Ukraine ‘didn't exist in 12th century', Russia's Medinsky tells NATO boss
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte should have paid closer attention in history class, because he apparently does not know that Ukraine did not exist in the 12th century, Vladimir Medinsky, Russian presidential aide and Moscow's top negotiator at the talks with Kiev, has said.
Rutte on Monday accused Moscow of stalling peace talks with Kiev while insisting that Russia should drastically revamp the line-up of its delegation that has held two rounds of talks with Ukraine in Istanbul. 'To end this war, we need [Russian President Vladimir] Putin to come to the negotiating table, and not with this historian.., telling us about the history of Russia and Ukraine from whatever the 12th century,' he said at the time, referring to Medinsky.
Speaking at the International Forum of Ministers of Education in Kazan on Monday, Medinsky fired back at Rutte. 'I know that Mr. Rutte studied history at university, but I would definitely send him a previous school history textbook on the Middle Ages, because from it he would surely learn that Ukraine did not exist in the 12th century,' Medinsky noted.
He added, 'If Vladimir II Monomakh, the Grand Prince of Rostov, Smolensk, and Kiev, were told that he lived in Ukraine, he would probably be surprised and might even be offended,' he quipped.
Medinsky, who used to hold the post of Culture Minister, is also known for co-authoring a new series of history textbooks introduced in Russian schools. He is also personally leading an extensive online course on Russian history.
Back in the 12th century, the territory of modern Ukraine was part of Kievan Rus', a loose feudal entity combining several East Slavic principalities and ruled by the Rurikid dynasty. The term 'Ukraine' did originate in the late 12th century, but it did not refer to a sovereign state or principality. Instead, it was used as a geographic descriptor, meaning 'borderland.'
The notion of Ukraine as a distinct political and cultural entity started to emerge only in the 17th century.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
41 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Zelensky makes new threats against Russia
Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has suggested that Kiev's forces will conduct more long-range strikes targeting facilities deep inside Russian territory. Ukraine has significantly escalated drone attacks deep into Russia in recent weeks, despite ongoing diplomatic efforts to end the conflict. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has described the actions as an attempt to derail the peace process. In a post on his Telegram channel on Sunday, Zelensky wrote that he had held a meeting with the head of Ukraine's military intelligence, Kirill Budanov, claiming that Kiev was keeping tabs on Russia's 'main pain points.' He pledged to 'strike appropriate blows' with a view to 'significantly reducing' Moscow's military potential. Zelensky also stated that Kiev was sharing its intelligence on Russia with its Western backers, with which it is 'preparing joint defense solutions.' Speaking to reporters also on Sunday, Ukraine's commander-in-chief, Aleksandr Syrsky, similarly said that Kiev 'will increase the scale and depth' of its strikes on Russian military facilities deep inside the country. On June 1, Ukrainian intelligence conducted a coordinated attack on several Russian airbases across five regions, from Murmansk in the Arctic, to Irkutsk in Siberia. Ukrainian media later reported that the operation codenamed 'Spiderweb' involved dozens of first-person view (PFV) kamikaze drones. At least some of them were reportedly launched in close proximity to the targets, from commercial trucks that had been covertly brought into Russia. The strikes were said to have been prepared for more than a year and a half and focused on Russia's 'strategic aviation.' The Defense Ministry in Moscow said that a number of aircraft in Murmansk and Irkutsk regions had caught fire as a result of the attack. Kiev claimed that the strikes had damaged or destroyed approximately 40 Russian military aircraft, including Tu-95 and Tu-22 long-range bombers. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov later dismissed these estimates as incorrect. 'The equipment in question… was not destroyed, but damaged. It will be restored,' the diplomat told TASS in early June. Around the same time, Keith Kellogg, US President Donald Trump's special envoy, cautioned that 'when you attack an opponent's part of their national survival system, which is their nuclear triad… that means your risk level goes up because you don't know what the other side's going to do.'
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
The EU's favorite war: the one Israel starts
Israel flew over to Iran with fighter jets and has since gone totally ballistic — literally and figuratively. So what does the European Union's insane clown posse have to say about it? Get yourself some popcorn. The Eurojokers are doing their best stand-up comedy again without even realizing it. First up: French President Emmanuel Macron, who took to social media to declare that 'peace and security for all in the region must remain our guiding principle.' Aww, how sweet. Calling for peace while holding your buddy's coat as he storms into the bar to punch someone on the face. So after Israel unilaterally launched its hundred-target missile tantrum across Tehran – complete with residential hits and assassinations – maybe some strong words against that kind of thing are in order? 'France has repeatedly condemned Iran's ongoing nuclear program and has taken all appropriate diplomatic measures in response. In this context, France reaffirms Israel's right to defend itself and ensure its security,' Macron posted as the conflict kicked off. Classic French parenting: ignore the kid setting the house on fire and scold the one who looked at him funny. Next up, Germany. Surely the new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, can inject some sober logic into the conversation about who just broke the fragile regional peace everyone's pretending to care about. 'Iran has subsequently threatened to accelerate uranium enrichment again. This nuclear programme violates the provisions of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and poses a serious threat to the entire region, especially to the State of Israel. We reaffirm that Israel has the right to defend its existence and the security of its citizens. We call on both sides to refrain from steps that could lead to further escalation and destabilise the entire region,' wrote Merz. Oh, so now that Israel has attacked Iran, it's time for restraint? Not before. Not during. After. Like a guy who throws the first punch in a bar fight and then shouts, 'Hey! Let's all calm down!' Both Macron and Merz say that Iran brought this on itself by enriching uranium. That's like this: you've got a neighbor who lifts weights in his home gym. You see him through the window with a squat rack, bench press, treadmill – getting jacked. And you're like, 'Wow, he's getting so ripped I'm afraid he might beat me up someday. So I better go over there now and beat him up while I still can.' That's basically what Israel did with its 'preemptive' strike. And Macron and Merz are cheering it on like, 'Totally! That guy was getting too buff. Definitely deserved a missile to the face.' Then Merz added from the G7 summit in Canada: 'This is the dirty work that Israel is doing for all of us. We are also victims of this regime.' Oh, sorry – didn't realize the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had hired Israel as a global bouncer. And remind us, Friedrich: where exactly did Iran touch Germany on the map? Because Europe is far more likely to be 'victimized' by waves of immigration facilitated by its own lax policies, and sparked by its own support for regime change wars – like this one is shaping up to be – than by any distant centrifuge. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the EU's de facto queen, is now cosplaying as global playground monitor, sending all the boys to their corners. 'Europe urges all parties to exercise maximum restraint, de-escalate immediately and refrain from retaliation. A diplomatic resolution is now more urgent than ever, for the sake of the region's stability and global security,' she wrote. Maximum restraint? That's rich – especially coming from someone who's usually all about blowing €800 billion on weapons in bulk like a redneck doomsday cult stocking up for when Russian tanks finally roll up to the McDonald's drive thru in Warsaw – five years from now, around 2030, she and the rest of the Eurojokers keep saying. 'Of course I think a negotiated solution is, in the long term, the best solution,' she later said. Sure – as long as peace doesn't get in the way of endless proxy war in Ukraine, right? So, is anyone in Europe offering a perspective that doesn't sound like a hostage video scripted by Netanyahu's PR team? Not really. The Wall Street Journal summed it up bluntly: 'Europe backs Israel against Iran despite anger over Gaza.' For actual dissent, you have to look just outside the EU. 'Israel's attacks on our neighbor Iran are a clear provocation that disregards international law. These attacks, which come at a time when negotiations on Iran's nuclear program are intensifying and international pressure is increasing against inhumane actions targeting Gaza, demonstrate Israel's rule-breaking mentality. The Netanyahu administration is trying to drag our region and the entire world into disaster with its reckless, aggressive and lawless actions,' wrote Turkish President Recep Erdoğan from right next door to the EU clown tent. Türkiye has been waiting to join the EU since 1999 – like an Amazon package left on the doorstep, permanently. Gee, wonder why. You'd think that when things get this hot, Europe might welcome some diverse opinions – if only to avoid sounding like a chorus line of brain-dead sock puppets mouthing press releases from the Israeli defense ministry.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
NATO summit to ditch Ukraine meeting
An upcoming NATO leaders summit in the Netherlands will have a shortened schedule, with the focus on Ukraine drastically reduced, Politico reported on Saturday, citing five people familiar with the matter. The summit, set to be held in the World Forum in The Hague from June 24 to 25, will only feature two main events – a welcome dinner at the Dutch royal family's castle and a single meeting of the North Atlantic Council instead of the usual two or three, according to Politico. There also will not be a meeting of NATO's Ukraine Council. Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has been only invited to attend the welcome dinner, and it still remains unclear whether he will come, the outlet noted. The sources suggested the abbreviated schedule was a concession to the US and President Donald Trump in particular, who has repeatedly shown impatience with and shunned multilateral gatherings of a ceremonial nature. NATO officials reportedly pared down the agenda after the G7 debacle, when Trump abruptly left the summit in Canada halfway through the two-day program. He also reportedly opposed a draft joint statement on the Ukraine conflict, and the summit ultimately ended without one. The upcoming gathering is expected to yield no lengthy joint communique, with the bloc likely to produce only short statements on new commitments. Cuts to the agenda have also been attributed to a need to minimize the risk of derailing the main event of the summit, where members are expected to pledge to hike defense spending to 5% GDP. Trump has long demanded that NATO countries spend more on defense, and the new commitment will be regarded as a big 'win' by the US president, the sources suggested. 'He has to get credit for the 5% – that's why we're having the summit,' a European defense official told Politico. 'Everything else is being streamlined to minimize risk.'
