‘Deviant' or not? Sisters in Islam awaits Federal Court verdict today on Selangor fatwa
Today, Federal Court to decide on Sisters in Islam's challenge against Selangor fatwa labelling it deviant
KUALA LUMPUR, June 19 — Muslim women's rights group Sisters in Islam (SIS) will find out today whether it will remain labelled 'deviant' in Selangor, and whether its publications risk seizure or its website could be blocked.
For more than 10 years, SIS has been challenging a Selangor fatwa which labels it as deviant, and this court battle will finally come to an end today at the Federal Court.
The Federal Court's five-judge panel, chaired by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, is expected to deliver its decision this morning on whether the Selangor fatwa is valid and applies to SIS.
Here's a quick guide to all you need to know ahead of today's upcoming decision:
1. What is SIS?
SIS, founded in 1988 and which operates through the company SIS Forum (Malaysia), is known for pushing for law reforms and promoting women's rights.
It has also been giving free legal advice to Muslims in Malaysia on their legal rights under Islamic family law and local laws on Shariah criminal offences.
2. What does the Selangor fatwa against SIS say?
On July 31, 2014, the Selangor state government gazetted a fatwa which declared SIS Forum (Malaysia) and any individual, organisation or institution who hold on to 'liberalism and religious pluralism' as 'deviants' from Islamic teachings.
The fatwa also says:
Any publications with elements of liberalism and religious pluralism should be banned and can be seized.
The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) is to block social websites that go against Islamic teachings and hukum syarak (Islamic law).
Any individuals holding on to liberalism and religious pluralism should repent and return to Islam.
Since the fatwa or religious edict was gazetted, it became legally-binding in Selangor.
3. What did SIS want in its constitutional challenge?
On October 31, 2014, SIS Forum (Malaysia) filed for judicial review in the civil courts to challenge the constitutionality and legality of the Selangor fatwa.
The court challenge named three respondents: the Selangor Fatwa Committee, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (Mais) and the Selangor state government.
In short, here are the court orders that SIS Forum (Malaysia) wanted the High Court to make:
to declare the state's fatwa goes against federal laws (Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984's Section 7 and the Communications and Multimedia Act's Section 3) and the Federal Constitution (Article 5, 8, 10, 11)
to declare that the fatwa cannot apply on SIS Forum as it is a company, and as the Selangor Islamic authorities only have jurisdiction over individuals professing the religion of Islam
to quash or cancel the fatwa.
4. What did the High Court and Court of Appeal say?
On August 27, 2019, the High Court dismissed SIS Forum's fatwa challenge as it ruled that the civil courts have no jurisdiction to hear the case, and that the Shariah courts should be the one to hear and decide it.
The High Court also said the fatwa did not go against federal laws and the Federal Constitution, and that the fatwa applies to SIS Forum even though it is a company as its directors are Muslim.
On March 14, 2023, the Court of Appeal in a 2-1 decision also dismissed SIS Forum's fatwa challenge, with the majority agreeing with the High Court.
Following those court rulings, SIS Forum appealed to the Federal Court.
5. What the Federal Court was asked to decide today
Over two days of hearings on December 2, 2024 and on March 12, 2025, the Federal Court was asked to consider 10 complex questions about the Federal Constitution and other laws.
Some of the key issues covered by these questions are whether fatwas that are gazetted would become subsidiary laws, and whether the civil courts would then have the power to review the constitutionality and legality of gazetted fatwas.
Other issues covered are the procedures that the Selangor fatwa committee should follow under a 2003 Selangor state law when making fatwas, such as whether it should have given SIS the opportunity to be heard first, and if the making of such fatwas cannot restrict or prohibit the constitutionally-guaranteed right of freedom of expression.
Other key issues are on whether companies can be treated as persons professing the religion of Islam, and whether the Selangor Fatwa Committee has the power to include directives — such as to ban publications and to block websites — to the federal government or the state government when making fatwas.
In short, the Federal Court was asked to consider if fatwas can apply to companies like SIS Forum, and if Selangor had followed procedures in making this fatwa and if the fatwa goes against constitutional rights such as equality, freedom of expression, freedom of religion.
6. What about that other Federal Court decision? And what is Section 66A about?
Just months after SIS started its judicial review case in the civil courts to challenge the fatwa, Selangor amended a state law to introduce Section 66A to give Selangor's Shariah courts the power to carry out judicial reviews.
The High Court in August 2019 had actually mentioned Section 66A as enabling SIS to apply for a judicial review of the fatwa in the Shariah courts, while also ruling that it is the Shariah courts that have the power to review the Selangor fatwa against SIS.
SIS then filed a separate court case at the Federal Court to challenge Section 66A.
On February 21, 2022, the Federal Court declared Section 66A as invalid and unconstitutional as it said Selangor does not have the powers to make the law to give judicial review powers to Shariah courts, and also made it clear that only civil courts have judicial review powers.
SIS's fatwa challenge then continued on, and its lawyers have also relied on the Federal Court's 2022 decision to say that civil courts have the power to review fatwas based on constitutional matters and that companies cannot profess a religion.
7. Why is the SIS court challenge important?
Today, the Federal Court will have a chance to make clear whether state religious authorities can apply fatwas on companies, and also the scope of powers and role played by state religious authorities as well as the procedures required, among other things.
In a list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) provided to the media earlier this week, SIS explained that it filed the judicial review 'not to challenge Islam', but to defend its constitutional rights as a civil organisation and to uphold justice in line with Islamic values.
'This case is not simply about a single fatwa or one organisation — it is a landmark test of constitutional boundaries affecting the rule of law in Malaysia,' SIS explained in its compilation of information about the case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
6 judges honoured with rare elevation ceremony in Penang
The six judges with presiding senior Justice Rozana Ali Yusoff after the elevation ceremony at the High Court in George Town. GEORGE TOWN : Six High Court judges were honoured at a rare judicial elevation ceremony here today, reviving a long-standing tradition with roots dating back over two centuries. Today's ceremony presided over by senior judge Justice Rozana Ali Yusoff was the first to honour six judges at once. They were: Quay Chew Soon, Anand Ponnudurai, Azizan Arshad, Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James, Fathiyah Idris and Rofiah Mohamad. Penang Bar chair Gowri Subbaiyah said the elevation ceremony usually takes place only when judicial commissioners are confirmed as High Court judges, 'which usually takes two to three years'. However, some among the six judges had been confirmed over the past three years but had not been formally recognised. 'Since they are still serving here, we felt it was only right to include them,' she said. It is understood that the elevation ceremony was last held in 2017, when Justice Lim Chong Fong, now a judge at the Court of Appeal, was elevated to the High Court. After today's ceremony, Justice St James described his confirmation as both humbling and liberating. 'I'm beholden to no one now. Only to God, my oath, the Constitution, and the rule of law,' he said. Justice Quay said his time in Penang had been both challenging and rewarding. 'I've enjoyed the cases, especially the complex ones, as they test the mind. And I've enjoyed the food and the people even more,' he said, adding that Penang was 'the best station a judge could hope for'. Justice Fathiyah paid tribute to the senior lawyers who helped her grow when she was a sessions court judge in Ipoh. Justice Anand, best known for his work in employment law, said the variety of cases in Penang had pushed him to grow. 'I've had to learn Acts of Parliament I never knew existed. And it's been worth it,' he said. 'My guiding rule is simple. I must be honest with myself. If I sign a judgment, it's because I believe it's the right decision.' The elevation ceremony is believed to have its beginnings in 1808 when the colonial settlement received its charter of justice, which led to the founding of the first formal court. Elevation ceremonies used to include a procession where judges would walk in full regalia from St George's Church to the court building. Although public processions are no longer held, the 'ceremonial spirit lives on', according to lawyer T Tharumarajah, who said the ceremony is aimed at introducing new judges to the public. It also serves as a bridge between the bar and the bench. He said: 'Judges and lawyers are meant to engage (with one another), not keep apart. But after the scandals that rocked the judiciary in the early 2000s, that bond weakened. It shouldn't be that way.'
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Abang Jo to ‘table something' at special Sarawak assembly sitting
Sarawak premier Abang Johari Openg is expected to table a bill at a special one-day sitting of the state assembly. PETALING JAYA : The Sarawak legislative assembly will convene on July 7 for a special one-day sitting, with state premier Abang Johari Openg expected to table a bill. The Borneo Post reported that a letter on the special sitting, which starts at 9am, has been sent to assemblymen, although the purpose was not disclosed. Sarawak deputy premier Dr Sim Kui Hian was also reticent about the agenda of the meeting when asked by reporters, saying simply that Abang Johari would be 'tabling something' on the day without elaborating further.
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Port Klang rep confident columbarium near mosque won't be built
Villagers protesting against the proposed columbarium project next to a mosque in Klang. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Port Klang assemblyman Azmizam Zaman Huri has expressed confidence that the Klang Royal City Council (MBDK) will reject a proposal to build a four-storey columbarium near the Kampung Raja Uda mosque in Klang. He said the developer had failed to present or justify the suitability of the project in a Malay-majority area, Bernama reported. Azmizam said the proposal was clearly unsuitable as the land zoning under the MBDK local plan up to 2035 specifies the proposed project site is meant to be 'a limited commercial area'. Today, he was present at a public hearing on the project attended by the residents, the developer and the town planning department. It was chaired by MBDK deputy mayor Zary Affendi Arif at the council's building in Klang. Azmizam, who led the residents in protesting against the proposal, said that under current laws, only 28 types of limited commercial activities were allowed in the area – none of which include the construction of a memorial or columbarium. He urged MBDK to give an assurance that no construction would be allowed at the proposed site unless official approval is obtained, in line with Section 19 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1976 (Act 172). Kampung Raja Uda mosque nazir (administrator) Ismail Arsat voiced concern that the village's status as part of the royal city could be tarnished by the project. He said the iconic landmark and main attraction of the village, the Raja Uda mosque, could be marred if the columbarium is built just 83 metres from the mosque. MBDK said it would consider objections and proposals from both sides before referring the matter to the one-stop centre committee meeting on June 24 for an assessment.
