Judge slams Two Oceans Marathon leadership in defamation ruling — A costly legal misstep
The Two Oceans hierarchy is still licking its wounds and assessing its options after failing to gag blogger Stuart Mann via the courts.
The Two Oceans Marathon hierarchy — led by its chairperson Toni Cavanagh — is keeping its cards firmly against its chest after a failed attempt to silence runner and blogger Stuart Mann for his articles in his Running Mann blog, which they deem to be defamatory and devoid of truth.
Gauteng Division of the High Court in Johannesburg Judge Seena Yacoob threw out the matter on 5 June 2025, after a few weeks of mulling over its merits. In her judgment, Yacoob was scathing of the Two Oceans leaders, stopping short of saying they had wasted her precious time. She dismissed the matter with grade C costs against the Two Oceans and Cavanagh. The costs are expected to be about R400,000.
In his articles Mann reported on alleged discrepancies in Cavanagh's professional CV, as well as questioning the chairperson's achievements as a runner. The runner/blogger also criticised the Two Oceans board following a permit breach that allowed more runners to start the 2024 edition of the race than had been stipulated.
As a result of this permit breach, the City of Cape Town confirmed to Daily Maverick that it had indeed pulled its sponsorship of the annual event. However, Cavanagh denied this when she spoke with this publication in the aftermath of the race.
Scathing judgment
'In this case neither of the applicants have made out a case that the esteem in which they are held is of a particular type. Cavanagh does not favour the court with her own full history nor does she demonstrate that she is viewed with any particular esteem or that she has a reputation for integrity and good leadership,' Yacoob wrote.
'Two Oceans does not contend that it has run its events in a manner reasonably beyond criticism and above board,' Yacoob continued.
'It does not even contend, let alone attempt to demonstrate that it has conducted its events in a manner compliant with its permits from the City of Cape Town. There is no attempt to demonstrate that any of the factual claims made in the publications are untrue, although there is a bald allegation that they are all false,' the judge stated.
'The applicants do not set out any factual background in the context of which I can conclude that the publications are defamatory. The applicants also do not plead facts from which the alternative questions of violations of the rights to dignity and privacy can be properly determined,' said Judge Yacoob.
Despite this harsh criticism, the Two Oceans says it is still considering its options, hinting at a potential appeal despite this costly defeat.
Ducking and diving
When Daily Maverick reached out to Cavanagh after the judgment was passed, she said she was a bit busy with meetings and would avail herself when things had settled down.
'I need to pop into a meeting right now and I will be able to talk to you either later today (5 June) or tomorrow. Preferably tomorrow,' Cavanagh said.
After confirming via WhatsApp that the following day (6 June) would still be fine to talk to her, Daily Maverick instead received communication from Two Oceans spokesperson Lindy-Joy Dennis — directing this publication to Rupert Candy (the Two Oceans' legal representative) for comment.
Candy told Daily Maverick on Friday, 6 June, that his clients had 'released a public statement which speaks for itself'. Candy said his clients would 'not be making any further statement at this stage, but reserve their right to do so in the next two weeks'.
Official Two Oceans response
'While the court accepted the urgency of the matter, the application was ultimately dismissed. We respect the Court's ruling, but are disappointed that the judgment did not substantively engage with the nature, tone, or personal impact of the specific language used — including statements which, in our view, extended beyond fair criticism into reputational harm and personal attack,' the Two Oceans said in the statement.
'We wish to clarify that the Court did not find Mann's statements to be truthful, justified, or ethically appropriate. The matter was dismissed on procedural grounds — not on the factual accuracy or moral acceptability of the comments made,' stated the Two Oceans.
'As an organisation, the Two Oceans Marathon has always welcomed scrutiny, transparency, and robust engagement — especially from the passionate running community we serve. However, it is essential that such engagement is carried out responsibly, respectfully, and with due regard for the rights and dignity of individuals,' it added.
'As custodians of the 'world's most beautiful marathon', we believe it is our duty to uphold the ethics of responsible engagement within the running community — not only on behalf of the organisation, but in the interest of all athletes, partners, sponsors, volunteers and stakeholders who are part of the Two Oceans Marathon legacy,' the organisation said.
'Our decision to pursue legal relief was not taken lightly, nor was it a frivolous attempt to silence criticism. It was a step taken to bring an end to ongoing public attacks that, in our view, undermined the integrity of the organisation and unfairly targeted individuals serving it in good faith,' the Two Oceans said.
Vindicated
Mann, however, believes the Two Oceans targeted him purely because of his reputation as a voice for the tight-knit running community. He said he was pleased to be vindicated by the courts.
'It was great to be 100% vindicated by a high court judge. She obviously considered it for a long time, about three weeks,' Mann told Daily Maverick.
'One of the things I've been exposing at Two Oceans with the current board has been the lies and the negligence. Ironically, that's what the judge ruled as well. I'm very happy with the result, because it was a bullying tactic on their side, to try to silence valid criticism of their ineptitude and negligence,' he said.
'In their statement they don't mention that they've received a cost order on grade C, which is the highest level. As well as the fact that the judge was completely scathing of them. But it's not surprising because it's what they've done, they've put their heads in the sand,' Mann stated. DM
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Tshwane Mayor Nasiphi Moya condemns alleged bribery attempt in Mamelodi
Tshwane Mayor Nasiphi Moya has denounced an alleged bribery attempt by an individual claiming to represent the Somali Association in South Africa as its chairperson. Image: Oupa Mopkoena /Independent Newspapers Tshwane Mayor Nasiphi Moya has strongly condemned an alleged bribery attempt by an individual claiming to be the chairperson of the Somali Association in South Africa. The individual sought a private meeting with Moya, apparently to facilitate the reopening of a foreign-run shop in Mamelodi that was closed for violating municipal by-laws. A video on X captured Moya's conversation with the individual, who suggested a private meeting with her, allegedly to bribe her into reopening the cash 'n carry business. Moya has shared the video on her X account, showing her rejecting the proposal for a private meeting. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading She added that her administration will not be influenced by threats or bribes. When Moya questioned why he needed to discuss the business closure with her, the individual replied: "Because you are the head of Tshwane." The person insisted the business was compliant despite Moya pointing out issues with its structure, specifically that it was built on a servitude and had a fuel tanker inside the building. 'How do you comply without the necessary documentation? How do you comply if you have built on four properties without approvals of the City,' she asked. In addition, she confronted him about allegations that he had attempted to bribe one of the city's councillors with R150,000 in exchange to have the shop reopened. 'I heard that you have been reporting me to everyone who cared to listen. Is this how you work in your country?' she asked. The person denied the bribery allegation, prompting Moya to ask why he would disregard South African laws. 'Are we a banana republic to you? Do you come here and do as you please? You don't pay taxes here and you keep cash up to a million rand in your property. You keep illegal immigrants on your property and you want to come and disrespect me? You want to meet with me. What do I say to people who don't respect our laws?' The person, however, continued to claim compliance, but Moya said: 'You are not compliant. We are not crazy. We can't just tell you that the people who have employed are illegal immigrants if they are not; we are not crazy people. I don't know what you normally do with politicians but I am not that type. You do not bribe me to break the City of my people. You must learn our laws and once you have done that, we can talk.' During last month's operation in Mamelodi, Moya and metro police raided the shop in question, which had reopened despite a previous shutdown for operating an illegal structure on a servitude. The owners were found to have forged a City of Tshwane operational certificate. As a result, all goods were seized and authorities also found cash machines and receipts in the living quarters above the shop, showing nearly R1 million in transactions for a single day. At the time Moya said the individuals were exploiting the country's economy, evading taxes, and breaking the law.
Daily Maverick
11 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Business community reels after kidnapping incident: Nelson Mandela Bay's security crisis deepens
On Saturday morning at 6 am, Gqeberha resident Lindsay Knowlden, 65, was kidnapped from the Fresh Produce Market in Markman Industrial Area. While the kidnapping has sent shockwaves through the Nelson Mandela Bay community, frustrated business owners, whose businesses are under threat from protection rackets, have been calling for improved security in that area for more than two years. For the past two years, members of the Markman Business Forum and business owners have been pleading with the Nelson Mandela Bay municipality for improved security infrastructure, more specifically a 300m fence to improve the safety of those who work in the area, spokesperson Graham Taylor said on Sunday. On Saturday, the business community was shocked after Peter and Lindsay Knowlden were attacked in the underground parking at the Fresh Produce Market. Peter Knowlden was assaulted with a firearm and his wife Lindsay was kidnapped. 'We have been battling now for close on two years, and you almost get the feeling that the municipality is trying its best to avoid us,' Taylor said. Taylor said that a meeting had been held earlier this month with acting city manager Ted Pillay and 'some commitments were made'. 'The boundaries of Markman Industria are incredibly porous,' Taylor said. 'Vulnerable' 'We are vulnerable on three sides of the area. We need a 300m fence. That corner where the Fresh Produce Market is has always been a problem,' he said. He said that to the municipality's credit, it had tried to improve the security at the Fresh Produce market and had built a wall around the facility. 'But personally, I have never seen security guards there. The problem is that it remains completely accessible from the back,' Taylor said. He said the area was monitored by private security, but it urgently needed a fence. 'That way we can introduce proper access control.' He said that currently, anybody could enter the area. 'That Addo corridor is a major challenge,' he said, referring to the road that runs from the N2 through Motherwell to Addo. 'We have been having meetings with logistics service providers and industry stakeholders just to address crime,' Taylor said. 'Businesses have the solution, but people need to start listening.' He said that as a result of the deteriorating security situation in the area, the cost of business had shot up. Some businesses now had to pay R300,000 a month for security. 'Protection racket' Taylor said a protection racket was being run in the area, and any vehicle leaving without security would be followed and hijacked, especially those transporting food. 'Demanding protection money has become a trend,' he said. 'People know exactly what is in those vehicles.' Wayne Hart from Atlas Security said they had been called in on Saturday after Lindsay Knowlden was kidnapped, as the couple were clients. 'As you, we are deeply concerned about the kidnapping of Lindsay Knowlden, which took place in the early hours of Saturday morning. Atlas Security was first on the scene, and our team responded immediately after being alerted. 'Our control room and teams have been working closely with the local authorities, using our extensive network of CCTV cameras across Nelson Mandela Bay to assist in the investigation. We can confirm that the vehicle involved was flagged, but in the interest of the ongoing investigation, further details cannot be shared at this time. 'We are aware that the Hawks have received a ransom demand for Lindsay's safe return. The case is now in the hands of the Hawks and SAPS, and Atlas Security will continue to cooperate fully with all roleplayers as the investigation unfolds. 'Our thoughts are with Lindsay's family and loved ones during this incredibly difficult time. We urge anyone with information to contact SAPS,' Atlas said. SAPS spokesperson Captain Andre Beetge confirmed the incident, and that the case had been transferred to the Hawks. The Fresh Produce Market is a Nelson Mandela Bay municipal facility, but by last night, municipal spokesperson Sithembiso Soyaya had not responded to questions about security measures there. Earlier this month, Sanral construction manager Victor Ngcobo was kidnapped from Addo Road, 3km from the latest abduction. He was released unharmed.
Daily Maverick
21 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
ATM hacking accused freed on bail after magistrate's blunder in multimillion-rand case
A man who allegedly made millions in cash by hacking ATMs in the Eastern and Western Cape was released on bail late last week after the Bhisho High Court ruled that the magistrate had made a mistake by not giving reasons for the decision to keep him behind bars. One of the men arrested by the Hawks in March 2025 and linked to a syndicate that has allegedly netted R7-million by hacking ATMs has been released on bail after the court ruled that the magistrate hearing his bail application had made a mistake. Mongameli Tom was arrested with another man near Peddie in the Eastern Cape after the pair allegedly hacked into two ATMs in Mdantsane, Buffalo City. At the time of Tom's arrest the Hawks said that he was also linked to a series of ATM fraud incidents in the Western Cape. Tom has denied any involvement. Tom and the other man were intercepted near Peddie on 17 March 2025 following a multidisciplinary, intelligence-driven operation led by the East London Serious Organised Crime Investigation team. The Hawks explained at the time that the suspects allegedly disguised themselves as cash-in-transit security guards, armed with a rifle, to create the illusion that they were legitimately servicing the ATM. But instead they were using 'jackpot' software to hack into the ATM and take all the money. Tom was arrested by the Hawks on 19 March 2025. On 9 April 2025 he applied for bail but this was refused. He is charged with 51 counts of fraud and 52 counts of theft which were allegedly committed between Cape Town and East London. Four of these offences were committed in the Eastern Cape and two in the magisterial district of Mdantsane, where he appeared in court. In February and March 2025 amounts of R143,500 and R236,900 were taken from two ATMs at two garages in Mdantsane. Tom, from Mitchells Plain in the Western Cape, is the director of two companies, Abakwazidenge Trading (Pty) Ltd and Khundulu Holdings (Pty) Ltd. According to Tom both companies made between R30,000 and R50,000 profit a month but had stopped operating after he was arrested. In an affidavit before court – detailing his personal circumstances – he stated that he had dependent children and had to provide for their needs. Acting Judge Aaron Zono said the magistrate hearing Tom's bail application had not dealt with an affidavit setting out his personal circumstances. Tom has no previous convictions nor pending cases. 'There is not a single reason in the magistrate's judgment why [Tom's] case or version has not been accepted or rejected. We may only assume that it was rejected for the fact that it is not referred to in the judgment,' Zono said. 'In fact, the magistrate's failure to accept or reject appellant's case is rooted in his failure to consider the same. One cannot accept or reject something he has not considered. No balancing act has been made by the magistrate. 'The magistrate did not account for the judgment he gave. He did not analyse the evidence before arriving at his conclusion. He did not explain why the evidence of the accused persons was not accepted and why that evidence did not meet the standard of being reasonably possibly true. He did not even explain on what basis he found that the state had discharged its onus of proof and why its evidence was accepted. 'A judgment without reasons is arbitrary. Equally a judgment that does not account for all the evidence is arbitrary. A judgment without balancing exercise between the two opposing versions or evidence lacks proper analysis and is consequently arbitrary. Zono also said the State had not rebutted evidence presented by Tom, who denies knowledge of any crimes, but only stated that the prosecution's case is strong and Tom's case is weak. He added that the magistrate should have given a reasoned ruling on why bail was refused.
