RGCB invites applications for PhD biotechnology programme
Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology (RGCB), Thiruvananthapuram, has invited applications for admission to the PhD programme, starting in August 2025, in various domains of disease biology, bioinformatics and plant science.
Candidates with a postgraduate degree in life/agricultural/environmental/veterinary/ pharmaceutical/medical sciences or allied subjects with a minimum of 60 per cent marks in aggregate or equivalent grade in the UGC 10-point scale can apply.
Aspirants should also have a valid JRF (Junior Research Fellowship) of UGC/CSIR/ ICMR/DBT/DST-INSPIRE or any other national-level fellowship for a period of five years offered by the government.
The upper age limit is 26 years. The age limit will be relaxed for SC/ST candidates and the physically-challenged.
The last date for submitting online applications is June 12.
For more details, visit: https://rgcb.res.in/phdadmission2025-Aug/
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
11 hours ago
- The Hindu
A critical look at UGC's recent regulations for Ph.D. guides, in the light of NEP 2020
Academic research in India is once again at a pivotal crossroads. In a recent directive, the University Grants Commission (UGC) has stipulated that research supervisors for Ph.D. candidates must belong to institutions with recognised postgraduate research centres. This move, intended to ensure quality control and institutional accountability, comes at a time when the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 is advocating the democratisation and decentralisation of research — starting right from undergraduate programmes. The apparent contradiction between these two directions raises fundamental questions about the future of research in India. Quality vs. accessibility On the surface, the UGC's intention seems well-founded. Research is a rigorous activity demanding access to institutional infrastructure, peer support, and ethical oversight. Restricting supervisors to PG research centres ensures that minimum academic standards are upheld. However, this measure inadvertently sidelines a vast cohort of capable researchers and teachers from UG colleges, who may possess strong academic credentials, extensive research experience, and proven track records but are now deemed ineligible solely due to institutional affiliation. The policy runs the risk of converting what should be an intellectually inclusive process into an exclusive club, centred around a few institutions with 'recognised' status. Is research potential a property of an institution or an individual? Individual merit This brings us to a crucial philosophical and pedagogical question: Should research supervision be institution-centric or individual-centric? There are several instances where professors in non-research PG colleges have published in high-impact journals, received fellowships, and mentored scholars informally with great success. By denying these individuals the ability to formally guide Ph.D. students, the system fails to recognise merit and performance outside bureaucratic boundaries. Ironically, NEP 2020 emphasises promoting research from the undergraduate level, allowing students to engage in high-level inquiry and innovation as early as the fourth year. How, then, do we reconcile this vision with a restrictive policy that limits who can guide future researchers? Repercussions The implications of this policy could be far-reaching. First, it may lead to overcrowding of researchers under a few supervisors in PG research centres, reducing the quality of mentorship. Second, it may demoralise qualified teachers in UG institutions who are eager to contribute to national knowledge production. Third, it creates a two-tiered system; those who are 'research-worthy' and those who are not, based not on talent but institutional status. Additionally, the assumption that only PG centres have the necessary infrastructure is increasingly outdated in the digital age. With open-access journals, virtual laboratories, collaborative tools, and global research networks, much of the academic work today transcends physical campuses. Need for balance A more nuanced framework is urgently needed: one that upholds academic quality while actively nurturing individual research talent. To begin with, merit-based accreditation should be introduced, allowing experienced faculty from non-PG research centres to independently apply to be Ph.D. guides based on academic credentials, such as publication records, citation indices, or leadership in funded research projects. In place of blanket bans on entire categories of institutions, regular institutional audits should be conducted to assess and certify research readiness in undergraduate colleges, ensuring that deserving institutions are not unfairly excluded. Additionally, collaborative mentorship models could be adopted, allowing for joint supervision where a researcher has a primary guide from a UG institution and a co-guide from a PG research centre, thereby encouraging mentorship diversity and inter-institutional learning. Policies must also be realigned with the NEP 2020's research-first vision, which calls for building research mentorship capacity across the academic spectrum — including UG colleges — instead of restricting it. Finally, investment in digital infrastructure is essential, enabling equitable access to research databases, tools, and collaborative platforms for all accredited institutions, thereby decentralising research power and making knowledge creation more inclusive. Research is not the privilege of a few but the responsibility of all in the academic ecosystem. UGC's commitment to quality is laudable, but it must not come at the cost of inclusivity and innovation. As India moves towards becoming a global knowledge hub, it is essential to ensure that the structures we build empower every capable mind, not just the ones housed in designated research centres. The strength of a nation's research culture lies not in institutional labels but in the intellectual spirit it chooses to nurture. The writer is a Professor and Head of the Department of English, M. J. College, Jalgaon, Maharashtra.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Indian scientists develop nano-cups to zap cancer with heat
Illustration of semi-shell formation using rhombic dodecahedron (RD) shaped ZIF-8 as a sacrificial template and its PEGylation-assisted blood compatibility, cryopreservation, systemic safety and on-demand reconstitution towards pronounced photothermal therapy of advanced cancer (Image credit: DST) BENGALURU: Indian scientists have developed a simplified, one-step method to synthesise nano-cups , minute, bowl-like particles, capable of destroying cancer tumours using heat. This innovation holds the potential to make photothermal therapy (PTT), a non-invasive cancer treatment technique, significantly more accessible and effective. 'The team, comprising researchers from the Institute of Nano Science and Technology (INST), Mohali; Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre; and the IIT-Bombay, has fabricated what are known as PEGylated semi-shells (SS) with a unique nano-cup morphology. These structures are partly coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG), which boosts their compatibility with biological systems,' the department of science and technology (DST) said. Traditionally, manufacturing such nano-cups involved cumbersome, multi-step procedures and harsh chemicals like hydrofluoric acid. The new method, published in Communications Chemistry, a journal from the Nature group, sidesteps those issues by using biocompatible materials and mild conditions. 'The process replaces complex etching with a clever use of ZIF-8, a metal-organic framework, as a sacrificial template. As the ZIF-8 dissolves, gold nanoparticles grow in its place, forming the semi-shells, all at room temperature, and using ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) as a gentle reducing agent,' DST said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Importantly, it added, the resulting nanoparticles strongly absorb and scatter light in the near-infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum. This makes them highly effective for PTT, which involves using laser light to heat and destroy cancer cells. 'Further, PEG coating enhances the particles' shelf life, water stability, and compatibility with the bloodstream, making them suitable for safe intravenous delivery. In laboratory tests, these PEGylated SS showed high photothermal conversion efficiency and no toxicity,' DST said. The research team demonstrated that these nano-cups could successfully ablate metastatic breast tumours in preclinical mice models. The treatment not only shrank the tumours but also improved survival rates and reduced the chances of relapse. 'Beyond treating cancer, researchers suggest that the particles' unique optical properties could be harnessed for biosensing applications, such as surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy (SERS), and future studies will explore combining chemotherapy with photothermal therapy,' DST added.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
PPU declares pre-PhD results, 803 research seats open
Patna: Patliputra University (PPU) has declared the results of the Pre-PhD Test 2024, bringing relief to thousands of aspiring research scholars. A total of 803 seats are available for the research programme this year with 7,329 candidates having appeared for the written examination held on April 4, said PPU registrar N K Jha. Among all subjects, history recorded the highest number of qualifiers with 262 candidates clearing the test, followed by commerce (191), economics (158), English (145), political science (127) and Hindi (110). Other notable numbers included psychology (93), sociology (89), zoology (82), geography (81) and botany (31). The results were declared by vice-chancellor Indrajeet Singh in the presence of pro-vice-chancellor Ganesh Mahto and other university officials on Monday evening. The registrar said the results marked a milestone in the university's academic calendar as successful candidates move one step closer to securing admission into the PhD programme. "The pre-PhD test serves as a mandatory gateway for research aspirants and is known for its rigorous standards set by the UGC," Jha said, adding that the successful candidates will now proceed to interviews. The final admission process will soon be published on the university's official website. Meanwhile, students have been advised to closely monitor the university website for updates and keep the necessary documents ready for the next stages of the admission process, he added.
