Extradition hearing starts for Indonesian businessman said to have bribed officials

Indonesian Paulus Tannos, also known as Tjhin Thian Po, was arrested in Singapore on Jan 17. PHOTO: SCREENGRAB FROM KPK.GO.ID
Extradition hearing starts for Indonesian businessman said to have bribed officials
SINGAPORE – A court hearing is taking place here that will determine whether an Indonesian businessman in a high-profile corruption case will be extradited to his home country.
The hearing on June 23 regarding Paulus Tannos, also known as Tjhin Thian Po, is Singapore's first such proceeding under its extradition treaty with Indonesia.
Tannos has been implicated in a major graft scandal involving the Indonesian government's issuing of electronic ID card – known as e-KTP – allegedly causing state losses of about 2.3 trillion rupiah (S$187 million).
The Indonesian fugitive, who is believed to have been living in Singapore since 2017, faces one charge of corruption under Indonesia law which is punishable with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
The crux of the hearing is to determine whethe r there is enough evidence to support the corruption charge Tannos is facing, so he can be sent back to Indonesia.
In extradition hearings, the State does not have to prove the fugitive's guilt or secure a conviction. It only has to show that there is enough evidence for the fugitive to face trial if his acts had taken place in Singapore.
Delivering the State's opening statement, Deputy Solicitor-General Vincent Leow said the State would rely on evidence submitted by Indonesian authorities.
Tannos was the president and director of technology company PT Sandipala Arthaputra, which was a member of the PNRI Consortium – a grouping of companies that won the e-KTP tender in 2011.
DSG Leow said under the alleged corruption scheme, the consortium paid 'commitment fees' to officials of the Ministry of Home Affairs of Indonesia (MOHA), which was responsible for the e-KTP tender.
Bribes were also allegedly given to members of the House of Representatives of Indonesia, otherwise known as DPR-RI, who appropriated and allocated the government's budget for the project.
The gratification amounted to 10 per cent of the total project value, split equally amongst MOHA officials and DPR-RI.
According to Indonesian authorities, Tannos eventually paid US$530,000 to a MOHA officer and approximately US$3,799,842 to former Indonesian politician Setya Novanto through the latter's associate.
'The Indonesian authorities' position is that the payment of these 'commitment fees' resulted in the manipulation of the decision-making process regarding the e-KTP project and tender, and that the PNRI Consortium won the tender through unlawful methods,' said DSG Leow.
Chief Special Investigator Alvin Tang of the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) – the State's only witness – took the stand to give evidence on how he arrested Tannos and brought him to the State Courts.
Meanwhile, Tannos' defence lawyer Bachoo Mohan Singh argued that there were about 100 pages in the formal extradition request that were added after the stipulated deadline, and should hence be thrown out.
Tannos' other defence lawyer, Mr Suang Wijaya, also objected to the admission of documents prepared by Indonesian authorities as he said they were not 'duly authenticated'.
For example, an English document said to be the translation of Tannos' arrest warrant did not have a stamp with official authorisation, said Mr Wijaya.
The hearing continues till June 25.
Tannos has reportedly been on Indonesia's fugitive list since Oct 19, 2021. He was arrested on Jan 17 by CPIB, and Indonesia put in a formal extradition request on Feb 24.
The extradition treaty between Singapore and Indonesia took effect on March 21, 2024.
It grants extradition for a list of offences, including corruption, money laundering and bribery, and can be retrospectively applied to crimes committed up to 18 years ago.
Christine Tan is a journalist at The Straits Times reporting on crime, justice and social issues in Singapore.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Times

an hour ago

• Business Times

Middle East conflict could drive up Singapore's inflation, warn economists, after core inflation dips in May

[SINGAPORE] Escalating tensions in the Middle East could spark a new wave of inflationary pressures, warned private sector economists, even as Singapore's authorities kept to their full-year inflation forecast. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) on Monday (Jun 23) left their 2025 core inflation forecast of 0.5 to 1.5 per cent unchanged, after May's inflation readings dipped from the previous month. According to data from Department of Statistics, Singapore's core and headline inflation edged down to 0.6 per cent and 0.8 per cent respectively, in line with economists' expectations. On a month-on-month basis, core inflation was flat while headline inflation rose 0.7 per cent. Still, private-sector economists warned that the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran could bring a spike in oil and energy prices, and consequently put upward pressure on Singapore's inflation. This prompted UOB to raise its full-year core inflation forecast to 0.8 per cent, from 0.7 per cent, in 2025, and 1.6 per cent, from 1.3 per cent, in 2026, under its base case of a 'weaker pass through from higher oil prices' and a gradual de-escalation in geopolitical tensions. In the bank's worst case, core inflation could surge to 2.6 per cent in the first quarter of 2026, while moderating to 2.1 per cent in the second half of next year. Overall, core inflation could average 1.2 per cent and 2.3 per cent, respectively, in 2025 and 2026. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Its associate economist, Jester Koh, estimates that about 7.7 per cent of the overall consumer price index (CPI) basket could be directly impacted by higher oil prices, including components such as electricity, gas, petrol, point-to-point transport services, airfares, transport services of goods, as well as bus and train fares. 'Additionally, the spillover effects of higher utility, transportation and input costs on both goods and services inflation could be significant,' he added. According to UOB's estimates, year-on-year core inflation could rise by five to six basis points for every US$1 per oil barrel increase in Brent crude oil prices. Further, any supply-led spike in oil prices could filter through to Singapore's inflation 'largely within three to four months', said Koh in a research note. Meanwhile, RHB maintained its core inflation forecast of 1.1 per cent – but at the higher end of the official forecast range, the forecast factors a potential spike in oil prices driving higher global inflation. 'The recent US involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict, including strikes on Iranian territory, has driven oil prices higher over the weekend, extending a three-week rally,' said economists Barnabas Gan and Laalitha Raveenthar. 'Imported goods and services may become more expensive if global supply chains are disrupted or rerouted due to regional conflict.' Monetary policy settings MAS and MTI, however, said that the impact of the trade conflicts and higher global energy prices on Singapore is likely to be offset by the disinflationary drags exerted by weaker global demand. 'While crude oil prices have risen in recent weeks, they are for now still close to the average in 2024,' they said. Singapore's imported inflation thus should remain moderate. Agreeing, Maybank economists Chua Hak Bin and Brian Lee said imported prices should remain contained due to weak global demand and contained food commodity prices, amid abundant supply conditions. An appreciating Singapore nominal effective exchange rate (S$NEER) will also put a lid on imported costs, the economists added. Against this uncertain outlook, economists largely expect MAS to maintain its current policy stance in the upcoming July monetary policy meeting. Said Maybank's Dr Chua and Lee: 'Inflation remains contained, while growth is slowing to a more sustainable pace.' RHB's Gan and Raveenthar, however, believe rising volatility could prompt MAS to widen the S$NEER policy band, while maintaining the current appreciation slope. They also do not rule out the possibility of MAS flattening the slope of the policy band in future reviews, should trade tensions escalate again or if global demand slows more sharply than anticipated. 'While the headline and core inflation remain contained, the balance of risk has tilted towards the need to support growth, given rising external uncertainties,' said Gan and Raveenthar. The outlier was UOB's Koh, who expects MAS to flatten the S$NEER slope in the upcoming review. 'We assess that the economic outlook still warrants a further easing move,' said Koh, adding, however, that MAS may choose to delay monetary policy easing to the subsequent October policy meeting instead. 'Greater clarity could emerge with regard to tariff policy, the Middle East conflict and economic data (between July and the subsequent policy meeting in October), conferring the advantage for MAS to adjust monetary policy possibly with more comprehensive information.' Key CPI categories In May, most consumer price index (CPI) categories saw easing prices, except for accommodation and services inflation, which was unchanged from the month before. Food inflation eased to 1.1 per cent, from 1.4 per cent previously, as the prices of non-cooked food rose at a slower pace. Meanwhile, electricity and gas inflation fell further to 3.7 per cent, from a fall of 3.5 per cent, due to a larger decline in electricity prices. Retail and other goods prices continued to fall, but at a slower pace of 1 per cent, compared to a decline of 1.2 per cent previously, due to increases in the prices of household appliances, which offset a smaller decline in the cost of personal effects. Private transport inflation rose at a slower pace of 1.1 per cent, from 1.3 per cent previously, on the back of a smaller increase in car prices. Meanwhile, both services and accommodation inflation were unchanged from the previous month, at 1.1 per cent, respectively.

Business Times

an hour ago

• Business Times

Israel vs Iran: Navigating a new regime of geopolitical risk

ISRAEL'S 'pre-emptive' strikes directly against Iran on Jun 13 represents a meaningful escalation in what had been Israel's ongoing battle against primarily Iranian proxies. It now represents a direct confrontation between regional powers in the Middle East, drawing a red line which Israel has not crossed previously in its long-running conflict. Following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, we analysed geopolitical conflicts since World War II as categorised by the Glenview Trust, an investment adviser. Major power conflicts (US-Soviet primarily) and short-lived conflicts between 'mismatched adversaries' proved limited in their impact on US equity returns. In contrast, more prolonged conflicts (such as the Russia-Ukraine war that began in 2022) generated more headwinds for US equity markets in both their initial stages as well as over the year after they started. Most impactful: energy market disruptions Regional conflicts which result in energy market disruption – notably Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait and Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine – have been among the most impactful and prolonged regional cross-border conflicts based on our analysis. Thus, while the humanitarian costs of such conflicts are paramount, for investors, the prospect of spillover to global energy flows poses the most imminent risk to global capital markets, in our view. With press reports indicating that Israel has attacked Iranian refineries and storage capacity as well as its Pars natural gas field, BCA Research suggests that these facilities are primarily for domestic Iranian use rather than for export. This is consistent with growing signs of Israel's intent to foment domestic instability and 'regime change' in Iran, rather than – for now – to disrupt Iran's energy exports and potentially roil global energy markets. Despite this and in light of the recent US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, global energy prices have begun to factor in the prospect of more sustained disruption. Prices have increased not only in spot markets, but also in futures markets as far as 12 months out. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In contrast, the 2019 Iranian strikes on Saudi energy infrastructure proved temporary in their impact on global oil supply. There was limited effect on six and 12-month oil futures prices in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. Admittedly, the June moves in crude prices remain short of the market pricing following both the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait as well as the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, which resulted in prolonged disruption in global energy flows, leaving risk for markets should further escalation emerge. It is important to recognise that both the 1990 and 2022 energy market shocks were met by releases from the US' Strategic Petroleum Reserves that mitigated the longevity of the supply shocks. In 2022-23, the US released more than 300 million barrels of crude from its 650 million barrel stockpile, helping to bring down prices in the aftermath of the Russian invasion and ensuing sanctions. However, having only recently begun to restock and with only 400 million barrels in storage, it is unclear if the US could provide yet another comparable supply offset to a global oil supply shock, should the direct Israel-Iran conflict spur one. Risks of an oil supply shock We see two key risks to such a shock. First, should Israel's strategies evolve and it moves to strike Iran's primary energy export terminals at Kharg Island, this could directly impact Iran's 1.5 million to two million barrels of crude exports – a meaningful, but potentially a replaceable amount in the 100 million barrel per day global market. However, much like Russia's response to European efforts to limit Russian energy exports in the aftermath of Russia's 2022 Ukraine invasion, Iran may seek to weaponise global energy prices, either in response to an Israeli move against Iran's oil terminals by moving to disrupt or even close the movement of the nearly 20 million barrels of supply through the Persian Gulf bottleneck in the Straits of Hormuz. Such a volume would not be quickly replaceable globally. The second risk involves a shift in Iranian calculus. With Israel having struck Iran's nuclear facilities with more traditional 'bunker-busting' munitions, Iran has seen damage to its nuclear supply chain according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Should Iran's leadership perceive a weakening or should the recent follow-on US strikes use more advanced munitions to further degrade the capabilities of Iranian nuclear deterrence, Iran may turn pro-actively to Russia's 2022 approach. In this instance, it would seek to impose – at a minimum – 2022-style costs on global and western economies, in the hopes that the US and European countries can rein in what appears to be currently unconstrained Israeli efforts at regime change. Economically, we estimate that the recent rises in energy prices – following the initial stages of the conflict – pose only modest risk to current global inflation trajectories. However, current levels of global crude prices means we have seen the trough in US inflation momentum – which Patrice Gautry, Union Bancaire Privee's global chief economist, had been anticipating since early 2025. Inflation catalysts Looking ahead, however, the battle against inflation globally, which many had hoped would be won in 2025, would face potentially three catalysts for higher prices: US President Donald Trump's tariffs; broadening fiscal policy stimulus in the US, Europe and potentially China; and the prospect for a global energy supply shock on the horizon. Beyond this, though the recent escalations in the Israel-Iran and US-Iran conflict are worrisome in themselves, investors should also recognise that a growing range of events – including India-Pakistan and Russia-Ukraine tension – have crossed red lines that previously constrained both sides in long-running conflicts. They likely represent a growing series of events presaging a regime of elevated geopolitical volatility. That such events are occurring with greater frequency may indicate that the global powers – US, Russia and China – are either no longer willing or, more troubling, unable to constrain their surrogates at maintaining the historical status quo in these regional conflicts. This suggests that investors should expect nations involved in such regional conflagrations to embark on new and disruptive journeys to establish new equilibria. For financial market participants, it suggests that the periodic spikes in volatility seen in equity and bond markets are part of this new equilibrium. This requires a proactive risk management approach as a core part of investors' portfolio allocations. The writer is group chief strategist at Union Bancaire Privee, a private bank and wealth management firm

AsiaOne

2 hours ago

• AsiaOne

US attack on Iran: Singapore Airlines halts flights to Dubai , Singapore News

All Singapore Airlines (SIA) flights to and from Dubai have been cancelled till Wednesday (June 25). In an update posted to their website today, the national carrier cited the uncertain "geopolitical situation in the Middle East" as a reason for the cancellations. The SQ494 flight from Singapore to Dubai, and the SQ495 flight from Dubai to Singapore, have been cancelled till June 25. SIA also said that the situation remains "fluid", and that its other flights between Singapore and Dubai may be subsequently affected. The airline advised customers to stay updated on the latest information on their flights through the SIA flight status page. Cancellations by other airlines Other airlines are also reportedly weighing their options amid the US-Iran crisis. French airline Air France cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Riyadh on Sunday and Monday, while Finnair cancelled flights from Doha until Tuesday, reported Reuters. Air France has also suspended all flights to and from Tel Aviv indefinitely, reported the Sydney Morning Herald. US carrier United Airlines has also suspended all flights to Tel Aviv until July 31 and will "continue to evaluate an appropriate return date with the safety of our customers and crews as our top priority", reported UK's The Independent. [[nid:719372]]