The Yes movement itself has dreamed up barriers to independence
His perceived problem with the direct route to independence (briefly, making a UK General Election a plebiscite by a simple manifesto seeking a majority of Scottish votes for Scotland to become independent, and undertaking to implement it on such a majority, if necessary by declaration of the Scottish MPs) is that 'Westminster doesn't have to accept our legal argument in that vote, as the election is for a UK Parliament and Scotland would not be able to generate a majority of votes in Scotland alone ... Westminster can in theory prevent us from leaving ... the majority of English MPs have a veto on what Scotland does or doesn't do.'
He simply fails to grasp what the direct route is all about, in viewing it as a procedure of the Union parliament and attributing to England a role and a power which it does not have.
READ MORE: The lesson for the SNP as new poll puts independence support at 54%
Given that a referendum is prohibited, the one and only way which actually exists for the people of Scotland to vote for the country to become independent is by plebiscitary election. If the Scottish MPs, the highest representatives of the people, are elected as indy members by the majority of votes of the people of Scotland, they will occupy virtually all the Scottish seats, mandated by those votes to take Scotland out of the Union. Legal argument does not come into it. It is an election. The purpose and result of an election is the filling of seats. English votes and English seats do not come into it, since their make-up is neither here nor there for Scottish independence, and they have no part to play.
The Scottish members would have the legal, constitutional and democratic right and authority (and indeed the duty?) to fulfil the democratic imperative and carry out their mandate irrespective of other parts of the UK (reversing, this time democratically, the step into union taken three centuries ago by their predecessors). There is no prohibition of such a course. If Mr Potts or anyone else can find one, I would be interested to know.
In those circumstances, the declaration of Scottish independence by its MPs cannot properly be viewed as occurring either while Scotland is part of the Union or while it is independent. It is rather the deed of an instant marking the transition from one status to the other, a normal operation in steps of great legal effect.
READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: Why I stand by my claim after fierce debate that followed it
I imagine that London will actually negotiate the mechanism and details of independence with Edinburgh, but only after Scotland has voted for it and our representatives plainly demonstrate their resolve to carry it through at their own hand if necessary.
Mr Potts' position is far from unique in the independence movement, most of which may indeed be with him. Heaven help us, but the fixation with English omnipotence and the barriers it can place in Scotland's way is a concoction of the movement itself, as if we were determined not to succeed. No such claim has ever emerged from London, where any rare UK Government statement on the issue has been to the effect that Scotland may go if it no longer consents to the Union.
Alan Crocket
Motherwell
AMIDST the ongoing chaos, let it be known that Scotland's hydro, wind and other renewable energy sources are helping to keep this broken UK afloat. Yet in return, energy-rich Scotland, pays among the highest bills in the UK and indeed Europe.
The SNP and all independence campaigners cannot remain silent about this grossly unfair situation. It's time for the people of Scotland to take back control, believe, stand up and deliver independence.
Grant Frazer
Newtonmore
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
Free school meals ‘key' in Government's work to end child poverty
The Scottish Government is investing £3 million in a trial phase which will extend the provision of free school meals to S1 to S3 pupils who receive the Scottish child payment. More than 6000 secondary school students will be eligible for the meals from the start of the next school year – taking the total of youngsters who can claim a free lunch to more than 360,000. The latest phase of the project will see lunches being provided for eligible students in almost 60 schools in eight local authority areas – Aberdeen, Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (the Western Isles), Fife, Glasgow, Moray, North Ayrshire, Shetland and South Lanarkshire from August 2025. READ MORE: Palestine Action to be proscribed as terrorist organisation, Yvette Cooper says The impact of this trial will be independently reviewed, with the Scottish Government adding that the results of this would help with the future development of any further phases of the free school meal programme. First Minister John Swinney highlighted the advantages of the scheme as he visited Springburn Academy in Glasgow, where some 140 pupils could benefit. Swinney said: 'The free school meals programme is key in our national mission to eradicate child poverty, which saves families who take up the offer around £450 per eligible child per year. (Image: PA Wires) 'This next phase of the rollout will ensure that this offer is available to more families across the country. 'We know the positive impact that access to a healthy and nutritious meal can have on a pupil's learning and achievement in school. 'This demonstrates how important the programme is in our efforts to close the poverty-related attainment gap in Scotland, ensuring that every child is given an opportunity to succeed in education regardless of their background.' Swinney added: 'The Scottish Government will also continue its broader support to tackle the cost of the school day, including our £14.2 million school uniform clothing grant and our investment in the £1 billion Scottish attainment challenge.'
Scotsman
43 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Industrial strategy 'will drive tens of thousands of new jobs in Scotland', as business power cut promised
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Sir Keir Starmer's industrial strategy will "drive tens of thousands of new jobs" in Scotland, the Scottish Secretary has claimed. Ian Murray said the areas featured in the decade-long plan "are really a microcosm of the entire Scottish economy". The strategy includes specific funding to train people for work in defence, engineering, digital and construction roles. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish Secretary Ian Murray | PA Meanwhile, electricity costs for thousands of businesses will be cut by up to 25 per cent by scrapping green levies to help them compete with foreign rivals. The Prime Minister said the plan marked a 'turning point for Britain's economy' by supporting key industries where there is potential for growth. Launching the strategy on Monday at the site of the former Cockenzie power station in East Lothian, which is being redeveloped with UK government funding, Mr Murray said: "The big positive thing from a Scottish perspective is the eight sectors that are part of that industrial strategy, developed with business and sectors, are really a microcosm of the entire Scottish economy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What does the future hold for Cockenzie after its famous chimneys were brought down in 2016? "So whether it be defence, professional services, financial services, life sciences, AI, all of those kinds of parts of the Scottish economy are key. Scotland will drive a lot of this industrial strategy." Mr Murray added: "It's a really good news story for the Scottish economy and will drive tens of thousands of new jobs." 'Stifling growth' But Mr Murray argued policies pursued by the Scottish Government, such as its opposition to new nuclear power, risked stifling this growth. He pointed to the 10,000 jobs promised as part of the Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk. "That investment could be coming to Scotland, but it's currently not because of the de facto ban on nuclear here," Mr Murray said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Likewise with defence. We have a very, very big defence footprint in Scotland. In fact, the SDR [strategic defence review] and the investment in defence will disproportionately benefit Scotland in terms of jobs and that growth. "We have to look at that as an economic opportunity. But if that is stifled, it's not going to happen." UK ministers target SNP over munitions UK ministers have criticised the Scottish Government's policy of not providing public funding for munitions. Sir Keir said the decade-long plan would deliver 'the long-term certainty and direction British businesses need to invest' during an 'era of global uncertainty'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said: 'This industrial strategy marks a turning point for Britain's economy and a clear break from the short-termism and sticking plasters of the past.' The strategy's key areas The strategy focuses on eight areas where the UK is already strong and there is potential for further growth: advanced manufacturing, clean energy, creative industries, defence, digital, financial services, life sciences, and professional and business services. Manufacturers have warned 'crippling' power costs are far higher for UK businesses than competitors overseas. From 2027, a new British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme will cut costs by up to £40 per megawatt hour for over 7,000 manufacturing firms by exempting them from levies on bills including the renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs and the capacity market.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray ends 'lifelong' opposition to nukes
Speaking to Scottish media during a visit to East Lothian on Monday, Ian Murray said that his long-held position on nukes had changed because the world had changed. Previously, Murray described himself as a 'lifelong unilateralist', meaning he supported the UK binning its nuclear arsenal without any agreements for other nuclear-armed states to do the same. He is among the 2000 parliamentarians to have signed the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) pledge, which obliges signatories to work for their respective nations to sign up to a worldwide ban on nuclear weapons through the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). READ MORE: UN summit 'delivers strongest condemnation yet' of nuclear deterrence During a visit to an energy project in Cockenzie on Monday, Murray was asked about his position on nuclear weapons following the US government's strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities amid the country's escalating war with Israel. Asked if he was still a 'lifelong unilateralist' who wanted the UK to give up its nukes, Murray said: 'My position's not that anymore. I mean, times have changed. 'You can very much see with what's happened in Ukraine, but also the instability across the world, that is very important for us to have that nuclear deterrent. I think the public's also changed their mood on that.' Murray was then asked if he would remove his name from the ICAN pledge, where he is still listed as a signatory, due to his change of heart. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Defence Secretary John Healey on board a UK nuclear submarine at Faslane (Image: Simon Dawson/No 10 Downing Street) The Scottish Secretary initially seemed to play the pledge down, twice suggesting it was something he had signed in 2014. It was pointed out that the pledge did not exist before the adoption of the TPNW in mid-2017. Pushed on whether he would take his name off it, Murray said: 'Well, I would have to look at how to do that. I don't know if it's possible to do that, but certainly times have changed. 'The real important thing here is that the [UK] Government's posture is quite clear. I think the public back that posture in terms of increasing defence spending. 'I think nuclear deterrence is something that is critical in terms of national security, not just for ourselves, but our NATO allies. READ MORE: Kenny MacAskill: Donald Trump's bombing of Iran is illegal and insane 'So things do move on, and it's really important to have that very strong message both to our NATO allies and indeed to our European allies and the US that our commitment to that nuclear deterrent is sacrosanct and our commitment to NATO the same.' Asked again if he would then remove his name from the ICAN pledge, Murray said: 'If that's what's required.' He added: 'If you want to ask if I've changed my view, the answer to that question is obviously yes, but I think it's really important when circumstances change for that to happen.' The Scottish Secretary was visiting East Lothian to mark the launch of the UK Government's industrial strategy, which was published on Monday and outlined eight key areas for development in the British economy. These are: Advanced manufacturing Defence Clean energy Digital and technology Creative industries Financial services Life sciences Professional and business services For Scotland, the strategy singled out areas including Glasgow for manufacturing and defence, Edinburgh for financial and creative industries, Dundee for life sciences, and Aberdeen for energy. It further said a new 'professional and business services skills hub' would be set up somewhere in the 'Edinburgh-Glasgow central belt', mirroring similar projects in Manchester, Liverpool, Yorkshire, and the Midlands. The strategy said the hubs 'will reflect local needs and priorities, from accelerating the development of emerging technology sectors to connecting firms to potential investors'. Speaking to media in East Lothian, Murray was asked whether he believed Scottish Government opposition to the use of public money for arms firms or nuclear projects are holding the country's economy back. Torness power station (Image: Copyright Richard Sutcliffe and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence) The UK Government has said it will step in if necessary after Rolls-Royce was told that a project for a welding centre in the Glasgow area could not be supported with £2.5 million of funding from Scottish Enterprise due to the SNP Government's policy of not funding 'munitions' projects. And the SNP also oppose any new nuclear energy plants north of the Border, a policy Labour have insisted they will quickly rescind if they win power at Holyrood. Murray said: 'We're not very far away from Torness, in terms of Scotland's nuclear site, and if you look at the announcement that's been made in terms of the massive investment into Sizewell C, that's 10,000 jobs, that's 1500 apprenticeships, it's £14.6 billion. 'That investment could be coming to Scotland, but it's currently not because of the de-facto ban on nuclear here. 'Likewise with defence, we have a very, very big defence footprint in Scotland. In fact, the investment in defence will disproportionately benefit Scotland in terms of jobs and that growth. 'We have to look at that as an economic opportunity, but if that is stifled, it's not going to happen.'
