logo
How hard can it be to say sorry over Fanling water scare?

How hard can it be to say sorry over Fanling water scare?

To celebrate the 60th anniversary of the
Dongjiang water supply to Hong Kong, the government launched a series of events reminding residents to be grateful for the water they drink. Earlier in the year, Director of Water Supplies Roger Wong Yan-lok said he hoped the public would more deeply understand the importance of the water supply and appreciate the country's immense support.
Yes, water is life. It is not to be taken for granted. That's why both Wong and Secretary for Development Bernadette Linn Hon-ho have been in the spotlight in the past week, after mysterious particles were found in the
freshwater supply of two housing estates in Fanling.
The mystery was finally solved when the government released laboratory results last Thursday. The particles turned out to be
bitumen , a black, sticky by-product of crude oil, not the kind of substance you would want in your glass of water. The substance has been banned from the lining of pipes since 2005. Yet it somehow turned up in freshwater pipes supplying the two estates that were completed between 2021 and 2022.
The outcry has been absolutely understandable. Residents should be applauded for not getting into a widespread panic. Many were buying bottled water to drink and cook with, despite government assurances that the samples collected 'consistently complied with freshwater safety standards'.
Even after the results were released, Drinking Water Safety Advisory Committee chairman Chan Hon-fai said the water was safe, but advised residents against consuming the particles.
There are several reasons for the public outcry. First, it took the government a week to determine what the substance was, while a test commissioned by local media and conducted by the Education University only took half a day to find that it was bitumen.
When the media asked why it had taken the government so long, Wong said the Water Supplies Department had collected 126 samples, which meant there was '10 times more [testing] work' than usual. One could almost hear the angry game show buzzer that goes off for a wrong answer. Residents' safety, not the department's workload, should clearly have been the first priority here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taiwan pursues homegrown Chinese spies as Beijing intensifies espionage
Taiwan pursues homegrown Chinese spies as Beijing intensifies espionage

HKFP

time3 hours ago

  • HKFP

Taiwan pursues homegrown Chinese spies as Beijing intensifies espionage

Taiwan is vetting hundreds of thousands of military service members, public school teachers and civil servants in a bid to root out potential homegrown Chinese sympathisers, as Beijing intensifies espionage on the island. Alarm is growing in Taiwan over the extent of China's infiltration on the self-ruled island, which Beijing claims is part of its territory and has threatened to seize by force. Prosecutors last week charged four recently expelled members of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party — including a former staffer in President Lai Ching-te's office — for sharing state secrets with Beijing. While Taipei and Beijing have spied on each other for decades, analysts warn the threat to Taiwan is more serious given the risk of a Chinese attack. The main targets of Chinese infiltration have been retired and active members of the military, persuaded by money, blackmail or pro-China ideology. Lai, an outspoken defender of Taiwan's sovereignty and loathed by Beijing, has branded China a 'foreign hostile force' and sought to raise public awareness about Chinese actions he says threaten national security. After a sharp rise in the number of people prosecuted for spying for China in recent years, the government is trying to identify people within its own departments, military and public schools with a possible allegiance to Beijing. Anyone on the public service payroll found with Chinese residence or other identification cards risks losing their Taiwanese household registration, effectively their citizenship. 'The reason we started to survey (for Chinese IDs) is because China uses this way to coerce Taiwanese people, to penetrate our system, especially the public service,' DPP lawmaker Wang Ting-yu told AFP. 'The threat is getting worse and worse and we have to deal with that.' 'Cleanse the population' In the first round held recently, 371,203 people, or nearly all of those surveyed, signed statements declaring they did not hold any Chinese ID documents prohibited by Taiwanese law. Two people admitted having Chinese ID cards and 75 having residence permits, which were annulled, Taiwan's top policy body on China, the Mainland Affairs Council, said. The second round of vetting is underway, but the government has said the general public will not be targeted. Concern over Taiwanese people holding Chinese ID documents flared after a YouTube video last year alleged there were tens of thousands of cases. A senior Taiwanese security official said recently China was issuing ID papers to a growing number of people from Taiwan, but it was 'difficult to estimate' how many or track down offenders without Beijing's cooperation. 'The idea is to define Taiwanese citizens as Chinese citizens under their legal framework,' the official said. Legal scholar Su Yen-tu said there were limits on the government's 'investigatory power' to find out who held Chinese ID cards in Taiwan. If Taiwanese people did not voluntarily disclose the information, 'there's not much the government can do,' said Su, a research professor at Academia Sinica. Collecting records was still 'potentially useful', Jamestown Foundation president Peter Mattis told AFP, particularly if someone under investigation in the future is found to have lied about their documents. Taiwan has also asked around 10,000 Chinese spouses and their China-born children for proof they have given up their Chinese household registration, a decades-old requirement under Taiwanese law. 'It's a fight every day' The notices sparked criticism that the government was being heavyhanded, but Wang said stricter enforcement was needed because some 'new immigrants' from China had spied for Beijing and interfered in Taiwan's elections. 'I personally feel that it's a bit disturbing for the people,' said Li I-ching, a 23-year-old graduate student in Taipei, who was born in China to a Chinese mother and a Taiwanese father. Like many others, Li has to obtain evidence from China that she no longer holds permanent residence status. The Beijing-friendly main opposition Kuomintang party (KMT) has accused the government of conducting 'loyalty' tests. 'At a time when our country is facing so many difficulties… the government is only thinking about how to cleanse the population,' said KMT lawmaker Chen Yu-jen. The dispute between Taiwan and China dates back to 1949 when Chiang Kai-shek's nationalist forces lost the Chinese civil war to Mao Zedong's communist fighters and fled to the island. China has vowed to annex Taiwan and in recent years has ramped up its military pressure on the island. Taiwan says China also uses disinformation, cyberattacks and espionage to weaken its defences. 'It's a fight every day for the Taiwanese against this sort of stuff,' said Mark Harrison, a senior lecturer in Chinese studies at the University of Tasmania. 'I think their democracy has tremendous integrity, but it does have to be defended, and when you defend something, it certainly generates a lot of discourse, a lot of debate.'

Thailand-Cambodia border clash tests China's neighbourhood diplomacy
Thailand-Cambodia border clash tests China's neighbourhood diplomacy

South China Morning Post

time3 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Thailand-Cambodia border clash tests China's neighbourhood diplomacy

A deadly border skirmish between Thailand and Cambodia late last month has put China's neighbourhood diplomacy to the test as Beijing seeks to maintain stability in a region crucial to its strategic interests. Analysts said China would probably monitor the Thailand-Cambodia border dispute closely while avoiding direct mediation. They added that Beijing might work with Asean to prevent future direct confrontations between troops along a 4.6 sq km (1.78-square-mile) stretch of disputed land. Thai and Cambodian officials met for the first time last weekend following an exchange of fire between troops that left one Cambodian soldier dead. But tensions remain high over the clash on May 28 in an area known as the Emerald Triangle – where Cambodia, Thailand and Laos meet. Both sides claim to have acted in self-defence and quickly withdrew their soldiers to prevent further confrontation. But the brief skirmish has shed light on deep-rooted border disputes in the Indochina peninsula, which lies alongside China and is considered a crucial trade gateway for Beijing to Southeast Asia and beyond. It was also the second armed conflict in China's neighbourhood within a month. In early May, nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan exchanged missile and air strikes in a four-day conflict. It followed a deadly attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22 that New Delhi blamed on Pakistan-based militant groups. While analysts agreed that the risk of a wider escalation between Cambodia and Thailand was low, they said the recent confrontation might cast a shadow over China's neighbourhood diplomacy – a priority for Beijing's foreign policy as it looks to foster closer regional ties to offset pressure from its rivalry with the United States. 'Both Cambodia and Thailand are friendly neighbours to China, and nothing concerning China's surroundings is a small matter,' said Qian Feng, a senior research fellow with Taihe Institute, a Beijing-based think tank.

What's next - Xia Baolong speaks on national security law's fifth anniversary
What's next - Xia Baolong speaks on national security law's fifth anniversary

South China Morning Post

time4 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

What's next - Xia Baolong speaks on national security law's fifth anniversary

This story has been made freely available as a public service to our readers. Please consider supporting SCMP's journalism by subscribing . New users who download our updated app get a seven-day free trial. Beijing's point man on Hong Kong affairs is addressing a national security law forum on Saturday as part of his third inspection visit to the city to assess its progress on multiple fronts. Xia Baolong's attendance at the forum, which is being held to mark the fifth anniversary of the Beijing-imposed legislation, is a focus of the official's five-day visit. Commentators have suggested that the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office (HKMAO) director may use the event to share his latest assessment of national security threats in the city and lay down the direction for the next phase of the law's implementation. More from our coverage: Reporting by Jeffie Lam, Jess Ma and Willa Wu.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store