avoid difficult intersections, and would use humans to monitor the vehicles. What those teleoperators are doing is not clear.
For years inside Tesla, company executives have expected to use teleoperators who could take over in case of trouble, said one person familiar with the matter. For instance, if a robotaxi were stuck in a crowded pedestrian area and confused about what to do next, a human teleoperator could take over and guide it, the source said.
Tesla advertised for teleoperation positions, saying the company needs the ability to "access and control" autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots remotely. Such employees can "remotely perform complex and intricate tasks," it said in the advertisements.
Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.
"We are being super paranoid about safety," Musk said in a post ahead of the launch.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Colleagues or overlords? The debate over AI bots has been raging but needn't
There's the Terminator school of perceiving artificial intelligence (AI) risks, in which we'll all be killed by our robot overlords. And then there's one where, if not friends exactly, the machines serve as valued colleagues. A Japanese tech researcher is arguing that our global AI safety approach hinges on reframing efforts to achieve this benign partnership. In 2023, as the world was shaken by the release of ChatGPT, a pair of successive warnings came from Silicon Valley of existential threats from powerful AI tools. Elon Musk led a group of experts and industry executives in calling for a six-month pause in developing advanced systems until we figured out how to manage risks. Then hundreds of AI leaders—including Sam Altman of OpenAI and Demis Hassabis of Alphabet's DeepMind—sent shockwaves with a statement that warned: 'Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks, such as pandemics and nuclear war." Also Read: AI didn't take the job. It changed what the job is. Despite all the attention paid to the potentially catastrophic dangers, the years since have been marked by AI 'accelerationists' largely drowning out AI doomers. Companies and countries have raced towards being the first to achieve superhuman AI, brushing off the early calls to prioritise safety. And it has all left the public very confused. But maybe we've been viewing this all wrong. Hiroshi Yamakawa, a prominent AI scholar from the University of Tokyo who has spent the past three decades studying the technology, is now arguing that the most promising route to a sustainable future is to let humans and AIs 'live in symbiosis and flourish together, protecting each other's well-being and averting catastrophic risks." Yamakawa hit a nerve because while he recognizes the threats noted in 2023, he argues for a working path toward coexistence with super-intelligent machines—especially at a time when nobody is halting development over fears of falling behind. In other words, if we can't beat AI from becoming smarter than us, we're better off joining it as an equal partner. 'Equality' is the sensitive part. Humans want to keep believing they are superior, not equal to machines. Also Read: Rahul Matthan: AI models aren't copycats but learners just like us His statement has generated a lot of buzz in Japanese academic circles, receiving dozens of signatories so far, including from some influential AI safety researchers overseas. In an interview with Nikkei Asia, he argued that cultural differences in Asia are more likely to enable seeing machines as peers instead of as adversaries. While the United States has produced AI-inspired characters like the Terminator from the eponymous Hollywood movie, the Japanese have envisioned friendlier companions like Astro Boy or Doraemon, he told the news outlet. Beyond pop culture, there's some truth to this cultural embrace. At just 25%, Japanese people had the lowest share of respondents who say products using AI make them nervous, according to a global Ipsos survey last June, compared to 64% of Americans. It's likely his comments will fall on deaf ears, though, like so many of the other AI risk warnings. Development has its own momentum. And whether the machines will ever get to a point where they could spur 'civilization extinction' remains an extremely heated debate. It's fair to say that some of the industry's focus on far-off, science-fiction scenarios is meant to distract from the more immediate harm that the technology could bring—whether that's job displacement, allegations of copyright infringement or reneging on climate change goals. Still, Yamakawa's proposal is a timely re-up on an AI safety debate that has languished in recent years. These discussions can't just rely on eyebrow-raising warnings and the absence of governance. Also Read: You're absolutely right, as the AI chatbot says With the exception of Europe, most jurisdictions have focused on loosening regulations in the hope of not falling behind. Policymakers can't afford to turn a blind eye until it's too late. It also shows the need for more safety research beyond just the companies trying to create and sell these products, like in the social-media era. These platforms were obviously less incentivized to share their findings with the public. Governments and universities must prioritise independent analysis on large-scale AI risks. Meanwhile, as the global tech industry has been caught up in a race to create computer systems that are smarter than humans, it's yet to be determined whether we'll ever get there. But setting godlike AI as the goalpost has created a lot of counter-productive fear-mongering. There might be merit in seeing these machines as colleagues and not overlords. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Would you hail 'robotaxi'? Musk bets cabs will give Tesla lift after boycotts, sales plunge
Elon Musk promised in 2019 that driverless Tesla "robotaxis" would be on the road "next year," but it didn't happen. A year later, he promised to deliver them the next year, but that didn't happen either. Despite the empty pledges the promises kept coming. Last year in January, Musk said, "Next year for sure, we'll have over a million robotaxis." Would you settle for 10 or 12? Musk appears to be on the verge of making his robotaxi vision a reality with a test run of a small squad of self-driving cabs in Austin, Texas, starting Sunday. Reaching a million may take a year or more, however, although the billionaire should be able to expand the service this year if the Austin demo is a success. The stakes couldn't be higher, nor the challenges. While Musk was making those "next year" promises, rival Waymo was busy deploying driverless taxis in Los Angeles, San Diego, Austin and other cities by using a different technology that allowed it to get to market faster. It just completed its 10 millionth paid ride. Boycotts related to Musk's politics have tanked Tesla's sales. Rival electric vehicle makers with newly competitive models have stolen market share. And investors are on edge after a USD 150 billion stock wipeout when Musk picked a social media fight with a US president overseeing federal car regulators who could make the robotaxi rollout much more difficult. The stock has recovered somewhat after Musk said he regretted some of his remarks. Tesla shareholders have stood by Musk over the years because he's defied the odds by building a successful standalone electric vehicle company - self-driving car promises aside - and making them a lot of money in the process. A decade ago, Tesla shares traded for around USD 18. The shares closed Friday at USD 322. Musk says the Austin test will begin modestly enough, with just 10 or 12 vehicles picking up passengers in a limited area. But then it will quickly ramp up and spread to other cities, eventually reaching hundreds of thousands if not a million vehicles next year. Some Musk watchers on Wall Street are sceptical. "How quickly can he expand the fleet?" asks Garrett Nelson, an analyst at CFRA. "We're talking maybe a dozen vehicles initially. It's very small." Morningstar's Seth Goldstein says Musk is being classic Musk: Promising too much, too quickly. "When anyone in Austin can download the app and use a robotaxi, that will be a success, but I don't think that will happen until 2028," he says. "Testing is going to take a while." Musk's tendency to push up the stock high with a bit of hyperbole is well known among investors. In 2018, he told Tesla stockholders he had "funding secured" to buy all their shares at a massive premium and take the company private. But he not only lacked a written commitment from financiers, according to federal stock regulators who fined him, he hadn't discussed the loan amount or other details with them. More recently, Musk told CNBC in May that Tesla was experiencing a "major rebound" in demand. A week later an auto trade group in Europe announced sales had plunged by half. Musk has come under fire for allegedly exaggerating the ability of the system used for its cars to drive themselves, starting with the name. Full Self-Driving is a misnomer. The system still requires drivers to keep their eyes on the road because they may need to intervene and take control at any moment. Federal highway safety regulators opened an investigation into FSD last year after several accidents, and the Department of Justice has conducted its own probe, though the status of that is not known. Tesla has also faced lawsuits over the feature, some resulting in settlements, other dismissed. In one case, a judge ruled against the plaintiffs but only because they hadn't proved Musk "knowingly" made false statements. Musk says the robotaxis will be running on an improved version of Full Self-Driving and the cabs will be safe. He also says the service will be able to expand rapidly around the country. His secret weapon: Millions of Tesla owners now on the roads. He says an over-the-air software update will soon allow them to turn their cars into driverless cabs and start a side business while stuck at the office for eight hours or on vacation for a week. "Instead of having your car sit in the parking lot, your car could be earning money," Musk said earlier this year, calling it an Airbnb model for cars. "You will be able to add or subtract your car to the fleet." Musk says Tesla also can move fast to deploy taxis now because of his decision to rely only on cameras for the cars to navigate, unlike Waymo, which has gone a more expensive route by supplementing its cameras with lasers and radar. "Tesla will have, I don't know," Musk mused in an conference call with investors, "99 per cent market share or something ridiculous." Given Waymo's head start and potential competition from Amazon and others, dominating the driverless market to that extent could be a reach. But Dan Ives, a Wedbush Securities analyst and big Musk fan, says this time Musk may actually pull it off because of Tesla's ability to scale up quickly. And even sceptics like Morningstar's Goldstein acknowledge that Musk occasionally does gets things right, and spectacularly so. He upended the car industry by getting people to buy expensive electric vehicles , brought his Starlink satellite internet service to rural areas and, more recently, performed a gee-whiz trick of landing an unmanned SpaceX rocket on a platform back on earth. "Maybe his timelines aren't realistic," Goldstein says, "but he can develop futuristic technology products."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
From Apple to Meta: The meaning behind the world's most famous logos
Logos are the visual heart of a brand, encapsulating its identity, values, and story in a simple yet powerful image. The most iconic logos transcend mere design, becoming symbols recognized worldwide, carrying deep meanings that often go unnoticed by casual observers. Behind every famous logo lies a carefully crafted story reflecting a company's heritage, mission, or vision. Whether it's the bitten apple symbolizing knowledge and innovation for Apple, the intertwined circles of Meta , the paper plane of Telegram symbolizing swift communication, or the bold 'X' embodying transformation and ambition, these logos communicate much more than meets the eye. Similarly, Dell's emblem reflects reliability and innovation, Instagram's camera icon captures creativity and connection, and Google's colorful lettering represents diversity and accessibility. In this article, we explore the fascinating symbolism and history behind these world-renowned logos, revealing the stories that make these brands truly unforgettable. The story behind world's most iconic logos including X, Dell and Amazon Amazon by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like What She Did Mid-Air Left Passengers Speechless medalmerit Learn More Undo Amazon's logo is deceptively simple but packed with meaning. The arrow that stretches from the letter 'A' to 'Z' is a clever visual metaphor for the company's vast product range—offering everything from A to Z. This arrow doubles as a smile, symbolizing customer satisfaction and the company's commitment to delivering happiness through convenience and service. The design reflects Amazon 's mission to be the world's most customer-centric company, promising an enjoyable shopping experience. The smile also subtly conveys friendliness and approachability, softening the corporate image and making the brand feel more personal and trustworthy. X Elon Musk chose the letter "X" as Twitter's new logo and brand name as it embodies his long-standing fascination with the symbol and aligns with his vision for the platform's future. Musk has a personal affinity for "X," having used it in previous ventures like (his early online banking company), SpaceX, and even his Tesla Model X. He views "X" as a powerful, versatile symbol representing the unknown, a crossroads, and limitless potential. Musk aims to transform Twitter into an 'everything app' — a multifunctional platform integrating social media, payments, commerce, and more — much like China's WeChat. The minimalist "X" logo reflects this ambitious new direction, signaling a break from Twitter's past and the start of a broader, more inclusive digital ecosystem. Musk also said "X" embodies the imperfections that make us unique, making it a personal and symbolic choice for the brand's evolution Meta The Meta logo, introduced when Facebook rebranded as Meta in 2021, features a sleek, continuous loop that resembles both the letter "M" and the infinity symbol. This design embodies the company's vision of limitless possibilities and the boundless horizons of the metaverse, a virtual shared space where people can interact in 3D digital environments. According to Meta's design team, the logo's shape reflects the idea that 'there is always something more to build,' symbolizing ongoing innovation and evolution. Its infinity-like form also draws inspiration from the ancient Ouroboros symbol, a snake biting its own tail, representing cycles of renewal and endless creation. The logo is designed to be dynamic, experienced in both 2D and 3D, and to capture the creativity and imagination of the metaverse, aligning with Meta's mission to push beyond current digital boundaries and create the future of connected experiences. Instagram Instagram's original logo, designed in 2010, was inspired by vintage Polaroid cameras, reflecting the app's core purpose of capturing and sharing moments instantly. The early design featured a detailed camera icon with a rainbow stripe, symbolizing creativity, nostalgia, and the joy of photography. Over time, Instagram's logo evolved into a simplified, modern camera glyph set against a vibrant gradient of pink, orange, and purple. This transformation mirrors Instagram's growth from a photo-sharing app to a dynamic social platform emphasizing creativity, connectivity, and self-expression. The bright colors and minimalist design capture the energy and diversity of its global community while maintaining the essence of visual storytelling. LG LG 's logo cleverly incorporates the letters 'L' and 'G' inside a circle, forming a stylized human face winking. This design symbolizes friendliness, approachability, and the company's commitment to customer satisfaction. The circle represents the world, unity, and technological advancement, emphasizing LG's global reach and innovative spirit. By blending human elements with modern design, LG's logo communicates harmony between technology and people, reflecting the brand's mission to make life better through innovative and user-friendly products. Telegram Telegram's logo features a sleek paper airplane, symbolizing swift, simple, and secure communication. The paper airplane evokes the idea of sending messages quickly and effortlessly across distances, highlighting Telegram's focus on privacy, freedom, and user control. Its minimalist design conveys modernity and efficiency, reinforcing the app's reputation as a fast, reliable, and secure messaging platform in the digital age. Dell Dell's logo is distinguished by its tilted 'E,' a design choice that has sparked much curiosity. The tilted 'E' is widely believed to represent a floppy disk, a nod to Dell's early days in the computer industry and its commitment to technology innovation. This subtle detail makes the logo unique and memorable, symbolizing the company's mission to 'turn the world on its ear' by challenging norms and delivering cutting-edge technology solutions. The clean, modern font paired with this distinctive twist reflects Dell's blend of professionalism and forward-thinking attitude. Google Google's logo is instantly recognizable for its simple yet playful design. The use of primary colors (blue, red, yellow) with a secondary green on the letter 'L' breaks conventional color rules, symbolizing Google's unconventional and innovative approach. The clean, sans-serif font paired with bright colors reflects the company's spirit of creativity, accessibility, and fun. Google's logo embodies the brand's mission to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible, while also highlighting its willingness to experiment and push boundaries. Apple Apple's logo—a minimalist apple with a bite taken out—is one of the most iconic in the tech world. The bite serves a practical purpose: it prevents the apple from being mistaken for other round fruits. Symbolically, it references knowledge, inspired by the biblical story of Adam and Eve, where the apple represents the fruit of knowledge. The sleek, simple design conveys innovation, elegance, and user-friendly technology. Apple's logo embodies the company's philosophy of combining cutting-edge technology with intuitive design to empower users. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
