Q&A with Maliki Osman ahead of his retirement from politics
SINGAPORE: Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Mohamad Maliki Osman announced last month that he would retire from politics after almost 25 years.
In an interview with CNA ahead of his final day in office on Thursday (May 22), the veteran politician – who is also Second Minister for Foreign Affairs – spoke about the ongoing Israel-Hamas war. He said that while Singaporeans feel strongly about it, he hopes they can appreciate the complexity of the issues.
The 59-year-old also shared his advice and regrets, including not being there for his family when he first entered politics.
Q. The plight of the Palestinians continues to be a polarising topic among Singaporeans. Having been in the political scene, wearing the foreign affairs hat, what about the conflict do you want more Singaporeans to know?
A: I came to MFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) some 10 years ago, and of course, (I have been) advancing Singapore's relations internationally. But nothing compares to the amount of work that (has been) invested since the Oct 7, 2023 incident. Prior to that, I've been traveling the Middle East several times. I've been to Ramallah prior to that, also because we have been supporting the Palestinian people for many years, looking at how best we can continue to support them, and we do this because we believe that as a small country, we do support countries which are faced with challenges that we had before.
What happened after Oct 7 was very, very painful to many people, heart-wrenching as we see the visuals. It affects Singaporeans of all walks of life, not just Muslim Singaporeans. Young people feel very strongly about what they are seeing and and I think it's a very complex issue. I visited the Middle East many, many times … and even till today, I'm learning a lot more about the Middle East and the dynamic relationship between different countries, different people, different tribes.
What I do hope Singaporeans can appreciate is that it's really a complex issue that did span very, very far, many, many years - even centuries for that matter.
We've articulated very clearly that while Israel has its right to self-defence, it can only do so and should only do so within international law, abiding by international law and international humanitarian law. And Singapore has articulated our position that Israel's actions have gone too far, and we will work with the international community to find sustainable solutions.
Most important is the opening up of the pathways for major aid to go in. We had a ceasefire. We had human aid coming in, but it was stopped, as we all know, and we do hope that's the first thing that will happen next. We continue to engage our partners out there in the Middle East. (Since Oct 7, 2023), we have delivered almost eight tranches of major aid.
What more can we do? We can continue to work with like-minded partners there, to work with both parties to find that solution that we want. But it's going to be very challenging, and I appeal to Singaporeans to understand that is not easy. It's not easy, and we need to continue to have the space to work with both parties, and that's why we continue to work with Israel. Minister for Foreign Affairs (Vivian Balakrishnan) visited Israel, had direct communications, articulated our position. Because we continue to have that channel of communication, we were able, and one of the very few air forces that were given the clearance to do the air drop of humanitarian assistance. Not many air forces who had sought permission to do so was able to do so. It is because we are seen as a trusted partner.
Q. Can you share more about Singapore's role as a small democratic society? How do these international countries view us when it comes to a global crisis where cooperation is needed?
A. We are a little red dot. Some have always said that we punch above our weight. I want to be more humble and modest to say that we do what we can to be a responsible member of the international community in foreign affairs.
One of the key things that we hold on to is that we are a friend to all, an enemy to none. As far as we can two, being a friend, we must be there to help our friends who are in need. Three, we must always be relevant to others.
I go to many international meetings and they recognise Singapore for many of our contributions. We do financial contributions, but not much. We do what we can. But it is more the Singapore that values the rule of law, the Singapore that's able to galvanise likeminded countries to articulate the important principles of international, rule of law, respect for sovereignty - these are very important things that Singapore brings to the table, and these are the things that people appreciate us for.
And when there's an international crisis, we will step forward. We will do what we can, tell them that we are prepared to provide whatever assistance that's needed. So that's why we went to Egypt in November 2023, just a month after Oct 7, to discuss with our Egyptian counterparts what can be done.
Q. Why was it important to build interpersonal relationships, whether it's with our neighbours Brunei, Malaysia, Indonesia, and how does it translate to Singapore on the bigger level?
A: One of the things that I believe in is sincerity and honesty and genuineness in establishing and maintaining relationships - not just personal relationships, but even at the international level. Even as diplomats, we need to show everyone out there that we are sincere; we are a friend; we are a trusted partner.
I started visiting Brunei sometime in 2012 when I was in MINDEF (Ministry of Defence) at that time for Hari Raya visits, and we realised that's part and parcel of the region - the Malay-ness, you know, where we build a sense of familiar ties with each other? And what better way than Hari Raya?
In 2013, I took over visiting and leading the delegation. I would spend the first day at home in Singapore, and the next day I would have flown to Brunei and I would spend four, five days there. And my relatives would see pictures in the media of me meeting many, many friends in Brunei, and they say: 'Why are you not visiting us yet?' So that's part and parcel of work at the same time.
By the time I reached my second year, third year, I didn't see it as work anymore. I see it as me going to visit friends. And who are the friends I visit? I don't just visit ministers. I visit former ministers. I visit Brunei elders who were there way before I was there to pay respects to them, to learn from them about the relationship between Brunei and Singapore. And I also visited potential leaders - the permanent secretaries, the deputy secretaries - who today are ministers. So we literally spent a lot of time together, and that allows us to continue to maintain that strong relationship and find new ways of collaboration.
Q. Many maybe had a sense that you would be the next Minister-in-charge for Muslim Affairs. How do you make sense to Singaporeans about the relevance of that role today? And do you see that it will continue to be relevant moving forward?
A. I think as a Malay, I fully appreciate that role, and I think it reflects the government's commitment to support the Malay community and to provide the Malay community with someone at the highest level in Cabinet overseeing the development of the Malay community.
The position of the Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs was instituted in 1977 to really bring up the stature of the importance of the Malay community for the holistic development of Singapore. That's where the minister has direct access to the Prime Minister and the Cabinet to articulate issues that are relevant to the Muslim community, issues that must be addressed, as well as how we can continue to support the community to move forward.
I think over many years, you've seen the success of the various institutions. You see MUIS, for example, you see how our Islamic leadership has reached a level that's been recognised by many Islamic countries.
Q. After your retirement from politics, what is next for you?
A. After 25 years, people ask me, what's my greatest regret? My greatest regret was I was never there for my family. I spent very little time with them. My daughter was six; my son was three when I started politics. And today, my daughter is almost 30, and she just got married, and my son is 27 and I didn't get a chance to see them grow. I didn't get a chance to see my parents in their later years.
So those are moments that I would like to spend time reflecting a little bit more first before I step into the next phase of my life. Spend a bit more time - I should say, spend a lot more time with my wife now, and I think taking a little bit of a break and then see where I can contribute more. I think I won't run away from contributing in the social service sector.
Q. What is your advice to young Singaporeans considering a role in the public service?
A. Answer the call if you are asked to step forward. Don't be afraid, but go inside it with an open mind and an open heart. Go inside it with a partnership with whoever that's around you, your significant others. Go into it with a sincerity, the sincerity that you really do want to make a difference in the lives of the people who will come across in the things that you see that are not right.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
41 minutes ago
- Straits Times
16 hurt, building hit in Israel after Iran missiles: Rescue services, TV
Rescuers and security personnel at the impacted site after a missile attack from Iran, amid the Iran-Israel conflict in Tel Aviv, Israel on June 22. PHOTO: REUTERS JERUSALEM - At least 16 people were hurt and at least one impact was reported in central Israel after Iran launched two waves of missiles at the country following the US bombing of its nuclear sites, rescue services and reports said. Israel's Magen David Adom rescue service said in a statement that it had 'evacuated 16 people to hospital, including a 30-year-old man in moderate condition after being wounded in the upper body by shrapnel'. Public broadcaster KAN 11 showed images of a devastated building surrounded by mounds of rubble that it said was in central Israel, following the two waves of missiles launched at Israel from around 7.30am (12.30pm Singapore time). Sirens rang around the country after the Israeli army reported the incoming missiles, with air defences activated shortly afterwards, causing loud explosions heard in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Israeli police reported 'the fall of weapon fragments' in a northern area encompassing the port of Haifa, where local authorities said emergency services were heading to an 'accident site'. Reporting on missile strikes is subject to strict military censorship rules in Israel, but at least 50 impacts have been officially acknowledged nationwide and 25 people have been killed since the war began with Iran on June 13, according to official figures. Coastal hub Tel Aviv, the southern city of Beersheba and the northern port Haifa have been the three areas most frequently targeted by Iran. Israel's sophisticated air defences have intercepted more than 450 missiles along with around 1,000 drones, according to the latest figures from the Israeli military. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Strikes on Iran mark Trump's biggest, and riskiest, foreign policy gamble: Analysts
WASHINGTON: With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch-foe, US President Donald Trump has done something he had long vowed to avoid - intervene militarily in a major foreign war. The dramatic US strike, including the targeting of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear installation deep underground, marks the biggest foreign policy gamble of Trump's two presidencies and one fraught with risks and unknowns. Trump, who insisted on Saturday (Jun 21) that Iran must now make peace or face further attacks, could provoke Tehran into retaliating by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil artery, attacking US military bases and allies in the Middle East, stepping up its missile barrage on Israel and activating proxy groups against American and Israeli interests worldwide, analysts said. Such moves could escalate into a broader, more protracted conflict than Trump had envisioned, evoking echoes of the 'forever wars' that America fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, which he had derided as 'stupid' and promised never to be dragged into. 'The Iranians are seriously weakened and degraded in their military capabilities,' said Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East negotiator for Democratic and Republican administrations. 'But they have all sorts of asymmetric ways that they can respond ... This is not going to end quick.' In the lead-up to the bombing that he announced late on Saturday, Trump had vacillated between threats of military action and appeals for renewed negotiation to persuade Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear programme. A senior White House official said that once Trump was convinced that Tehran had no interest in reaching a nuclear agreement, he decided the strikes were 'the right thing to do'. Trump gave the go-ahead once he was assured of a 'high probability of success,' the official said – a determination reached after more than a week of Israeli air attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities paved the way for the US to deliver the potentially crowning blow. NUCLEAR THREAT REMAINS Trump touted the "great success" of the strikes, which he said included the use of massive "bunker-buster bombs" on the main site at Fordow. But some experts suggested that while Iran's nuclear programme may have been set back for many years, the threat may be far from over. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon, saying its programme is for purely peaceful purposes. 'In the long term, military action is likely to push Iran to determine nuclear weapons are necessary for deterrence and that Washington is not interested in diplomacy,' the Arms Control Association, a non-partisan US-based organisation that advocates for arms control legislation, said in a statement. 'Military strikes alone cannot destroy Iran's extensive nuclear knowledge. The strikes will set Iran's programme back, but at the cost of strengthening Tehran's resolve to reconstitute its sensitive nuclear activities,' the group said. Eric Lob, assistant professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at Florida International University, said Iran's next move remains an open question and suggested that among its forms of retaliation could be to hit 'soft targets' of the US and Israel inside and outside the region. But he also said there was a possibility that Iran could return to the negotiating table – 'though they would be doing so in an even weaker position' – or seek a diplomatic off-ramp. In the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, however, Iran showed little appetite for concessions. Iran's Atomic Energy Organization said it would not allow development of its 'national industry' to be stopped, and an Iranian state television commentator said every US citizen or military member in the region would not be legitimate targets. Karim Sadjadpour, an analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, posted on X: 'Trump indicated this is now the time for peace. It's unclear and unlikely the Iranians will see it the same way. This is more likely to open a new chapter of the 46-year-old US-Iran war than conclude it.' "REGIME CHANGE" Some analysts suggested that Trump, whose administration has previously disavowed any aim of dislodging the Iranian leadership, could be drawn into seeking 'regime change' if Tehran carries out major reprisals or moves to build a nuclear weapon. That, in turn, would bring additional risks. 'Beware mission creep, aiming for regime change and democratization campaigns,' said Laura Blumenfeld, a Middle East analyst at the Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies in Washington. 'You'll find the bones of many failed US moral missions buried in Middle East sands.' Jonathan Panikoff, a former US deputy intelligence officer for the Middle East, said Iran's leadership would quickly engage in 'disproportionate attacks' if it felt its survival was imperilled. But Tehran will also have to be mindful of the consequences, he said. While actions such as closing the Strait of Hormuz would pose problems for Trump with the resulting higher oil prices and potential US inflationary impact, it would also hurt China, one of Iran's few powerful allies. At the same time, Trump is already facing strong pushback from congressional Democrats against the Iran attack and will also have to contend with opposition from the anti-interventionist wing of his Republican MAGA base. Trump, who faced no major international crisis in his first term, is now embroiled in one just six months into his second. Even if he hopes US military involvement can be limited in time and scope, the history of such conflicts often carries unintended consequences for American presidents. Trump's slogan of 'peace through strength' will certainly be tested as never before, especially with his opening of a new military front after failing to meet his campaign promises to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza. 'Trump is back in the war business,' said Richard Gowan, US director at the International Crisis Group. 'I am not sure anyone in Moscow, Tehran or Beijing ever believed his spiel that he is a peacemaker. It always looked more like a campaign phrase than a strategy."
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
In full: President Trump's speech on US strikes on Iran
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said US air strikes on Saturday (Jun 21) "totally obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites, as Washington joined Israel's war with Tehran in a flashpoint moment for the Middle East. In a televised address to the nation from the White House, Trump warned that the United States would go after more targets if Iran did not make peace quickly. Here's the full transcript of his speech, which lasted just over three minutes: Thank you very much. A short time ago, the US military carried out massive, precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime. Fordo, Natanz and Esfahan. Everybody heard those names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise. Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not. Future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier. For 40 years, Iran has been saying. Death to America, death to Israel. They have been killing our people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs, with roadside bombs. That was their specialty. We lost over 1,000 people and hundreds of thousands throughout the Middle East, and around the world have died as a direct result of their hate in particular. So many were killed by their general, Qassim Soleimani. I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen. It will not continue. I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before, and we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel. I want to thank the Israeli military for the wonderful job they've done. And most importantly, I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight, and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades. Hopefully, we will no longer need their services in this capacity. I hope that's so. I also want to congratulate the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan "Razin" Caine, spectacular general, and all of the brilliant military minds involved in this attack. With all of that being said, this cannot continue. There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes. There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight. Not even close. There has never been a military that could do what took place just a little while ago. Tomorrow, General Caine, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth will have a press conference at 8am at the Pentagon. And I want to just thank everybody. And, in particular, God. I want to just say, we love you, God, and we love our great military. Protect them. God bless the Middle East. God bless Israel and God bless America. Thank you very much. Thank you.
