More luxury items set to attract sales tax in upcoming Pakistan budget

ISLAMABAD: The government is planning to expand the list of luxury items on which a higher rate of 25 percent sales tax would be applicable on the import and local supply stages in the federal budget (2025-26).
The government will amend SRO 297(I)/2023 or introduce a separate Schedule in the Sales Tax Act through Finance Bill 2026.
Sources said that the list of items would be expanded by including more home-appliances, tiles/wall papers, expensive wristwatches and many other items. This is a revenue generation measure and also compensates revenue loss on account of reduction of customs duties, regulatory duties and Additional Customs Duties (ADCs) in budget (2025-26).
RD slapped on 657 luxury goods: 2pc ACD imposed on import of 2,200 items
Under SRO297 of 2023, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) had imposed 25 percent sales tax on the import and local supply of luxury items including aircraft, ships, jewellery, cosmetics, cigarettes, high-end mobile phones, imported food, decoration items, certain categories of vehicles and other luxury goods.
The sales tax was raised from 17 percent to 25 percent on 33 categories of goods covering 860 customs tariff lines.
According to an SRO 297(I)/2023, the federal government has directed that the sales tax shall be charged, levied and paid at the rate of 25 percent of the value of the goods imported and their subsequent supply or the retail price, as the case may be and the sales tax shall be charged, levied and paid at the rate of 25 percent of the value of the supply of specified goods.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Express Tribune

14 hours ago

• Express Tribune

Taxman gets arrest powers

Listen to article A National Assembly panel on Saturday approved special powers for tax authorities to arrest individuals involved in tax fraud, while it deferred the approval of another fiscal law that would have suddenly deprived government entities of their cash surpluses. Meanwhile, teachers and researchers will now be subject to full income tax, as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) did not agree to the government's proposal to extend the 25% income tax rebate for another fiscal year. Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Chairman Rashid Langrial informed the National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance that the IMF had refused to extend the rebate. The committee, chaired by Syed Naveed Qamar, approved legal powers for the FBR to arrest taxpayers involved in tax fraud without prior court approval. However, additional safeguards were added to limit the discretionary use of these powers. At one point, Qamar remarked that the tax fraud "law has been borrowed from the National Accountability Bureau". The Senate Standing Committee on Finance had already cleared the controversial proposal. Now, following minor amendments by the National Assembly panel, the bill is expected to become law from July 1. Tax fraud has been defined as: "knowingly, intentionally or dishonestly doing any act or abets any action to cause loss of tax under this Act, including: using or preparing false, forged and fictitious documents including return, statements, annexures and invoices; false claim of input tax credit based on fictitious transactions; issuance of any tax invoice without supply of goods; tampering with or destroying of any material evidence or documents required to be maintained; generating fake input through manipulation of return filing system of the Board and making fake entries in the sales tax returns or in the annexures; and making fictitious compliance of section 73, including routing of payments back to the registered person, or for the benefit of the registered person, through a bank account held by a supplier or a purported supplier." Upon committing any of the above offences, the FBR will have the authority to arrest the individual without first seeking a warrant from any court of law. FBR Chairman Rashid Langrial said the criminality of tax fraud has been divided into two parts. In some cases, court permission will be required before an arrest is made. He explained that crimes such as suppression of taxable supplies under the Sales Tax Act, suppression or nonpayment of withholding tax for more than three months, dealing in goods liable to confiscation and making taxable supplies without registration will require court approval for arrest. According to the proposal, an Inland Revenue officer not below the rank of assistant commissioner – or any officer authorised by the board – may initiate an inquiry upon approval from the commissioner, if there is material evidence pointing to the commission of tax fraud or an offence warranting prosecution under the act. The inquiry officer shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, including summoning and enforcing attendance of any person, examining on oath, requiring discovery and production of documents and receiving evidence on affidavits. The inquiry officer must complete the inquiry within six months. During proceedings, the officer must provide the accused with a chance to be heard and confront them with details of the alleged fraud. A final report will then be submitted to the commissioner, who may either approve a full investigation, request further details, or close the matter. Upon approval, the investigation must be completed within three months. The board may authorise a commissioner — through a three-member committee notified by the chairman — to issue an arrest warrant if the tax loss exceeds Rs50 million. Arrests will only be made if the accused fails to respond to three notices, attempts to flee, or is likely to tamper with evidence. When asked, Langrial said the accused can also be arrested at the airport if there is suspicion of an escape attempt. Cash surplus The standing committee held an extended discussion on a government proposal to assert full rights over the cash surpluses held by state-owned enterprises. The proposed amendment to the Public Finance Management Act aimed to grant the federal government control over these surpluses. "The federal government's budget deficit would never end, and it now wants to bankrupt the public sector companies," Syed Naveed Qamar said. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb argued that the companies were acting like "states within a state" and were not cooperating. He added that even government-nominated board members were not being heeded, blaming bureaucrats for the lack of progress. Minister of State for Finance Bilal Kayani withdrew the bill from the agenda, saying the government would reintroduce it after incorporating the committee's recommendations to strike a balance between fiscal discipline and autonomy. One major state-owned company was reported to be sitting on a cash surplus of Rs253 billion.

Express Tribune

15 hours ago

• Express Tribune

Inflation, rupee dip lift FBR taxes

Listen to article Owing to massive inflation-driven increases in nominal collections, sharp currency depreciation, and a greater reliance on indirect taxes, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has achieved its annual revenue growth rise from an average of 18% over the past decade to 24% in the recent five years. The FBR has demonstrated a remarkable acceleration in tax collection growth over the past five years, surpassing the average pace observed over the preceding decade. Data from the FBR, Ministry of Finance (MOF), and Arif Habib Limited (AHL) Research reveals that annual revenue growth averaged 24% during this period, significantly higher than the 10-year average of 18%. "The rise in FBR's annual revenue growth, from an average of 18% over the past decade to 24% in the recent five years, reflects a mix of policy adjustments and economic factors," noted AHL. "The higher growth is partly attributed to inflation-driven increases in nominal collections, currency depreciation, and a greater reliance on indirect taxes." This upward trend illustrates both nominal tax collections and growth rates, with the former rising from Rs3.11 trillion in the base year, fiscal year 2016, to Rs14.13 trillion in the most recent year — reflecting a strong compound growth trajectory. Notably, growth rates peaked at 35% in certain years before moderating, highlighting the recent surge in tax mobilisation. Several factors have driven this performance. Inflation and currency depreciation played a central role, inflating nominal tax collections, especially on goods and services subject to ad valorem taxes. The weakening rupee also raised the local currency value of import-based taxes, a key revenue source. On the policy front, the withdrawal of tax exemptions under International Monetary Fund (IMF) programmes expanded the taxable base, while the government's reliance on indirect taxes — such as sales tax and customs duties — further fuelled collection growth, though it raised equity concerns. Administrative reforms, including efforts to document the informal economy, digitise tax filings, and curb evasion, also contributed to improved compliance and revenue outcomes. Despite this strong showing, questions remain over the sustainability of such growth. Much of the recent gains are rooted in inflationary effects and indirect taxation — factors that may not sustain momentum without deeper structural reforms. Reliance on import-based taxes leaves revenues vulnerable to external shocks or a decline in trade volumes, while over-dependence on indirect taxes disproportionately burdens lower-income groups, underscoring the need for a more balanced and equitable tax policy. Looking ahead, the FBR's continued progress will depend on its ability to broaden the tax base by formalising untapped sectors, shift towards more stable revenue streams such as direct taxes, and enhance transparency to build public trust and voluntary compliance. While the recent growth trajectory signals a positive departure from past trends, its translation into lasting fiscal strength will ultimately hinge on the government's commitment to comprehensive and sustained reforms amid evolving economic challenges.

Business Recorder

18 hours ago

• Business Recorder

India's water belligerence

That India has learnt no lesson from its humiliation that it has suffered in the battle field as well as on the diplomatic front at the hands of Pakistan is a fact that has found its best expression form its home minister Amit Shah's remarks that he made in an interview to an Indian newspaper yesterday. According to him, India will never restore the Indus Waters Treaty with Islamabad, and the water flowing to Pakistan will be diverted for internal use. This development clearly shows that it is a foolish attempt at face-saving. Needless to say, the incumbent government in India, which is the political face of Sangh Parivar, is working day in, day out to restore its tarnished image, but nothing is working for it. In my view, it is quite likely that the very public loss of credibility will lead to the demise of the Narendra Modi-led government in coming weeks or months, if not days. Saba Shaukat, Karachi Copyright Business Recorder, 2025