logo
South Africa: Select Committee on Public Infrastructure Is Briefed by Auditor-General

South Africa: Select Committee on Public Infrastructure Is Briefed by Auditor-General

Zawya04-06-2025

The Select Committee on Public Infrastructure and the Ministries in the Presidency received a briefing from the Auditor-General (AG) of South Africa on the audit outcomes for the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME), Brand SA and Statistics South Africa (Stats SA).
The committee expressed serious concerns about the mixed performance of these critical government institutions that report to the department.
Committee Chairperson Mr Rikus Badenhorst noted that while Brand SA maintained its clean audit status, the regression in the DPME's audit outcome from clean to unqualified with findings, as well as the persistent material findings at Stats SA, point to systemic weaknesses in expenditure management, internal controls and consequence management across the portfolio.
"What emerges most clearly from the Auditor-General's presentation is a culture of stagnation. Recommendations are noted but not acted upon, plans are drafted but not internalised, and repeat findings accumulate without resolution. We cannot allow inaction to become institutionalised," said Mr Badenhorst.
The committee was particularly concerned about the significant backlog of unresolved irregular and fruitless expenditure cases at Stats SA, some dating back over a decade. Members of the committee argued that the vacancies in key positions, including the CFO role which has been vacant for eight years, have severely weakened the control environment and accountability mechanisms at the entity.
The committee said the credibility of the data and statistics produced by Stats SA is critical for effective government planning and service delivery. The persistence of these governance and financial management failures is deeply troubling and requires urgent intervention.
The committee welcomed the Auditor General's recommendations for the accounting officers, including:
- Ensuring vacant positions are timeously filled to maintain effective internal controls
- Enhancing reviews of performance planning and reporting processes
- Swiftly resolving all cases of irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure
- Monitoring the implementation of action plans with a focus on daily controls and reconciliations
Members emphasised the need for the executive authority and accounting officers to be held accountable for addressing these persistent weaknesses.
The committee committed to regularly engage the DPME, Brand SA and Stats SA to monitor progress on implementing the AG's recommendations and achieving tangible improvements in audit outcomes, performance and accountability.
'This report must be our guide when we engage these departments during the upcoming budget process. We cannot allow inaction to become institutionalised. The people of South Africa deserve efficient, transparent and accountable public institutions that deliver on their developmental mandate,' concluded Mr Badenhorst.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Republic of South Africa: The Parliament.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Up to Dh30,000 fine: UAE announces penalties for offences by public benefit institutions
Up to Dh30,000 fine: UAE announces penalties for offences by public benefit institutions

Khaleej Times

time3 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Up to Dh30,000 fine: UAE announces penalties for offences by public benefit institutions

In a recent Cabinet resolution, the UAE government has introduced a new framework for administrative penalties imposed on public benefit institutions. These measures aim to ensure compliance with Federal Decree-Law No. (50) of 2023, which regulates the operations of such entities. Under the new regulations, institutions can face fines ranging from Dh1,000 to a staggering Dh30,000 for various violations. These offences include failure to notify authorities of operational changes, unauthorised participation in events, and mismanagement of funds. Here is a list of offences and their corresponding penalties: Failure to notify changes within the institution First and second violations: Warning Third violation: Dh1,000 fine Fourth violation: Temporary closure for one month Unauthorized participation in events First violation: Warning Second violation: Dh1,000 fine Third violation: Dh2,000 fine Fourth violation: Temporary closure for one month Hosting individuals from within the country for events without approval First violation: Warning Second violation: Dh1,000 fine Third violation: Dh2,000 fine Hosting individuals from outside the country for events without approval First violation: Dh2,000 fine Second violation: Dh4,000 fine Third violation: Dh6,000 fine Fourth violation: Temporary closure for one month Participation in activities organized by associations or entities outside the country without approval First violation: Dh5,000 fine Second violation: Dh10,000 fine Third violation: Dh15,000 fine Affiliation or membership in any organization based outside the country without local approval and ministry authorization First violation: Dh10,000 fine Second violation: Dh20,000 fine Third violation: Dh30,000 fine Improper fund management First violation: Warning Second violation: Dh5,000 fine Third violation: Dh10,000 fine The resolution emphasises the importance of adhering to regulations and highlights the government's commitment to transparency and accountability within the sector. Institutions are urged to familiarize themselves with these new rules to avoid penalties and ensure their operations align with national standards.

Pakistan recommends US President Donald Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize
Pakistan recommends US President Donald Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize

Khaleej Times

time2 days ago

  • Khaleej Times

Pakistan recommends US President Donald Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize

The Pakistani government has decided to formally recommend US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his "decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership" during the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. The conflict ended in a ceasefire after several days of cross-border shelling. In a post shared on X, the government said the international community had "bore witness to unprovoked and unlawful Indian aggression, which constituted a grave violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity, resulting in the tragic loss of innocent lives, including women, children, and the elderly." Following the Indian aggression, Pakistan "launched Operation Bunyanum Marsoos -- a measured, resolute, and precise military response", the post read. It noted that the response was executed to exercise the country's "fundamental right to self-defence" and "carefully to re-establish deterrence", defending its "territorial integrity while consciously avoiding civilian harm." The post further read that "at a moment of heightened regional turbulence", President Trump "demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi." It continued that the US president "de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation, ultimately securing a ceasefire and averting a broader conflict between the two nuclear states that would have had catastrophic consequences for millions of people in the region and beyond," as reported by Dawn. "This intervention stands as a testament to his [Trump's] role as a genuine peacemaker and his commitment to conflict resolution through dialogue," it added. "Durable peace in South Asia would remain elusive until the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning Jammu and Kashmir," it observed. The government noted that President Trump's leadership during the 2025 Pakistan-India crisis "manifestly showcases the continuation of his legacy of pragmatic diplomacy and effective peace-building". In conclusion, the post read that Pakistan remains hopeful that Trump's "earnest efforts" will continue to contribute towards regional and global stability, particularly in the context of ongoing crises in the Middle East, including the humanitarian tragedy unfolding in Gaza and the deteriorating escalation involving Iran, as reported by Dawn. Trump has repeatedly said that the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours agreed to a ceasefire after talks mediated by the US, and that the hostilities ended after he urged the countries to focus on trade instead of war, Dawn reported. The cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan was reportedly agreed upon following a call from Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) to his Indian counterpart, Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai. During the conversation, the Pakistani DGMO proposed an end to hostilities, which was accepted by the Indian side, leading to a cessation of cross-border firing and air intrusions starting from 5:00 pm on May 10. However, Lieutenant General Ghai later disclosed that the cessation of hostilities was short-lived, as Pakistan violated the agreement with cross-border firing and drone intrusions just hours after it took effect. The conflict had initially intensified after the Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting nine terrorist infrastructure sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoK). This operation was a direct response to the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which resulted in the death of 26 civilians, including one Nepali national. The Indian military's retaliatory strikes were followed by increased cross-border shelling from Pakistan and a series of counter-responses by the Indian Armed Forces.

United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS)-supported General Court Martial launches in Wau
United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS)-supported General Court Martial launches in Wau

Zawya

time2 days ago

  • Zawya

United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS)-supported General Court Martial launches in Wau

A military court has officially begun in Wau, the capital of South Sudan's Western Bahr El Ghazal, to hear cases related to allegations of serious misconduct by uniformed personnel from the South Sudan's Peoples Defense Forces (SSPDF). As judges and legal officers stood to take their oaths, marking the official opening of the proceedings, silence washed over community members. In a country where access to justice is often not available for many people in remote locations, this quiet moment speaks volumes – it's pregnant with hope that even though justice has been delayed, it won't be denied. For Major General Marech Chietak from this young nation's National Prisons Service, the message is clear. 'Noone is above the law, irrespective of the uniform they wear.' As the general court martial began hearing cases on 18 July, the emphasis remains on fairness, accountability and transparency. 'The overarching principle governing these proceedings is respect for the rule of law,' says Justice Yai Anyuon Akot, a high court judge in Wau. 'Military courts aren't merely about meting out punishments but rather ensuring that people who have been wronged can receive the reparations they deserve, thereby restoring public faith in the justice system,' he added. 'It's about building trust between uniformed personnel and community members.' For their part, community members, while optimistic, still have concerns, reveals Stephen Musa, a civil society representative. 'There is a lot of doubt among people about what will happen if they come forward and report cases,' he said. 'People are worried about their safety, confidentiality and some fear retaliation if the verdict doesn't go in their favour,' he stated. 'It is our shared responsibility to build trust and ensure survivors are protected and I hope the final outcome of this court will shore up public trust in the system.' Sam Muhumure, Head of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan's (UNMISS) Field Office in Western Bahr El Ghazal, is keenly aware of community sentiment. "With years of conflict and struggles under their belt, it's understandable that people are apprehensive. Our hope, as UNMISS, is that supporting such military courts is the first step to creating mutual understanding and respect among civilians and military personnel. It's one of the many steps that collectively contribute towards building a lasting peace in South Sudan,' he explains. The Wau general court martial is expected to hear a total of 28 cases, 15 of which relate to serious crimes such as rape and murder. These proceedings will conclude on 6 July, with judgments and sentencing, followed by a civilian-military dialogue on 7 July to reinforce public understanding of the process and promote trust between communities and the armed forces. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store