Budget 2025: 'It's about prioritising your taxpayer money carefully'
By Lilian Hanley of RNZ
"It feels like a kid robbing his mum to pay for his mates" says library assistant Alex Cass, as she prepares for the Government to reveal Budget 2025.
New Zealanders will find out on Thursday just how much money will be cut from various services, as the Government looks to make its promises add up.
Just how much is saved from the pay equity law changes - and where that money will be going instead - will also be revealed.
The Pay Equity Amendment Bill was passed on May 7 after being rushed through under urgency. The legislation means 33 equity claims involving hundreds of thousands of workers being negotiated will now have to restart the process under new criteria.
Cass was part of a pay equity claim scrapped due to the Government's last-minute law change.
"It's unbelievably underhanded the way this process has been done. It was done lightning fast, with no chance for any of us to object. It's incredibly cruel, and it's a legacy of cruelty."
Cass felt the Government was saying to those who are fighting for their work to be taken seriously, "you don't deserve better".
She would be on Parliament's lawn on Thursday afternoon to react to the Budget - money she said the Government got from people who were "already massively underpaid".
But Finance Minister Nicola Willis said New Zealanders were "realistic" because the new scheme would still deliver a scheme protecting women against sex-based discrimination.
"Every single cent" reprioritised from money reallocated from those claims would go into "priorities for New Zealand", she claimed.
"I've had it with opposition politicians who keep promising they can 'do it all', that somehow they're gonna stick to the debt levels, they're not gonna have deficits but also they're not gonna make savings and they're gonna spend on everything - that doesn't add up.
"Our approach is different," she said.
"It's about prioritising your taxpayer money carefully and ensuring that we're actually nourishing the growth that ultimately delivers the jobs and living standards we all depend on."
For this Budget, the government's given itself only $1.3 billion of new money to use on day-to-day spending.
Already $2.5b is needed for yearly cost increases and more than $3b has been allocated in pre-budget announcements for health, defence, social investment, state abuse survivor redress and a screen production rebate.
"It's not a budget filled with rainbows and unicorns," Willis said, "It's a reality budget that will deliver genuine hope for the future."
She also called it a "no BS" budget - but would not specify what that stood for. Labour, Greens critical
Labour leader Chris Hipkins said "paying women properly" should not be described as "rainbows and unicorns".
"Making sure women who have been underpaid are paid what they're worth is something that a responsible government should prioritise - this government isn't."
Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said it did look like a "BS" budget.
"The Government has decided it is going to be cutting public services to the bone in order to pay for its landlord and tobacco tax cuts of the last budget."
Council of Trade Unions economist Craig Renney, who is also on the Labour Party's policy council, said the Government did not have much to work with given it would not borrow more money.
"We're cutting Government services at a time when we know there's increasing demand on those services. We have an increasingly elderly population. We have increasingly higher needs in terms of health and education."
Now is the time to invest in the economy and inject some confidence into the economy, he believed.
Despite the Government saying it would not cut frontline services, Kiwis were finding it harder to access those frontline services, he said.
"It's not that there's a direct cut, but because these services aren't being properly funded for change, they're having to work harder and harder to deliver the same services with less real cash available to them."
In the Budget, he will be looking out for how the Government has chosen to use the savings from stopping pay equity claims. He will also be looking at Treasury's estimates for what is happening to unemployment, wages and the cost of living.
"We've actually seen wages rising far less quickly than in the past, and we've seen two years of cuts to the minimum wage in real terms, and we've seen rising unemployment.
"If those trends continue, that will suggest that the medicine and the pain of economic change is really being borne by workers, in particular, low-paid workforces, rather than by others in the economy who might have broader shoulders."
He also will be looking to see if the Government changes KiwiSaver settings, or begins means-testing for the winter energy payment or BestStart.
"If it tries to do all of those to balance the books, we'll be asking why is it that these workers are having to pay the price for the fact that the Government hasn't been able to deliver its fiscal plan to date."
New Zealand Initiative chief economist Dr Eric Crampton said the Government should focus on getting spending back down to pre-Covid levels.
He wanted to know where the Government was planning on reducing expenditure to deal with its deficit.
"If it's simply tighter spending allowances over the next few years, you start wondering how credible it is as a path to get out of structural deficit.
"Pulling the Government out of the provision of some services, or explicitly cutting the amount that's provided, would signal a more serious approach."
Crampton was interested to see Treasury's projections of future paths for Government spending, and for productivity and GDP growth, as well as Government spending priorities.
"I'm watching for the tweaks the Government might make to align the budget with the economic growth agenda.
"There has been talk of changes in depreciation schedules to encourage private investment."
He also pointed to a coalition agreement promise between National and ACT to provide housing incentive payments to councils, asking if it would show up in the Budget "at least as a forecast for next year".
"The Government would need to make fiscal room for it. But it is important if the Government wants councils to welcome urban growth."
The Finance Minister has confirmed she will not be making any changes to superannuation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Flood Of Interest To Invest In New Zealand
Minister for Economic Growth Hon Erica Stanford Minister of Immigration The Government is attracting new migrants to bring their capital, experience and skills to New Zealand with a flood of formal interest in the new 'golden' visa. Since only April – less than three months – Immigration New Zealand (INZ) has received 189 applications for the Active Investor Plus visa, significantly more than the 116 applications received over more than two-and-a-half years under previous settings, Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis says. 'New applications under the scheme represent a potential $845 million of new investment in New Zealand business.' "Attracting investment to New Zealand is crucial to the country's economic growth. It means Kiwi businesses can expand, hire and grow – and that means more opportunities for New Zealanders. 'Investor migrants are clearly attracted to New Zealand's growing reputation as a safe, pro-business, high-potential economy. In a world where countries compete for dollars and talent, it's great to see New Zealand's growth prospects being recognised.' 'New investors don't just bring their dollars to our shores, they also bring skills, knowledge and experience that will drive future economic development. It's a win-win.' Immigration Minister Erica Stanford says the interest shows investors hear the call loud and clear: New Zealand is open for business. 'We welcome your capital, your knowledge, and your contribution to New Zealand's economic growth,' Ms Stanford says. 'We're seeing strong momentum from global investors, particularly across Asia and North America. This reflects our growing reputation as a stable, forward-looking destination for investment and innovation. 'These are smart, flexible and nuanced immigration solutions to help stimulate economic growth.' On April 1 the Government changed the Active Investor Plus visa to a simple two-pronged system: the Growth category and the Balanced category. Other changes included expanding the scope of acceptable investments and removing potential barriers to investment, such as the English language requirement. As at 23 June, 100 applications had been approved in principle, and of those, seven had transferred and invested their funds in New Zealand and had been granted a resident visa. Five of those were invested in the Growth category and two under the Balanced category, totalling a total minimum investment of $45 million. The Growth category for this Visa focuses on higher-risk investments, including managed funds and direct investments in New Zealand businesses. It will require a minimum investment of NZD $5 million for a minimum period of 3 years. The Balance category focuses on mixed investments, with the ability to choose ones that are lower risk. There will be a minimum investment of NZD $10 million over 5 years.
Newsroom
3 hours ago
- Newsroom
Middle East military action ‘extremely worrying', but no call yet on bombing
This story first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission The foreign affairs minister says the Government will gather facts before taking a position on the United States' airstrikes on Iran. The US attacked three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, with President Donald Trump saying the country's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been 'completely and totally obliterated.' Trump said Iran 'must now make peace' or there would be further attacks. In response, Iran has accused the US of launching 'a dangerous war,' and of violating the United Nations Charter and international law. But on Sunday afternoon, shortly after the attack was launched, Foreign Affairs Ministers Winston Peters said the New Zealand government was waiting for the facts. 'Look, this has just happened. These are circumstances in which we will first of all gather the facts, and the circumstances, before we give our opinion.' Peters said the crisis was 'extremely worrying' and New Zealand would continue to call for diplomacy and dialogue. 'Ongoing military action in the Middle East is extremely worrying, and it's critical further escalation is avoided. We strongly support efforts towards diplomacy and urge all parties to return to talks,' he said. 'Iran's nuclear activities have long worried New Zealand. We want Iran to comply with its international obligations. Our concern is that further military action is not going to deliver a sustainable solution to this problem. 'We're a long way from the region, but New Zealand will continue to convey these measures in favour of diplomacy and dialogue directly to Iran, Israel, and the other parties involved in possible talks.' Labour's defence spokesperson Peeni Henare backed Peters' calls for a return to talks, but said the government should acknowledge the US breached international law and be 'perhaps a bit stronger' in the first instance. Henare said Trump's statements had made it 'quite clear' what had happened. 'Countries can't call for peace and de-escalation, only to take the action that's been taken.' Waikato University law professor Alexander Gillespie said the airstrikes were 'clearly' illegal in terms of international law. 'There's nowhere in the UN charter that says you can bomb someone who won't negotiate with you. But whether you get to a point where that is actually condemned is going to be very different,' he said. 'There's the theory of international law, with the UN Charter, and then there's the reality of international politics at the moment, which means that America will not be condemned internationally by the Security Council or even through the International Court of Justice.' The Prime Minister is heading to NATO this week. New Zealand is not a member, but in recent years has been invited as a partner along with fellow Indo-Pacific Four nations Australia, Japan and South Korea. While Christopher Luxon would be 'on the margins,' Gillespie expected he would be watching closely to see what like-minded partners were saying. 'This is an act which is not self-defence, and even if you argued it was pre-emptive self-defence, it wasn't necessary because there were other options of diplomacy still open. It will create difficulties if we speak out and say that, I don't think we're in a position to do that right now, for fear of the reaction that you get from America.' Australia's government has already issued a statement on the airstrikes. 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security,' the statement said. 'We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy.' Defence Force plane leaves today The Government is sending a C-130J Hercules plane to the Middle East, with Defence Force and Foreign Affairs personnel, to assist New Zealanders stranded in Iran and Israel. Defence minister Judith Collins said the plane was a contingency, and would not be able to aid in evacuation flights until airspace restrictions in the region eased. In the meantime, those who were able to leave via a safe route were urged to do so. Peters said the flights would get people to a safe place. 'We're not bringing them home. We're getting them to where they can make arrangements to get home.' The Government has been warning New Zealanders in the region to leave for a long time, Peters said. The number of New Zealanders registered as being in Iran or Israel had increased in recent days. The decision to send the Hercules was made even before knowledge of the airstrikes had come through. 'Our anxiety was enunciated and formulated into policy, warnings, and collections of views months ago. We've been saying it, and it's a sad circumstance here, but we said 'look this is very dangerous, get out,'' Peters said. Citing security reasons, Collins would not say where the plane and personnel would be based. Both Henare and Gillespie supported the move. 'I think if we're ready and on standby, at the very least, to make sure we can respond to our citizens and their needs, and also those of our diplomatic staff, I think that's a really smart move,' Henare said. Gillespie said sending a plane was prudent in case the situation worsened quickly, and the damage became more indiscriminate.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Govt planning rules could 'override the community'
New planning rules proposed by the Government could override community aspirations, says a Canterbury council boss. Hurunui District Council chief executive Hamish Dobbie said he struggles to see how a proposal to stop councils defining rural-urban boundaries would work. ''If they override something in the planning document, they are not overriding the council - they are overriding the community," he said. Resource Management Act Reform Minister Chris Bishop announced proposed changes last week which he said will stop councils from stalling housing developments. ''We have had decades of local councils trying to make housing someone else's problem, and we have a planning system that lets them get away with it,'' Bishop said at the time. The Government proposal would stop councils from imposing rural-urban boundary lines in planning documents. A Rural Urban Boundary identifies land suitable for urban development, and areas to be kept rural. The proposal would give the Government the power remove provisions in council plans which impact on growth, and replacing development contributions with a development levy system, increased flexibility of targeted rates, and strengthening the Infrastructure Funding and Financing Act. But Mr Dobbie said preparing a District Plan is ''a long and tortuous process'', as councils strive to find a balance between community aspirations, the need for growth, aspirations of developers and Government legislation. He said rural-urban boundary lines allowed councils to ensure development occurred where there is council infrastructure. Drawing rural-urban boundaries was integral to developing spatial plans, which identified areas for future housing growth and protected agricultural land. The proposal appeared to go against the national direction of developing regional plans, which included spatial planning, to replace district plans, he said. ''I don't know how you can identify areas for housing and agriculture without drawing lines on a map,'' Mr Dobbie said. ''But I might be about to learn something.'' The clause allowing the Government to override District Plan provisions which impacted on growth would be open to interpretation, he said. ''Imagine somebody wanted to build a nuclear power plant or a whale slaughtering station. ''It might be something the community would not want, but the Government would have the power to override it.'' Environment Canterbury chairperson Craig Pauling said the council is considering the proposals and will be making a formal submission. Parts of the region are facing significant population and demographic change, particularly Greater Christchurch, he said. ''We need to make sure we get the balance right, and we're actively safeguarding the environment, as well as social, and cultural values at the same time.'' Any decisions needed to consider the region's infrastructure capacity, housing availability, labour market, transport connectivity and natural hazards. Public consultation on the Going for Housing Growth discussion document closes on August 17. By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter ■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air
