Biomass power generators could be ‘marking own homework on sustainability'
In a report published on Friday, MPs on the Public Accounts Committee said certification schemes, which aim to ensure biomass used in the UK has been sustainably sourced, may not be strong enough.
Burning wood chips to generate electricity is classified as renewable power, and is seen by the Government as essential to achieving the UK's net zero goals provided the wood is sustainably sourced and combined with carbon capture and storage technology, known as BECCS.
The Government has provided £22 billion in public subsidies to businesses and households that use biomass, with £6.5 billion going to Drax, which runs the UK's biggest power station in Yorkshire.
The sector has long faced accusations of burning wood from environmentally important or rare forests overseas.
Billions upon billions of government support has been provided to the biomass sector over the past two decades Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown
Wider concerns also remain over whether biomass can be genuinely considered a low-carbon fuel and if BECCS can be effectively scaled to mitigate the emissions from burning wood.
The Public Accounts Committee's report said the Government has for too long relied on an untested approach to make sure biomass generators are meeting sustainability criteria in return for receiving financial support.
Current arrangements rely heavily on self-reporting and third-party schemes, it said.
The group of MPs also argued that neither the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) nor regulator Ofgem know whether this is effective in ensuring the sustainability of biomass.
On BECCS, the committee raised concerns about a lack of a contingency plan if the technology is no longer considered viable, urging DESNZ to outline alternative routes for achieving net carbon removals and what the future of biomass will be without carbon capture.
It comes in light of BECCS's deployment being beset by delays, with the Government yet to settle on a target date for the UK's first plant to be operating with the technology.
And while ministers committed in 2023 to strengthening sustainability rules, the committee said DESNZ has not made it clear how this will work in practice, and that the department acknowledged an increase in resources will be needed to monitor compliance.
Drax has come under increasing scrutiny over its sustainability claims but a recent KPMG report found the firm did not breach any rules.
Because significant public concerns were raised in relation to the findings, the Public Accounts Committee called for the full report to be provided to them for parliamentary scrutiny.
The group of MPs said they had also identified risks that a provisional new deal on Government subsidies for Drax may not provide good value for money.
In February, ministers announced fresh subsidies for Drax, saying they would halve costs for consumers and ensure all of its biomass comes from 100% sustainable sources.
Current subsidies are due to expire in 2027 and ministers have announced the plant is 'important to delivering a secure, value-for-money power system' from then until 2031.
But the report noted that under the provisional deal, Drax will still receive a higher unit price than many other renewable generators.
It also called on DESNZ to consider how it can update the agreement to prompt Drax to begin transitioning to BECCS.
Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, said: 'Billions upon billions of government support has been provided to the biomass sector over the past two decades.
'Rather than taking it on faith that the woody biomass burnt for energy is a sustainably sourced low-carbon alternative fuel, it is long past time a true assay was made of what taxpayers are getting for their money.
'In light of the continuing concerns raised around biomass highlighted by our written evidence, gaining full confidence around the sector's supply chains is work that must be carried out if government is to truly satisfy itself that biomass is not a white elephant.
'We hope that Drax will agree with the need for parliamentary scrutiny of the findings of the review into its supply chain and reporting practices, and to supply this review to our committee.
Samantha Smith, head of trade body Heat And Biomass UK, said it was 'deeply disappointed' by the report.
She argued it overlooks the 'critical role that sustainable biomass plays today in providing baseload power and clean heat, supporting the UK's energy security and keeping bills down'.
'Independent certification schemes like the Sustainable Biomass Programme are benchmarked by Ofgem and found to fully meet UK sustainability requirements, with similar findings by regulatory bodies in other jurisdictions such as the EU,' she added.
A Drax spokesperson said: 'Drax's biomass is certified as sustainable through the Sustainable Biomass Programme (SBP), an internationally recognised certification scheme. Our regulator, Ofgem, has tested and benchmarked the SBP against the Government's sustainability requirements for woody biomass, alongside other programmes.
'The KPMG reports Drax commissioned have been subject to ongoing speculation and mischaracterisation. We provided these reports under legal privilege to the Government and Ofgem for them to scrutinise in depth.
'Following Ofgem's review, they publicly stated that they did not find evidence within the KPMG reports or any other of the thousands of documents we made available that meant Drax had breached sustainability obligations or was wrong to receive RO (Renewables Obligation) funding.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Assisted dying, abortion, grooming gangs...Britain is morally deformed
I've a friend in a nursing home with very bad cancer. Physically, he feels OK, but there are hints of mental confusion. One afternoon we watched a quiz show on a blank television that wasn't turned on. It was proof, he said, that his mind couldn't be going because he got all the answers right. With the passage of Kim Leadbeater's Bill – save a stay of execution in the Lords – he suddenly looks like a candidate for assisted dying, and yet his suffering strengthens the case against. My friend, at this stage, is miserable less because of the tumour than because he's poor – can't afford a home care – and anxious because he wakes up in a strange place and imagines he's been kidnapped. He tells me he is at the centre of a plot by the state to kill the old by driving them mad. Though I assure him that no government is competent enough to pull such a thing off, I'm beginning to wonder if he has a point. Last week, the Commons voted to decriminalise abortion and legalise state-assisted suicide, the latest twist on 'cradle to grave'. Supporters spoke of humanising the law, of continuing the 'progressive' effort begun in the 1960s when abortion was first permitted. But there's a big contextual difference. Social liberalism in a time of economic growth was about increasing choice; today, in a period of austerity, it suggests narrowing options. Can't afford a baby? Terminate it. Worry you might burden the grandkids? Take a seat in the suicide pod. Of course this isn't what MPs meant by voting this way – but when you cut benefits for the elderly and cap them for children, and then make it easier to destroy yourself or your baby, it's hard not to infer a link. People keep saying to me, with a dash of British humour, that the state intends to kill us all to save money. Let's assume this is wrong. Let's call the speculation tasteless. Nevertheless, we have to account for why so many people feel this way, for the historic loss of trust. This is not some opioid-induced fantasy; human beings respond to cues. The third story in the grimmest week of Starmer's premiership was the publication of the Casey report, which confirmed that Asian men raped girls, and that officials declined to act because it might appear racist. This is mind-blowing stuff and shows how morally deformed our establishment now is. It has no coherent understanding of good and evil – in the difference between innocence and guilt – and in its yearning to look good by its own bizarre standard, it permits evil to flourish. In 2025, a person who prays outside an abortion clinic faces arrest. Meanwhile, a foreign-born, convicted rapist might avoid deportation by invoking their human rights. Religion, in fact, barely featured in the assisted dying debate, except to suggest that opponents might be acting under orders from the Pope. This fantasy pays a backhanded compliment to a faith that has been losing its influence for a very long time. As far back as 1937, Cosmo Gordon Lang, the archbishop of Canterbury, abstained in a Lords vote on divorce because he judged it 'no longer possible to impose the full Christian standard by law on a largely non-Christian population'. Christianity defined the West for so many centuries that its loss is experienced as the death of a fixed order, but we mustn't forget that Jesus was a revolutionary who overturned an even older system of ethics. Pagans, who largely felt life was meant to be enjoyed, thought the martyrdom-chasing Christians were nuts. One can see why. They taught that death is not the end, life is a test, and suffering is an opportunity to imitate the crucifixion. For example: the 7th century saint Cuthbert had a best friend, Herbert, and the two men dreamt of spending eternity together. But Cuthbert was a famously holy man, so would pass through purgatory to Heaven fast, whereas Herbert was just a very good man, so, they feared, might take longer – delaying their reunion. How did God fix the problem? He generously gave Herbert a long, painful illness, so that when he died on the same day as Cuthbert, his soul was so cleansed by suffering that they entered paradise at the same time. Weird, isn't it? Yes, but it also seeded into the West the idea that our life belongs to God, that He made us in his image, and this is a foundation for the principle that you can't take away another's life at will. This gradually flowered into rights for women or slaves, the peace movement and abolition of the death penalty. The problem with a commandment, of course, is that it's inflexible: it extends to unwanted foetuses and relatives in pain. Around the 19th century, we detached God from ethics, getting around the 'Thou Shalt Nots' and opening morality up to negotiation. Add individualism, toss in consumerism, and moral action today is contingent upon personality, economics, circumstance. Back when I was a socialist, before religion came into it, I wasn't comfortable with the idea that one unborn baby gets to live because its parents happen to be married and rich, whereas another is aborted because its mother is single and poor. Humanistic morality seemed surprisingly naive about the reality of the human condition, its appetites and deprivations. Looking at my friend in the nursing home, to what possible extent can one say he has 'agency'? I'm not sure he understands his diagnosis. The notion that he might have a chat with Kim Leadbeater, she with a smile and a clipboard in her hand, and make a rational choice to die next Wednesday afternoon is preposterous. The opportunity for error or manipulation is self-evident, yet many cannot, or will not, see it. For anyone who does choose assisted dying, I hope Christians respond with mercy. We are not in charge of Britain, haven't been for a long time, and I'm not sure I'd want to be. The best options left are to witness and accompany, to do the sometimes depressing, occasionally rewarding work of being with people when they go. I enjoy holding my friend's hand. I'd never have done that when he was healthy.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Scotland 'should not be treated as afterthought' of HS2 project
Last week, the UK Government admitted the flagship infrastructure project had been 'no less than a litany of failure'. The Labour administration blamed the previous Tory government for the overruns. The link to Scotland for the project was cancelled in June 2022, with the route from Birmingham to Manchester scrapped by former Tory prime minister Rishi Sunak in 2024. READ MORE: UK providing 'political cover' for US and Israel after Iran attack Now, the scheme is running £37 billion over budget, and has been delayed beyond 2033. The UK's Secretary of State for Transport, MP Heidi Alexander, told the House of Commons last week: 'I'm drawing a line in the sand – calling time on years of mismanagement, flawed reporting and ineffective oversight. 'It means this government will get the job done between Birmingham and London. 'We won't reinstate cancelled sections we can't afford.' Alexander (above) also admitted there was 'no reasonable way to deliver' on the 2033 target for the first trains to run between London and Birmingham. The SNP are now urging the UK Government to look again at extending the line to Scotland, after taxpayers north of the border will have contributed to the project but see no benefit. Willie Coffey, SNP MSP, said: 'The fact the UK cannot construct a high-speed rail network - the norm in many countries around the world - speaks for itself. 'While we know HS2 won't have any stations in Scotland, with the way things are going it'll be lucky to have any stations in England either.' Coffey pointed to claims made during the 2014 independence referendum that a Yes vote would jeopardise Scotland's opportunity to benefit from HS2 'only to find that promptly after the referendum the connections to Scotland were ditched'. READ MORE: Douglas Alexander refuses to set out route to Scottish independence 'This is nothing new sadly, 30 years ago we were promised that Scotland would be connected to the Eurostar - but that was dumped despite Scotland's sizeable contribution to paying for the creation of the Channel Tunnel,' he added. "Promises broken and public money squandered is par for the course for Westminster. It's clear we need to get Scotland's finances and transport investment out of the hands of Westminster and into Scotland's hands with independence." It comes after new HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Wild said the 'overall situation with respect to cost, schedule and scope is unsustainable' in a letter to Alexander. He said costs would continue to rise if ministers did not renegotiate engineering contracts awarded in 2020. Wild also said that the testing phase alone would be likely to take three years, rather than the 14 months that had been previously assumed. The Department for Transport has been contacted for comment. The £3bn Scottish link to HS2 was quietly dropped by the then-Tory government just 30 minutes before the result of a no-confidence vote on Boris Johnson was announced. When Sunak cancelled the Manchester leg at the 2023 Tory party conference, he said the money would be diverted to other public transport projects and roads in the North of England and the Midlands.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
DWP offering three month lifeline for 150,000 carer's set to lose benefits – will you be impacted?
OVER 150,000 households receiving carer's allowance will start losing their payments from November 2026. Carer's allowance is a benefit for those who provide at least 35 hours of unpaid care each week, usually for a disabled or sick relative. 1 It is currently paid at £83.30 per week, and carers can earn a second income from a job. However, if they earn more than £196 a week, they lose the allowance entirely. One of the main ways to qualify for carer's allowance is by caring for someone who receives the daily living component of personal independence payments (PIP). In March, the government announced plans to tighten the rules for claiming PIP in an effort to save £5billion a year on welfare spending and encourage more people to return to work. On Wednesday, the government introduced the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to Parliament. This proposed law outlines plans to make PIP eligibility rules stricter. Currently, people qualify for PIP by earning enough points across various tasks, such as cooking, cleaning, or managing money. Under the new rules, applicants will need to score at least four points on one specific daily living activity to qualify. This change means that having minor difficulties across several areas may no longer be enough to qualify for PIP. This change could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year, according to government's own impact assessment. As a knock-on effect, around 150,000 carers will no longer qualify for carer's allowance due to the stricter eligibility rules. However, the Bill also introduces measures to protect existing claimants who might lose their payments. If someone loses their PIP under the new rules, they will continue to receive payments for 13 weeks as a safety net. This 13-week grace period also applies to those receiving carer's allowance. The 13-week transition period is longer than the four weeks originally planned by the government. What is carer's allowance? CARER'S allowance is a UK benefit designed to help people who have caring responsibilities for more than 35 hours each week. Those eligible get £83.30 a week paid directly into bank accounts. To qualify, the person you care for must already get one of these benefits: Personal independence payment (PIP) - daily living component Disability living allowance - the middle or highest care rate Attendance allowance Constant attendance allowance at or above the normal maximum rate with an Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit Constant attendance allowance at the basic (full day) rate with a war disablement pension Armed forces independence payment You don't have to be related to the person or live with them to apply. But if you share caring responsibilities with someone else, only one of you can make a claim. The type of care you provide can vary, but includes things such as helping with washing or cooking, taking the person to medical appointments or helping out with household tasks such as shopping or organising bills. To get the benefit, you must also meet a certain set of criteria: You must be 16 or over You have to spend at least 35 hours a week caring for someone You need to have been in England, Scotland or Wales for at least two of the last three years (this does not apply if you're a refugee or have humanitarian protection status) You must normally live in England, Scotland or Wales or live abroad as a member of the armed forces (you might still be eligible if you're moving to or already living in an EEA country or Switzerland) You cannot be in full-time education You must not be studying for 21 hours a week or more You cannot be subject to immigration control You will also have to meet certain earnings criteria in order to get the benefit. Your earnings must also be £196 or less a week after tax, National Insurance and expenses. You can apply for the carer's allowance online by visiting Despite the longer grace period, campaigners, including the disability equality charity Scope, have warned that this extended period is only a temporary fix. They argue that once the payments stop, disabled people will still face the same extra costs of living. Food bank network Trussell said: "The last-minute details on protections offer something for a small proportion of people, but even they will still see a real-terms cut. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has also set out how the government proposes to slash incapacity benefits offered to those on Universal Credit. It also includes a proposal to hike the Universal Credit standard allowance above inflation over the next four years. What is PIP and who is eligible? HOUSEHOLDS suffering from a long-term illness, disability or mental health condition can get extra help through personal independence payments (PIP). The maximum you can receive from the Government benefit is £187.45 a week. PIP is for those over 16 and under the state pension age, currently 66. Crucially, you must also have a health condition or disability where you either have had difficulties with daily living or getting around - or both - for three months, and you expect these difficulties to continue for at least nine months (unless you're terminally ill with less than 12 months to live). You can also claim PIP if you're in or out of work and if you're already getting limited capability for work and work-related activity (LCWRA) payments if you claim Universal Credit. PIP is made up of two parts and whether you get one or both of these depends on how severely your condition affects you. You may get the mobility part of PIP if you need help going out or moving around. The weekly rate for this is either £29.70 or £77.05. On the daily living part of PIP, the weekly rate is either £73.90 or £110.40 - and you could get both elements, so up to £187.45 in total. You can claim PIP at the same time as other benefits, except the armed forces independence payment.
