India and UK strike trade deal
India and UK strike trade deal
Keir Starmer says reducing trade barriers with economies worldwide is part of the plan to deliver a stronger and more secure UK economy. Photo: AFP
India and the United Kingdom concluded on Tuesday a long-coveted free trade pact, in a landmark deal that represents London's most significant post-Brexit agreement that was finalised in the shadow of US President Donald Trump's tariff increases.
The deal, between the world's fifth and sixth largest economies, has been concluded after three years of stop-start negotiations and aims to increase bilateral trade by a further 25.5 billion pounds (US$34 billion) by 2040 with liberal market access and eased trade restrictions.
"These landmark agreements will further deepen our comprehensive strategic partnership, and catalyse trade, investment, growth, job creation, and innovation in both our economies," Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said.
The deal lowers tariffs on goods such as whisky, advanced manufacturing parts and food products such as lamb, salmon, chocolates and biscuits. It also agrees to quotas on both sides for vehicle imports.
Both countries are also seeking bilateral deals with the United States to remove some of Trump's tariffs that have upended the global trade system, and the resulting turmoil sharpened focus in both London and New Delhi on the need to clinch a UK-India trade deal.
"We are now in a new era for trade and the economy. That means going further and faster to strengthen the UK's economy," British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said.
"Strengthening our alliances and reducing trade barriers with economies around the world is part of our plan for change to deliver a stronger and more secure economy here at home."
The pact marks India opening up its long-guarded markets, including automobiles, setting an early example for the South Asian nation's likely approach to dealing with major Western powers such as the US and the European Union.
Talks over a free trade deal between India and Britain were initially launched in January 2022, and became a symbol of Britain's hopes for its independent trade policy after leaving the European Union.
But negotiations were stop-start, with Britain having four different prime ministers since that launch date and elections in both countries last year. (Reuters)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's Iran nuclear site strikes: risky bet on ‘peace' or a recipe for wider war?
President Donald Trump with his decision to order US military strikes on Iran's nuclear facility is gambling that direct US involvement can deliver a decisive blow to a weakened Tehran while managing to avoid bringing the US into an expansive regional conflict. Advertisement Trump announced the strikes on three Iranian enrichment facilities – Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan – and said that a 'full payload of BOMBS was dropped' on Fordow. 'All planes are safely on their way home,' Trump added in his post. 'Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' It remained to be seen whether the attacks mark the totality of direct American involvement in strikes against Iran or the opening salvo of a larger campaign. The decision to directly involve the US comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. Advertisement The strikes are a perilous decision for the US, as Iran has pledged to retaliate if it joined the Israeli assault. The stakes are also high for Trump personally – he won the White House on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump announces US attacks on Iran nuclear sites
US President Donald Trump announced on Saturday that the US military carried out an aerial attack on three Iranian nuclear sites, following days of appeals by Israel for the American military to join its attacks on the Islamic republic. Trump, who will hold a press briefing at 10pm local time, called the operation 'very successful' and demanded that Tehran much 'AGREE TO END THIS WAR'. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan,' the US leader announced. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' Israel had been urging the Pentagon to use its 30,000-pound [13,608kg] GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs – commonly known as 'bunker busters' – to disrupt nuclear enrichment facilities built at Fordow deep within an Iranian mountain. The US sent B-2 bombers to the Pacific island of Guam earlier on Saturday, aircraft that would be needed to drop them.
HKFP
an hour ago
- HKFP
China downplayed nuclear-capable missile test, classified New Zealand gov't papers show
China tried to mislead foreign governments in 2024 by playing down the importance of a nuclear-capable missile test over the Pacific Ocean, New Zealand diplomats privately warned in documents obtained by AFP. Beijing sent shivers through the South Pacific in September 2024, when its elite Rocket Force fired a dummy warhead into the high seas near French Polynesia. A tranche of classified government briefing notes obtained by AFP shows deep concern within the New Zealand government in the wake of the surprise launch, which China shrugged off as 'routine'. It was China's first long-range missile launch over international waters in more than 40 years, the papers confirmed, serving as a blunt reminder of Beijing's potent nuclear-strike capabilities. 'We are concerned that China is characterising this as a 'routine test',' senior diplomats wrote in a memo to New Zealand's foreign affairs minister. 'It is not routine: China has not conducted this type of long-range missile test in over 40 years. 'We do not want to see this test repeated.' China's military played down the test as a 'legitimate and routine arrangement for military training'. Behind the scenes, New Zealand diplomats privately decried China's 'mischaracterisation'. 'As this is the first time that China has undertaken such an action in the Pacific in several decades, it is a significant and concerning development,' they wrote in one of the briefing documents. AFP applied to access the heavily redacted documents — written between September and October last year — under New Zealand's Official Information Act. They were classified as 'Restricted', which protects government information with diplomatic or national security implications. Nuclear scars China has been seeking to cement its presence in the strategically important South Pacific, showering developing island nations with new hospitals, freshly paved roads, and gleaming sports stadiums. But rarely has it so obviously flexed its military might in the region, where the United States, Australia and New Zealand have long been the security partners of choice. 'We have again asked China why it conducted the test at this time, and why it chose to terminate the missile test in the South Pacific,' New Zealand diplomats wrote. China's Rocket Force launched the intercontinental ballistic missile with little warning on September 25, 2024. Photos released by China showed a projectile streaking into the sky from a secret location atop a billowing plume of smoke. It appeared to be one of China's advanced Dong Feng-31 missiles, analysts said, a weapon capable of delivering a thermonuclear warhead. The long-range missile splashed into a patch of ocean long designated a nuclear-free zone under an international treaty. Pacific island nations remain deeply scarred by the nuclear tests that shook the region in the decades following World War II. 'This is the first time that we are aware of a test of a nuclear-capable missile terminating within the zone since its establishment in 1986,' the New Zealand diplomats wrote. Forceful reminder China alerted the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Australia and New Zealand before the test. But there was only a vague indication of what it would do, according to a separate batch of Australian government documents obtained by AFP. 'Beijing advised us of a planned activity the evening prior to the launch, but specific details were not forthcoming,' Australian defence officials wrote in November last year. Pacific island nations, however, were not provided with advance notice of the launch, New Zealand diplomats noted. Following the launch, Japan publicly voiced 'serious concern', Australia said the test risked 'destabilising' the South Pacific, and Fiji urged 'respect for our region'. Pacific nation Kiribati, one of China's warmest friends in the region, said the South Pacific Ocean should not be a proving ground for jostling big powers. 'The high seas in the Pacific are not isolated pockets of oceans… we appeal to all countries involved in weapon testing to stop these acts to maintain world peace and stability,' read a government statement at the time. China foreign policy expert Nicholas Khoo said the intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) test was particularly significant because it took place in the South Pacific. 'Since 1980, China's ICBM tests have taken place within Chinese territory,' he told AFP. 'The test is a reminder to regional states that China is a 'full spectrum' power that has economic and military power. It is a peer with the US.' Harvard University researcher Hui Zhang said it was a forceful reminder of China's nuclear strength. 'The test shows that the Rocket Force has an operational and credible nuclear force that can help ensure China's ability to maintain a strong nuclear deterrent,' he wrote last year for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 'The rare public ICBM test seems to have been specifically aimed at dissuading Washington from using nuclear weapons in a potential conflict across the Taiwan Strait.' China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the 'facts are clear and no one has been misled'. 'The missile test is a routine part of annual military training, in compliance with international law and international norms,' it said in a statement.
