MGS a key force behind the Muziris project, says Satheesan
Notwithstanding his strong disagreements with the identification of the Pattanam archaeological site as the ancient port of Muziris, historian M.G.S. Narayanan played a pivotal role in shaping the Muziris Heritage Project, recalls V.D. Satheesan, Leader of the Opposition and legislator from the Paravur constituency.
'I vividly remember his spirited arguments with fellow historians during the initial seminar on Muziris, held at North Paravur. He openly voiced his apprehensions, firmly stating that there was insufficient archaeological evidence to claim Pattanam as the ancient Muziris port,' Mr. Satheesan recalls.
M.G.S. Narayanan consistently argued that Pattanam was not Muziris, and criticised the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR) for what he believed were historical inaccuracies in their identification. He advocated for the use of 'Mahodaya'—a historically grounded name , instead of the Eurocentric 'Muziris.'
According to him, it was Kodungalloor, the harbour town ruled by the Cheraman chiefs of ancient Tamizhakam, with their political center located inland at Karur, near modern-day Tiruchi, that truly held the identity of ancient Muziris.
Yet, despite his theoretical differences, M.G.S. Narayanan never allowed his opposition to cloud his commitment to the Muziris Heritage Project.
'He was convinced of the existence of a thriving ancient port at Pattanam, which had trade links with over 34 countries. He recognised the evidence of a vibrant port culture in the region, unearthed during excavations,' Mr. Satheesan said.
'It was this conviction that led him to participate in the seminar on Muziris, even as he used the platform to publicly air his objections. As the organiser, I had to navigate between divergent scholarly opinions, but he respected my position too,' Mr. Satheesan added.
He also recalled M.G.S. Narayanan's deep concern over the slow progress of the Muziris Heritage Project in the past decade. 'That indeed highlighted the historian's dedication to preserving Kerala's rich historical legacy,' noted Mr.Satheesan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
3 days ago
- India Gazette
Pinarayi Vijayan parroting RSS's narrative against Muslim majority Malappuram: Kerala LoP
Kochi (Kerala) [India], June 19 (ANI): VD Satheesan, Leader of Opposition in the Kerala Assembly, on Thursday accused the ruling Communist Party of India (Marxist) of having an unholy nexus with the BJP. He also accused Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan of parroting the RSS's 'narrative' against Malappuram, a Muslim-majority district in Kerala. He said that though the construction work on national highways caused numerous mishaps in the State, the LDF government did not have any complaints against the Centre. He cited this as one of the examples of the 'unholy nexus.' 'In Kerala, there is an unholy nexus between the CPI(M) and the BJP. It is very clear. For example, construction work on national highways causes numerous accidents, mishaps, and falls. Still, unfortunately, the state government doesn't have any complaints against the central government,' Satheesan told ANI. 'When the chief minister and the PWD minister (PA Mohammed Riyas) met the surface transport minister (Nitin Gadkari), he adorned him with a garland and presented him with a prize box... The CPI(M) and the Chief Minister are repeating the narrative of the RSS against Malappuram district; they are saying that almost all the people in Malappuram are criminals, smugglers, and doing shady activities,' he added. Satheesan's remarks came amid the voting in the Nilambur Assembly byelection in the Malappuram district. The campaign for the bypoll saw bitter trading of charges between the ruling LDF and the UDF. During the election campaign, LDF leaders, including the Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, slammed the Congress-led UDF for accepting Jamaat-e-Islami's support for its candidate. Hitting back, the UDF leaders accused the ruling alliance of fomenting Islamophobia. However, the Chief Minister said that opposing Jamaat-e-Islami's theocratic ideology was not tantamount to stoking Islamophobia. The bye-election is crucial for both the ruling LDF and the UDF, as the results will be seen as a reflection of voter sentiment ahead of the 2026 Assembly polls in the State. Earlier, stressing that the Nilambur by-election is the semi-final before the 2026 Assembly polls, Kerala LoP and Congress MLA VD Satheesan said that they will emerge victorious, which will mark the beginning of the United Democratic Front's (UDF) return to the state. (ANI) .
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Like a lover to an ex: VD Satheesan hits out at CPM's BJP ‘outreach', calls it 'romantic reminder' of Left's past alliances
V D Satheesan attacked M V Govindan's statement. He reminded everyone of CPM's past ties with RSS and BJP. Satheesan mentioned CPM's alliance with Jan Sangh in 1967. He highlighted a photo of EMS Namboodiripad with BJP leaders. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Opposition leader V D Satheesan on Wednesday mocked CPM state secretary M V Govindan's statement, calling it a "romantic reminder" of the Left's past alliances with RSS and BJP . He said CPM hasn't just partnered with Janata Party in the past, but it has also cozied up to Jan Sangh and BJP. Satheesan said while CPM claims it only collaborated during the Emergency and with Janata Party, it allied with Jan Sangh in 1967. Former general secretary P Sundarayya even resigned in 1975 warning against RSS ties, though his letter emerged posthumously. BJP was formed in 1980 and there is a 1989 photo showing EMS Namboodiripad and Jyoti Basu alongside AB Vajpayee, LK Advani, and VP Singh. CPM even cited a CAG report by Hindutva supporter TN Chaturvedi to justify ties-ironic, given how it now dismisses CAG findings in Kerala, Satheesan said. He said CPM ideologue Mohit Sen warned in 1989 that aligning with communal forces would doom the Left. "They'll clasp hands with any devil to defeat Congress," Satheesan said, adding that CM Pinarayi Vijayan himself admitted to securing RSS votes. He mocked CPM's vote-seeking tactics ahead of the Nilambur bypoll, comparing them to a "lover pleading to an ex." "During LS polls, it was minority appeasement; now it's majority appeasement," he said, alleging that CPM's PR machinery has been pushing Sangh-style narratives in Malappuram. Even Gadkari's road failures draw no criticism. Satheesan criticized Vijayan's silence on "RSS influence" in the Raj Bhavan and called his meeting with Nirmala Sitharaman-where no state finances were discussed-just a "puttu and kadala" chat. "With CPM, everyone's secular; with us, they turn communal," he quipped, noting how Welfare Party's past UDF support is ignored while CPM stokes Islamophobia. KPCC president Sunny Joseph said Govindan had "inadvertently spoken the truth" CPM long hid.
The Print
4 days ago
- The Print
On eve of Nilambur bypoll, ruling CPI(M) and Congress-led UDF lock horns over past ties with RSS
On the sidelines of the campaigning, CPI(M) general secretary M.V. Govindan was asked in a TV interview how the party could attack the UDF's engagement with Jamaat when it too has worked with such forces. He replied that while the Left had never politically aligned with Jamaat-e-Islami, there had been instances of support. He went further, referencing past ties with the RSS during the post-Emergency period. The row erupted after CPI(M) general secretary M.V. Govindan, during a TV interview, referred to a post-Emergency alliance involving the RSS, drawing sharp criticism from the Opposition, which accused the Left of hypocrisy even as it targets the UDF for accepting Jamaat-e-Islami's support in the Nilambur assembly bypoll. Thiruvananthapuram: Hours before the crucial Nilambur bypoll, the ruling Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) are locked in a war of words over past ties with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). 'RSS was formed in 1925. But we never supported their stand. After the Emergency in 1967, didn't we join hands with the RSS? That was the situation then. The RSS is a communal force, but during the Emergency, when the country was heading towards fascism, everyone opposing it stood together, in Kerala and across India,' Govindan said in the interview to Mathrubhumi Wednesday. The Janata Party, formed in 1977 to oppose Indira Gandhi's regime, had brought together the Jan Sangh, Bharatiya Lok Dal, and Socialist Party—an alliance that saw cooperation from the CPI(M) as well. The coalition's landslide win saw Morarji Desai become the first non-Congress Prime Minister. But the statement triggered a political firestorm in Kerala, a state where BJP, which considers RSS as its ideological parent, is aggressively trying to find footing, but still struggling. Leader of Opposition V.D. Satheesan said the timing of the statement was not a coincidence. 'It may seem untimely, but this was a calculated move. Why is the CPI(M) remembering this past now? It's a coded call for help—a signal to the RSS–BJP that they can be partners again,' he alleged Thursday. Satheesan said BJP's initial reluctance to field a candidate in Nilambur hinted at tacit coordination with the Left. He also accused the CPI(M) of running a communal, Islamophobic campaign to win RSS support. Incidentally, the CPI(M) has been attacking the Congress-led UDF for accepting the support of Jamaat-e-Islami in the aftermath of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, terming the organisation 'communal'. The party renewed its attack recently after the organisation openly supported the Congress in the Nilambur bypoll. Being conducted months before the state's Assembly election, the bypoll is considered a preview of the larger electoral battle ahead. Voting is to be held Thursday. Satheesan alleged that the CPI(M) had colluded with BJP to defeat the Congress's Rajiv Gandhi again in 1989. He produced a photograph of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, L.K. Advani, Jyoti Basu, and E.M.S. Namboodiripad together to support his claim. The 1989 general election saw significant changes in the Indian political and coalition history. With the Bofors scandal marring its image, the Congress's seats came down to 197 from the 404 it got in 1984, followed by V.P. Singh's Janata Dal (142) and the National Front. The Opposition led by the Janata Dal, formed the coalition government with the support of BJP and the left parties. 'One of the primary explanations for the success of the Dal was its ability to work out a significant number (89) of effective electoral seat adjustments with the other major opposition parties—the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in northern and western India and the Left Front (the two Indian Communist parties and two small Marxist parties, the Forward Bloc and the Revolutionary Socialist Party) in eastern India. On 2 December 1989, V.P. Singh, the JD leader, was sworn in as Indian Prime Minister, and on 21 December 1989, the Janata Dal/National Front Government won a vote of confidence in the Lok Sabha by a voice vote,' writes Lewis P. Fickett in the Asian Survey's 1993 journal The Rise and Fall of Janata Dal. 'We have always maintained a single stand against the RSS. The allegations are just to create a controversy ahead of polls,' CPI(M) MLA from Malappuram's Ponnani, P. Nandakumar, told ThePrint. However, Nandakumar refused to respond to the Congress's allegation about the left alliance with the RSS and the BJP after the Emergency. Govindan holds press conference As the controversy gained traction, Govindan Wednesday held a press conference in Thiruvananthapuram, saying his words were being distorted to make him appear sympathetic to communal forces. 'The Emergency was a period of semi-fascism. The Janata Party, which we supported, was not just the Jana Sangh. It was a broad front of socialists, democrats, and Emergency opponents. Yes, Jana Sangh was part of it—but RSS was not a prominent force in that alliance,' he clarified. 'CPI(M) has never formed and will never form a partnership with the RSS—past, present, or future,' Govindan said. Earlier in the day, Nilambur candidate M. Swaraj also reiterated that the alliance in 1977 was necessitated by circumstances, but once the RSS's influence in Janata Party grew, the CPI(M) backed off. He said in the consecutive bypolls in Kasargode, Thalassery, Thiruvalla, and Parassala, Namboodiripad famously said the party doesn't need RSS votes, reinforcing the Left's commitment to secularism. 'We won all four seats. That statement boosted secular forces in Kerala,' Swaraj said. The CPI(M) also pushed back by accusing the Congress of its own ties with the RSS during the 1958–59 Liberation Struggle. The Liberation Struggle was an anti-communist movement against the first Kerala government, backed by the Syro-Malabar Church, Nair Service Society, the Muslim League, and the Congress. Congress candidate for the Nilambur bypoll Aryadan Shoukath too jumped into the debate, saying, 'In 1977, the Congress lost power for the first time because the Left openly aligned with the Jan Sangh. We all know these alliances can return. Remember, L.K. Advani inaugurated V. Sivadasa Menon's election convention in Palakkad.' The Congress had earlier accused the CPI(M) of diluting its stand against BJP after the party's draft resolution ahead of the 24th Party Congress used the word 'neo-fascist' for the BJP. However, CPI(M) Polit Bureau member clarified that the resolution referred to 'neo-fascism' and 'neo-fascist tendencies' as they represented an ideological trend distinct from the 'classical fascism' that emerged globally in the early 20th century. In the party's state conference in Kollam earlier this year, Prakash Karat said Modi government's 11-year rule is showing 'neo-fascistic characteristics' in its aggressive push for Hindutva and neo-liberal agendas, warning that it will develop into 'full-fledged fascism, if not resisted'. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: Nilambur bypoll: How Anvar, once Kerala's richest MLA, is adding twist to crucial LDF-UDF contest
