Are Those Viral ‘Cooling Blankets' for Real?
Jun 13, 2025 7:00 AM According to physics, any blanket can cool you—for a few minutes. But a real cooling blanket is possible with phase-change materials. Photograph:If you spend much time on the internet, you will see the same things pop up again and again. For me, it's these 'cooling blankets' that people talk about on social media. I mean, it sounds great for summer—just like a blanket that warms you up but in reverse.
Sadly, these products don't do what they claim. They might be breathable so they don't make you as hot as an ordinary blanket would, but you'd still be cooler with no blanket at all. However, there is hope. Someone has created a real cooling blanket that's sort of awesome. Of course, there's a bunch of physics here, so let's get to it. Temperature vs. Energy
Temperature is one of those words everyone uses and no one understands. In chemistry it's the average kinetic energy, or vibrational motion, of the molecules in a substance. The greater the commotion, the higher the temperature.
But I like this more pragmatic definition: Temperature is the property two objects will have in common when they're in contact for a long time. So, if you take a hot block of metal and set it against a cold block of metal, eventually they will have the same temperature. Heat flows from the warmer thing to the cooler thing until they equalize. (Note: It doesn't work the other way around; you can't transfer 'coolness.')
We also talk about objects having a certain amount of thermal energy , which you'd get by adding up the kinetic energy of all the particles inside it. It depends on three things: the mass of the object, its temperature, and the material it's made of. So for instance, focusing on mass, big potatoes have more thermal energy than small potatoes at the same temperature.
Now, if you look at the type of material, every substance has a 'specific heat capacity,' which is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of that substance by one degree. Try this at home. Find two objects that have been sitting in your room for a while, so they're both at room temperature. Here, I have a block of wood and a block of aluminum.
Touch both objects. They're the same temperature, but the wood feels warmer, right? Why is that? It's not about temperature but thermal energy. When your hand touches an object, there is a heat conduction interaction. Energy is transferred from your warmer hand to the cooler object until the two are the same temperature. However, with the metal block it takes way more energy to reach the temperature of your hand. It feels cooler because it causes your hand to lose more energy.
You'll notice the same thing when you go swimming. An air temperature of 75°F feels nice and comfortable, but wading into water of the same temperature feels really cold. That's because water has a much higher mass and specific heat capacity than air, which causes you to lose more thermal energy and feel colder. All Blankets Cool
So, blankets, how do they work? A blanket is basically an insulator. That means it prevents energy transfer between objects at different temperatures. Wrapping yourself in a blanket on a cold day keeps you from losing body heat to the air around you, so you feel warmer. Similarly, if you put a blanket around a cold soda on a warm day, it will slow down the transfer of thermal energy from the air to the soda, keeping the soda cold longer.
But what if you feel hot and you put on a blanket? In that case, two things can happen at once. It can still act as a thermal insulator and slow down the transfer of energy between you and the air. Unless the ambient air is above 98.5°F, this is going to make you hotter, not cooler.
However, the blanket can also have a thermal interaction with your body. Suppose you have a 80°F blanket in contact with a 98°F person. This will raise the temperature of the blanket while reducing the thermal energy of your body. Yes, it will act as a cooling blanket—at least for a few minutes, until the temperatures are equalized.
So, what makes one blanket cool more effectively than another? First, it should have a high mass, so that it takes a lot of energy to warm up. Second, the blanket needs to make good contact with your skin to increase the thermal interaction. So, one of those light fluffy blankets won't cool you off that much. Other than that, it's just a normal blanket.
But I'm a sucker for trying these things, so I bought a cheap 'cooling blanket' online. (I know, someone will say it doesn't work unless you get an expensive one.) For those who say their cooling blanket was out in the sun and they measured a 75°F temperature, I don't believe you. Check this out. I have three blankets on my sofa. One of them is the cooling blanket and the others are normal. In back is the same picture taken with an infrared camera so that different colors represent different temperatures.
Can you tell which one is the cooling blanket? Nope. You can't. There's almost no difference in the temperatures. They are all cooling blankets. They are also all normal blankets. A Real Cooling Blanket
But what if I told you it's possible to have a thermal interaction between two objects but one of them doesn't change in temperature. Yes, this is a thing—it's called a phase transition. It happens whenever a material changes from solid to liquid or liquid to gas.
Here's an interesting experiment. Imagine I take a beaker with frozen water (aka ice) that's colder than the freezing point (maybe –10°C). Then I put the beaker on a hot plate and add energy to it, measuring the temperature of the water as I go. Here is what that would look like:
As you can see, the ice increases in temperature until it reaches the melting point, 0°C (32°F). At that point the temperature levels off, and it remains constant until all the ice melts—even though heat is still being added to the system. Why is that? It's because the energy is being used to break the molecular bonds and turn the solid into a liquid. Once it's entirely liquid, the temperature starts rising again, until it reaches the boiling point (100°C). Again, the temperature levels off until all the water turns to gas. (This is why it's nice to cook with boiling water—it stays the same temperature.)
You can see how this would make for a better cooling blanket. Because of these temperature plateaus during a phase change, you can keep transferring thermal energy from your body to the blanket without the blanket getting warmer and becoming ineffective.
Does this mean you could use an ice blanket, maybe with the water in a flexible lining, to cool yourself? Sure. But it would be excruciating and you might get frostbite. Also, once you melt the ice and heat up the water, you'd need to put your blanket back in the freezer before you could use it again.
But how about a material that has a melting point closer to the temperature of the human body? In this video from the YouTube channel NighthawkInLight, Ben Cusick makes just such a phase-change material (PCM) from common salts (sodium sulfate and sodium chloride).
Of course I had to try making some of this stuff myself. I'm not a chemist, but I think it turned out pretty well.
It depends on your mixture and the type of salts used, but these kinds of materials have a melting point somewhere around 18°C (65°F). Why does that matter? Well, first, it's not so cold that it hurts. Second, you don't need a freezer; a cool place like a basement floor will make it refreeze.
And best of all, the high melting point means it will melt slowly at room temperature, so the phase transition lasts a long time—hours instead of minutes—and it will cool you off during this whole time. Put this stuff in the lining of a blanket and voilà! Pretty cool, right?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why is AI halllucinating more frequently, and how can we stop it?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The more advanced artificial intelligence (AI) gets, the more it "hallucinates" and provides incorrect and inaccurate information. Research conducted by OpenAI found that its latest and most powerful reasoning models, o3 and o4-mini, hallucinated 33% and 48% of the time, respectively, when tested by OpenAI's PersonQA benchmark. That's more than double the rate of the older o1 model. While o3 delivers more accurate information than its predecessor, it appears to come at the cost of more inaccurate hallucinations. This raises a concern over the accuracy and reliability of large language models (LLMs) such as AI chatbots, said Eleanor Watson, an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) member and AI ethics engineer at Singularity University. "When a system outputs fabricated information — such as invented facts, citations or events — with the same fluency and coherence it uses for accurate content, it risks misleading users in subtle and consequential ways," Watson told Live Science. Related: Cutting-edge AI models from OpenAI and DeepSeek undergo 'complete collapse' when problems get too difficult, study reveals The issue of hallucination highlights the need to carefully assess and supervise the information AI systems produce when using LLMs and reasoning models, experts say. The crux of a reasoning model is that it can handle complex tasks by essentially breaking them down into individual components and coming up with solutions to tackle them. Rather than seeking to kick out answers based on statistical probability, reasoning models come up with strategies to solve a problem, much like how humans think. In order to develop creative, and potentially novel, solutions to problems, AI needs to hallucinate —otherwise it's limited by rigid data its LLM ingests. "It's important to note that hallucination is a feature, not a bug, of AI," Sohrob Kazerounian, an AI researcher at Vectra AI, told Live Science. "To paraphrase a colleague of mine, 'Everything an LLM outputs is a hallucination. It's just that some of those hallucinations are true.' If an AI only generated verbatim outputs that it had seen during training, all of AI would reduce to a massive search problem." "You would only be able to generate computer code that had been written before, find proteins and molecules whose properties had already been studied and described, and answer homework questions that had already previously been asked before. You would not, however, be able to ask the LLM to write the lyrics for a concept album focused on the AI singularity, blending the lyrical stylings of Snoop Dogg and Bob Dylan." In effect, LLMs and the AI systems they power need to hallucinate in order to create, rather than simply serve up existing information. It is similar, conceptually, to the way that humans dream or imagine scenarios when conjuring new ideas. However, AI hallucinations present a problem when it comes to delivering accurate and correct information, especially if users take the information at face value without any checks or oversight. "This is especially problematic in domains where decisions depend on factual precision, like medicine, law or finance," Watson said. "While more advanced models may reduce the frequency of obvious factual mistakes, the issue persists in more subtle forms. Over time, confabulation erodes the perception of AI systems as trustworthy instruments and can produce material harms when unverified content is acted upon." And this problem looks to be exacerbated as AI advances. "As model capabilities improve, errors often become less overt but more difficult to detect," Watson noted. "Fabricated content is increasingly embedded within plausible narratives and coherent reasoning chains. This introduces a particular risk: users may be unaware that errors are present and may treat outputs as definitive when they are not. The problem shifts from filtering out crude errors to identifying subtle distortions that may only reveal themselves under close scrutiny." Kazerounian backed this viewpoint up. "Despite the general belief that the problem of AI hallucination can and will get better over time, it appears that the most recent generation of advanced reasoning models may have actually begun to hallucinate more than their simpler counterparts — and there are no agreed-upon explanations for why this is," he said. The situation is further complicated because it can be very difficult to ascertain how LLMs come up with their answers; a parallel could be drawn here with how we still don't really know, comprehensively, how a human brain works. In a recent essay, Dario Amodei, the CEO of AI company Anthropic, highlighted a lack of understanding in how AIs come up with answers and information. "When a generative AI system does something, like summarize a financial document, we have no idea, at a specific or precise level, why it makes the choices it does — why it chooses certain words over others, or why it occasionally makes a mistake despite usually being accurate," he wrote. The problems caused by AI hallucinating inaccurate information are already very real, Kazerounian noted. "There is no universal, verifiable, way to get an LLM to correctly answer questions being asked about some corpus of data it has access to," he said. "The examples of non-existent hallucinated references, customer-facing chatbots making up company policy, and so on, are now all too common." Both Kazerounian and Watson told Live Science that, ultimately, AI hallucinations may be difficult to eliminate. But there could be ways to mitigate the issue. Watson suggested that "retrieval-augmented generation," which grounds a model's outputs in curated external knowledge sources, could help ensure that AI-produced information is anchored by verifiable data. "Another approach involves introducing structure into the model's reasoning. By prompting it to check its own outputs, compare different perspectives, or follow logical steps, scaffolded reasoning frameworks reduce the risk of unconstrained speculation and improve consistency," Watson, noting this could be aided by training to shape a model to prioritize accuracy, and reinforcement training from human or AI evaluators to encourage an LLM to deliver more disciplined, grounded responses. RELATED STORIES —AI benchmarking platform is helping top companies rig their model performances, study claims —AI can handle tasks twice as complex every few months. What does this exponential growth mean for how we use it? —What is the Turing test? How the rise of generative AI may have broken the famous imitation game "Finally, systems can be designed to recognise their own uncertainty. Rather than defaulting to confident answers, models can be taught to flag when they're unsure or to defer to human judgement when appropriate," Watson added. "While these strategies don't eliminate the risk of confabulation entirely, they offer a practical path forward to make AI outputs more reliable." Given that AI hallucination may be nearly impossible to eliminate, especially in advanced models, Kazerounian concluded that ultimately the information that LLMs produce will need to be treated with the "same skepticism we reserve for human counterparts."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
An explosion of sea urchins threatens to push coral reefs in Hawaii ‘past the point of recovery'
The turquoise water of Hōnaunau Bay in Hawaii, an area popular with snorkelers and divers, is teeming with spiny creatures that threaten to push the coral reef 'past the point of recovery,' new research has found. Sea urchin numbers here are exploding as the fish species that typically keep their populations in check decline due to overfishing, according to the study, published last month in the journal PLOS ONE. It's yet another blow to a reef already suffering damage from pollution as well as climate change-driven ocean heat waves and sea level rise. Kelly J. van Woesik, a researcher at the North Carolina State University Center for Geospatial Analytics and a study author, first noticed unusually high numbers of sea urchins on snorkeling trips. 'I knew there was a story to be told,' she said. She and her fellow researchers used data from scuba surveys and images taken from the air to track the health of the reef. 'We found on average 51 urchins per square meter, which is among the highest recorded densities on coral reefs anywhere in the world,' van Woesik said. Sea urchins are small marine invertebrates, characterized by their spiny bodies and found in oceans around the world. They play a useful role in preventing algae overgrowth, which can choke off oxygen to coral. However, they also eat the reef and too many of them can cause damaging erosion. In Hōnaunau Bay, the coral is already struggling to reproduce and grow due to ocean heat and water pollution, leaving it even more vulnerable to the erosion inflicted by sea urchins. Its rate of growth has plummeted according to the study. Reef growth is typically measured by the amount of calcium carbonate — the substance which forms coral skeletons — it produces per square meter each year. The reef in Hōnaunau Bay is growing 30 times more slowly than it did four decades ago, according to the study. Production levels were around 15 kilograms (33 pounds) per square meter in parts of Hawaii, signaling a healthy reef, according to research in the 1980s. Today, the reef in Hōnaunau Bay produces just 0.5 kg (1.1 pounds) per square meter. To offset erosion from urchins, at least 26% of the reef surface must be covered by living corals – and even more coral cover is necessary for it to grow. Gregory Asner, an ecologist at Arizona State University and study author, said what was happening in this part of Hawaii was emblematic of the mounting pressures facing reefs throughout the region. 'For 27 years I have worked in Hōnaunau Bay and other bays like it across Hawaii, but Hōnaunau stood out early on as an iconic example of a reef threatened by a combination of pressures,' he said, citing warming ocean temperatures, pollution from tourism and heavy fishing. The implications of coral decline are far-reaching. Coral reefs are sometimes dubbed the 'rainforests of the sea' because they support so much ocean life. They also play a vital role protecting coastlines from storm surges and erosion. 'If the reef can't keep up with sea-level rise, it loses its ability to limit incoming wave energy,' said van Woesik. 'That increases erosion and flooding risk of coastal communities.' Kiho Kim, an environmental science professor at American University, who was not involved in the study, said the findings highlight the fragility of reef ecosystems under stress. 'Dramatic increases in any species indicate an unusual condition that has allowed them to proliferate,' Kim said. That imbalance can undermine diversity and reduce the reef's ability to provide essential ecosystem services including food security and carbon storage, he told CNN. Despite the challenges, researchers emphasize that the reef's future is not sealed. Local groups in Hōnaunau are working to reduce fishing pressure, improve water quality and support coral restoration. 'These reefs are essential to protecting the islands they surround,' van Woesik said. 'Without action taken now, we risk allowing these reefs to erode past the point of no return.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
SLO County hills hid fossil treasures from a tropical era millions of years ago
Maybe Templeton High School's mascot should be a crocodile or rhino, not an eagle. Maggie White wrote this article that explains the deep history hidden in the hills of the area on Oct. 25, 1994. TEMPLETON — Imagine Templeton as a tropical seaside paradise overgrown with lush greenery and lined with white beaches along warm waters filled with colorful fish. It's tough to picture this dusty inland ranching town as a thriving shoreline, but 200 million years ago it was. Rex Saint'Onge doesn't just believe that — he's helping to prove it. Saint'Onge is a field associate in vertebrate paleontology — a fancy name for someone who looks for animal fossils — for the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. 'I always wanted to be in search of the truth about the Earth's history,' says the San Miguel resident. 'I don't want people to tell me what to think.' The volunteer researcher doesn't have to travel to exotic locations to do his digging for the museum. He can take his picks and brushes and head out to the hills near Adelaide, the dry creekbeds behind his house or the innocuous-looking mounds in Templeton. What he's finding are clues to what the Central Coast was like more than 20 million years ago. It was a place none of us would even recognize, says Saint'Onge. At different periods between 10 million and 23 million years ago — the age of many of the fossils Saint'Onge is discovering — sea water covered much of North America. As the water receded, 75-foot-long whale-eating sharks ruled the local oceans. Mastodons, camels and rhinos roamed where we walk today. Palm trees were abundant, beavers were the size of bears and hippo-like mammals munched on seaweed and shellfish. 'It's kind of romantic to think of that kind of stuff going on here,' Saint'Onge says. 'You go to work every day and you don't think about what the Earth's history is, but you're walking on it.' Saint'Onge searches for fossils — which include bones, teeth, shells and impressions in rock — at hundreds of locations in the county. Some of his most important finds have come out of sites near Templeton, where he was spending a morning digging last week. While most people would pass by the cream-colored hill near town without a second glance, Saint'Onge knows what he's looking for. With a couple of hammer-sized picks, a knife, some small boxes and tubes for his finds and a sifting screen to separate the fossilized treasures from the sand, Saint'Onge can usually find a handful of history. In about half an hour at the site last week, the researcher found a nearly whole mako shark tooth, two smaller shiny black shark teeth, three fish molars and two teeth form a tiny tropical fish known as a surgeon fish. Though the large shark tooth looked the most impressive, it was the least interesting to Saint'Onge — he finds dozens of them. It was the surgeon fish teeth — as tiny as sesame seeds — that were the most important, he said. The tropical teeth are more proof that Templeton was a pre-historic Hawaii. What is also important about the Templeton site is that Saint'Onge is finding fossils from both water and land animals. That means the sandstone mound was once a beach, lagoon or marshy area where the land met the water, he says. Sites like those are rare. 'We never know what we're going to find,' he says. 'That's the neat thing about this site — you had two different things going on.' Saint'Onge has found hundreds of shark, dolphin, sea lion and tropical fish teeth in Templeton, as well as rhino and rodent teeth. He's also turned up a 4-inch tooth from a 75-foot shark called carcharocles megaladon. The Templeton hillside has also produced the county's first — and so far only — pre-historic crocodile tooth, one of Saint'Onge's key discoveries. Until he found the tooth three months ago, researchers had no record that crocodiles — which have remained almost unchanged for millions of years — existed in this area. But the researcher's biggest find is a previously undiscovered bird that may be named after him, the Saint Ongii. In the hills between Paso Robles and Cambria, Saint'Onge found an almost complete, detailed fossil impression in the shale. It was of a new species of a diving bird similar to a gull or shearwater. Because birds' bones are hollow and the feathers decompose, their fossils are extremely hard to come by, the researcher says. This is the first record that the bird existed. Saint'Onge's other finds include fist-sized mastodon molars in San Miguel, whale skulls all over the county, camel bones in Dry Creek in Paso Robles and molars and tusks from desmostylians, an extinct animal similar to a hippo or walrus, in Coalinga. Teeth are the most common finds because they are harder than marrow-filled bone, allowing them to fossilize more easily. 'I'm adding to the fossil record of North America,' he says. Saint'Onge specializes in the Miocene time period — about 23 million to 10 million years ago. In contrast, dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago and man showed up about 5 million years ago. He's been with the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County as a field researcher since 1988. 'After a couple of hundred finds I guess they decided to give me a chance,' he said. Saint'Onge sends all of his finds to the museum for official identification, aging and cataloging. Though Saint'Onge keeps his sites secret so they aren't picked clean or overrun, he will take an interested amateurs on digs with him to show what to look for. 'Most people throw away 80 to 90 percent of what they're looking for' because the fossils are so small or indistinguishable, he said. It is illegal to collect items from private property without a permit or permission. Saint'Onge has been interested in the pre-historic since his first-grade class took a field trip to the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History. 'I saw the dinosaurs and I was hooked,' he said. 'It's the idea that all these things lived on this earth that amazes me,' he said. 'Fossils are like pages in a history book — it's a different way of looking at the world. After living in Southern California for several years and learning about the miocene era there, Saint'Onge moved to San Miguel — partly because he knew this county is a virtually unresearched 'bone bed.' 'Pretty much you can go everywhere and find stuff,' he said. Saint'Onge digs during the day and works at night and Ennis Business Forms in Paso Robles. He's a graphic designer and former illustrator for Warner Bros. cartoon characters. He still creates T-shirt and product packaging designs for them as a freelancer. His wife, Sherry, and children, Rex Jr. and Ashley, help him occasionally on his digs even though they don't share his passion for paleontology. 'But I just cant think of anything else I'd rather be doing.'
