Archaeologists uncover proof of brutal gladiator-lion clash in shocking tourist destination
Archaeologists recently discovered proof of a gladiatorial fight with a lion in an unexpected tourist destination.
York, a city in northern England known for its breathtaking medieval architecture, welcomes millions of visitors annually – but its history goes much further back than the Middle Ages.
The area was inhabited by the ancient Romans, who founded the city in 71 A.D. and named it Eboracum.
Until now, archaeologists weren't sure that gladiatorial fights with lions took place outside of Italy – and didn't have much evidence of these battles, other than Roman art depicting the fights.
The recent findings, publicized in the journal PLOS One, analyze a puncture wound that was found on the pelvis of a gladiator buried in a York cemetery.
The gladiator lived during the 3rd century A.D. and was between 26 and 35 years old at the time of his death.
Analyzing the man's wound, researchers found that the bite mark was made by a big cat, most likely a lion.
'Skeletal evidence associated with gladiatorial combat is rare, with most evidence deriving from written or visual sources,' the article states.
'A single skeleton from a Roman cemetery outside of York where gladiators arguably were buried presented with unusual lesions.'
3 Archaeologists recently discovered proof of a gladiatorial fight with a lion in an unexpected tourist destination.
Hew Morrison/York Archaeology / SWNS
3 The gladiator lived during the 3rd century A.D. and was between 26 and 35 years old at the time of his death.
REUTERS
The piece noted, 'Investigation, including comparative work from modern zoological institutions, has demonstrated that these marks originate from large cat scavenging.'
The discovery is the 'first physical evidence for human-animal gladiatorial combat from the Roman period seen anywhere in Europe,' according to the study's authors.
Although researchers believe that the gladiator died in battle, they don't believe the pelvic puncture was the fatal blow.
'We don't think that this was the killing wound, as it would be possible to survive this injury, and it is in an unusual location for such a large cat,' forensic anthropologist Tim Thompson of Maynooth University said in a statement to Reuters.
'We think it indicates the dragging of an incapacitated individual.'
3 Analyzing the man's wound, researchers found that the bite mark was made by a big cat, most likely a lion.
via REUTERS
John Pearce, a Roman archaeologist at King's College London and a co-author of the study, told Reuters that the cat may have been starved before the fight in order to increase its aggression.
'Very speculatively, from the gladiator's perspective, perhaps an approach like a matador's would have been applied – to dodge and progressively wound, so as to extend the performance,' Pearce said.
'In this case, clearly that ended unsuccessfully, with it being likely, given the position of the bite mark, that the lion is mauling or dragging this individual on the ground,' he continued.
'At the end, when one or both were dead, there would be a burial for the gladiator and the use of the animal carcass for meat for the spectators.'
The expert added that the discovery reflects the 'spectacle culture' central to Roman life.
'This new analysis gives us very concrete and specific evidence of a human-animal violent encounter, either as combat or punishment, showing that the big cats caught in North Africa were shown and fought not only in Rome or Italy but also surprisingly widely, even if we don't know how frequently,' Pearce concluded.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
An explosion of sea urchins threatens to push coral reefs in Hawaii ‘past the point of recovery'
The turquoise water of Hōnaunau Bay in Hawaii, an area popular with snorkelers and divers, is teeming with spiny creatures that threaten to push the coral reef 'past the point of recovery,' new research has found. Sea urchin numbers here are exploding as the fish species that typically keep their populations in check decline due to overfishing, according to the study, published last month in the journal PLOS ONE. It's yet another blow to a reef already suffering damage from pollution as well as climate change-driven ocean heat waves and sea level rise. Kelly J. van Woesik, a researcher at the North Carolina State University Center for Geospatial Analytics and a study author, first noticed unusually high numbers of sea urchins on snorkeling trips. 'I knew there was a story to be told,' she said. She and her fellow researchers used data from scuba surveys and images taken from the air to track the health of the reef. 'We found on average 51 urchins per square meter, which is among the highest recorded densities on coral reefs anywhere in the world,' van Woesik said. Sea urchins are small marine invertebrates, characterized by their spiny bodies and found in oceans around the world. They play a useful role in preventing algae overgrowth, which can choke off oxygen to coral. However, they also eat the reef and too many of them can cause damaging erosion. In Hōnaunau Bay, the coral is already struggling to reproduce and grow due to ocean heat and water pollution, leaving it even more vulnerable to the erosion inflicted by sea urchins. Its rate of growth has plummeted according to the study. Reef growth is typically measured by the amount of calcium carbonate — the substance which forms coral skeletons — it produces per square meter each year. The reef in Hōnaunau Bay is growing 30 times more slowly than it did four decades ago, according to the study. Production levels were around 15 kilograms (33 pounds) per square meter in parts of Hawaii, signaling a healthy reef, according to research in the 1980s. Today, the reef in Hōnaunau Bay produces just 0.5 kg (1.1 pounds) per square meter. To offset erosion from urchins, at least 26% of the reef surface must be covered by living corals – and even more coral cover is necessary for it to grow. Gregory Asner, an ecologist at Arizona State University and study author, said what was happening in this part of Hawaii was emblematic of the mounting pressures facing reefs throughout the region. 'For 27 years I have worked in Hōnaunau Bay and other bays like it across Hawaii, but Hōnaunau stood out early on as an iconic example of a reef threatened by a combination of pressures,' he said, citing warming ocean temperatures, pollution from tourism and heavy fishing. The implications of coral decline are far-reaching. Coral reefs are sometimes dubbed the 'rainforests of the sea' because they support so much ocean life. They also play a vital role protecting coastlines from storm surges and erosion. 'If the reef can't keep up with sea-level rise, it loses its ability to limit incoming wave energy,' said van Woesik. 'That increases erosion and flooding risk of coastal communities.' Kiho Kim, an environmental science professor at American University, who was not involved in the study, said the findings highlight the fragility of reef ecosystems under stress. 'Dramatic increases in any species indicate an unusual condition that has allowed them to proliferate,' Kim said. That imbalance can undermine diversity and reduce the reef's ability to provide essential ecosystem services including food security and carbon storage, he told CNN. Despite the challenges, researchers emphasize that the reef's future is not sealed. Local groups in Hōnaunau are working to reduce fishing pressure, improve water quality and support coral restoration. 'These reefs are essential to protecting the islands they surround,' van Woesik said. 'Without action taken now, we risk allowing these reefs to erode past the point of no return.'
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
An explosion of sea urchins threatens to push coral reefs in Hawaii ‘past the point of recovery'
Animal stories Climate changeFacebookTweetLink Follow The turquoise water of Hōnaunau Bay in Hawaii, an area popular with snorkelers and divers, is teeming with spiny creatures that threaten to push the coral reef 'past the point of recovery,' new research has found. Sea urchin numbers here are exploding as the fish species that typically keep their populations in check decline due to overfishing, according to the study, published last month in the journal PLOS ONE. It's yet another blow to a reef already suffering damage from pollution as well as climate change-driven ocean heat waves and sea level rise. Kelly J. van Woesik, a researcher at the North Carolina State University Center for Geospatial Analytics and a study author, first noticed unusually high numbers of sea urchins on snorkeling trips. 'I knew there was a story to be told,' she said. She and her fellow researchers used data from scuba surveys and images taken from the air to track the health of the reef. 'We found on average 51 urchins per square meter, which is among the highest recorded densities on coral reefs anywhere in the world,' van Woesik said. Sea urchins are small marine invertebrates, characterized by their spiny bodies and found in oceans around the world. They play a useful role in preventing algae overgrowth, which can choke off oxygen to coral. However, they also eat the reef and too many of them can cause damaging erosion. In Hōnaunau Bay, the coral is already struggling to reproduce and grow due to ocean heat and water pollution, leaving it even more vulnerable to the erosion inflicted by sea urchins. Its rate of growth has plummeted according to the study. Reef growth is typically measured by the amount of calcium carbonate — the substance which forms coral skeletons — it produces per square meter each year. The reef in Hōnaunau Bay is growing 30 times more slowly than it did four decades ago, according to the study. Production levels were around 15 kilograms (33 pounds) per square meter in parts of Hawaii, signaling a healthy reef, according to research in the 1980s. Today, the reef in Hōnaunau Bay produces just 0.5 kg (1.1 pounds) per square meter. To offset erosion from urchins, at least 26% of the reef surface must be covered by living corals – and even more coral cover is necessary for it to grow. Gregory Asner, an ecologist at Arizona State University and study author, said what was happening in this part of Hawaii was emblematic of the mounting pressures facing reefs throughout the region. 'For 27 years I have worked in Hōnaunau Bay and other bays like it across Hawaii, but Hōnaunau stood out early on as an iconic example of a reef threatened by a combination of pressures,' he said, citing warming ocean temperatures, pollution from tourism and heavy fishing. The implications of coral decline are far-reaching. Coral reefs are sometimes dubbed the 'rainforests of the sea' because they support so much ocean life. They also play a vital role protecting coastlines from storm surges and erosion. 'If the reef can't keep up with sea-level rise, it loses its ability to limit incoming wave energy,' said van Woesik. 'That increases erosion and flooding risk of coastal communities.' Kiho Kim, an environmental science professor at American University, who was not involved in the study, said the findings highlight the fragility of reef ecosystems under stress. 'Dramatic increases in any species indicate an unusual condition that has allowed them to proliferate,' Kim said. That imbalance can undermine diversity and reduce the reef's ability to provide essential ecosystem services including food security and carbon storage, he told CNN. Despite the challenges, researchers emphasize that the reef's future is not sealed. Local groups in Hōnaunau are working to reduce fishing pressure, improve water quality and support coral restoration. 'These reefs are essential to protecting the islands they surround,' van Woesik said. 'Without action taken now, we risk allowing these reefs to erode past the point of no return.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
US judge blocks slashing of universities' federal funding from National Science Foundation
By Nate Raymond and Blake Brittain (Reuters) -A federal judge on Friday prevented the National Science Foundation from sharply cutting research funding provided to universities in the latest legal setback to efforts by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to slash government support of research at major academic institutions. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston invalidated a policy NSF adopted in May that limited the ability of universities to be reimbursed for administrative and facility costs that indirectly support grant-funded research, ruling that it was "arbitrary and capricious." Spokespeople for NSF and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling. NSF, a $9 billion agency that funds scientific research, adopted the policy after having already canceled hundreds of grants out of step with the Republican president's priorities. His administration has also been freezing billions of dollars in government funding for numerous universities, including Harvard. NSF's policy, which was announced on May 2, set a cap on how much grant funding could go to cover indirect costs. NSF said funding for such costs could equal no more than 15% of the funding for direct research costs, regardless of what the costs actually were at universities. Historically, universities had negotiated with NSF and other agencies over the rate at which indirect costs could be reimbursed. The cap meant that for every $100 in funding going directly to a research grant award, universities would receive just $15 to cover overhead, such as the costs of maintaining lab space and paying for electricity and staff. The Trump administration said it sought through the policy to rein in spending on administrative overhead, which had grown to consume $1.07 billion of NSF's annual $4.22 billion grant-making budget for higher education institutions. That rate, though, is significantly lower than the indirect cost that many of the 69 research universities belonging to Association of American Universities had negotiated, which was often in the 50% to 65% range, the group's lawyers said. Talwani, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, said in her Friday decision that the administration's 15% rate was unlawful. The association along with two other academic trade groups and 13 schools sued in May to block the policy, after earlier convincing judges in Boston to block similar funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health and U.S. Department of Energy. The association did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Friday decision. Among the schools that challenged NSF's funding cuts were the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Brown University, the University of California, Carnegie Mellon University, Cornell University, the University of Michigan and the University of Pennsylvania. They argued that NSF's action, if allowed to stand, "will badly undermine scientific research at America's universities and erode our nation's enviable status as a global leader in scientific research and innovation." The U.S. Department of Defense has since also adopted a 15% cap, which a judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked pending a hearing on July 2. He did so a day after a different judge in Boston ordered NIH to reinstate hundreds of grants for research on diversity-related topics nixed as part of the administration's purge of initiatives viewed as supporting "diversity, equity and inclusion."
