Cianan Brennan: Why didn't government admit its error with biometric public services cards?
Six years ago, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) went mano-a-mano with the government of the day over the infamous public services card, and ended up in a long legal war of attrition.
That battle involved a simple question: Could the card be used as a catch-all portal for citizens accessing the State's services, regardless of their wishes?
That particular spat was more than a little unedifying, ending up in a wholesale climbdown on the part of the Department of Social Protection in December 2021.
However, yesterday's decision by the commission to fine the department €550,000 and order it to suspend the biometric processing of the public's data via the card should be even more seismic.
€550,000 is five times the amount of the next-largest fine for breach of GDPR by a public body, and more than half of the maximum allowable.
Puzzling defence of the indefensible
Six years is a long time, however, and the world is a different place now.
This time round, the State may be more willing to take its punishment from its own regulator.
That in itself would be borderline farcical.
The government — former social protection minister Regina Doherty being probably the most noteworthy culprit — argued for years that the card did not carry biometric data, despite it being plainly obvious to anyone with common sense that it did — in this case, a photo used for facial matching.
Why did the State spend hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible? The answer may be because it couldn't afford not to.
Why did it do so? Because it couldn't afford not to.
Having stated until it was blue in the face that black was indeed white, to change tack in any way would have been legally disastrous.
Why the government of the day couldn't just hold its hands up and admit fault in the first place, rather than spending hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible, we may never definitively know.
However, we can speculate. The card is deeply ingrained in Irish society now, but that wasn't the case to quite the same extent in 2019.
Furthermore, back then GDPR was brand new. It was so new that the initial investigation into the public service card was carried out under Ireland's previous Data Protection Act.
Under that act, the commission had far fewer teeth to impose fines.
GDPR is now a firmly embedded, if not universally beloved, EU policy.
Maybe in 2019 it was felt the time wasn't right for the government to eat crow on its ambitious biometric card venture.
Range of views in data protection community
Those we polled yesterday across Ireland's niche data protection community had different views as to whether or not the Government, in the guise of the Department of Social Protection, will go the legal route once more. One said:
The circumstances have changed. The data protection and GDPR landscape is much clearer now than it was under the old act.
'It seems more likely than not that this is one that won't be challenged, at least not in court.'
However, there was little consensus.
'For years, they [the department] have been shouting that there is no biometric data on the card. Now this decision from the regulator is unequivocal that there is. Can they really back down from that? Would that be in character?' a second expert asked.
DPC will defend its decision 'very robustly'
Should the Government press the nuclear button once more and appeal the decision to the courts, deciding commissioner Dale Sutherland has made it clear that 'we will very robustly defend our decision'. He said:
We are well used to this. It is a feature of our system.
There are other puzzling aspects to yesterday's decision, not least the sheer length of time it took.
The biometrics investigation had been set in train even before the 2019 decision, which dealt specifically with whether or not the government had the right to make the card mandatory for public services such as passport applications, yet it was only officially commenced in July of 2021.
It then took four more years to complete, during which time the card has become ever more embedded in Irish society. That is surely an inordinate amount of time to take over a key investigation concerning personal data.
'This was a complex inquiry with complex issues,' Mr Sutherland said.
'The resources these inquiries take are just extraordinary. This one took a bit of time,' he added, while allowing 'it's probably a bit longer than we would have liked'.
Digital Rights Ireland, whose initial complaint spurred the investigations back in 2017, professed itself 'concerned' at the length of time it had taken to finalise the probe. A spokesperson added that the decision 'leaves the Government in a very serious situation', given it has spent 'hundreds of millions of euro on an illegal public service card project'.
Mr Sutherland stressed, however, that 'the important thing is that it [the investigation] is done now'.
Asked whether the world had moved on in the last six years, he said: 'The principles haven't.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
UN questions Irish family courts over 'concept of parental alienation'
Ireland has been asked to respond to the UN on why "the concept of parental alienation" is being considered by the family law courts. Parental alienation is typically used to describe a situation where one parent wrongfully influences a child or children to turn against the other parent, usually in situations of relationship breakdown. The issue was raised on Friday afternoon by Dafna Hacker Dror of the UN's committee on the elimination of discrimination against women and girls. Ms Hacker Dror told the Irish delegation attending a hearing in Geneva: 'It seems that formal bodies are using the concept of parental alienation as if not contested, while it is highly contested on many levels including due to the risk that use of this concept holds for women and children who suffer from domestic violence.' Ms Hacker Dror asked why the concept was being used and added: 'What is done to prevent its potential harm to victims of domestic violence?" Minister for migration Colm Brophy led the Irish government's delegation and agreed to respond to that and some other questions in writing. It comes after minister for justice Jim O'Callaghan said last month that recommendations arising from a consultation process on parental alienation are currently being progressed. He said the process had resulted in a public consensus that 'the means to address parental alienation lie in improvements to the Irish family courts and family justice system'. He acknowledged that parental alienation is a highly contested and divisive concept. The consultation process on the issue was launched in 2022 by then-Justice Minister Helen McEntee. The aim of the consultation process was to seek the views of stakeholders and individuals around the issue of parental alienation. A report on parental alienation in other jurisdictions was also reviewed by the department as part of a process examining whether policy or legislative changes are required in Ireland. Meanwhile, concern was also raised during the hearing in Geneva that although Travellers make up just 0.7% of the Irish population, 15% of the male prison population and 22% of the female prison population in Ireland are Travellers. Department of Justice representative Lisa Doherty acknowledged that the 'disproportionate representation' of Travellers in the prison system is a 'cause for concern and is a reflection of the challenges facing Travellers in our society.'
The Irish Sun
3 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Hung jury in trial of Dublin firefighter accused of raping US woman in Boston on St Paddy's weekend as new date set
A US judge has declared a mistrial in a case involving Dublin firefighter Terence Crosbie, who is accused of rape. Mr Crosbie is accused of raping a 29-year-old attorney in a Boston hotel room over St Patrick's Day weekend in 2024. Advertisement He was sharing the room with his colleague Liam O'Brien, both of whom had travelled over as part of a group of firefighters to participate in the Boston parade. Mr Crosbie was arrested on March 16, 2024 and was on trial this week for the alleged offence. He has been held at the Nashua Street jail in Boston since his arrest. However, the jury of eight men and four women were unable to reach a verdict after four days and 22 hours of deliberation. Advertisement READ MORE IN NEWS As they returned to the court room today the judge declared the jury as "hung". Judge Sarah Ellis said: 'I declare that this jury is deadlocked and I declare a mistrial.' Both the woman and Mr Crosbie testified over the five-day trail. The 29-year-old attorney alleges she met Liam O'Brien in a bar on March 14 and returned to the hotel room where they had consensual sex. Advertisement Most read in Irish News However, she claims after they fell asleep in separate beds she woke up as a man she did not know was raping her. Liam O'Brien remained asleep and was snoring at this stage. Gardai and RSA measures aimed at driving crash deaths on Irish roads The trial heard CCTV shows Mr Crosbie enter the hotel room and the woman leave 20 minutes later. The woman also alleges the man told her: "I know you want this. [Mr O'Brien] can't even do this for you – what a loser." Advertisement Mr Crosbie denies the charge and said that he had no sexual contact with the woman and that he "didn't touch" her. DNA evidence collected from the woman did show two samples the court heard. However, analysts were unable to determine whether the second sample belonged to Mr Crosbie. He testified in court: "There was nobody in my bed. My bed was empty." Advertisement He also said "loser" was not a common Irish term and he would not have said it. A new trial date has been set for October 14 and bail was increased from $10,000 to $50,000 after the judge deemed the accused to be a flight risk. 1 The firefighter denies the charge
Irish Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Ian Bailey's ashes scattered in west Cork
A sister of Ian Bailey said innocent victim Sophie Toscan du Plantier's family is 'misguided' for believing that he killed her. Kay Reynolds was speaking on Friday when she scattered her brother's ashes near the 1996 death site in west Cork, as he requested. Bailey, who died 16 months ago, was found guilty of French filmmaker Sophie's murder in a trial in France in 2019 without his attendance. Ms Reynolds spoke of how Bailey cherished the area, which he was tied to for legal reasons, and claimed the murder probe impacted his health. She said her sibling 'had nothing to hide' and she expressed sympathy for the family of Sophie. She told Cork's 96fm Opinion Line with PJ Coogan: 'He absolutely loved West Cork with a passion. 'I know there was the warrant that meant he couldn't leave the country and he used to say, 'I wouldn't want to be anywhere else'.' When producer Paul Byrne asked Kay if 'pressure' from the 'murder investigation' contributed to 'his already ill health?', she said: 'Without question.' She added: 'I think if he'd have kept quiet, it would have been better. But that wasn't Ian's style. He felt he didn't need to hide. 'He had nothing to hide. And so he confronted his challenges face on. 'I think it came out very close to the time that there were things, I think, that the gardai felt only someone involved in the crime would have known. I don't think that helped. But as a family, we never thought that he'd done these things because that was his style of journalism. 'When he lived in Gloucester, we were near GCHQ, and he found out all sorts of things that other journalists didn't. 'He thought outside the box and he came up with things that no one else had thought about. And I think that's really what had to happen there and in the end became his downfall, really. He came up with all sorts of ideas around what had happened and that's how he became a suspect.' Kay stated she never questioned her brother's innocence and vowed: 'Never for a second.' She added: 'We never doubted him that he'd been involved in this.' She also expressed sympathy with Sophie's relatives and said: 'A very young mother was brutally murdered. 'I feel so sorry for the family because I think because of their misguided belief that Ian committed the murder, they've just had so many years of torture. 'And I just wish them peace around this. And hopefully the cold case will [help]. It's just not only losing her, but to have no peace and thinking that Ian was the perpetrator and that he's got away with it. 'I can't imagine what that must be like for them. And I just feel so sorry for them.' Taoiseach Micheal Martin claimed last year, when he was Tanaiste, the State let Bailey away with Sophie's murder. After he died in 2024 f rom a suspected heart attack, gardai conducted a search under warrant of his home and seized items, including a laptop computer, memory sticks, notebooks, and materials with DNA.
