The Revolutionary War was more brutal than you probably learned in school

Write to us at
. To subscribe,
.
TODAY'S STARTING POINT
On June 13, 1775, runaway horses smashed the carriage ferrying Faith Trumbull Huntington, her husband, and other members of her family to what is now Roxbury, where her brother John was stationed with a regiment fighting against the British during the first months of the Revolutionary War. The accident forced the party to hire another carriage, delaying their arrival.
For Faith, the delay would prove fatal.
She and her companions ended up reaching Boston just in time to witness the Battle of Bunker Hill from afar. The battle, which took place 250 years ago today, killed or injured about 1,500 British and American soldiers over a couple hours of bloody fighting. Instead of 'the pomp and circumstances of glorious war,' as John recounted, Faith ended up 'in the midst of all its horrible realities.' (An artist as well as a soldier, John later painted the above depiction of the battle.)
The experience triggered a deep depression. Despite the interventions of family and doctors, Faith hanged herself five months later.
Advertisement
Faith's story is a sobering object lesson about a conflict whose brutalities have sometimes been obscured by hindsight. 'Over 250 years, the Revolution has taken on kind of a faded sepia tone,' said Rick Atkinson, a Pulitzer Prize winning historian who published his latest book about the war, '
Advertisement
Today's newsletter explores the many ways in which the Revolution was more brutal for both combatants and civilians than many Americans today remember.
Horrors on both sides
The carnage that Faith Trumbull Huntington witnessed at Bunker Hill was only the start. The war ultimately claimed at least 25,000 American lives, about 1 percent of the population at the time.
Atkinson, who has also written histories of World War II, notes that the overall death toll was nowhere close to that of future conflicts. Still, some battles would have shocked even today's observers. British casualties at Bunker Hill exceeded 1,000 — all to recapture the comparatively small Charlestown Peninsula. 'That's a staggering figure even by 21st century standards,' Atkinson said.
Yet most deaths during the war
came not from combat but from illness. During a single winter at Valley Forge, typhoid fever, dysentery, and other diseases circulating among Patriot soldiers living in close quarters killed nearly 2,000. Poor medical treatment and malnutrition brought on by collapsing supply chains didn't help.
Other deaths resulted from what we would today consider war crimes. The British anchored
And then there was the anxiety. For many of the founders, the war itself came on top of more than a decade of civil strife. Until the decisive siege of Yorktown in 1781, battlefield fortunes seemed to swing back and forth. The fighting had disrupted the young country's economy, leaving George Washington struggling to lead an army full of disgruntled, poorly paid soldiers. In letters, Atkinson said, 'you find cries of despair from most of the founders at one time or another.'
Advertisement
'Brother against brother'
The Revolution wasn't just a war of independence; it was also a civil war that forced residents of the newly declared United States to choose sides.
During the war, as much as 20 percent of former colonials remained loyal to the British crown. Those who did faced property theft, imprisonment, threats, whippings, exile, and sometimes even execution — conduct we might today classify
Internecine atrocities weren't restricted to the rebels. During one 1780 battle in South Carolina, Patriot forces accused loyalists led by a British commander of
Native people also became embroiled in the violence. The war divided the six nations that made up the Iroquois Confederacy, a political alliance that had controlled swathes of present-day New York for many years. Four nations allied with the British and two with the Americans. In the summer and fall of 1779, Washington ordered the destruction of dozens of British-aligned Iroquois villages, burning crops and displacing women and children. Many of the refugees perished during the harsh winter that followed.
Advertisement
A chance to remember
This year's
Facing the war's horrors has the benefit of reflecting the historical record. But it also need not undermine the lessons in patriotism that many Americans have drawn from it, Atkinson said. 'It reminds us that we're made of pretty stern stuff, even in an age, in 2025, when we sometimes wonder.'
🧩
5 Across:
72°
POINTS OF INTEREST
Boxes of food at the Greater Boston Food Bank, which just published its annual food insecurity report.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Boston and Massachusetts
Karen Read retrial:
The jury didn't reach a verdict yesterday and
Going hungry:
For the second year in a row, about a third of Massachusetts families either
can't afford enough to eat or worry about the source of their next meal,
Boston mayoral race:
Josh Kraft, Mayor Michelle Wu's chief challenger,
What's changed?
Democrats promised a more efficient Legislature. So far, they've done a lot of infighting and
The other Pedro Martinez:
The state's new education commissioner has
Helping hand:
Companies aren't sure what to do as the Haitian workers they rely on
New England
Vermont detention:
Border Patrol agents violently detained
Litigating the past:
New Hampshire's Supreme Court will decide whether a man who alleges he was sexually abused at a Catholic camp in the 1970s can sue even though a statute of limitations at the time
Freedom to read:
Rhode Island's State House passed a bill meant to make it
Trump administration
'Have we no shame?'
A Ronald Reagan-appointed judge ordered the administration to restore more than 800 grants it terminated for research
Trump vs. Harvard:
A judge temporarily extended an order that
RFK Jr.:
All 17 members of the CDC advisory board Trump's health secretary fired last week accused Kennedy of making 'destabilizing decisions' that could limit vaccine access. (
The dance of legislation:
Senate Republicans unveiled parts of their version of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which would more deeply cut Medicaid and more slowly eliminate clean-energy tax credits compared to the House's version. Several Republicans promptly criticized it. (
Reality check:
Trump's mass deportation efforts are colliding with the economic fact that many US businesses rely on undocumented labor,
Financial aid:
Trump and Republicans are proposing to cut federal student aid. These Massachusetts college students
The Nation
Sackler settlement:
States approved a new $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma, the maker of Oxycontin. If finalized, payouts would go to individuals and communities affected by opioid addiction. (
Diddy trial:
The judge dismissed and replaced a juror over 'concerns about his candor.' The music mogul's defense lawyers tried to keep the juror seated. (
BESIDE THE POINT
💍
The Big Day:
For these Newton newylweds, it was all about having the right moves —
⛔
Nightmare at the museum:
A tourist sat on and broke a crystal-covered chair at a museum in Italy where the work of art was on display. (
✈️
Sounds fly:
Boston's next live-music venue is…
💬
Brave new world:
They asked AI chatbots questions. The answers distorted their reality and sent some of them spiraling. (
🌯
Passing resemblance:
This Brooklyn dad won $50 and a year's supply of burritos for winning a Pedro Pascal lookalike contest in New York City. (
🍫
Secret ingredient:
The story of how this stay-at-home mom's chocolate cake went from family favorite to famous is sweet —
Advertisement
Thanks for reading Starting Point.
This newsletter was edited by
❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at
✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can
📬 Delivered Monday through Friday.
Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Boston Globe

3 hours ago

• Boston Globe

That time I was headed nowhere, fast

Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up School was a break from work on the farm and on trucks, and I wanted to laugh and run wild. Still, I wonder what difference it might have made if any one of my teachers had given me a tape measure, pencils, and paper and sent me out to measure everything in the playground or draw the birds in the sky that I saw there. But that just wasn't how teachers taught boys like me. I suspect they had little doubt as to the type of man I would become — the kind I worked with on ranches and construction sites, ones with clichéd blue-collar traits, both good and bad. Advertisement My father was among them. A professional country music musician, a trucker, and operator of heavy equipment, he was also a drinker and a fighter. He espoused racist views that made no sense to me, since I'd only ever been around white people, and some of them were dangerous crooks who'd spent time in prison. My father was also the one man I spent much of my young life with — under trucks, tending farm animals, riding around in pickups. Advertisement I drank with or around him in my late teens. I spent endless hours with him as he worked and drank with other men. I often witnessed his raw violence — toward helpless animals on our farm, toward a sister's boyfriend who'd sneaked into the house. I learned that emotions can be dangerous. When I was 8, after weeks of being attacked by a rooster that left me bloodied, my father locked me in a barn with it. I had a large stick. The rooster, his spurs. I knocked him out of the air and would have killed him, but my father stopped me. He respected that rooster and called me 'Rooster' ever after. By the end of my junior year of high school in 1981, I had a grade-point average in the low D range, poor attendance, lunch time drinking, and pervasive discipline problems, including fights in and out of school. Like millions of American boys and young men, past and present, I was well on my way to becoming a member of a Advertisement So how am I writing this after a 30-year career in journalism instead of a few stints behind bars and the kind of hard-luck life I'd seen so much of? Rebellion, and a science fiction novel. As my senior year approached, my father wanted me to delay going back to school so I could work for him. Ambivalent as I was about school, I knew that if I did this, I would never go back, and I had the vague but motivating sense that I wanted something else for myself, something more. I rebelled by going back to school. Later that year, I moved out of my family home. I met the girl who has now been my partner for more than 40 years. I made guy friends who introduced me to punk rock and wild, nonviolent escapades with bikes, trampolines, junk cars, and conversation. And then I met Mark, who gave me the first novel I ever read. I had noticed that our social studies teacher genuinely engaged with Mark's challenging questions. Skinny and studious, Mark appeared more rebellious to me than those of us roughhousing, flirting, drunk or stoned or both, giggling at the back of the classroom. I was curious about Mark's ability to so constructively question authority. We spoke a few times about it, and one afternoon, he gave me ' Advertisement Briefly, 'Orphans' is about a young man, Hugh Hoyland, who discovers that his world exists inside a spaceship. This reality was hidden from him by myths and lies passed down to him that his own willful ignorance perpetuated. Only when he encounters the freaks of that world — banished mutants, the readers of forbidden books, and thinkers — does Hugh understand that there is an entire universe outside his world. There could not have been a more apt metaphor for my cramped, small, myth-laden life. The novel sparked something in me. I began to read and study. I participated in a week-long event for high schoolers on a college campus. I figured out how to get student loans and Pell Grants. I figured out how to get into the community college in Billings and then the University of Montana, where I studied philosophy and eventually earned an MFA in creative writing. For me, education was an act of defiance. It freed me from the confines and contours of a destiny as a hard and angry man, and it made me want to earn access to the world beyond it. But I had to discover my own path to the power of language and knowledge. There's a lot of talk about boys these days. How they're in trouble. How they're toxic. I hope that as we focus on them, we don't force-feed them our expectations or beat them down like dangerous animals. I hope we give them the time and space to be rebellious and build themselves up with education that welcomes them. It's a lot of trouble to let boys be boys, but I believe in us. Advertisement

Buzz Feed

9 hours ago

• Buzz Feed

The Hidden Dark Side Of Gifted Programs Revealed

I don't remember precisely when I first heard the word 'gifted,' but it must have been in early elementary school. I do remember being pulled out of my first-grade class and led to the fifth-grade classroom, where a teacher told me to choose a chapter book that was 'more at my level.' I appreciated the chance to choose from all sorts of new books, but it marked an early example of what would eventually be both a privilege and a curse: my foray into being 'set apart' academically from my fellow classmates. By the time I reached middle school, the gifted and talented program in my district had taken wing. The timing makes sense: In 1998, many American schools were provided with official K-12 standards for so-called 'gifted education' by the National Association of Gifted Children. While the NAGC first promoted advanced academic programming in the 1950s, its work in the late '80s and '90s represented a more structured approach to educating students who were found to be gifted. K-12 gifted education standards were preceded by the passage of the Jacob Javits Gifted and Talented Act in 1988, which secured funding to 'orchestrate a coordinated program of scientifically based research, demonstration projects, innovative strategies, and similar activities that build and enhance the ability of elementary and secondary schools to meet the special educational needs of gifted and talented students.' In those early days, my experience with Gifted & Talented (or G/T, as we fondly called it) was almost entirely positive. Our G/T class was tucked away in a windowless classroom whose walls we decorated with silly drawings and posters. Several of my close friends were also in the program, and there was nothing better than getting to hang out with them for an hour or two per day while working on our largely self-assigned curriculum. Our teacher was warm and encouraging, always pushing each of us to incorporate our individual interests and skills into projects. In fact, nearly all the teachers I worked with in G/T were engaged educators who genuinely wanted their students to thrive. I'm forever grateful for their personal guidance, regardless of my later reflections on the program. In so many ways, G/T was a safe place at school — a place where I could be my true (weird) self and engage in more self-directed learning. But there was a troubling flip side to the G/T experience that took me years to unpack. From what I could gather, most students qualified for the program based on standardized test scores. While the NAGC defines gifted pupils as 'those who demonstrate outstanding levels of aptitude (defined as an exceptional ability to reason and learn) or competence (documented performance or achievement in top 10% or rarer) in one or more domains,' it seems inevitable that many kids would be excluded from gifted education for factors beyond their control. In her 2016 book Engaging and Challenging Gifted Students: Tips for Supporting Extraordinary Minds in Your Classroom, Jenny Grant Rankin, Ph.D., outlines gaps in gifted education. Nonwhite students, socioeconomically disadvantaged kids, girls, and those classified as English language learners are disproportionately excluded from gifted and talented programming, Rankin reports. She also cites a 2016 study by Jason A. Grissom and Christopher Redding that found that Black students were 50% less likely to be considered for gifted and talented programs than their white counterparts, even when both groups recorded similar standardized test scores. What's more, students of color were less likely to be labeled gifted when their teachers were white. In G/T, I learned quickly that much of my self-esteem came from academic praise and approval from adults. The 'gifted' label seeped into everything I did and was a stumbling block at times — if I struggled to master a concept in math class or didn't understand a question on a social studies test, I'd avoid asking for help. After all, I was gifted. I shouldn't need help with anything, right? It felt like my so-called 'natural' giftedness should pre-qualify me to succeed in any endeavor, which led me to prematurely give up on new hobbies later in life when I didn't immediately feel like a master. And when a project in a non-G/T class earned anything less than an A, I often found myself in tears and seeking reassurance from my family and friends that I was 'still smart.' The question of 'potential' was another overwhelming aspect of G/T. Gifted kids at my school were encouraged to pursue all sorts of fields — with the unspoken message that no matter what we pursued, we were expected to be excellent. Most of us went on to take as many Advanced Placement classes in high school as our schedules would allow, driven by the sense that we simply had to be high achievers. Academic excellence would translate directly to excellence in career and life in general, many of us thought. It wasn't until college that I first experienced the lingering impacts of the gifted education experience. Suddenly, I was a very small fish in the massive pond that is the University of Michigan. I wasn't the 'smart kid' anymore— I was one of thousands of 'smart kids,' all of whom had ambitions on par with or beyond my own. College instructors rarely offered direct praise, and the occasional B in a class became commonplace. When I couldn't maintain perfection, I felt like I was failing the version of myself I was supposed to become. Unsurprisingly, college was also when my mental health took its first major nosedive. Alongside a handful of personal issues, my sudden sense of academic invisibility had triggered a crisis. My path felt unclear. Wasn't I supposed to get to college, breeze through with perfect grades, and immediately jump into an impressive career? When graduation rolled around, I got a dose of validation by heading off on a Fulbright teaching grant to Malaysia, but my life beyond that looked so blurry. It took a long time to admit that I didn't want to go to grad school, which felt shameful. Without academic validation or 'high achievement' on the table, would I be untethered forever? In the decade since, I've drawn connections between my most plaguing anxieties and my early education. It's taken practice to feel more comfortable with accepting professional criticism or admitting when I'm not sure how to do something at work. I see how my G/T years merged self-worth with accolades and grades, and I feel sad for the younger version of myself — along with other 'formerly gifted' peers — who internalized so many false measures of success. At times, adulthood feels like an ongoing battle to remind myself that I'm a valuable, worthy person, regardless of outward achievements. I'm not alone: In recent years, the 'formerly gifted kid' trope has become something of a meme, with TikTokers cracking dark jokes about their lingering sense of anxiety, perfectionism and perceived failure to live up to parents' and teachers' expectations. It's funny because it's true. Data shows that while gifted programs can result in better long-term academic outcomes and college success for some students, these benefits still reflect inequities. A 2021 study by Grissom and Redding found that small associations existed between participation in gifted programming and long-term achievement in math and reading, but there was no evidence to support a correlation between gifted kids and their general engagement with school. Most glaringly, even these small positive associations were skewed toward higher-income white pupils, with low-income or Black gifted students excluded from long-term academic gains. What's more, this research doesn't begin to explore gifted education's extended impact on social and emotional development for all participants. I don't regret my time as a gifted kid, but I do wish G/T had offered more care for students' mental health and more inclusivity for children who didn't fit the program's relatively narrow mold of exceptionalism. I wish I could unlearn the idea that outward praise equals true success, and measure excellence in the form of learning for learning's sake. Above all, I wish we'd had an environment where every single student was reminded how smart and talented they were, and given the tools to explore their gifts — no matter what form they took.

Boston Globe

21 hours ago

• Boston Globe

The Battle of Bunker Hill rages again -- in Gloucester

Spectators also will be able to interact with the military reenactors, as well as hundreds of 'civilian' interpreters who will depict the hardships of everyday life in the besieged town of Boston at the time of the battle. Organizers chose The spectators 'will get a very good look at what Advertisement Narrators using a sound system will describe the events in context for the audience as they unfold. A slightly compressed version of the reenactment will be staged Sunday from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. 'We'll follow the script of what already happened historically,' said Dietzel, 37, of Bridgewater. 'We have people coming from all over the country, a few coming from Canada, and a few British coming from the UK' to portray the combatants. Advertisement Although Bunker Hill technically was a British victory, the Colonial troops inflicted massive casualties on the British, who were forced to mount three assaults on the Americans' hilltop fortifications before the rebels ran out of ammunition and retreated. The British lost 1,054 killed and wounded in the battle, the first pitched conflict of the American Revolution. The Colonials suffered 450 casualties, but gained the morale-boosting confidence that they could stand and fight a disciplined army with superior numbers. 'Reenactments make history come alive in a way that you don't really get from the textbooks,' said Annie Harris, chief executive officer of the Essex National Heritage Area, one of the event's organizers. 'It was a more significant battle than many of us realize,' Harris said. 'You think about the Battle of Bunker Hill, and you see the obelisk [in Charlestown], and you don't really think much about it.' The reenactment includes what Dietzel described as a series of battle vignettes interspersed throughout the day, beginning with the approach of several ships posing as troop-bearing British naval vessels toward Half Moon Beach in Gloucester beginning about 8 a.m. Saturday. From 9 to 10 a.m., the rebels will build their redoubt, or hilltop fortification, with period hand tools. Spectators are encouraged to join the soldiers as they assemble their defenses, and to learn about their 18th-century backgrounds and motivation to take up arms against the British. From 10 to 11 a.m., British reenactors will land on Half Moon Beach. From about 1 to 2 p.m., they are scheduled to make a flanking attack on Cressy Beach. British commanders ordered this flanking move as their marines made a frontal assault on the redoubt. Advertisement The coordinated attacks were unsuccessful, as was a following frontal assault. Only on the third assault, which will be staged about 4 p.m. Saturday, did the British break through and claim victory atop Breed's Hill, the Charlestown summit where the battle actually occurred. 'If we wanted to keep this exactly right, we'd have to burn a city,' which the British did to Charlestown, 'but we can't do that,' Dietzel said with a chuckle. Dietzel said he feels honored to be able to portray Warren, a key Revolutionary figure whom he has researched extensively. 'I've been reading biographies, letters from the Massachusetts Historical Society, and attending lectures. I've been in the weeds with this man for quite some time,' Dietzel said. The goal of the reenactment, which has been years in the making, is to convey the relevance of the battle to 21st-century Americans. 'We want to make sure we do justice to this event and help share a story that's important to us all,' Dietzel added. 'I told my third-grade teacher I wanted to be a Minute Man. It's been a passion of mine for as long as I can remember.' Brian MacQuarrie can be reached at