What's in a name: Does it matter whether it's chicken kyiv or kiev?
Poultry brands in New Zealand are changing their spelling from chicken kiev to chicken kyiv. Ukrainians say the update of two little letters matters a lot.
There's a scene in the 1973 neo-noir film The Long Goodbye, based on the Raymond Chandler novel of the same name, where a man eats 'the fanciest meal' he's ever had. 'I don't understand how you get the butter in the chicken. When you cut the chicken, the butter comes out,' he gushes, in awe. 'I don't understand.'
The woman who prepared the meal responds, 'That's the secret about it. Chicken kiev.'
These days, the classic dish – breadcrumbed chicken breast stuffed with herb and garlic butter – remains the same, but won't look the same on paper. The dish is now more likely to be spelled 'chicken kyiv'.
This tiny but mighty change in spelling has taken place in supermarket freezers across the nation, in a signal of support for Ukraine.
The last time I unpacked a supermarket click-and-collect order I noticed the packaging on a box of Waitoa free range 'chicken kievs' now says 'chicken kyivs'.
'Kyiv' is how Ukrainians spell the name of the capital city of Ukraine, but 'Kiev' is a transliteration from the Russian word for the city. Yuriy Gladun, former chairperson of the Ukrainian Association of New Zealand's northern branch, says using 'kyiv' instead of 'kiev' is Ukrainian people shedding their colonial past. And that includes when referring to the chicken dish.
'The spelling of chicken kyiv is really important. It is part of the war but on a cultural field. We are trying to get rid of the Russian influence in every way – economical, political, cultural and language. That's why we advance the spelling 'Kyiv' – for us, this issue really matters. It might sound simple but it has deep historical roots.'
There has been a campaign by the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, #kyivnotkiev, on social media since 2018 to promote the Ukrainian language transliteration rather than spelling from Russia. The story goes that Kyiv is named after Kyi, one of the city's legendary founders. The spelling matters to Ukrainians.
In March 2022 Woolworths told Australian media that it was changing its spelling from 'kiev' to 'kyiv' to stand in solidarity with Ukrainians living in Australia. The brands stocked in the trans-Tasman supermarket chain soon followed suit.
A spokesperson for Ingham's, the poultry company that owns Waitoa, said they changed the spelling of their Kyiv products in 2024. 'The adjustment to the name reflects the Ukrainian spelling and was done with the benefit of discussions with members of the community. '
Like many internationally recognised meals with a long history, there is debate around the origin of the dish. Some say it was created in the kitchen of a Ukraine hotel in the beginning of the 20th century, others say French chefs hired by Russian gentry are responsible for the meal.
'I don't know who created it, whether it came from Kyiv or Ukraine at all,' Yuriy Gladun says, 'But as it carries the name of the Ukraininan capital, we are proud.' He points out that 'chicken kyiv' isn't what people in Ukraine would call it anyway, the dish would be referred to as 'kotleta po kyivsky'.
Dr Corrinne Seals, Ukrainian-American by birth, is associate professor of applied linguistics at Te Herenga Waka said definitively that the dish should be called chicken kyiv, not chicken kiev.
'Kyiv is a Ukrainian city. We should use the Ukrainian spelling. Language is very political.'
She has noticed spelling of the well-known dish is beginning to change but more slowly than in references to the name of the city Kyiv. When it comes to the chicken meal, she says, people are used to spelling it in a certain way and they don't necessarily link it to the city Kyiv. While the generally accepted spelling is changing, it will take time to tidy up the long history of the dish.
A Jamie Oliver recipe from 2020 refers to 'chicken kiev' (the page includes a 2021 comment from a fan saying 'Thank you for a good recipe. But it is KYIV not Kiev. FYI.'). In 2023 he released a recipe for 'chicken kyiv' which he calls an '80s classic' – his dad used to make hundreds of them a week for customers in the family pub.
Similarly, celebrity chef Rachael Ray calls it 'chicken kiev' on an older recipe published on her website but in a newer recipe from May 2022 she refers to 'Kyiv' with the comment, 'When I was a little girl, chicken kyiv, then spelled kiev, was a really, really big deal. Everybody loved this.'
The HelloFresh website has a recipe for 'baked chicken kievs' but, when asked about spelling, said it was a mistake – the recipe was discontinued four years ago. Even so, 'our ANZ style guide across all our assets stipulates that recipes in this cuisine style are to be spelt 'Kyiv' and it looks like this one was missed,' HelloFresh spokesperson Amy Hayes said.
A spokesperson for popular UK recipe site Good Food said they changed the name of some recipes earlier this year to bring them in line with other UK media and so that users can find them more easily. Classic chicken kyiv is the #78 chicken recipe on thewebsite so far this year. The web address for the recipe still holds the previous spelling in the URL though.
Closer to home, New World still calls them 'chicken kievs', as do many smaller businesses like delis and privately-owned butchers. Seals says changing the spelling is a small but impactful move businesses can make. 'No use of language is ever neutral. If you aren't aligning with the internationally accepted correct spelling, you are – whether you feel you are or not – showing a type of resistance. It's important for people to know that if they're not sure of the preferred spelling or pronunciation Ukrainians would prefer people ask. It is better to ask and get the correct information than keep using something outdated that takes a negative stance.'
Although brands updating the spelling of their products to align with Ukrainian spelling sends a signal, does it matter to most customers? When you're hungry, does the spelling on the box make a difference?
Tim Morris, director of Food, FMCG & Retail at agri-food market research company Coriolis, thinks 95% of customers won't even notice the spelling change. 'People are astoundingly oblivious. Kiev/Kyiv is one of those place names like Massachusetts, Reykjavík and Liechtenstein that nobody can spell.'
As for the brands who made a change to stand in solidarity with their Ukrainian customers in their local markets, he didn't think much of it. 'It's like wetting yourself in a dark suit. You get a warm feeling but nobody notices.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
7 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
'She's wrong': Trump contradicts spy boss on Iran nuclear programme
US President Donald Trump said on Friday (local time) that his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey. "She's wrong," Trump said. In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that the US intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon. "The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon," she said. On Friday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." She said the media had taken her March testimony "out of context" and was trying to "manufacture division." The White House has said Trump will weigh involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict over the next two weeks. On Tuesday, Trump made similar comments to reporters about Gabbard's assessment. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets by saying Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead. Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment programme is only for peaceful purposes. In March, Gabbard described Iran's enriched uranium stockpile as unprecedented for a state without such weapons and said the government was watching the situation closely. She also said that Iran had started discussing nuclear weapons in public, "emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran's decision-making apparatus." A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters that the assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed. They said US spy services also judged that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice. Some experts, however, believe it could take Iran a much shorter time to build and deliver an untested crude nuclear device, although there would be no guarantee it would work. Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of US intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged - without providing proof - are part of a "deep state" cabal of US officials opposed to his presidency. Gabbard, a fierce Trump loyalist, has been among the president's backers who have aired such allegations. The Republican president repeatedly clashed with US spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favour and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials.
NZ Herald
8 hours ago
- NZ Herald
David Seymour: I went to Oxford to test my beliefs and learned a sad thing about NZ
Is it a prank? We think it's real. Okay, then, but we can't use taxpayer money. That conversation is how I ended up debating at Oxford Union. The question of the debate was that 'no one can be illegal on stolen land'. It was a clever moot, tapping into colonisation and immigration. What Government has the right to tell would-be migrants they can't come, when every inch of the planet has been fought over at some time? I went to test my beliefs that human rights are universal, that we should stop searching the past for reasons to doubt one another and focus more on where we're going than where we've been. I think those beliefs held up well, but I learned something sad about our country, too. Every Thursday in semester time, the Union invites guests to debate. Most people don't realise Lange was one of six or eight debaters. His speech, and the uranium line, obliterated the others. I had a student and a couple of American 'immigration enforcement experts' on my team. On the other side was the president of the Union, an Australian senator, an Oxford academic, and someone best described as Noam Chomsky's daughter. At the end of the debate, the audience divides, going through one door or another to register their vote for or against the motion, like Parliaments of old. The president of the Union opened, saying our team of white guys in tuxedos had 'something in common', that all borders are drawn in blood, and that New Zealand 'invites, exploits, then hunts' migrants. Since she came in an Alice in Wonderland dress with a two-metre hoop skirt, though, you can't help but like her. I think she was in on the joke. The Australian senator said 'white immigration' to Australia is unlawful, then described her own migration from India without explaining the difference. The academic wanted open immigration rights for anyone whose ancestors had been colonised, but it wasn't clear how far back this went. Chomsky promised to make seven points in her speech. I listened, but can only guess they were above my pay grade. My team agreed that, yes, history is filled with barbarism on all sides, but who decides where it stopped and started? Should we count Scottish victims of the Clearances as victims or villains? How about descendants of Māori who slaughtered other tribes in the musket wars? How do we account for people who, like the new Pope, have ancestors on both sides of conflict? We argued that grouping ourselves into victims and villains, based on ancestry, is exactly what leads to oppression and discrimination – seeing an individual as just another faceless member of a guilty group. Even if you could pick a time when land stopped being owned and started being stolen, you would create another problem, determinism. No wonder young people are depressed and anxious, being told they are either victims or villains in stories written before they were born. Building a better world, we said, needs a commitment to treat each person as a thinking and valuing being, deserving equal rights and dignity. I think the arguments for equal rights stood up well, but I learned something about New Zealand from how the events in Oxford were reported at home. What a depressing little country we can be. TVNZ based its coverage around an activist saying I shouldn't be able to speak because free speech is dangerous. The headline was me 'defending' speaking. What a contrast with the Oxford Union's commitment to free speech. Stuff's coverage announced, sneeringly, that I 'debated at Oxford, and lost'. Nowhere in the article does it explain how the debate is decided, or that my team, not I, lost by a margin of 54-46. It quotes a handful of audience members who disagreed with me, but didn't try to inform the reader of what I said or why nearly half voted for my team. Anyone reliant on these outlets would prove the adage that if you don't read the media, you're uninformed; if you do, then you're misinformed. I thank the Herald for its more balanced coverage and this right of reply. Thank you, Oxford Union, for the wonderful opportunity to freely debate controversial topics. Yes, all borders are drawn in blood, but if you want a better world, you need to ask not where we came from, but where we're going. Some in our media could learn from your spirit. David Seymour is the Deputy Prime Minister and Act Party leader
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Australia suspends Iran embassy as conflict escalates
Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong. Australia said today it had suspended operations at its embassy in Tehran, citing "a deteriorating security environment" as Israel hit Iran's nuclear facilities again, and the week-old air war showed no sign yet of an exit strategy from either side. Israel launched a sweeping aerial campaign against Iran last Friday, calling it a preemptive strike to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Iran has denied any such plans and retaliated by launching counterstrikes on Israel. "The Australian government has directed the departure of all Australian officials and dependents ... based on advice about the deteriorating security environment in Iran," Foreign Minister Penny Wong said in a statement. Consular staff are being deployed to neighbouring Azerbaijan, including its border crossings, to support Australians departing Iran, Wong said. "We remain in close contact with other partner countries. At this stage, our ability to provide consular services is extremely limited due to the situation on the ground. The airspace remains closed," she added. Australia's ambassador to Iran, Ian McConville, would remain in the region to support the government's response, Wong said. More than 1500 Australians and their families in Iran have sought assistance to leave the country, official data showed.
