Starmer hails ‘common sense' EU deal as Brexiteers condemn ‘surrender'
Under the deal struck with Brussels, more tourists will be able to use e-gates at airports in Europe, pet passports will be introduced for UK cats and dogs and businesses can sell burgers and sausages into the bloc again.
But the Prime Minister faced accusations of betraying Brexit over the extension of fishing rights for European vessels for a further 12 years and closer ties to EU rules.
Sir Keir met European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa at a summit in Lancaster House, London, to seal the deal.
The Prime Minister said: 'It's time to look forward. To move on from the stale old debates and political fights to find common sense, practical solutions which get the best for the British people.
'We're ready to work with partners if it means we can improve people's lives here at home.
'So that's what this deal is all about – facing out into the world once again, in the great tradition of this nation.
'Building the relationships we choose, with the partners we choose, and closing deals in the national interest. Because that is what independent, sovereign nations do.'
Sir Keir Starmer and Ursula von der Leyen led high-profile delegations at the summit (Kin Cheung/PA)
Measures include:
– A 12-year extension of fishing arrangements when the current deal ends, allowing European vessels to operate in UK waters under the same terms until 2038.
– An open-ended new sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) agreement to slash red tape on food and drink exports and imports between the UK and EU.
– Some routine checks on plant and animal products will be removed completely and British burgers and sausages will once more be allowed into the EU.
– Linking UK and EU emissions-trading schemes which will mean British firms will not be hit by Brussels' carbon tax next year.
– A security and defence partnership will pave the way for UK arms firms to bid for work under the EU's proposed new £150 billion security action for Europe (Safe) fund.
– The UK and EU have agreed to co-operate on a 'youth experience scheme', but British officials insisted numbers would be capped and stays would be time-limited.
– British steel exports will be protected from new EU rules and restrictive tariffs, saving the beleaguered industry £25 million.
In striking the deal, the Prime Minister has had to balance the Government's desperate search for measures to grow the economy with the backlash he will inevitably face from Brexit-supporting voters and political opponents.
The acceptance of some form of youth mobility programme, allowing young EU citizens to live, work and study in the UK and vice versa, has been politically controversial because of the Government's drive to cut net migration.
Officials insisted the scheme being proposed would not breach the Government's red line of not allowing the return of free movement, pointing to similar deals with Australia and New Zealand.
The 'reset' deal also respects the Government's other red lines of not returning to the customs union or single market, officials said.
But Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'We're becoming a rule-taker from Brussels once again.
'And with no details on any cap or time limits on youth mobility, fears of free movement returning will only increase. This is very concerning.'
Shadow farming minister Robbie Moore accused Sir Keir of 'surrendering access to our British waters to European fishermen'.
'Whose side is he on? When Labour negotiates, Britain loses,' he added.
Reform UK's Nigel Farage said the 12-year deal on access for European boats 'will be the end of the fishing industry'.
Mr Farage's deputy leader Richard Tice said: 'Labour surrenders. Brussels bureaucrats win again.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Massive step forward' for post-Brexit youth visa scheme
The European Union has given approval to begin detailed discussions with the UK regarding post- Brexit youth visas. Campaigners have hailed this decision as a "massive step forward" for young people in the UK, aiming to restore opportunities lost after Brexit. The proposed scheme would allow 18 to 30-year-olds from the UK to work in EU countries and young EU citizens to work in the UK for short periods. Conditions for the youth visa scheme include no access to benefits, no accompanying family members, and payment of an immigration health surcharge. This development follows a recent poll indicating that a majority of Britons now desire the UK to rejoin the European Union.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hospices warn of facing ‘huge implications' after assisted dying Bill passed
Hospices and end-of-life care professionals will face 'huge implications' and 'seismic change' after the assisted dying Bill cleared the House of Commons, leading organisations have warned. MPs voted 314 to 291 in favour of the legislation, which would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of under six months to end their lives, at third reading on Friday. Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a Bill they argued has been rushed through, the Bill will now move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both Houses must agree the final text of the Bill before it can be signed into law. Reacting to the vote, Jan Noble, interim chief executive of St Christopher's Hospice, said: 'Today's vote to pass the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has huge implications for hospices and end-of-life care professionals. 'It is vital that the Government now provides assurance that the impact on hospices will be properly considered and that high-quality end-of-life care is made available to everyone across the country, and for that we need a better funding model for hospices. 'Our position on any change of law remains neutral but as the home of the modern hospice movement we're committed to providing expertise and evidence to policymakers and we're now urging the House of Lords to carefully consider the complex views of the public, particularly those with experience of health inequalities. 'We recognise this may be a difficult moment for many of those working in hospice and end-of-life care, as well as the wider health and social care sector. 'We are now looking to both the Government and the House of Lords for further reassurances that they will address the concerns raised by multiple professionals' bodies.' Toby Porter, chief executive of Hospice UK, said the vote represented 'a seismic change for end-of-life care in England and Wales' and the introduction of assisted dying would have 'a huge impact' on hospices. He said: 'Already, too many people don't get the care they need at the end of their lives. Today's decision brings the urgency to improve palliative care into even sharper focus, particularly for the most vulnerable members of society. 'Should the Bill become law, the Government has four years to bring about a transformation in palliative and end-of-life care. 'Nobody should ever feel that they have to choose an assisted death because they fear they won't get the care and support they need. As it stands, we are concerned this could become the case. 'The Bill does not detail where assisted dying will take place, or to what extent hospices will be involved. This leaves many unanswered questions for hospices, who are already under immense pressure.' Mr Porter added that Hospice UK also remained neutral on the principle of assisted dying but would work with other hospices and the Government 'to navigate the many operational challenges it poses'. An amendment to the Bill requiring ministers to report within a year of its passing on how assisted dying could affect palliative care was also approved by MPs ahead of Friday's vote. James Sanderson, chief executive of palliative care and bereavement charity Sue Ryder, said: 'We all care about how and where we will die and this review is a vital step in making sure everyone gets the care they need at the end of their life. 'Sue Ryder maintains a neutral position on assisted dying, but we are concerned that gaps in care could be leaving some people feeling it's their only option. 'Our research found that 77% of people felt that terminally ill people could be forced to consider an assisted death because the end-of-life care they need isn't available. That must change – no matter how the Bill progresses in its next stages through the House of Lords. 'We are calling for the Government to back our plan for a new ecosystem for palliative care that would mean more people can die with the care and the dignity they deserve.' Marie Curie welcomed the amendment, but warned that 'this will not on its own make the improvements needed to guarantee everyone is able to access the palliative care they need'.
Times
30 minutes ago
- Times
We have a golden opportunity to create a new ‘Brand Britain 2.0'
President Reagan famously said the nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' More than 40 years on, that's a message that business owners across Britain still sympathise with. It's also a message I've been thinking about a lot as the government prepares to launch its industrial strategy next week. It's a signature part of the government's growth agenda, and from speaking to the chancellor and the business secretary, I know it's something they believe in passionately as a way of putting rocket boosters under the economy. So companies are expectant, but nervous. The last time the government knocked on their door they saw billions added to their tax bills by increasing national insurance contributions. I speak to owners of companies of every size and shape day in, day out. And while they're clear they want no further taxes, they are equally clear that there is a hugely important role for the government to play in helping them to grow. That's the prize that's at the heart of this industrial strategy. It must provide a genuine road map for how Britain's entrepreneurs, fuelled with huge reserves of imagination, ingenuity and dogged determination, can go further and faster to drive the economy forward. • Cheaper energy will be key for Labour's industrial strategy We have a golden opportunity to use the industrial strategy to create a new 'Brand Britain 2.0', that uses the strength of our past as the base to build an even better future. So how will we know if this industrial strategy has been a success? It must set out clearly how we will leverage the country's competitive advantages. The eight priority sectors are the right ones — advanced manufacturing, financial services, life sciences, defence, digital, clean energy, professional and business services and our world-beating creative industries. But alongside the key growth sectors of the economy, it must integrate every region's strengths into the plan, ensuring benefits for businesses and people across all nations of the United Kingdom. What will support industry in Glasgow isn't the same as what will drive growth in Colchester or Cornwall. Plans by the government to unleash the potential of the Oxford-Cambridge corridor are an important start — but it needs to seriously consider how this can be replicated across the country. It needs to set out how we close the skills gaps across the country, and how we create a stable regulatory environment, so businesses have certainty as they invest. It needs to address energy, too. British firms are being hamstrung by eye-watering energy bills, which is having a direct impact on their ability to invest and hire. And crucially, finance is the lifeblood of any business, so we need to see a plan that supports our most innovative firms to access capital and scale up their businesses. This is our chance to send a message to the world that the UK really is the best place to start, grow, invest and do business. Let's not pretend that delivering this will be easy. It will require major work across almost every department in government, and a commitment from the public and private sectors to work in lockstep like never before. At the British Chambers of Commerce, we've spent years calling for an industrial strategy that rises to the challenges that firms face and we're committed to making it work. Then we can set Britain on a path to thrive, not just survive. Shevaun Haviland is director-general of the British Chambers of Commerce
