MBRSG to host fifth round of the Public Administration Forum under the theme 'Strategic Horizons'
Dubai, UAE – The Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government (MBRSG) hosted today the fifth round of the Public Administration Forum 2025 under the theme 'Strategic Horizons: The UAE Economic Diplomacy Report 2024-2025 – Advancing Policy, Trade, and Global Partnerships Through Evidence-Based Insights'.
The event took place at the School's premises in the Dubai World Trade Centre (DWTC), gathering an elite group of decision-makers, diplomats, economists and public policy experts, who discussed the evolving landscape of the UAE's economic diplomacy and explored its future trajectory amid ongoing geopolitical shifts and rapid global transformations.
This year's forum serves as a strategic platform for unveiling the UAE Economic Diplomacy Report 2024-2025, prepared by the Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy (AGDA) in collaboration with MBRSG, with contributions from local and international researchers.
His Excellency Dr. Ali bin Sebaa Al Marri, Executive President of MBRSG, said: 'We take great pride in this platform that brings together distinguished experts and decision-makers to explore emerging economic trends. The forum represents a pivotal milestone in supporting the UAE's efforts to build a forward-looking model of economic diplomacy – one grounded in knowledge and analysis, and aimed at enhancing the effectiveness and competitiveness of government decision-making. Our partnership with the Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy reflects our deep belief in the value of strategic collaboration in strengthening national capabilities to respond to global economic developments.'
His Excellency added: 'This year's report highlights the UAE's growing international prominence through clear indicators that reflect the strategic use of investment flows, economic partnerships, and sovereign wealth funds. We are confident that the forum's outcomes will help shape more agile and impactful economic policies, ensuring the UAE's readiness to address future challenges and seize emerging opportunities.'
From his side, Dr. Mohammed Ibrahim Al Dhaheri, Deputy Director-General of the Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy, emphasized the importance of the forum, stating: 'The Government Administration Forum serves as a strategic platform to reimagine economic diplomacy as a tool that reflects the nation's identity and global aspirations.' He explained that economic choices are no longer isolated technical decisions, but rather part of a broader narrative that requires capacity building, expanded partnerships, and the pursuit of inclusive and sustainable prosperity. He affirmed that the gathering of leaders and decision-makers during the forum reflects this direction and embodies the UAE's commitment to strengthening its global presence through innovation, integrity, and impact.
The report provided a comprehensive review of the UAE's economic diplomacy strategy, with a focus on key areas including the analysis of Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements (CEPAs) and their impact on national competitiveness, food security, and foreign direct investment (FDI) flows.
It also explored the role of sovereign wealth funds and state-owned enterprises in advancing the UAE's soft power and expanding its global economic influence. The report examined the country's approach to navigating changes in global trade, its leadership in integrating the digital economy and climate diplomacy, and presented case studies of successful UAE economic diplomacy in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Furthermore, it offered strategic recommendations to enhance institutional coordination, build diplomatic capacities, and integrate economic tools within the country's foreign policy framework.
Supported by recent indicators and statistics, the report underscored the effectiveness of the UAE's economic and diplomatic strategies. The country recorded FDI inflows of USD 30.7 billion in 2023, while the number of CEPAs reached 24 by 2024, with 16 agreements already in effect. The nation's sovereign wealth funds manage substantial assets, including the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (USD 993 billion), Mubadala Investment Company (USD 302 billion), and the Emirates Investment Authority (USD 87 billion).
The data also revealed the issuance of over 200,000 new business licenses in 2024, bringing the total number of active companies in the UAE to more than 1.1 million. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the country's GDP is projected to grow by 4.2% in 2025. UAE foreign aid remains a key pillar of its human-centred foreign policy, amounting to USD 3.45 billion in 2022, with USD 2.56 billion allocated to the most vulnerable nations.
These developments align with the vision of the UAE's leadership. His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, has affirmed that the country, under the leadership of His Highness Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, President of the UAE, is steadily advancing towards its goal of achieving AED 4 trillion in non-oil foreign trade by 2031 – four years ahead of schedule.
In Q1 2025, the UAE's non-oil foreign trade reached AED 835 billion, reflecting an 18.6% increase. Non-oil exports grew remarkably by 40.7%, reaching AED 177.3 billion and accounting for more than 21% of total foreign trade for the first time. The UAE's GDP stood at AED 1.77 trillion in 2024, with the non-oil sector contributing 75.5%.
The forum's activities commenced with an opening speech delivered by H.E. Dr. Ali bin Sebaa Al Marri, followed by a formal speech by HE Dr. Mohammed Ibrahim Al Dhaheri, Deputy Director General of AGDA, who highlighted the importance of economic diplomacy in strengthening the UAE's global standing and strategic partnerships.
The forum targeted a broad audience of stakeholders in the economic and diplomatic spheres, including government officials, economic diplomats, trade and policy experts, academics, business leaders, and students specialising in international affairs, fostering knowledge exchange and collaboration to shape a shared vision for the future of UAE economic diplomacy.
The event reaffirmed MBRSG's commitment to advancing national and international dialogue on economic and public policy issues, in line with its role as a research and academic institution that contributes to policy development and the nurturing of future Emirati leaders capable of driving economic transformation with agility and foresight.
The Forum's sessions covered the role of sovereign wealth funds, implications of the WTO's Abu Dhabi Ministerial Declaration, and policy evaluations linked to economic diplomacy. Discussions addressed the importance of strengthening the UAE's global economic partnerships, with contributions from Dr. Ahmed Rashad, Lead Researcher and General Editor of the Report and Assistant Professor of Economics at AGDA, Dr. Mona Mostafa El-Sholkamy, Professor of Macroeconomic Policies and Public Finance at MBRSG, HE Amb. Husain Haqqani, Senior Research Fellow and Diplomat in Residence at AGDA, Ms. Dina Abdullah – Senior Trade Specialist and Senior Policy Advisor. The Forum Sessions were moderated by Prof. Khalid Al Wazani, Professor of Economics and Public Policy at MBRSG, Dr. Fadi Salem, Policy Research Director at MBRSG, and Mohammed Galal, Head of News at Almal Channel, Dubai TV.
The fourth session shed light on the strategic and humanitarian dimensions of the UAE's foreign policy through a lecture titled 'The Strategic Importance of UAE Foreign Aid', delivered by H.E. Amb. Husain Haqqani, Senior Research Fellow and Diplomat-in-Residence at the Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy. The lecture explored how the UAE leverages its foreign aid programmes to broaden political and economic influence and deepen international cooperation, reflecting the human-centred foundation of its foreign policy.
The forum concluded with an open dialogue session that brought participants together from various disciplines to expand the scope of discussion and encourage cross-sectoral exchange among decision-makers, diplomats, business leaders, researchers, and students in international relations. The session highlighted the importance of knowledge and institutional integration in shaping a forward-looking UAE model of economic diplomacy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
39 minutes ago
- The National
IAEA warns of 'serious consequences' if Israel attacks Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant
An Israeli strike on Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant could have 'most serious' consequences, the head of the UN's atomic watchdog warned on Friday, raising concern over possible regional escalation. 'It is an operating nuclear power plant and as such it hosts thousands of kilograms of nuclear material,' International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi told the UN Security Council. 'Countries of the region have reached out directly to me to express their concerns. I want to make it absolutely and completely clear: In case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit could result in a very high release of radioactivity to the environment.' Mr Grossi warned that, should Israel target the power lines supplying electricity to the plant, the consequences could be 'severe' within and beyond the boundaries of Iran. Residents may be required to take iodine tablets and could face food and water shortages. He spoke a day after an Israeli military official said a representative's statement saying a strike had been carried out on Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear power plant, was a 'mistake'. He said he could neither confirm nor deny that the Russian-built Bushehr plant, located on the Gulf coast, had been hit. Iran's UN ambassador Amir Iravani accused Israel of attacking civilians and urged the Security Council to respond. 'If the Council fails to act now, it will send a message that international law and resolution apply selectively,' he said. He also voiced concern over 'credible reports that the United States … may be joining this war ', warning that such involvement would violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and threaten global security. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres called on Iran to uphold and 'respect' its commitments under the NPT and reiterated Tehran's previous statements that it is not seeking nuclear weapons. Israel's ambassador lashed out at Iran's envoy for requesting an emergency Security Council session. 'How dare you? How dare you write five letters in the last week? Come before this council demand the session and ask the international community for sympathy?' Danny Danon said. 'How dare you ask the international community to protect you from the consequences of your own genocidal agenda? Have you no shame? 'Iran has already enriched uranium to near weapons-grade levels. It cannot be denied. We saw the reports. It has built deep underground facilities designed to survive bunker-busting bombs. It has advanced missile delivery systems, and it has lied to the IAEA and the world at every step.' He described Israel as 'holding the line between civilisation and genocidal jihadist imperialism'. 'Iran doesn't just want to destroy Israel, it wants to remake the world order, one missile, one terror proxy, one destroyed hospital at a time,' Mr Danon said. Russia, which has citizens working at Bushehr, said the internationalisation of the Israel-Iran conflict should be avoided. Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's UN envoy, called for immediate de-escalation and urged the council to avoid 'another devastating' war that would have unpredictable repercussions for the entire region and world. 'Not a single of the member states of this body is under more stringent oversight and scrutiny. Iran has been strictly complying with its obligations under the NPT,' he said. 'Today, the US, yet again, together with the UK, France and Germany, is attempting to persuade all parties to believe the groundless fabrications about plans allegedly harboured by Tehran to gain possession of nuclear weapons.' The US has long believed that Iran has been working on developing a nuclear weapon – something Tehran denies. US President Donald Trump has reiterated that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Concern is high that the US will soon join the conflict and strike Iran. But the US ambassador said it is 'not too late' for Iran 'to do the right thing'. 'President Trump has been clear in recent days that Iran's leadership must completely abandon its nuclear enrichment programme and all aspirations of acquiring a nuclear weapon,' said acting US ambassador Dorothy Shea. 'We can no longer ignore that Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon. All it needs is a decision from their supreme leader [ Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ].' China, meanwhile, called for an immediate ceasefire, saying Israel's actions violate international law and international norms, threaten Iran's sovereignty and security, and undermine regional peace. China's UN Ambassador Fu Cong warned that the situation must not be allowed to spiral into an 'unknown abyss'. Kuwait, speaking on behalf of the Gulf Cooperation Council condemned Israeli attacks on Iran and its nuclear facilities, warning they posed 'dangerous repercussions' for regional security and stability. 'They are a blatant violation of the principles of international law and the UN Charter, and they thwart international efforts to achieve peace and de-escalation,' Faisal Al Enezi, charge d'affaires at Kuwait's mission to the UN told the Council. He added that the GCC is intensifying diplomatic efforts at the highest levels to prevent further escalation, emphasising that diplomacy and dialogue remain the 'only choice and alternative' to confrontation and escalation. Mr Al Enezi warned that continued deterioration of the situation could have 'catastrophic consequences', fuelling broader regional tensions and closing the door on a peaceful resolution.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Money & Me: ‘Raising Dh2 million in funding for my start-up is a milestone'
For Jennifer Cohan Solal, buying a home in Dubai and raising funds for her UAE-based retail start-up are major financial milestones. The French citizen, 37, who lives on Dubai's Palm Jumeirah with her husband and two children, is chief executive and co-founder of Hushday, a premium flash sales platform. The company offers limited-time flash sales from luxury and premium brands in a members-only space for the digital-first generation. In April, it raised more than Dh2 million ($550,000) in pre-seed funding. Launched just this year, Hushday offers members access to sales across fashion, beauty, accessories, electronics, home and leisure products. The company is already considering plans to grow beyond the UAE and expand operations into Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait. 'We're not here to patch a post-Covid inventory issue. We're here to open a new, scalable path for growth for brands who want to reach a younger, price-sensitive, digital audience,' says Ms Solal, who has lived in Dubai for more than two years. 'We found our paradise here as entrepreneurs. There's something very inspiring about the UAE's pace, vision and ambition. It's the best choice we've ever made.' Before moving to the Emirates, Ms Solal worked in fashion and e-commerce sectors for more than 12 years and studied marketing at a French business school. Did wealth feature in your childhood? What did you learn from it? I grew up in a fairly privileged environment. Both my parents were doctors, but nothing was handed to them. They arrived in France from Algeria with nothing, and built their lives through hard work and education. That influenced me the most, seeing first-hand how much it takes to succeed and how deeply independence and resilience are rooted in our family culture. So even though we never lacked anything, my parents always told me to be careful and thoughtful about money, and above all, to rely on myself. That mix of stability and drive has shaped every decision I've made. How did you first earn? My first job was with a start-up when I was 18. I launched a luxury concierge service company in Paris by procuration for a woman who had an amazing idea, but no time to execute it. So, I did everything from A to Z for her and gained more recognition and experience than money. I enjoyed the feeling of autonomy, the sense that if I wanted something, I had the power to go out and make it happen. My first real job was with The Other Store, and my job was to create and manage e-commerce websites for brands. I was 20 years old and got paid €1,000 ($1,154) a month. Any early financial jolts? The biggest financial setback was when I left the corporate world to launch my first start-up, L'Ultime, in Paris. I call it the first digital native vertical brand in pastry. Although the brand gained strong visibility in France, the media attention was incredible and the revenue looked exciting, I quickly learnt the difference between revenue and profit and between brand hype and sustainable growth. So, it was humbling, but also an incredible experience. I met a lot of inspiring people and understood the deeper mechanics of running a business. It made me a stronger and responsible entrepreneur. How do you grow your wealth? I'm in reinvestment mode, so I pour most of my capital into building a long-term vision for Hushday. I have also invested in Dubai real estate. My husband and I purchased a villa on Palm Jumeirah two years ago. We also have property investments in France. Are you a spender or a saver? I'm more of a spender now, but spend consciously. I invest in my business, in quality experiences with my family and in our lifestyle. But I aspire to become more of a saver in the years to come because I want to build a legacy and create a financial foundation that brings freedom, not stress. Have you been wise with money? Yes, I've always been careful with money. I don't take reckless risks such as big spending sprees or flashy purchases, apart from the occasional luxuries I need during sales or beautiful family trips. I've never lived beyond my means. I was raised to be intentional with money and that has stayed with me. Even now as I build my company, I make sure that every dirham I spend serves a purpose and receives a return on investment. What has been your best investment? My best investment was on my own education and self-development, in my children's education and in Dubai. We love this city and feel aligned with its energy and ambition. We are committed to creating something meaningful here for our family and the ecosystem. Any cherished purchases? Yes, everything in our home is a cherished purchase. All items, from the furniture to the decorations, have been chosen with intention. I spent a lot of time and energy to build our home. I love the feeling when people walk in and say it doesn't feel like a house, but a home. Every morning, my husband and I almost cry when we wake up and see the sun and sea in front of us. How do you feel about money? Money is just a consequence, it's not a goal. It gives you freedom, but it doesn't define success. For me, what matters most is creating an impact, leaving a mark and building something lasting. Being the richest person in the cemetery never interested me. I want to do something that lives beyond me and make my children and family proud. Any financial advice for your younger self? Start saving earlier, not out of fear, but to gain freedom. Understand that money buys you time, leverage and peace of mind. Use it to invest in skills, ideas and people who elevate you. Never confuse visibility with value. Also understand that growth is quiet, but compounding is magic. Any key financial milestones? Raising our first round of funding for Hushday was huge, not just because of the capital but the confidence it signalled from people who believe in our vision. Another milestone was buying our home in Dubai before we moved here from Paris. It was a statement of trust in ourselves, in our family and in the life we're choosing to build here. What luxuries are important to you? Spending quality time with family and friends, discovering new places and getting lost in different cultures. When we will eventually be free from work, my husband and I plan to do a world tour. So, it's not always about price, but about the richness of experience and emotions. What are your financial goals? Financial independence is non-negotiable. But right now, my main focus is on creating value and building Hushday into the future leader of premium private sales in the Gulf region. I want to create strong returns for investors and build a brand that resonates across borders.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Iran's history points to the direction the country could take
Israel's attacks on Iran last week sent the two countries to war, marking a turning point in each of their histories. It is Iran's first major war since 1988, when its eight-year-long conflict with Iraq came to an end. Israel's shock-and-awe campaign has targeted not just Iran's nuclear programme, the main casus belli, but also the political and military leadership of the Islamic Republic. Israeli and American leaders, meanwhile, have engaged in doublespeak on the question of whether they seek regime change. Regardless of their war aims, the possibility of a seismic political shift has been starkly posed in Iran. This is particular so because of the many years of economic hardship and social upheaval that have exerted tremendous pressures on the current establishment. Many are now wondering about the political consequences of the war for the Islamic Republic and the rule of its 86-year-old leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In trying to understand the present moment, historians inevitably turn to the past. Iran's centuries-long history provides many examples of upheavals and regime change. Which historical moments are most suitable to give us a sense of where the country is at today? One inescapable point of comparison is the 1979 revolution, which replaced Mohammad Reza Pahlavi – known more widely then as the Shah of Iran – with the current establishment. But as the Islamic Republic faces one of the biggest challenges in its 46-year history, what is the likelihood that Iranians will once again rise up for the reasons noted above? Any comparison between 2025 and 1979 quickly shows why a similar revolution is much less likely to happen today. In 1979, the Shah's opponents had an overarching leader to rally behind. Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini pulled together a diverse coalition of nationalists, Marxists and Islamists to support him as an alternative. Although he was a dyed-in-wool Islamist, Khomeini was careful not to dispel other groups, particularly in the early days. Any comparison between 2025 and 1979 quickly shows why a radical change in the country's power structure is much less likely today He had in his team more veterans from within Iran's nationalist movement than fellow clerics. Khomeini also used the broad network of mosques inside the country to organise. Other opposition groups also had extensive and disciplined networks across Iran. By contrast, the opponents of the Islamic Republic today are bitterly divided, lack networks inside the country and don't have any credible organisations either inside or abroad. Reza Pahlavi, the 64-year-old son of the Shah who is currently living in exile, has attempted to pitch himself as the singular leader of the opposition. But he lacks broad-based support or organisation, without either of which it is impossible to stage an uprising that seriously challenges the Islamic Republic. Even a spontaneous movement – such as the ones in 2017-19 and 2022-23 – is unlikely to go far without organised leadership. Rather than change being imposed from the outside, it is much likelier to happen from within the establishment. Again, Iranian history has a number of examples of military figures taking up the reins of their country during moments of acute crises. The best-known example in modern times is the one mounted by Mr Pahlavi's eponymous grandfather – and the father of the deposed Shah – who rose from a lowly military position to lead a British-backed coup in 1921. Reza Pahlavi appointed himself prime minister and, after considering the idea of establishing a republic, abolished the Qajar dynasty in 1925 and created a new monarchical dynasty. The Qajars, who had run Iran since the late 1700s, had become enfeebled by the early 20th century creating the conditions necessary for change. It is conceivable that figures from inside the Islamic Republic's establishment will similarly rise to assume power. It is also possible that instead of a typical military coup, a broadly representative committee consisting of politicians and military figures takes over. Iran also experienced regime change in 1941 and 1953, both of which took place with extensive support from foreign powers. In 1941, the Soviet Union and Britain invaded the country during the Second World War before deposing Reza Pahlavi and replacing him with his son, the Shah. Twelve years later, the CIA and MI6 helped bring down the democratically elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh and reinstated the Shah, who had been reduced to a mere figurehead, as the country's ruler. It's worth pointing out that, while the British aided Reza Pahlavi during the 1921 coup, the support had been limited and the operation very much led from within. By contrast, the 1953 coup was planned and carried out by Washington and London, albeit with local support from Iran's armed forces. It's extremely unlikely that the US and its allies can carry out a similar operation today, since they lack the level of political penetration the West had in 1953. The US remains the only foreign power capable of mounting a ground invasion of Iran, but the American public has little appetite for such an intervention – particularly after the misguided invasion and occupation of Iraq two decades earlier. While it is possible for some to imagine the US and Israel deposing Mr Khamenei, this scenario also remains unlikely. For without boots on the ground, any transition process will be chaotic, unwieldy and perhaps even met with resistance from several quarters. There is also little guarantee that a more friendly government will emerge from this process. By comparing the current moment to what happened in 1921, 1941, 1953 and 1979, we can conclude that, if there was to be a change, something akin to the 1921 coup is perhaps the most relevant model. A primarily Iranian-led power usurpation is more likely than a popular revolution (1979), a foreign-organised coup (1953) or change as a consequence of foreign occupation (1941). It remains to be seen whether there are elements inside Iran's armed forces or political establishment who would make such an ambitious dash for power, given all the risks that it will involve. It certainly appears that the Islamic Republic is on the cusp of change, given the many pressures emanating from within and beyond Iran's boundaries today. Time will tell what that change actually entails.
