Lammy says Middle East needs ‘diplomatic solution' after US talks
His remarks came after a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, held in the wake of US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Mr Lammy also spoke with secretary of state Marco Rubio.
'Important discussion with @SecRubio this evening on the situation in the Middle East,' Mr Lammy wrote in a post on X.
Important discussion with @SecRubio this evening on the situation in the Middle East.
We will continue to work with our allies to protect our people, secure regional stability and drive forward a diplomatic solution.
— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 22, 2025
'We will continue to work with our allies to protect our people, secure regional stability and drive forward a diplomatic solution.'
Mr Lammy's sentiments were echoed by the UK's representative at the United Nations Dame Barbara Woodward, who urged Iran to show 'restraint' and for 'all parties' to return to the negotiating table.
'Military action alone cannot bring a durable solution to concerns about Iran's nuclear programme,' she said.
In a Monday post on Truth Social, Mr Trump claimed the US strikes caused 'monumental' damage, although US officials have said they are still assessing the situation.
'The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!' he wrote.
Over the weekend, the US attacked Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz which are linked to Iran's nuclear programme.
The Tehran regime has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but its uranium enrichment process has gone far beyond what is required for power stations.
Israeli military officials confirmed late on Sunday they had struck infrastructure sites in Tehran and in the west of Iran.
Explosions could be heard in the city of Bushehr on Sunday, home to Iran's only nuclear power plant.
Israel confirmed it had struck missile launchers in the city, as well as a command centre where missiles were being stored.
Iranian media reported defence systems were firing in Tehran in the early hours of Monday morning, but Iran is yet to comment on the latest strikes.
On Sunday night, Downing Street said Sir Keir and Mr Trump agreed Tehran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and called for Iran to return to negotiations.
'The leaders discussed the situation in the Middle East and reiterated the grave risk posed by Iran's nuclear programme to international security,' Downing Street said.
'They discussed the actions taken by the United States last night to reduce the threat and agreed that Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon.
'They discussed the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table as soon as possible and to make progress on a lasting settlement.
'They agreed to stay in close contact in the coming days.'
Other countries endorsed the US strikes, with Australian foreign minister Penny Wong giving the White House her full backing on Monday.
'We support action to prevent Iran getting a nuclear weapon and that is what this is,' she said.
In the hours after Mr Trump's phone call with Sir Keir, he again posted on Truth Social, saying: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!'
The social media post marked a reversal from previous statements on regime change, including an earlier press conference from defence secretary Pete Hegseth, about the bombing on the three nuclear sites.
Iran is yet to confirm how much damage was done in the US-led attack.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
20 minutes ago
- The National
David Lammy refuses to say if US Iran strikes were illegal
The US attacked three sites in Iran at the weekend, inserting itself into Israel's war aimed at destroying the country's nuclear programme. Asked about the lawfulness of the strikes on Monday, the Foreign Secretary told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that as the UK was "not involved" it was "for the Americans to discuss those issues". It was put to him that the UK Government had a firm view on whether Russia attacking Ukraine was legal, which he said was not a 'moral equivalence'. READ MORE: Kenny MacAskill: Donald Trump bombing Iran is illegal and insane He said: 'There isn't a moral equivalence here'. He added it had been "crystal clear' that Moscow invaded a sovereign nation. When it was put to him that it was extraordinary he could not answer the question as critics argue Iran is also a sovereign nation which was attacked without warning, he said: 'I don't think it is extraordinary because this was not the UK's action, we were not involved, we were clear when this began and Israel's attacks began that we were not involved… so I don't say it's not legitimate, but I can tell you as Foreign Secretary that we were not involved.' Lammy added that Iran has to 'get serious about the off-ramp that is being made available to them' and that 'ultimately this can only be dealt with in diplomacy.' (Image: Kin Cheung) The Foreign Secretary said Donald Trump's action 'may well have set back Iran several years', and enrichment of uranium at 60% cannot be allowed to 'slide'. Trump has floated the possibility of leadership change in Iran, hours after his team said replacing the Iranian government was not the aim of US attacks. Iran's military has vowed a "decisive response" after Trump said US strikes caused "monumental damage" to Iranian nuclear sites. The UN's nuclear watchdog has called for a ceasefire in order to inspect the damage. Asked about Trump's posts on Truth Social about regime change in Tehran, Lammy said: 'There will be further tweets on many issues over the next three-and-a-half years of Donald Trump's leadership that you will be discussing… the rhetoric is strong but actually I can tell you, having spoken to the Secretary of State, having sat in the White House, that this is targeted action to deal with Iran's nuclear capability.' READ MORE: UK providing 'political cover' for US and Israel after Iran attack He added: 'I'm very conscious that when I met colleagues in the White House on Thursday that they were considering all of the options… we knew that, you knew that as journalists. And Donald Trump made a decision to act to degrade that capability. "It may well have set back Iran by several years. That was a decision that he took.' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Iran's nuclear programme is a 'grave threat' which the US military action would 'alleviate'. He has been accused of providing "political cover" for Israel and the US. The US attacked three sites in Iran including the Fordo facility, which is buried deep underground. In an address to the nation from the White House, Trump warned there could be further strikes if Iran retaliates. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi warned the attacks 'will have everlasting consequences' and that Tehran 'reserves all options' to retaliate.
South Wales Guardian
22 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Lammy says he told Iran it would be a mistake to blockade Strait of Hormuz
The Foreign Secretary said it would be a 'catastrophic mistake' for Tehran to fire at US bases in the region, after an American attack on Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend. Questions are being asked about whether the shipping channel or oil exports through it could be blocked amid the tensions. Important discussion with @SecRubio this evening on the situation in the Middle East. We will continue to work with our allies to protect our people, secure regional stability and drive forward a diplomatic solution. — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 22, 2025 Speaking to BBC Breakfast on Monday morning, Mr Lammy said he had been 'crystal clear' that 'it would be a huge, catastrophic mistake to fire at US bases in the region at this time. We have forces in the region at this time. 'It would be a catastrophic mistake. It would be a mistake to blockade the Strait of Hormuz.' He said he thinks his counterpart 'gets that and understands that'. The UK has been pressing for Iran to engage in negotiations and diplomacy over the issues, and Mr Lammy told the same programme: 'Let's take the diplomatic off-ramp. Let's get serious and calm this thing down.' Mr Lammy is expected to address MPs in the Commons about the situation on Monday. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer warned on Sunday that there is a risk of the crisis escalating beyond the Middle East, telling reporters 'that's a risk to the region. It's a risk beyond the region, and that's why all our focus has been on de-escalating, getting people back around to negotiate what is a very real threat in relation to the nuclear programme.' Sir Keir spoke to US President Donald Trump on Sunday, and Downing Street said the leaders agreed Tehran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and called for Iran to return to negotiations. The conversation came after the air raid by American B-2 stealth bombers and a salvo of submarine-launched missiles hit Iran's nuclear facilities. 'They discussed the actions taken by the United States last night to reduce the threat and agreed that Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon,' Downing Street said. 'They discussed the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table as soon as possible and to make progress on a lasting settlement.' — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 21, 2025 Mr Lammy suggested on Monday that the action by Mr Trump 'may well have set back Iran several years'. He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that the US President's rhetoric was 'strong' but that strikes had been 'targeted' to 'deal with Iran's nuclear capability'. The Foreign Secretary later added: 'Donald Trump made a decision to act to degrade that capability. It may well have set back Iran by several years. That was a decision that he took.' Mr Lammy has also spoken to his Iranian and Israeli counterparts 'to stress the need for de-escalation'. 'I urged a diplomatic, negotiated solution to end this crisis,' he said over the weekend. Overnight, Mr Trump called the future of the Iranian regime into question, posting on his TruthSocial platform: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' It appeared to be a different approach to that of his defence secretary Pete Hegseth, who had said on Sunday that 'this mission was not and has not been about regime change'.
Daily Mirror
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
US attack on Iran is a 'disaster for NATO' and 'massive win for Vladimir Putin'
Defence analyst Michael Clarke warned Donald Trump's decision to back the Israelis with a bombing campaign in Iran was a "massive gamble" that could have unintended consequences The US attack on Iran's nuclear sites has inadvertently proved a "disaster for NATO" and could mark the "real end" of the decades-long Transatlantic relationship, a defence analyst has told The Mirror. US President Donald Trump proudly declared the bombing campaign of three nuclear sites in Iran had "totally obliterated" the country's enrichment ambitions. The weekend bombings came after Israel launched attacks and called for US assistance amid its concerned Iran's leaders were seeking to build a nuclear weapon and further threaten Washington's allies in the Middle East. Mr Trump called the bombings a "spectacular military success" and went on to hint at regime change in Iran, a concerning prospect for many Americans following the failed attempts to create thriving democracies in both Iraq and Afghanistan. While the lasting impact of US military strikes is yet to be seen, defence analyst Michael Clarke said it could have unintended consequences at the expense of NATO. Speaking to The Mirror, Mr Clarke described the bombings as a "massive gamble for the US in the Middle East." He added: "It may or may not succeed in 'remaking' the region in favour of a new US, Israeli, Saudi Arabian hegemony. Or it may fail and leave the US either militarily committed - again - across the region or else disempowered and expelled from it with globally reduced influence as a result. "Either way, the immediate geostrategic bottom line is that - succeed or fail - this probably marks the real end of the Transatlantic relationship. The politics of this will be impossible to smooth over and the lack of the common values that the Transatlantic Relationship has always been based on will from now on become very evident." Mr Clark said the upcoming NATO summit starting on June 24 will prove to be a "real breaking point" as leaders grapple with an inadvertent gift given to their foe, Russian President Vladimir Putin. The attacks on Iran will result in oil prices spiking as the Middle Eastern country is a major global supplier of the fuel. "The immediate win for Putin in higher oil prices for a while," Mr Clarke added. "The massive accidental strategic win for Putin in presiding over a transatlantic split that no one - back to Stalin - had the benefit of. The US attack - whether a good or bad idea - is a disaster for NATO at exactly the worst time." With the US turning its attention to the Middle East and away from Eastern Europe, it is unclear whether Mr Trump will be keen to secure a lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia. The Republican president's decision to strike Iran also exposes a potential double standard in his foreign policy after he vowed to end US involvement in wars abroad. While his position toward Russia has remained static, making no demands of despot Putin. He has hinted at regime change in Iran against the country's oppressive mullahs. In a previous TruthSocial post, Mr Trump said: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!"
