Israel-Iran conflict triggers fear of ‘death spiral', analysts say
Firefighters work outside a building that was hit by Israeli air strikes north of Tehran. PHOTO: EPA-EFE
Follow our live coverage here.
Israel's early-morning strikes against Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic-missile sites on June 13 prompted the Islamic Republic to vow a 'harsh blow' against both Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government and the US, which denied any involvement.
The widespread attack across Iran, which sent oil prices surging, targeted nuclear sites and top military commanders.
Iranian state television reported that the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, General Hossein Salami, was killed.
Here is a round-up of reaction from geopolitical experts, including their views on where things go from here:
Ms Andrea Stricker, non-proliferation and bio-defence programme deputy director and research fellow at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies
'To disable the facilities it would require multiple days of fighter jets dropping bombs or launching missiles at the sites, and they would ideally use heavy bunker buster bombs, in order to penetrate the facilities,' said Ms Stricker.
'Namely, the Fordow facility enrichment site is around 60 to 90m deep. And then the Iranians were also talking about bringing a new enrichment facility online that is around 100 or more meters deep under a mountain near Natanz.'
She added that to take out or disable the nuclear programme, and set it back for a number of months to years, they are talking about really heavy bombs and multiple bombing that runs over many days.
'Ideally, they would have had the US involved because the US still has the heaviest bunker busters, but Israel has some that they could use on their own,' she added.
On an Iranian counter attack, Ms Stricker said Iran will probably go for military sites, installations, bases, but there is always the possibility that they may target civilian cities and centres, if they really wanted to inflict terror on the population.
'If or when Iran retaliates, we'll see the US step in as they did in April of 2024 in October of 2024,' she said.
Dr Rodger Shanahan , Middle East expert and former Australian army officer, spoke on the worst-case scenario in terms of Iranian retaliation
'An indiscriminate attack against civilian population areas in Israel. That would be the red line. That would be kind of a spiral of no return thing,' said Dr Shanahan.
'If they targeted Israeli military bases, a like-for-like, they could target Israeli nuclear... people involved in the Israeli nuclear programme, senior military officers. So I think if it was like-for-like, then it's containable. If it's indiscriminate, then that's when you got in the kind of death spiral.'
Ms Mara Rudman, University of Virginia professor and former deputy envoy and chief of staff for the Office of the Special Envoy for Middle East Peace at the State Department
'I think this is unlikely to be one-strike action by Israel given what the concerns are, what the objectives have been in terms of removing Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon, and what it would take I believe with what Israel has available to them,' Ms Rudman told Bloomberg Television.
I think people have to expect a long and extended campaign and one to which Iran would be responding in various ways.'
Mr Bilahari Kausikan, Singapore's former permanent secretary for foreign affairs and former chairman of the Middle East Institute
'I think this will remain a regional conflict with most Sunni Arab states quietly siding with Israel. Although Iran may launch terrorist attacks world wide as part of its retaliation, it can only become a wider war if major powers get involved on Iran's side,' said Mr Kausikan, adding that US and its allies will not play that role, while Russia is fully occupied in Ukraine and while China is a significant economic actor in the Gulf, its political, diplomatic and military policies in the Middle East are largely performative.
'How bad can it get? Not too bad I think. Its missiles have failed against Israel in 2024 causing no significant damage and its forward defence assets Hezbollah and Hamas have been decimated. Tehran may cause more damage to Israel this time and attack softer targets in Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain as well as shipping in the Gulf, but it will not be anything apocalyptic.'
Dr Nicole Grajewski , fellow in the Nuclear Policy Programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
'If you were to ask the worst case scenario, this would be close to it – ongoing US-Iran talks (regardless of progress) and Israel acting on its own, targeting Iran's military leadership along with civilian casualties only three days before US-Iran negotiations, Dr Grajewski said on social media.
'Iran's retaliation will likely hinge on several factors: the scale of civilian casualties, whether key political or military leaders were targeted, and the extent of damage to its capabilities (conventional and nuclear). I think we may see Iran strike Israeli civilian sites.'
Dr Jeffrey Lewis , professor at the Middlebury Institute
'If Israel is striking Iran alone, I don't see how it makes any long-term impact unless there something really special and/or surprising in the mix,' Dr Lewis said on social media.
'Starting to think the play here is to destabilise the regime more than cripple the nuclear programme. It's quite a bet by the Israelis.'
Mr Ankit Panda, Stanton senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
'Israel has said it is not seeking regime change, but is narrowly targeting nuclear capabilities, but if some rumored targets in Iran pan out (including Supreme National Security Council members), hard to see how that doesn't look like a broader political war aim to the Iranians. Really dangerous,' Mr Panda said on social media. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Business Times
Iran threatens US bases in response to strikes on nuclear sites
[WASHINGTON] Iran on Sunday threatened US bases in the Middle East after massive air strikes that Washington said had destroyed Tehran's nuclear programme, though some officials cautioned that the extent of damage was unclear. International concern intensified that the unprecedented US attacks would deepen conflict in the Middle East after Israel launched a bombing campaign against Iran earlier this month. Ali Akbar Velayati, an advisor to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said bases used by US forces could be attacked in retaliation. 'Any country in the region or elsewhere that is used by American forces to strike Iran will be considered a legitimate target for our armed forces,' he said in a message carried by the official IRNA news agency. 'America has attacked the heart of the Islamic world and must await irreparable consequences.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up President Donald Trump urged Iran to end the conflict after he launched surprise 'bunker buster' strikes on a key underground uranium enrichment site at Fordo, along with nuclear facilities in Isfahan and Natanz. 'We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)' he said on social media. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told a Pentagon press briefing that Iran's nuclear program was 'devastated,' adding that the operation 'did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people.' Standing beside Hegseth, top US general Dan Caine said 'it would be way too early for me to comment on what may or may not still be there.' 'Initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction.' Tehran protests As Iran's leaders struck a defiant tone, President Masoud Pezeshkian also vowed that the United States would 'receive a response' to the attacks. People gathered Sunday in the center of Tehran to protest against US and Israeli attacks, waving flags and chanting slogans. In an address to the nation hours after the attack, Trump had claimed total success for the operation, and Vice-President JD Vance followed up on Sunday morning. 'We know that we set the Iranian nuclear programme back substantially last night,' he told ABC. But he also suggested Iran still had its highly enriched uranium. 'We're going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel,' he said. 'They no longer have the capacity to turn that stockpile of highly enriched uranium to weapons grade uranium.' Another Khamenei advisor, Ali Shamkhani, said in a post on X that 'even if nuclear sites are destroyed, game isn't over, enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, political will remain.' Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CNN there were clear signs of the hit on Fordo. But no one knows 'how much it has been damaged,' he said. The IAEA said it had not detected any increase in radiation at the nuclear sites and Tehran said there were no signs of contamination. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prayed for Trump at the Western Wall in Jerusalem on Sunday, after hailing the strikes as a move that would 'change history.' Retaliation risk The Israeli military was also checking the results of the US raid on the deeply buried nuclear facility in Fordo, with a spokesman saying it was uncertain if Iran had already removed enriched uranium from the site. The main US strike group was seven B-2 Spirit bombers that flew 18 hours from the American mainland to Iran, Caine said. In response to the attack, which used over a dozen massive 'bunker buster' bombs, Iran's armed forces said they targeted multiple sites in Israel including Ben Gurion airport, the country's main international gateway near Tel Aviv. Israeli rescuers said at least 23 people were wounded. In Jerusalem, Claudio Hazan, a 62-year-old software engineer, said he hoped the US intervention would hasten an end to the Iran-Israel war. 'Israel by itself would not stop... and it would take longer,' he said. At least nine members of the Revolutionary Guards were killed on Sunday in Israeli attacks on central Iran, local media reported, as fighting between the two foes continued. Israeli strikes on Iran have killed more than 400 people since they began, Iran's health ministry said. Iran's attacks on Israel have killed 24 people, according to official figures. The United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Oman, which had been mediating Iran-US nuclear talks, criticised the US strikes and called for de-escalation. The leaders of France, Germany and Britain urged Iran 'not to take any further action that could destabilise the region' and UN chief Antonio Guterres warned of a cycle of retaliation. Iran's Huthi allies in Yemen on Sunday repeated their threat to resume attacks in the Red Sea if Washington joined the war, saying they were ready to target US ships. The US president had stepped up his rhetoric against Iran since Israel first struck the country on June 13, repeating his insistence it could never have nuclear weapons. AFP
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
While You Were Sleeping: 5 stories you might have missed, June 23, 2025
US House Speaker Mike Johnson was one of the lawmakers allegedly notified of the US military action ahead of time. PHOTO: REUTERS While You Were Sleeping: 5 stories you might have missed, June 23, 2025 US lawmakers call for Congress to review Trump's Iran actions Some Democratic and Republican lawmakers on June 22 called on Congress to rein in President Donald Trump's use of military force in Iran and prevent US involvement in a deepening Middle East conflict. With Republican leaders in the Senate and House of Representatives strongly backing the US attacks on key Iranian nuclear sites, it seemed unlikely any resolution that asserts the power of Congress to declare war and restricts Mr Trump's actions could pass both chambers. US Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said he expects to force the Senate to vote this week on his measure requiring Mr Trump to terminate hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorised by a declaration of war from Congress. Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California said they want a vote on similar legislation they introduced in the House. 'This is the US jumping into a war of choice at Donald Trump's urging, without any compelling national security interest for the United States to act in this way, particularly without a debate and vote in Congress,' Mr Kaine told CBS' Face the Nation programme. READ MORE HERE Satellite images undermine Trump's claim that Iran's atomic sites were destroyed President Donald Trump's decision to order US forces to attack three key Iranian nuclear installations may have sabotaged the Islamic Republic's known atomic capabilities, but it's also created a monumental new challenge to work out what's left and where. Mr Trump said heavily fortified sites were 'totally obliterated' late on June 21, but independent analysis has yet to verify that claim. Rather than yielding a quick win, the strikes have complicated the task of tracking uranium and ensuring Iran doesn't build a weapon, according to three people who follow the country's nuclear programme. International Atomic Energy Agency monitors remain in Iran and were inspecting more than one site a day before Israel started the bombing campaign on June 13. READ MORE HERE At least 20 killed in suicide bombing at Damascus church At least 20 people were killed and dozens injured when a suicide bomber blew himself up at the Mar Elias Church in the Dweila neighbourhood of Syria's capital Damascus on June 22, health authorities and security sources said. The incident marks the first suicide bombing inside Damascus since Mr Bashar al-Assad was toppled by an Islamist-led rebel insurgency in December. Syria's interior ministry said the suicide bomber was a member of the terror group Islamic State. READ MORE HERE 12 arrested as wave of syringe attacks mar France street music festival French police have detained twelve suspects after 145 people reported being pricked with syringes during the country's annual street music festival, officials said June 22. Millions of people took to the streets across France on the evening of June 21 for the Fete de la Musique, with authorities reporting 'unprecedented crowds' in Paris. Before the party, posts on social media had called for women to be targeted during the festivities. READ MORE HERE Carlos Alcaraz beats Jiri Lehecka in Queen's final to send Wimbledon statement Top seed Carlos Alcaraz edged out Czech Jiri Lehecka 7-5, 6-7 (5-7), 6-2 to claim his second Queen's Club title on June 22 and send out a powerful statement ahead of his Wimbledon defence. The 22-year-old Spaniard, who triumphed at Queen's a few weeks before claiming his first Wimbledon title in 2023, extended his winning streak to 18 matches but was pushed hard by Lehecka, who underlined his own credentials as a rising force. Alcaraz pounced at 5-5 to break the Lehecka serve and duly bagged the opening set in 45 minutes. READ MORE HERE Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
From isolationist to warmonger: Will Trump's Iran bet pay off?
US President Donald Trump took the biggest gamble of his combined four and a half years in the White House on the night of June 21 in striking Iran. PHOTO: EPA-EFE President Donald Trump took the biggest gamble of his combined 4½ years in the White House on the night of June 21 in striking Iran and joining Israel's war against the Islamic republic. His primary wager is that Iran and its proxies in the Middle East have been so weakened that the US President can cast his intervention as both limited and successful. It is also a bet that a cowed Tehran will swiftly seek a settlement rather than retaliating. If Mr Trump is right, he will have achieved a goal of US foreign policy spanning multiple administrations – the elimination of the Iranian nuclear threat – and done so at relatively low cost. But the move carries the huge risk of inflaming the Middle East further – jeopardising the security of the US and Israel, and backfiring on a president who had vowed not to draw America into new global conflicts. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
