EU shuts out Chinese medical suppliers from European market
The European Commission has formally introduced restrictions previously reported by Euronews in response to what it describes as discriminatory barriers imposed by China against European medical device manufacturers.
Following a detailed investigation, the Commission found "clear evidence" that China had been unfairly blocking EU-made medical devices from its public procurement market.
This marks the first countermeasure taken under the International Procurement Instrument (IPI), which came into force in August 2022 to promote fair access for EU firms to procurement opportunities outside the bloc.
'Our aim with these measures is to level the playing field for EU businesses. We remain committed to dialogue with China to resolve these issues,' said Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič.
Under the new rules, Chinese companies are barred from bidding on public contracts for medical devices in the EU single market that exceed €5 million. Additionally, successful bids must contain no more than 50% of inputs originating from China.
According to the Commission, the measures are proportionate to China's own restrictions and are designed to ensure the continued availability of critical medical equipment for EU healthcare systems. Exceptions will apply in cases where no viable alternative suppliers are available.
The Commission pointed out that the decision aligns with international trade obligations, including those under the World Trade Organization (WTO), noting that the EU has no binding procurement commitments with China.
EU-based medical device companies have long struggled to access China's procurement market, despite China being one of the bloc's largest export destinations for such products, accounting for 11% of exports in 2022.
The Commission's investigation focused on China's government procurement law, which enforces a "Buy China" policy, requiring public institutions to prioritise domestic products and services.
The probe identified several barriers faced by EU firms, including opaque approval processes, discriminatory certification practices, ambiguous national interest clauses used to exclude foreign suppliers, and unsustainable pricing requirements.
According to a 2025 Commission report, 87% of public procurement contracts for medical devices in China were subject to exclusionary and discriminatory practices against EU suppliers.
The new EU measures come at a delicate moment in EU-China relations, which are undergoing a cautious diplomatic reset.
Both sides have intensified efforts to manage longstanding disputes amid shifting global dynamics, including the aftermath of the Trump-era trade wars and ongoing US-China tensions.
A key milestone in this renewed dialogue is the upcoming EU-China Summit, now scheduled to take place in Beijing in the second half of July 2025.
Meanwhile, reciprocal actions continue to define the trade relationship. China has extended its anti-dumping investigation into EU pork imports by six months, while the EU recently imposed tariffs of up to 45% on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), reflecting a strategic pattern of targeting politically sensitive industries ahead of high-level negotiations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
39 minutes ago
- Euronews
EU review indicates Israel breached human rights in Gaza
Israel's actions in the Gaza Strip indicate a breach of the human rights provisions contained in its Association Agreement with the European Union, a highly anticipated review from the bloc's diplomatic service has found, citing a collection of findings by independent international organisations. The breach stems from Israel's war on Gaza and the stringent conditions applied to the deliveries of humanitarian aid, which have stoked fears of widespread famine among Palestinians living in the densely populated enclave. It also covers Israel's decades-long occupation of the West Bank, where settlers have engaged in violent acts. Europeans have reacted with shock and fury at reports of Palestinians being killed by the Israeli army while waiting for supplies at distribution sites. The review was conducted by the European External Action Service (EEAS) and sent to member states on Friday under a restrictive format to avoid leaks. "There are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement," a senior diplomat told Euronews, quoting the conclusions contained in the document. The review was launched last month at the request of 17 countries, led by the Netherlands, to determine whether Israel was still complying with Article 2 of the Association Agreement, which states bilateral relations "shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles, which guides their internal and international policy and constitutes an essential element of this agreement". Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden backed the Dutch call. Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy and Lithuania were against, and Latvia adopted a "neutral" position, sources said then. Israel decried the decision and called on Brussels to keep bilateral dialogue going. "We completely reject the direction taken in the statement, which reflects a total misunderstanding of the complex reality Israel is facing," a spokesperson of Israel's foreign ministry said in May. "This war was forced upon Israel by Hamas, and Hamas is the one responsible for its continuation." The outcome of the review will be discussed by ambassadors on Friday and Sunday and later by foreign ministers on Monday. High Representative Kaja Kallas will personally brief EU leaders during a summit in Brussels on Thursday. Kallas, who walks a fine line to keep all countries on the same page, has recently hardened her tone towards Israel and what she calls "weaponisation" of humanitarian aid. "It is very painful for me to see the suffering," Kallas said earlier this week. "When I'm hearing that 50 people have been killed in the line for getting flour, it is painful, of course, I ask myself, what more can we do?" It will be up to member states to decide what course of action, if any, the EU should take in response to the critical findings. Possible options include the complete suspension of the agreement, which is highly unlikely, or the partial suspension of certain provisions related to free trade, research, technology, culture, and political dialogue. Some options will require the unanimous support of all 27 member states, while others will require a qualified majority, meaning at least 55% of countries representing at least 65% of the bloc's population. Any decision to suspend the trade aspects of the agreement will be in the hands of the European Commission, and diplomats say that here too, an agreement will be difficult to reach. No action until July Given the short timing between the release of the review and Monday's meeting, concrete action is not expected to be taken until foreign ministers meet again in July. A senior diplomat said it was "difficult" to predict whether the 17-strong group will remain united on the next steps, but hoped the findings would help "increase pressure" on Israel to alleviate the human suffering inside the war-torn strip. "There are three important points that we want to see," the diplomat explained, speaking on condition of anonymity. "First, a full and immediate end to the humanitarian blockade. Second, meaningful steps towards a ceasefire that enable the release of all hostages. And third, we would like to see that no more steps are taken to make the two-state solution more difficult." The review coincides with the military escalation between Israel and Iran, which will also be high on the agenda when foreign ministers meet on Monday. It remains to be seen how the discussion on Iran will influence the deliberations on Gaza. A diplomat from another country said it was "critical" to keep the political attention on Gaza rather than "looking somewhere else", meaning Iran. "If the report goes as far as we imagine, how many member states will still be willing not to do anything and keep on saying that it's business as usual?" the diplomat said. "Those member states will have to justify their inaction." But the sense of urgency is not equally shared. Several capitals insist the EU should focus on keeping open lines with Tel Aviv instead of cutting them off. "For us, what is important is to keep a decent level of communication with Israel. We want to keep the Association Agreement as it is," a third diplomat said. "For many of us, trade with Israel is important, and we don't want to shut the doors." A fourth diplomat noted: "We're away the humanitarian situation is very bad (but) it won't stop being dramatic even if we do suspend the agreement." The review comes a day after Belgium, together with Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, asked the European Commission to examine "how trade in goods and services linked to illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory can be brought into line with international law".
France 24
41 minutes ago
- France 24
Putin can't have a veto on Ukraine's EU membership: Parliament speaker Stefanchuk
Summing up his official visit to France, Stefanchuk says: 'I came with words of gratitude to the French people for the active support that we have been receiving. But also I came with words of request, a request that we need to continue this fight together, together with our friends all over the world, including Europe and France. I came with the words that what is extremely needed now in Ukraine, is the air defence system. This issue is connected with providing Ukraine more weapons to make sure that we can withstand this attack.' Stefanchuk elaborates; 'Let's be completely honest. War is a horrible math. Ukraine today is protecting the eastern flank of NATO from Russia's assault. And we are paying a terrible price for this. We're paying with the lives of our best sons and daughters. War includes the financial component, the military component and, unfortunately, the human component. And we must understand that, in order to win this war, we need to have all these components filled in. And of course, we are going to work with our partners to make sure that if we have less financial support (from the US), we'll be asking Europe to increase its support for Ukraine.' Stefanchuk adds that he also came to France to discuss the issue of frozen Russian assets, and 'legal solutions' to unlocking the assets. Many EU governments – including France – do not want to set an international legal precedent by fully using the assets. But Stefanchuk argues that if this is not done, a different kind of precedent will be set. 'We must find the mechanism to make sure that the one who violates the law is made accountable for these violations,' he states. 'If this is not done, then in the near future, anyone who has the strength, the power, and has no conscience, will do whatever they like, knowing that their assets are guaranteed. No! We must create the precedent according to which every criminal must know that they will pay for war with their money.' We turn to Ukraine's EU accession process, which has run into Hungarian opposition, despite the European Commission saying that Ukraine has 'done its homework' in three negotiating clusters. 'Ukraine, despite the war, is fulfilling all its obligations to the European Union. We adopt the laws, we carry out reforms. We are not asking for some excuses for Ukraine, for some simplified track,' Stefanchuk asserts. 'We honestly take our path, but we are also counting on the same kind of honesty from our European partners. And we want to make sure that Hungary is not a country that is Putin's veto on Ukraine's accession to the EU. Putin is not an EU member. He has no right of veto in the EU. This, I believe, is becoming a big threat for all the countries of the European Union, for all the NATO countries, because Putin is using some countries to block the alliance decisions. So this is a huge challenge.' Stefanchuk is adamant there is 'no backtracking at all' on anti-corruption reforms, despite the country slipping slightly in Transparency International's last Corruption Perceptions Index (2024). 'The situation has changed', Stefanchuk remarks. 'The Ukraine of 2025 is a different country from the Ukraine of 2005. Today we can hold top officials accountable, demonstrating to others that the fight against corruption is irreversible in our country. For example, the ex-head of the Supreme Court received a suspicion, and a couple of ministers received this notification of suspicion. That's the first time ever in the history of Ukraine. Ukraine's President Zelensky, the prime minister, and I, we all have a zero-tolerance approach to corruption.' Many countries were deeply concerned about Israel's attack on Iran on June 13. But Stefanchuk reminds viewers that 'Iran's Shahed drones terrorise Ukrainians every night. Of course, the weaker Iran and North Korea are, and the weaker Russia is, the better it is for us. The less peaceful citizens will suffer and the less Ukrainian infrastructure will suffer, the closer we will be to our common victory.'
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
NATO scrambles to overcome Spain block on summit spending deal
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Thursday threw a last-minute hand grenade into preparations for the gathering in The Hague by coming out strongly against the agreement. In a blistering letter to NATO chief Mark Rutte, Sanchez said that committing to a headline figure of five percent of GDP "would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive". The outburst from Madrid's centre-left leader has sparked fury from other NATO members who fear it could derail the carefully crafted compromise designed to keep Trump happy at the summit. Ambassadors held a round of negotiations at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Friday, but broke up without a deal being reached. Several diplomats said talks could drag on through the weekend in an effort to reach a breakthrough or the start of the summit on Tuesday. "There is no clarity yet," one diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing deliberations. In a bid to satisfy Trump's demand to spend five percent of GDP on defence, NATO chief Rutte has corralled allies towards a diplomatic trade-off. That would see them agree to coughing up 3.5 percent on core military needs, and 1.5 percent on a looser category of "defence-related" expenditures such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. As a string of reluctant European capitals fell into line, officials believed they were comfortably on track to reach the deal for the Hague summit. Washington's allies fear that Trump -- who has previously threatened not to protect countries he thinks don't spend enough -- could blow a hole in NATO if he doesn't get what he wants. Spain has been one of the lowest spending NATO countries on defence in relative terms. The country is only set to hit the alliance's current target of two percent this year after a 10 billion euro ($11.5 billion) injection. Sanchez is facing a difficult balancing act of aligning with NATO allies and cajoling his junior coalition partner, the far-left alliance Sumar, which is hostile to increasing military spending. © 2025 AFP
