How Thai Political Crisis May Unfold as PM Fights to Keep Job

Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is fighting to hold on to power less than a year since taking office, after leaked comments critical of the military triggered a political crisis.
The 38-year-old leader, the youngest prime minister in Thailand's history and the third member of the Shinawatra family to serve as leader, lost her coalition's second-largest party this week, leaving her coalition with a razor-thin majority in Parliament. As allies consider their next moves, pressure is mounting on Paetongtarn to resign or dissolve the lower house and call new elections.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Wall Street Journal

17 minutes ago

• Wall Street Journal

Oil Futures Diverge on U.S. Holiday Price Lag, Contract Expiration

Oil prices were mixed in European afternoon trade on Friday, with Brent crude down more than 2% to around $77 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate edging 0.7% higher to $74 a barrel. Brent futures fell after President Trump set a two-week deadline to decide whether the U.S. will strike Iran, easing fears of an imminent military intervention. The international oil benchmark had settled 2.8% higher on Thursday at $78.85, its highest close since January.

Yahoo

21 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Karoline Leavitt Reveals Trump's Deadline to Decide on Attacking Iran

The world is on edge waiting for Donald Trump to decide if he will order the U.S. military to attack Iran. And according to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, everyone will have to wait a little longer—two weeks, to be exact. Leavitt revealed Trump's decision-making timeline during a press briefing at the White House Thursday. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Leavitt said, reading out a statement from Trump. A reporter then pointed out that Trump often sets two-week deadlines only to move them to suit his needs, as he has done while tepidly trying to convince Russia to stop its war in Ukraine. 'How can we be sure that he's going to stick to this one on making the decision on Iran?' asked AFP's Danny Kemp, referring to a similar two-week deadline Trump has repeatedly given Russia to stop bombing Ukraine (with no tangible results). Leavitt stammered as she claimed that Iran negotiations and Russia-Ukraine negotiations were completely different before pivoting to a tried-and-true fallback: blaming Joe Biden. Trump has previously claimed that Iranian officials want to come to Washington and negotiate an end to Israel's war, which has so far killed at least 639 people in Iran, according to human rights groups. Tehran, for its part, has said that 'no Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House.' 'The only thing more despicable than [Trump's] lies is his cowardly threat to 'take out' Iran's Supreme Leader,' the Iranian mission to the U.N. wrote on X Wednesday. Either way, making a people under attack wait two weeks to see if they will face further bombardment is a bonkers decision. It also marks a significant change in tone for Trump, who has so far indicated all the dirty work.

Washington Post

26 minutes ago

• Washington Post

NATO's call to arms: Time to muscle up ‘at the speed of fear'

LONDON — NATO chief Mark Rutte visited Britain this month and had a bracing message for his hosts, along with other nations in the alliance: Start bulking up militarily, he said, or 'you had better learn to speak Russian.' Vladimir Putin isn't about to invade England. But don't forget that, shortly before invading Ukraine in 2022, he did casually threaten then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson with a missile strike that 'would only take a minute.' Europe, a top British defense strategist told me, needs to re-arm 'at the speed of fear.' With a handful of exceptions, most of NATO's European leaders have gotten the memo that Russia, far from being depleted by the bloodbath in Ukraine, is now a country remade, reoriented and revved up for a state of permanent warfare. A much greater share of overall Russian economic activity, more than 7 percent of gross domestic product, is now earmarked for defense than in any of the alliance's 32 member states. That is likely to continue even if the guns fall silent in Ukraine, which they probably won't any time soon. 'As the army eats through Soviet legacy equipment, Putin is determined to replenish stockpiles — and equip his military with the most modern [equipment] informed by wartime innovation,' Alexandra Prokopenko of Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center in Berlin wrote recently in the Financial Times. 'This will take several years, keeping the performance-enhancing drug of high military expenditure in the Russian economic system.' The growing dread in Europe arising from Moscow's threat has been compounded by the parallel fear inspired by President Donald Trump's contempt for Washington's NATO allies, and his apparent indifference to their security. That is the backdrop as NATO prepares for its annual summit next week at The Hague, where it is expected to adopt an annual spending goal of 5 percent of GDP on defense and related infrastructure — a target most of member states will struggle over years to meet. About one-third of the alliance's members don't even hit the current minimum of 2 percent; some that do, including France and Britain, are grappling with severely squeezed public finances. Rutte's prescription is that the alliance should be prepared to defend its own territory from Russian aggression within five years, including by boosting its air and missile defense by 400 percent. Others across the continent think the timeline is even shorter. Don't imagine that Putin would launch a massive invasion of a European NATO state like the unsuccessful one of Ukraine three years ago. To achieve his aim — unmasking the alliance as a paper tiger — he wouldn't need to. It would be enough to take a bite out of one of the three tiny Balts — Lithuania, Latvia or Estonia — and bet that Washington wouldn't respond with boots on the ground or a sustained missile air assault. With Trump in the White House, that's a bet Putin might be willing to make. For the Russian leader, the West is an implacable forever-foe obstructing his neoimperial dream. He's not giving up or backing down; to the contrary, he sees opportunity in Trump's disregard for Europe. The intensifying peril for Europe is not only to fortify its own defenses but simultaneously to bear the burden of keeping Ukraine in the fight for its sovereignty and survival as Washington disengages. In Ukraine, my British strategist source told me, Europe must seek 'escalation dominance,' meaning arming Kyiv at a pace that might double Russian casualties, forcing Putin to reassess the war's cost-benefit calculus. That's an ambitious goal given Russia's resilience. One measure of Putin's callousness is that he is untroubled by his forces' average daily toll of at least 1,200 deaths and injuries in Ukraine over the past year, for territorial gains the size of Rhode Island. The question is whether the continent's major powers — their economies anemic, their leaders facing ascendant right-wing parties, their aging populations frustrated by ineffectual governments — can rise to the occasion. Amid that haze of challenges, will Europe's main leaders leverage the crisis they face in Russia's threat, and fundamentally reorder their nations' priorities? Doing so would require asking voters to sacrifice some of their comforts — and real political courage. 'That this threat is now clear gives Europeans the chance to go beyond meetings in gilded palaces, and to convince people they face an existential choice,' Gerald Knaus, founding chairman of the European Stability Initiative, a think tank, told me. 'We need a clear narrative to make the case for a modern arsenal of democracy.' That is the concern that prompted Rutte's call to arms. Britons, like other Europeans, can maintain their generous public health care and other social services, he said, and ignore his recommendation that alliance members devote 5 percent of their economies to defense. But in that case, start studying the Cyrillic alphabet.