The Y Combinator Question And Is Silicon Valley's Kingmaker Playing A Different Game In The AI Era?
Sign with logos for Google and the Google owned video streaming service YouTube at the Googleplex, ... More the Silicon Valley headquarters of search engine and technology company Google Inc in Mountain View, California, April 14, 2018. (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)
The YC demo day numbers present a fascinating puzzle. Y Combinator's first ever Spring 2025 batch at their new HQ showcased 141 startups with an average weekly revenue growth of 12%, marking another impressive milestone for the accelerator that gave the world Airbnb, Stripe, and Dropbox. More than 18000 startups applied, and at the 0.8% accept rate, the prestige and hype seem to be at the all time high .Yet these metrics show a more intriguing question that has venture capitalists and industry observers scratching their heads.
According to a recent debate on LinkedIn, since 2018 and fundamental changes the rules of artificial intelligence, thirty-seven companies have achieved unicorn status in the generative AI space. The curious fact? Zero went through Y Combinator. Some investors are debating the value of the YC badge premium, reflected in the valuation and its multiple.
At first glance, this seems like a damning indictment. YC invests in approximately five hundred startups annually, with nearly ninety percent of recent cohorts being GenAI companies. Yet their unicorn count in this space remains conspicuously absent. But what if this apparent failure actually reveals something more sophisticated about YC's long-term strategy?
The most immediate explanation lies in the fundamental economics of the AI revolution. Infrastructure plays in generative AI require massive capital outlays that dwarf traditional software startups. When foundation model development demands one hundred million dollars or more in computational resources, YC's standard investment amounts become challenging to scale to unicorn status through traditional pathways.
OpenAI's billion-dollar funding rounds and Anthropic's multi-billion dollar war chest have created an entirely new category of competition. But this capital intensity might actually validate YC's approach rather than undermine it. While others chase the expensive infrastructure plays, YC may be positioning itself for the inevitable wave of application-layer innovations that will follow.
History suggests that the most sustainable value creation often occurs not in the foundational technologies themselves, but in the creative applications built on top of them. The internet's biggest winners weren't the infrastructure providers, but companies like Amazon and Google that leveraged existing infrastructure in novel ways.
YC's apparent focus on AI application companies might reflect a sophisticated understanding of technology adoption cycles. The current GenAI unicorns are primarily infrastructure and foundation model companies—impressive technical achievements, but potentially vulnerable to commoditization as the technology matures.
The Spring 2025 batch revealed interesting patterns: companies building "Cursor for X" applications, vertical AI solutions for specific industries, and novel consumer AI experiences. While these may seem less ambitious than training new foundation models, they could represent the real long-term value creation opportunities in AI.
Consider that Microsoft's massive investment in OpenAI has generated more value through integration with existing products like Office and Azure than OpenAI has captured independently. The application layer may prove to be where the most durable competitive advantages emerge.
YC's investment timing might be more strategic than it appears. The accelerator is known for entering markets before they become obviously attractive to larger investors. Their absence from the current crop of GenAI unicorns could signal that they view the current wave as overvalued infrastructure plays rather than sustainable business models.
The companies achieving unicorn status in GenAI today are doing so primarily on potential rather than proven business fundamentals. Many face uncertain unit economics, regulatory challenges, and intense competition from well-funded incumbents. YC's focus on companies with demonstrated revenue growth and clear paths to profitability might prove prescient as the market matures.
The accelerator's emphasis on weekly growth metrics, while sometimes criticized as short-term thinking, could actually provide better risk-adjusted returns than the massive bets being placed on unproven AI infrastructure companies.
Perhaps most intriguingly, YC's approach might reflect a belief in AI democratization rather than concentration. While current GenAI unicorns represent centralized, capital-intensive approaches to AI, YC's portfolio companies seem to be building tools that make AI accessible to smaller businesses and individual creators.
This democratization thesis aligns with YC's historical pattern of betting on technologies that empower individuals and small businesses rather than reinforcing existing power structures. The real AI revolution might not be in building bigger models, but in making AI capabilities accessible to everyone.
The rise of companies building AI development tools, specialized vertical applications, and consumer-focused AI experiences suggests YC might be positioning for a future where AI capability is distributed rather than concentrated in a few large foundation model providers.
YC's absence from current GenAI unicorns might reflect a longer investment horizon than the market currently appreciates. The accelerator has historically succeeded by identifying sustainable business models rather than chasing technological trends. Their current AI investments might be targeting the second or third wave of AI innovation rather than the first.
The most successful technology investors often appear to be "missing out" during peak hype cycles, only to emerge with superior returns as markets mature and fundamentals matter more than speculation. YC's cautious approach to infrastructure-heavy AI plays might prove to be shrewd risk management rather than strategic blindness.
Furthermore, the three-month accelerator program might be perfectly suited for AI application companies that can iterate quickly and validate market demand, even if it's inadequate for companies requiring years of research and development.
While YC hasn't produced GenAI unicorns, their portfolio companies are generating impressive revenue growth and solving real customer problems. The Spring 2025 batch's 12% weekly growth rate suggests that practical AI applications might offer more predictable returns than moonshot infrastructure investments.
The accelerator's focus on revenue-generating AI companies, rather than pure research plays, might reflect a sophisticated understanding of what creates lasting value in technology markets. Companies that can demonstrate clear customer demand and sustainable unit economics often outperform those built on technological prowess alone.
This approach also provides more diversified risk exposure. Rather than making massive bets on a few infrastructure companies that could be disrupted by new research breakthroughs, YC is building a portfolio of application companies that can adapt to changing technological foundations.
The absence of YC companies among current GenAI unicorns raises broader questions about how innovation emerges and scales in different technology cycles. Perhaps the current wave of GenAI unicorns represents an anomaly rather than the new normal—companies that achieved massive valuations based on technical capability during a period of abundant capital and speculative enthusiasm.
As the market matures and focuses more on sustainable business models, YC's emphasis on practical applications and proven revenue generation might prove to be the winning strategy. The real test won't be who achieved unicorn status first, but who builds lasting, profitable businesses that create genuine value for customers.
Ultimately, the success of YC's AI strategy will be measured not by participation in the current unicorn race, but by the long-term performance of their portfolio companies. If the current GenAI unicorns prove to be overvalued infrastructure plays with questionable business models, YC's focus on practical applications could generate superior returns.
The Spring 2025 batch's strong revenue growth metrics suggest that YC's AI companies are building real businesses with paying customers rather than pursuing valuation-driven strategies - despite the fact that 70% applied with $0 revenue, and nearly half had only an idea. This focus on fundamentals might seem unexciting compared to billion-dollar foundation model funding rounds, but it could prove to be the more sustainable approach.
The accelerator's track record suggests they excel at identifying business models that can scale efficiently rather than technologies that generate headlines. Their current AI portfolio might be optimized for long-term value creation rather than short-term valuation maximization.
YC's approach might reflect strategic patience rather than strategic confusion. The accelerator has consistently succeeded by entering markets at optimal times rather than being first movers. Their absence from the current GenAI unicorn wave could indicate they're waiting for better entry points or more attractive business models to emerge.
The history of technology adoption suggests that the most valuable companies often emerge in the second or third waves of innovation, after the initial infrastructure has been built and market needs become clearer. YC's current AI investments might be positioning for this later wave rather than trying to compete with well-funded infrastructure plays.
This patience could prove particularly valuable if the current GenAI market experiences a correction or consolidation. Companies with strong fundamentals and efficient capital structures might be better positioned to survive market downturns than highly valued infrastructure plays with uncertain business models.
Whether YC's AI strategy proves brilliant or misguided remains to be seen. The accelerator's absence from current GenAI unicorns could represent either a missed opportunity or sophisticated market timing. The answer will depend on how the AI market evolves and whether sustainable business models emerge from the current wave of infrastructure investment.
What's clear is that YC continues to attract strong founders and generate impressive portfolio company metrics. The Spring 2025 batch's performance suggests that their approach is creating real value, even if it's not generating the headline-grabbing valuations of foundation model companies.
The ultimate test will be whether YC's focus on practical AI applications and sustainable business models generates better risk-adjusted returns than the massive infrastructure bets being made elsewhere in the market. Only time will tell if Silicon Valley's kingmaker is missing the AI revolution or positioning for its next phase.
As the AI landscape continues to evolve, YC's strategy might prove to be exactly what the market needs: a focus on building real businesses that solve actual problems, rather than chasing technological breakthroughs with uncertain commercial applications. The proof, as they say, will be in the pudding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
34 minutes ago
- The Verge
macOS Tahoe could finally say goodbye to FireWire.
Posted Jun 20, 2025 at 6:29 PM UTC macOS Tahoe could finally say goodbye to FireWire. However, it's still several months before macOS Tahoe is officially released. FireWire support could still return, but the last computer Apple released with the port was the 13-inch 2012 MacBook Pro. macOS Tahoe Beta Drops FireWire Support [
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Comtech Rejoins iCERT, Deepening Commitment to Public Safety Innovation
Renewed Membership Reinforces Public Safety Commitment and Expands Advocacy Platform CHANDLER, Ariz., June 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun. 20, 2025-- Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (NASDAQ: CMTL) ("Comtech" or the "Company"), a global communications technology leader, today announced that its Terrestrial & Wireless Networks ("T&W") business segment has rejoined the Industry Council for Emergency Response Technologies, Inc. ("iCERT"). Founded in 2005, iCERT is a commercial sector trade association that brings together leading technology companies to drive innovation, shape effective policy, and promote open standards that improve public safety and emergency response. This return to iCERT is part of a series of strategic moves by the T&W business segment, including the launch of Allerium Mira - a cloud-native call handling platform designed to simplify complexity and support evolving 9-1-1 needs. Together, these efforts reflect a renewed commitment to public safety and essential service providers, backed by the same trusted team, proven solutions, and industry-wide support. "We're excited to collaborate with iCERT as it expands its focus on key issues and innovations in emergency communications," said Susan Ornstein, Senior Director of Legal & Regulatory Affairs of Comtech T&W, who joined the association's board of directors earlier this month. "Under its new leadership, iCERT is amplifying the voice of its members on public policy issues and engaging partner associations like NASNA, NENA, and APCO to advance shared priorities across the public safety community. Together with iCERT, Comtech is well positioned to address pressing public safety and regulatory matters, and advocate for federal funding, legislation, and FCC policy updates." "Few organizations have meant as much to me throughout my career as iCERT," said Jeff Robertson, President of Comtech T&W. "Twenty years ago, I worked alongside two industry visionaries to establish this organization with the shared goal of fostering collaboration between the public and private sectors. I was privileged to serve as iCERT's inaugural executive director and have remained a strong advocate of its mission throughout my career. Seeing our company rejoin the iCERT community is especially meaningful. Comtech is committed to delivering results that help communities become safer, more connected, and resilient, and iCERT is a vital partner in advancing that work." "iCERT stands committed to propelling public safety forward, facilitating collaboration among its member base and industry stakeholders, and creating an environment that fosters innovation and progress," said Don Brittingham, Interim Executive Director of iCERT. "Members like Comtech play a vital role in strengthening the organization's depth and breadth of experience across the full public safety call flow. I am excited to welcome Jeff Robertson and his team back to iCERT and look forward to empowering public safety together." About Comtech Comtech Telecommunications Corp. is a leading provider of satellite and space communications technologies; terrestrial and wireless network solutions; Next Generation 9-1-1 (NG9-1-1) and emergency services; and cloud native capabilities to commercial and government customers around the world. Through its culture of innovation and employee empowerment, Comtech leverages its global presence and decades of technology leadership and experience to create some of the world's most innovative solutions for mission-critical communications. For more information, please visit About iCERT iCERT—The Industry Council for Emergency Response Technologies—is the only industry trade association focused exclusively on emergency response technologies and related equipment, systems, and services. iCERT is dedicated to improving public safety through innovation. For more information, please visit Forward-Looking Statements Certain information in this press release contains statements that are forward-looking in nature and involve certain significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results and performance could differ materially from such forward-looking information. The Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings identify many such risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking information in this press release is qualified in its entirety by the risks and uncertainties described in such Securities and Exchange Commission filings. View source version on Contacts Investor Relations Maria Ceriello631-962-7102investors@ Media Contact Jamie
Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
Apple Loop: iPhone 17 Pro Release Date, Apple Challenges AI Assumptions, iPad Pro Multitasking Explained
Apple CEO Tim Cook delivers remarks at Apple headquarters (Photo by) Taking a look back at this week's news and headlines from across the Apple world, including iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro launch dates, stunning iPhone display upgrade, new iOS 26 features, MacBook Pro upgrade details, iPad multitasking, WWDC goals, and Apple challenges AI assumptions. Apple Loop is here to remind you of a few of the many discussions around Apple in the last seven days. You can also read my weekly digest of Android news here on Forbes. iPhone 17 Family Launch Dates Apple's tentpole event of the year, which everything is built around, is the iPhone launch. Which dates are available for this year's iPhone 17 family? David Phelan looks over the choices of September 2/3, 9/10, or 16/17: "We can rule out the first pair as that completely clashes with the big consumer electronics show in Berlin, IFA, which runs Sept. 5-9… The final pair of dates seems too late for me, though they're not impossible — if Apple hits a snag in production, it can move the launch to that week. Most likely are Tuesday, Sept. 9 or Wednesday, Sept. 10. My gut says it will be on Tuesday, Sept. 9 at 10 a.m. Pacific in Apple's Cupertino HQ." (Forbes). iPhone's Stunning Display Upgrade Apple is working hard to bring new display technology to the iPhone. Although these won't be ready for the iPhone 17, and perhaps not even the iPhone 18, but the allure of an OLED display that draws less power is one it is investigating: 'Apple is reviewing a plan to apply a new low-temperature polycrystalline oxide (LTPO) thin-film transistor (TFT) organic light-emitting diode (OLED) to the iPhone series to be released in 2027 at the earliest. The core of the new LTPO OLED is whether to apply oxide (oxide) to the driving TFT. If the proportion of oxide increases, it can reduce power consumption,' the site says." (The Elec via Forbes). Apple Already Adding New iOS 26 Features Apple has released a second build of the next iOS 26 release in public development. While there are some questions on the need for a rebuild (with suggestions of battery life or a significant security issue being discussed online), one of the key quality of life updates is present in the release; smart storage, which helps manage memory during install, updates, and upgrades: " We don't yet know how this dynamic reservation of space will work, or how much will be automatically be set aside, but it may 'align with similar mechanisms in macOS. If you are not familiar with it, Apple already uses temporary system storage management during updates, even in the case of iOS, but the new feature could mean that the system actively manages and holds onto space as part of its background maintenance,' the report adds. (Forbes). 2026 MacBook Pro's Anticipated Upgrade Following a burst of engagement in the move to Apple Silicon in 2020, the MacBook has seen little change in terms of design and features beyond the chipset. With an expected redesign in 2026, one of the biggest missing features could finally arrive, replacing the LED displays with OLED. "The OLED MacBook Air is also expected to get a standard single-stack display, rather than the more sophisticated Two-Stack Tandem displays we reported on for the MacBook Pro. Single-stack displays have one red, green and blue layer, while two-stack tandem OLED has a second RGB layer. Two layers stacked in tandem increases the brightness of the screen, while also increasing longevity. (The Elec via 9to5Mac). The iPad, The Mac, And Returning To An App Apple continues to thread the needle to increase the capability of the iPad while avoiding any clash with the Mac (specifically the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro laptops). Federico Viticci has a deep dive investigation and interview with Apple's Craig Federighi on the new iPadOS 26 changes, and much of that is built around a long-standing issue… multitasking, windowing, and using apps concurrently: "In listening to Federighi's analysis of iPad multitasking over the years, I get the sense that Apple has been trying to understand the iPad's audience for over a decade. At some point, they realized that the device has two types of users: those who just want a tablet, and those who want a tablet plus more traditional computing features. The company tried to reinvent those classic functionalities but ultimately understood that some users would rather have classic windowing, a file manager, and a menu bar that 'simply' worked with either touch or indirect manipulation, rather than entirely new UI metaphors." (MacStories). Only What Can Be Delivered After the hot takes of last week's Worldwide Developer Conference come the considered responses. Longtime Apple follower John Gruber makes an important observation on what was announced this year, compared to the vast promises of 2024: "I might be overlooking a minor exception or two, but every major feature announced in the WWDC 2025 keynote was both demonstratable in product briefings, and is currently available in the developer beta seeds. I was also told, explicitly, by Apple executives, that Apple plans to ship everything shown last week in the fall." (Daring Fireball). And Finally... Apple continues to lag behind the curve in the use of generative AI—the recent delay announced at WWDC points to nothing practical till 2026. Apple's work on AI has led to a research paper that suggests the promises made by the competition may be too generous: "In particular, the researchers assail the claims of companies like OpenAI that their most advanced models can now "reason" — a supposed capability that the Sam Altman-led company has increasingly leaned on over the past year for marketing purposes — which the Apple team characterizes as merely an "illusion of thinking.'" (Futurism). Apple Loop brings you seven days worth of highlights every weekend here on Forbes. Don't forget to follow me so you don't miss any coverage in the future. Last week's Apple Loop can be read here, or this week's edition of Loop's sister column, Android Circuit, is also available on Forbes.
