Ex-Tronoh assemblyman's final appeal against his rape conviction and prison sentence to be heard on Aug 27
PUTRAJAYA — The Federal Court has fixed Aug 27 to hear former Tronoh assemblyman Paul Yong Choo Kiong's (picture) appeal against his conviction and imprisonment for allegedly raping his maid.
One of his lawyers, Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik, confirmed with Bernama the hearing date following a case management held today. Also representing Yong is lawyer Datuk Rajpal Singh.
Yong is appealing against the Court of Appeal's decision in upholding the decision of the High Court which convicted him for raping his 23-year-old Indonesian maid.
The High Court, in July 2022, sentenced Yong to 13 years imprisonment, but the Court of Appeal in March, last year, reduced the sentence to eight years.
He was alleged to have commited the offence in a room at his house in Ipoh, between 8.15pm and 9.15pm on July 7, 2019.
The Court of Appeal, in a 2-1 majority decision, dismissed Yong's appeal against his conviction but reduced his prison sentence to eight years, along with two strokes of the cane.
The appellate court, however, granted a stay of execution, pending disposal of the appeal at the Federal Court and Yong was released on RM30,000 bail with one surety and ordered to surrender his passport to the court.
In March this year, the High Court in Ipoh, Perak dismissed Yong's application to submit additional evidence in his appeal.
A lawyer for the maid had testified in the High Court that the woman has withdrawn her rape allegations against Yong and she made the retraction through a statutory declaration affirmed in Indonesia. — BERNAMA
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
an hour ago
- Barnama
Retiree Loses Over RM530,000 To Facebook Investment Scam
JOHOR BAHRU, June 20 (Bernama) – A private sector retiree lost RM535,766 after allegedly falling victim to an online investment scam promoted via an advertisement on the Facebook application. Seri Alam District Police chief ACP Mohd Sohaimi Ishak said the police received a report from a 57-year-old local man on Tuesday, who claimed losses exceeding RM500,000. He said the victim had come across a share investment advertisement on Facebook on March 13 that promised lucrative returns within a short time, and clicked on the provided link out of interest.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
A-GC denies flawed prosecution in Najib's SRC case, cites evidence constraints
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) has refuted claims that the prosecution in the money laundering case involving funds from SRC International Sdn Bhd (SRC) was flawed. In a statement, the A-GC said it has consistently upheld the highest standards and quality in discharging its prosecutorial duties, in line with public expectations. "The A-GC remains committed to upholding the rule of law and will continue to carry out its responsibilities under the Federal Constitution with integrity, fairness and respect for judicial processes," the statement read. The statement followed the High Court's decision to grant a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) to former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak over three money laundering charges involving RM27 million linked to SRC. High Court Judge K. Muniandy issued the ruling today after the prosecution failed to furnish the defence with hundreds of documents related to the trial, despite the charges being filed as early as 2019. Addressing the delay in trial proceedings, the A-GC said the case, first registered at the High Court in February 2019, was postponed on five occasions due to various factors, including the Covid-19 pandemic, defence requests and applications by the prosecution itself. The A-GC said that proceedings for the 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) trial had commenced while the first SRC case was still ongoing at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court levels. This overlap led to delays in the second SRC trial, as both cases involved the use of key material documents required for the prosecution, it said. Following this, it said, there was no choice but to wait until the documents were made available. "Both cases involved the use of certain material documents that were also intended to be used in the second SRC trial. "As the documents in question are material to the second SRC trial, the prosecution had no choice but to wait until those documents became available, which is after the 1MDB trial proceedings have concluded. "It must be emphasised that the material documents are already available but are currently being used as evidence in the ongoing 1MDB trial," it said. The A-GC also said the prosecution had requested additional time to compile all the material documents to present them as evidence in the second SRC trial.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
MasterChef finalist, ex-husband jailed 34 years for maid's murder
KOTA KINABALU: A former MasterChef Malaysia finalist and her ex-husband have been sentenced to 34 years in prison each for the 2021 murder of their Indonesian domestic worker at a condominium in Penampang. The High Court found Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Sulang, 37, and contractor Mohammad Ambree Yunos, 44, guilty of killing 28-year-old Nur Afiyah Daeng Damin between Dec 8 and 11, 2021, at their Amber Tower residence. Justice Lim Hock Leng ordered the jail terms to commence immediately. Ambree was also sentenced to 12 strokes of the cane, while Etiqah was exempted due to her gender. The court ruled that the pair had acted with a common intention, with evidence showing the victim had suffered fatal injuries deliberately inflicted by both accused. "The defence failed to raise reasonable doubt," Lim said in his judgment, adding that the prosecution had successfully proven that the victim's injuries were intentional and jointly caused. The two were charged under Section 302 of the Penal Code, which carries the death penalty or imprisonment of 30 to 40 years and not less than 12 strokes of the cane, upon conviction. Deputy Public Prosecutor Dacia Jane Romanus had urged the court to impose the maximum sentence, saying the brutality of the case had shocked the nation. "The deceased was a young woman who left her hometown for honest work amid the pandemic, but ended up losing her life at her workplace," Dacia said. She also told the court that the maid suffered daily abuse and was denied her basic rights, including unpaid wages and the ability to return home.
