LAX Metro Transit Center station set to open June 6

The long-awaited LAX/ Metro Transit Center station is set to open on June 6, Metro Board Chair Janice Hahn announced on Thursday, finally connecting Metro riders to the airport.
"The wait is nearly over, Los Angeles," Hahn said. The station is a multi-modal transportation hub, located at Aviation Boulevard and 96th Street, just northeast-adjacent to the airport.
"And when the LAX People Mover finally opens, we will truly have an international airport that connects people from inside the terminals to the world beyond through Metro," Hahn said.
The station will offer access to the Metro K and C Lines. The K Line has been operating only between Westchester and the E Line station at Crenshaw. With the new station opening, the K Line will extend south of Westchester to the Redondo Beach station.
The Metro C (Green) Line, which currently runs between Redondo Beach and Norwalk, will run instead between Norwalk and a new Aviation/Century Station south of the airport, where riders can connect to the K Line.
The new station will also offer a multilevel bicycle hub with secured parking, a pedestrian plaza, as well as an area for passenger vehicle pick-up and drop-off, according to Metro. The facility will also have a 16-bay bus plaza with electric bus infrastructure, a customer service center, and a passenger pick-up/drop-off area.
Buses will shuttle travelers between the transit center and the airport until the Automated People Mover opens, as construction is ongoing.
Airport officials announced in August 2024 that the system's four final train cars arrived, keeping on pace with the scheduled completion date of Dec. 8, 2025. It's expected to be up and running by January 2026, ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Summer Olympics.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fast Company

a day ago

• Fast Company

The grid may fail, airports shouldn't

The power always comes back on. It did at London's Heathrow Airport earlier this year after a fire at a substation disrupted some 1,400 flights at the global hub, upending the plans and lives of 200,000 passengers. It did again on the Iberian Peninsula in April after a power outage, whose cause is still undetermined, knocking out transit in Barcelona, Madrid, and Lisbon and grounding flights even as back-up generators kicked on. And it did in May after the air traffic control tower at Houston Hobby lost power for an hour and backup generators kicked on. Some might say the missed business meetings, the vacations disrupted, and the cargo delayed are unfortunate costs of doing business, collateral damage in a system that supports $4.1 trillion in world economic activity. Others might think the airport power outages are so rare or brief that the fix—a power source not reliant on the existing electric grid—is a cost-prohibitive solution. Critical role in global connectivity The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) surveyed 24 commercial airports in 2023 and found a total of 321 electrical power outages—i.e., an unplanned loss of power lasting five minutes or longer—from 2015 through 2022. Eleven of the airports reported six or more outages over this eight-year period. The GAO study came after Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport— the world's busiest —had a power outage in 2017 and LAX—the world's seventh busiest —had one in 2019. Because of the interconnected nature of commercial aviation, the effects of those outages rippled across the nation and world. Airports play a critical role in global connectivity, in local and regional economic growth, and— in the event of disasters—the most likely place where aid and rebuilding supplies will first arrive. They are also where transplant organs, high-value, time-sensitive goods, and critical machinery/parts needed for hospitals and utility companies arrive. Reliably functioning airport infrastructure matters. Our lives and livelihoods depend on them. New energy solutions At Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT), we started to think about options after Atlanta's outage and took decisive action after Los Angeles' outage. Our goal was to ensure resiliency and redundancy so we could have power, no matter what. Four years ago, we commissioned a first-in-the-world airport microgrid that fully powers a major airport. Since then, we have achieved site-hardened infrastructure, lowered our cost of energy (in the millions, annually) and contributed to cleaner air by sourcing our energy very locally. PIT's microgrid, powered by a 20 MW energy plant using on-site natural gas and a 3MW solar facility with nearly 10,000 panels built on top of a landfill, allows us to operate independently if outside disruptions occur—and they have. A recent regional power loss that impacted commercial customers throughout the region had no effect on the airport. Our microgrid provided full power to our airport and airfield, without any disruption. Not every airport is blessed with huge supplies of natural gas on property, but by adopting innovative solutions to provide energy security, we can make our world a better place for everyone—whether they fly or not. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Airports must analyze the resources available that make the most sense for their circumstances—whether it's solar power, natural gas pipelines, or other creative options. The industry has faced threats and found solutions time and time again. As a result, air travel is safer and more secure. Now is the time for airports to lead with a vision that sees beyond runways and terminals and create plans for resilience and build a future that withstands the loss of power. Because wouldn't it be better and safer for us all if the power never went out?

Travel + Leisure

2 days ago

• Travel + Leisure

This $37 Item Is 1 Frequent Flier's Easy Fix to Avoid One of the Grossest Parts of Hotel Rooms

I was at my home airport of LAX covering a recent Condor press event, at which the airline unveiled new European routes and showed off its sleek A330neo business class cabin. But there was another highly specific detail that caught my attention: While standing in a group, I overheard one airline executive casually mention he never travels without his portable kettle. Even on short trips. Even when flying carry-on only. Naturally, I had to know more, so I leaned in and pressed the conversation. 'Why bother taking it? I guess it's the most British thing you'll hear this week, but good black tea needs boiling water," explained Stephen Mc Kenna, an area manager for Condor. And that, he explained, is where most hotel rooms fall short. 'These coffee makers in hotel rooms tend to be way below that, so you get really weak tea,' he said. 'They also have a constant lingering stale coffee taste in them, which I just can't do; it's the same thing in all the chain hotels that have a usually much-appreciated coffee and tea station: the water boilers have nearly always had coffee in them before, so again, that lingering taste.' Beyond ensuring a quality brew, Mc Kenna's inclination to travel with a portable kettle also acts as an ingenious fix for a rather unsettling hotel guest phenomenon. In April, the hosts of Britain's This Morning revealed that guests are known to wash their dirty underwear and socks in the hotel room's kettle. "You'd be surprised how many treat the kettle like a general-purpose pot because they don't want to use the sink," a Manchester-based housekeeper shared with the daytime television program. "Unless there's a complaint, kettles are usually just wiped on the outside and left in place." That's why, no matter how light he's packing, Mc Kenna makes room for a kettle similar to the Loutytuo Portable Travel Kettle—a compact, collapsible option that boils clean-tasting water fast and reliably. Available on Amazon starting at $37, the Loutytuo kettle has thousands of five-star reviews from travelers who praise its portability, speed, and reliability. Made with food-grade silicone and stainless steel, it folds down to under three inches high and weighs less than a pound, making it ideal for even the strictest luggage setups. 'There's always a couple of sachets of oatmeal in my bag, in case I need a quick breakfast,' Mc Kenna added. With the ability to boil water in just a few minutes, this kettle isn't just about tea. You can rehydrate instant soup, make pour-over coffee, or whip up noodles—all without leaving your hotel room. The device is dual-voltage (100–240V), so it works internationally with the right plug adapter—a key feature for frequent flyers. It heats quickly (typically under five minutes for .5L of water) and automatically shuts off when it reaches a full boil. A secure locking lid prevents spills, and the wide-mouth design makes it easy to clean between uses. Travelers also love that it cools down fast, so you can collapse it and pack it away not long after using it—perfect for those early hotel check-outs or airport transfers. Over in the review section, one traveler wrote, "This kettle folds up very nicely and the handle folds conveniently out of the way so that it takes up very little room in luggage," and another shopper added, "This is probably my favorite travel purchase ever." If you're someone who values a proper cup of tea, wants total control over your hot drinks while traveling, or just likes to keep your breakfast routine consistent on the road, a little kettle like Loutytuo Portable Travel Kettle might be worth the carry-on real estate. For Mc Kenna, it's non-negotiable: 'You don't know what kind of coffee-flavored water situation you're walking into at any hotel. This solves that every time.' Keep scrolling to explore the other top-rated Amazon travel essentials that will elevate your next hotel stay. Love a great deal? Sign up for our T+L Recommends newsletter and we'll send you our favorite travel products each week.

Los Angeles Times

4 days ago

• Los Angeles Times

Metro scrambles to find funding for massive bus fleet that is the heart of its Olympics plans

In a sprawling county where transit lines are sometimes miles apart, transit leaders' plans for the 2028 Olympics and Paralympics rely on a robust fleet of buses to get people to and from venues and avoid a traffic meltdown. The plan hinges on a $2-billion ask of the Trump administration to lease 2,700 buses to join Metro's fleet of roughly 2,400, traveling on a network of designated lanes to get from venue to venue. But with roughly three years to go until opening day, the plan faces several challenges over funding and time. The federal government has yet to respond to the city's request. And Metro's commitment to lease clean energy buses could pose supply problems and challenges around charging infrastructure. Operators would also need to be trained under state regulations and provided housing through the Games. 'Three years might seem like a lot of time to many of us, but in municipal time, three years is like the blink of an eye. That's our greatest challenge.' said Daniel Rodman, a member of the city of L.A.'s office of major events, at a recent UCLA transit forum. 'Father Time is coming.' The Games will be scattered in places across the region including Alamitos Beach in Long Beach, the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, Santa Anita Park in Arcadia, the L.A. Coliseum and Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles and outside the county in Anaheim and all the way to northern San Diego County. Official watch parties and fan gatherings will also occur throughout the metropolis. Since these and many of the venues aren't directly accessible by rail, the bus system will be key to the city's push for 'transit first' — a motto that city leaders have adopted since Mayor Karen Bass' previous messaging around a 'car-free Olympics.' Outside the bus system, several transit projects in the works are expected to ease some of the traffic burden, including the extension for the Metro D Line, also known as the Purple Line, which Metro has slated for completion before the Olympics, and the opening of the automated people mover train at Los Angeles International Airport, which will offer an alternative to driving to the airport. There are also proposals for water taxi use from San Pedro to Long Beach, where multiple events will be held, to offer an alternative to the Vincent Thomas and Long Beach International Gateway bridges. The big question is whether enough people in a famously auto-bound city will be willing to take public transit. Leaders believe that tourists are likely to take advantage of the system, and hope more Angelenos will too. 'All of our international visitors know how to ride public transportation — it's second nature for our people coming from other countries,' county Supervisor and Metro board Chair Janice Hahn said at a recent UCLA forum, pointing to the Paris Olympics and the city's long use of public transit. 'It's the Angelenos that we're still trying to attract. So I'm thinking the legacy will be a good experience on a bus or a train that could translate after the Olympics to people riding Metro.' Los Angeles leaders warned of major traffic jams ahead of the 1984 Olympics. Then-Councilmember Pat Russell advised residents to leave the city and take a vacation, and many Angelenos rented out their homes to visitors. Fears loomed that if the city couldn't nail down a transit plan, the experience would be a disaster and spectators would encounter a fate similar to the 1980 Winter Olympics in Lake Placid, N.Y., where thousands of people were stranded in below-freezing temperatures after the shuttle bus system became overloaded, according to Times archival reports. 'Of all the problems we're faced with these Olympics Games, transportation is the surest and most inevitable mess unless we get the cooperation and support of people to adjust their use of their personal vehicles,' Capt. Ken Rude, the head of California Highway Patrol's Olympic planning unit, told The Times a year before the 1984 Games. Months earlier, he warned that traffic jams could be so bad that people would be forced to abandon their cars on freeways. In the end, catastrophe was avoided. The plan 40 years ago was similar to today's — build a robust bus system to shuttle Olympics fans, athletes and leaders throughout the county. Traffic was manageable, whether due to transit plans that relied on an additional 550 buses to assist a fleet of 2,200, temporarily turned some streets one-way and limited deliveries to certain hours, or an exodus of residents as people left the area ahead of the Games, in part due to the dire predictions of complete gridlock. But fast-forward, Los Angeles' population has grown from nearly 8 million in 1984 to 9.7 million today, and the region is expecting millions more spectators than it did during the last Games. Estimates for the overall number of expected visitors are still vague, but planners have anticipated as many as 9 million more ticket holders than in the 1984 Olympics. 'There's a mountain to be moved and if you move it one year, it's a lot harder than in three years,' said Juane Matute, deputy director of UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies. 'The buses are hard enough to get, but all of these policy and regulatory changes may be hard as well.' Metro has received leasing commitments for roughly 650 buses so far. Vehicles aside, it will take time to get bus operators properly trained, tested and certified to operate public transit in the state, Matute said. An estimated 6,000 additional bus operators would be needed to drive people throughout the Games. Metro has said that those operators are expected to be provided through transit agencies loaning the buses. In the latest state budget proposal, $17.6 million from the state's highway fund would go toward Olympics and Paralympics planning, including Metro's Games Route Network, which would designate a series of roads for travel by athletes, media members, officials, the International Olympics Committee, spectators and workers. But city and Metro leaders have continued to raise concerns over the funding gap, especially since the additional buses and priority lanes network in 2028 won't be a permanent fixture to Los Angeles. Olympics planners, on the other hand, are confident that transportation will be successful. 'L.A. has invested unto itself a lot in infrastructure here and transportation infrastructure — far more than it did in '84,' LA28 Chair Casey Wasserman said after a three-day visit from the International Olympic Committee. 'We feel very confident that it'll be a different version of the success we had in '84 in terms of ingress and egress and access and experience when it comes to transportation.' Times staff writer Thuc Nhi Nguyen contributed to this report.