Labor wants to fix Australia's housing issues – but there's little hope for those not already on the ladder
Days after Labor won a decisive victory with a mandate to fix housing affordability, those in charge of handing out mortgages poured cold water on it coming to pass.
Andrew Irvine, the chief executive of National Australia Bank, said the country 'may not get the outcome we want' as the gulf between homeowners and everybody else threatens to expand in the coming months.
The long-serving ANZ chief executive, Shayne Elliott, was even more forthright when addressing media on Thursday.
'I don't know we are dealing with it. I mean, things are getting worse,' said Elliott, who stepped down from his role on Friday after almost a decade leading the bank.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'I know there's really well-meaning, really thoughtful policies on both sides of politics … but the reality is, as we sit here today, I'm not sure there's confidence that we are going to see any material change any time soon.'
The bank bosses pointed to a lack of housing supply for their dour outlook.
There are also other factors, such as the need to improve transport networks and infrastructure to ignite that supply, resolve unnecessary planning impediments, tackle high building costs and labour constraints.
The affordability problem has built up over decades, and Australia's banking CEOs don't believe the issue will be resolved any time soon.
'The Australian dream is owning a home, and you want younger people to have a chance to do that, you want new Australians to have a chance to do that,' said Irvine.
'The only way we're going to address this is to fix supply. It's still the case that too much of the discourse on housing is on the demand side.'
The lack of reformist housing policies – economists criticised both sides of politics for their competing election platforms – is fuelling an expectation that home prices will just keep rising, putting home ownership even further out of reach for younger generations.
Many housing reform advocates gave up on expecting federal governments to help resolve the issue after Labor's ill-fated 2019 campaign to overhaul negative gearing and capital gains tax, both of which would have represented robust reforms.
Advocates are now focusing their attention on rental rights, which are a state issue. The thinking is that improving tenancy rights may lower the value of rental properties, easing affordability at the expense of landlords.
Those already on the property ladder don't want to get off it.
Even the banks were surprised how many of those who scrambled to get a mortgage in recent years – and then faced a string of interest rate increases and sharp rise in living costs – kept up with repayments.
'The resilience of customers who have navigated significant cost-of-living challenges over the past few years is impressive,' Westpac chief executive Anthony Miller said on Monday, after delivering the bank's half-year results.
Part of the reason people clung on to their mortgages so tightly is that there are no good alternatives, given the tight rental market.
Mortgage arrears at the major banks have tended to plateau, or even drop, over the past six months, hovering well below pre-pandemic levels. The number of households requesting hardship packages from their lenders has generally been falling.
For those able to hang on to their mortgages, relief is in sight.
After the Reserve Bank reduced borrowing rates in February, a quarter-of-a-percentage point cut in the cash rate on 20 May is deemed a sure thing, and would lower the key rate to 3.85%, from 4.1%.
From there, financial markets are pricing in a further three cuts to 3.1% by December. Experts are a little less bullish, with a general consensus that the cash rate will end 2025 at 3.35%.
Either way, mortgage holders are set to receive substantial relief on their interest payments.
The monthly repayment on a $500,000 loan at an interest rate of 6.01% is $3,225.
Every cut of 0.25 percentage points lowers the interest bill by $76 a month. A further four rate cuts this year would deliver a $304 boost to monthly household budgets.
While existing homeowners will be cheering falling rates, the picture is more complicated for those hoping to break into the property market, or upgrade towards a family home.
Lower interest rates boosts borrowing capacity – meaning buyers can afford to pay more. But cheaper money will also lift prices and potentially widen the deposit gap, and worsen the affordability crisis.
AMP chief economist Shane Oliver said he expected a rate cut on 20 May followed by another in August. He then expects a cut in November and then again early next year.
Oliver said the combination of cheaper loans and Labor's election housing policy to help first home buyers buy with a smaller deposit would ultimately push property prices higher.
'Lower rates and 5% deposits may feel like a good thing, and if you get in early it will be, because they can borrow more and it will be easier to service your loan,' he said.
'For those who get in later (after prices have started climbing faster), it's not so good – and the ultimate winners are existing homeowners.'
Louis Christopher, the founder of SQM Research, said rate cuts – if they happen – will have a progressively greater impact on house prices as the year passes.
Still, with the election and April holidays out of the way, Christopher expects a busy winter of property auctions.
'We expect housing prices across the country to climb by 6-10% in 2025,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
How much do British Lions players get paid?
How much do British Lions players get paid? The Lions begin their summer tour preparations with a match against Argentina in Dublin on Friday night Maro Itoje and his Lions team-mates are set to make a lot of money this summer (Image: 2025 Getty Images ) The British & Irish Lions kick off their summer tour this evening with a warm-up game against Argentina in Dublin. It is the first time in their history that the touring side have played a match in Ireland and head coach Andy Farrell is certainly taking the curtain-raiser seriously. The Lions boss has named a strong XV to face the Pumas at the Aviva Stadium, with Wales skipper Jac Morgan starting and Welsh scrum-half Tomos Williams being selected on the bench. Both will have an opportunity to lay down a marker for the upcoming Test series against Australia, with excitement now building for the trip Down Under. Being selected for the Lions is widely regarded as the ultimate honour for players in the northern hemisphere. Former skipper Sam Warburton said during his playing days: 'To finally get that Test jersey playing the first match against Australia, which we managed to win, that is the only jersey that I have hanging up in my house – that's how proud I am of that one. 'For me that was the biggest and single most important game I have ever played in. Article continues below 'When you are playing club rugby, yes you want to play for Wales and I wanted to play for Cardiff but in the back of my mind I always set my sights really high on playing for the Lions. 'There was pressure on the players and as captain I felt a lot of responsibility. That was why it was such a relief to get the Test series win against Australia – an amazing feeling but we also knew that people would be optimistic about the Lions moving forward to the next series.' Along with the honour of representing the Lions, players also get rewarded financially - and quite handsomely too. According to the Telegraph, this summer's tour is set to be a record-breaker, with a £10million profit expected. A new profit-sharing agreement will see selected players pocket £100,000 each for their contributions in Australia. That is a 25 per cent increase on the tour to New Zealand in 2017, which saw players pocket £80,000 for their efforts. The trip to South Africa in 2021 was played behind closed doors due to Covid. "We know that players love playing for the Lions, and it is the pinnacle of their professional careers, and this landmark agreement highlights how they are at the centre of our thinking," said Lions chief executive Ben Calveley. Article continues below Simon Keogh, Rugby Players Ireland chief executive, added: "Players are central to the ongoing success of the British and Irish Lions Tours and we are delighted that their views – including those of Lions heroes of the past – have been heard throughout this process. "I'd like to thank the British and Irish Lions for their honesty, transparency, and genuine consideration of the players' voice. "As a result, I believe that we have reached an agreement that is both fair and reflective of the strong collaboration between all stakeholders in rugby."
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labor eyes ambitious tax reform but it must be ready for vicious backlash from vested interests
There was a hint of frustration in Anthony Albanese's voice when he spoke to the Canberra press gallery for the first time after Labor's thumping election victory on 3 May. In the prime minister's courtyard at Parliament House, he was asked if he planned to use his soaring political capital for major reforms of the tax or superannuation systems. Badly needed, and often talked about in the abstract, this kind of action had waited for a long time for the necessary political ambition. Albanese said he wouldn't get ahead of himself in the opening weeks of his second term in power. He insisted Labor had already been bold, delivering on its promises in the first three years. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Fast forward to Wednesday, while the PM was pressing the diplomatic flesh at the G7 summit in Canada, the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, showed the first signs of that reform ambition. In a speech to the National Press Club in Canberra, Chalmers signalled Labor was willing to consider changes to the tax system at the looming productivity summit in August, recognition that fixing longstanding problems was needed to right the budget's structural deficit. The speech was an implicit recognition that Labor's tax changes in the first term barely touched the edges of deeper structural problems in Australia's tax system. Chalmers, a student of economic reformer Paul Keating, said any progress on productivity or budget sustainability would be impossible without proper consideration of tax reform, a challenge he conceded would be 'hard and contested' with benefits that were not always immediate. Even someone with a passing interest in federal politics should know the scale of the problem is vast: some $1tn in government debt and soaring spending, held up by a system overly reliant on income tax from an ageing population – a problem that will only get worse due to the ageing population. For years Chalmers has been eager to point out the five main pressures on the budget are not going to get any easier without proper attention. Spending on health, aged care, the national disability insurance scheme, defence and interest from government debt will keep treasurers and finance ministers up at night for years to come. The government's revenue base is being eroded from declining fuel and tobacco excises, and in the long term will take a hit from lower tax receipts from fossil fuel extraction. The early stages of Labor's plans seem to include lower income taxes, but no changes to the 25-year-old GST. Chalmers is upfront, saying tax overall needs to rise. Whether it is indeed possible to meaningfully lower income taxes without broadening or raising the GST is unclear. Economists argue taxing consumption through mechanisms such as the GST is efficient, while taxing incomes isn't. Parliamentary Budget Office figures show the GST causes about 8 cents in economic loss for each dollar gained, compared with 24 cents for income tax or 40 cents for corporate tax. Two major pieces of work should be the starting point, acknowledging that any change which makes it into law will inevitably create some winners and some losers. Chalmers was working for then treasurer Wayne Swan when Ken Henry handed his landmark tax review to the Rudd government in late 2009. Both men marked up copies of the document over the course of the summer, leaving them to 'disgorge' sand from the beach by the time they made it back to Canberra. Many of the review's 138 recommendations never saw the light of day. Today, the former Treasury secretary says, the system is in even worse shape. Henry has called for wholesale reform, including increasing the GST to pay for company and personal income tax cuts, as well as comprehensive road user charging, replacing stamp duties, increasing taxes on super profits from the mining sector, an economy-wide price on carbon and changes to fringe benefits and superannuation taxes. Henry's review is best remembered for recommending the mining tax, an idea which prompted a furious campaign of resistance against the government. Chalmers has acknowledged the politics of the review were mishandled, that it was kept secret too long before ultimately crashing into Labor's leadership wars. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The second substantive report with proposals ready to go is the white paper released by teal independent Allegra Spender in the last term of parliament. In a different political reality, Spender would be part of the Liberal party's economic team, and her significant work comes with buy-in from Henry and other leading tax voices including Robert Breunig from the Australian National University's Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, and Robert Carling from the Centre for Independent Studies. Chalmers assigned a staffer to monitor the white paper process, at a time when Spender was one of the few MPs actually prepared to talk about meaningful tax reform. The Wentworth MP wants the coming reform push to look at business investment and corporate taxes, the under-performing petroleum resource rent tax, road user charging, indexation of income brackets, unhelpful state taxes and the GST. Spender has more guts than either of the major parties in one specific area as well. She has called for a review of Western Australia's insanely generous GST deal, which respected economist Saul Eslake calls the worst public policy decision of the 21st century. WA's state Labor government handed down a budget with a $2.5bn surplus this week, but taxpayers from every other state are paying $54bn to the state due to perceived unfairness in the grants commission process. This special treatment agreed by then treasurer Scott Morrison and locked in by Anthony Albanese to maintain Labor's political stocks in the West will see the nation's richest state receive an extra $21.1bn from federal taxpayers over the next four years alone. Family trusts, the legal tax structures used by millions of Australians to lower their tax liabilities, also look likely to come under increased scrutiny as part of the latest reform push. Chalmers and Albanese will convene their productivity summit in the cabinet room on 19 August. If they want their record to be considered alongside the Hawke-Keating and Howard-Costello governments, the political conditions could hardly be better. Labor must prepare itself for the predictable backlash from vested interests unwilling to countenance changes to cushy arrangements and handy loopholes. Only a serious government prepared to expend political capital will be able to make the system fairer and fit for a 21st century country facing major demographic and economic challenges. If Labor really has the ambition Anthony Albanese insists it does, meaningful tax reform might become the make-or-break test of the government's second term.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Victoria's Liberals saved John Pesutto from bankruptcy. But can they save themselves from all-out war?
As his party room imploded last year, plagued by infighting and a looming defamation trial, John Pesutto placed a blank sheet of butcher's paper in front of his colleagues. In the dying days of his tenure as opposition leader, Pesutto asked MPs what should have been simple questions to answer: What are our values? What do we stand for? His attempt to unify a deeply divided party failed spectacularly. Almost a year later, there is no consensus answer to those questions. Factional grievances have intensified, with MPs now warning of 'all-out war' and outlining 'completely brutal' schemes to gain control of the party. A bitter rift between Pesutto and fellow Liberal Moira Deeming, who successfully sued him for defamation after he falsely implied she sympathised with neo-Nazis, has left the party room, its organisational wing and dwindling membership divided. Many senior Liberals are despondent. There have been, according to some, more than two years of 'shit fights', 'constant stupidity and self-harm' that have allowed 'an inept Labor government' to evade scrutiny, despite the best efforts of a few opposition MPs. Some hope the party's decision to loan Pesutto $1.5m so he can pay Deeming's legal fees, avoiding bankruptcy, may lead to a truce. But others suggest animosity runs deep and the party will struggle to heal while both remain in the party room. On Thursday night, members of the party's administrative committee handed over their phones to an official before voting in a secret ballot. Pesutto, who had only a matter of days to raise $2.3m, outlined a last-minute loan deal using his superannuation as security, repayable with a commercial interest rate. This was, for some on the committee, the first time they had been briefed on the proposal despite reading about it in the media for several weeks. When Deeming's lawyers filed a bankruptcy notice against Pesutto, the Victorian Liberal party president, Philip Davis, began to canvass the views of his colleagues. Those strongly opposed were kept in the dark until the secret ballot. 'My position is well known,' said one admin member contacted by Davis. 'No, no, no, no, how many times can I say no.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Several members of the committee were furious at the prospect of party money being spent on an internal dispute, rather than on campaigning to beat Labor. The proposal, first reported by Guardian Australia, was pushed by Pesutto's supporters as a way to avoid an expensive byelection in his seat of Hawthorn and to ensure, in their view, that moderate MPs were not pushed out of the party. Even before the meeting was called, Pesutto's supporters put pressure on the party leader, Brad Battin, to endorse the loan and give it momentum. 'We're already in a shit fight, but if Brad doesn't support a loan, it will lead to all-out war,' threatened one Liberal MP who declined to be named so they could speak freely. Another MP said Battin 'should not be the one to stand in the way of a deal that has support' from the party room and a majority of the committee. This did not go down well with some on the committee. 'All this media stuff is emotional blackmail,' said one committee member who declined to be named given the tense nature of discussions. When the deal was ultimately approved, Davis emailed party members to claim it would 'settle the matter once and for all' and allow the party to move on without further distraction. Battin, who endorsed the motion, said it would 'avoid further financial and reputational damage' and also declared the matter resolved, with the party now 'united, disciplined and determined' to focus on the future. Not everyone agrees. Before the meeting, Deeming said she was dismayed a loan deal was even being considered. She said it ran 'against the grain of everything we believe as Liberals' and claimed it would be a 'direct rebuke' of the federal court judgment. 'I assume that they will continue with their quest to try to annihilate me,' Deeming said in reference to some of her party room colleagues. Pesutto's supporters remain bitter the party only intervened at the final hour after relentless pressure to do, in their view, the right thing. Others won't forget that Deeming's legal team threatened to chase money from Pesutto's supporters should he not be able to pay. Correspondence named former Liberal premiers Jeff Kennett, Denis Napthine and Ted Baillieu, and Victorian MPs David Southwick and Georgie Crozier as people who may be held liable. 'How can those two MPs sit in the party room with someone who was willing to do that and trust her?' said one Liberal source. 'They will always be looking over their shoulder.' Deeming did not respond to that comment, but a source close to her denied any allegation that she was untrustworthy, dishonest or a bully. Her financial backer, the New South Wales property developer Hilton Grugeon, who is owed $2.3m, said he was not bothered by the damage this would have unleashed on the party. 'I supported [the Liberals] when they were unsupportable,' Grugeon said. 'But I cannot care what happens to a party that wants to look the other way while their leader beats up on a woman who did nothing wrong.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Shortly before lodging defamation proceedings against Pesutto, Deeming outlined a vision of the Liberal party that is antithetical to some of her colleagues. In late May, Deeming told the podcast Club Grubbery praised the rightwing South Australian senator Alex Antic's ability to control his state branch and said 'nobody can get rid of him'. 'We need to take back ownership of the party of the centre right,' Deeming said, before speaking to its rank-and-file. 'This is your party. You own it, it's yours. Do not cede this ground.' 'We've really got to get really mercenary about it,' said Deeming, who raised the prospect of working with Antic and Liberal senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price to recruit more like-minded members. 'We've got to get completely brutal.' But many moderates, including former federal vice-president Tom Harley, warn any push to become more conservative would make the party electorally irrelevant. Harley is scathing of the party's internal divisions, describing them as being in a state of 'constant stupidity and self-harm'. 'The Liberal party in Victoria is stuck talking to a small section of itself in the corner,' Harley said. 'We must focus on the issues that matter to people, not who goes to which lavatory.' Others, including the federal Liberal MP Jason Wood, believe factionalism is tearing the state party apart, rather than being a disagreement about values. 'Hopefully all this sorts itself and everyone takes a chill pill but, sadly, people are putting their factions first,' Wood said. Many Victorian Liberals deny they have factions equivalent to the rigid blocs that divide power in the Labor party. But they don't dispute that their party is bitterly divided. On Friday morning, Pesutto said he was 'grateful and humbled' by the party's decision to save him from bankruptcy and his colleagues would 'focus all our energy on winning the next state election'. But some didn't get the memo. Within hours of the deal being approved, one unnamed conservative MP told the Herald Sun that Battin's leadership was in question and 'the conservative block will want a 'please explain''. One senior Liberal operative not authorised to speak publicly believes the party's leadership team allowed the saga to remain unresolved for too long. They argue the damage will now be difficult to contain, despite a resolution being reached. 'If there had been good leadership of the party, the John and Moira saga might have been dealt with very differently and much quicker,' the source said. 'But no one stood up. They all thought, 'oh this will be fine, it will be buried'. But it wasn't buried. And that's how we've got to this stage.' On Thursday night, just hours after the loan was secured, some members of Deeming's branch urged each other to draw a line under the scandal and focus attention on Labor. 'Let's move on now,' said one member in a WhatsApp message leaked to Guardian Australia. 'We have got an election to win.' One of Deeming's closest allies, her husband, Andrew, replied saying, 'sadly it's not that easy to just move on'. 'Personally, my kids have nightmares because of this. Moira still gets abusive messages because of this. Politically, the party just reinforced all its negative stereotypes that they are anti-woman, that they are an old boys club,' Andrew Deeming said. 'How can we convince the public that the Liberal party cares about them when the Liberal party has given effective support to an MP who defamed his own colleague?' The text messages show Moira Deeming is bitterly disappointed by the organisational wing's conduct. 'They literally sent a bulk email to brag about earning interest off ruining my life and destroying my family,' she wrote. 'Disgusting.' Deeming confirmed she sent the message and told Guardian Australia it explained her motivation for uploading an image on social media that said: 'They financially profited off her trauma. They told the world they did her a favour. This is what institutional abuse looks like.' 'Clearly, it is undeniable that there are deep wounds,' Deeming said. 'There have been wrongs done. The things I needed were full exoneration and my loan repaid. I now have those two things.' Pesutto may have been saved from bankruptcy, but the Victorian Liberals' internal battles are far from over.
