US tariffs may hamper efforts to cool inflation, says Fed official
April data showed the PCE price index increased 2.1% year-on-year, narrowly exceeding the Federal Reserve's 2% inflation target. (Reuters pic)
WASHINGTON : Shifts in US trade policy could hold back further progress in lowering inflation, a senior US central bank official said Tuesday, as President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs ripple through the economy.
The US economy is 'still on a firm footing, but uncertainty has notably increased since the beginning of the year,' Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook told a Council on Foreign Relations event in New York.
While the ultimate level of Trump's tariffs remains unknown as policy changes are ongoing, 'the effects are already noticeable,' she said.
In particular, Cook warned of higher inflation and a jobs market cooldown.
Price increases tied to policy shifts, in turn, 'may make it difficult to achieve further progress in the near term' when it comes to inflation, she added.
Typically, the Fed holds interest rates at a higher level if inflation is elevated and when inflation is low, the central bank can cut rates to boost economic activity.
For now, the Fed's preferred gauge of inflation – the personal consumption expenditures price index – rose 2.1% from a year ago in April.
This was down from a month prior, but slightly above the central bank's longer-run 2% target.
In a separate address in Iowa, Chicago Fed president Austan Goolsbee cautioned that encouraging inflation figures were 'old news,' saying they were the last reports before the effects of Trump's tariffs.
'Are the tariffs going to have a small impact?' he said. 'We gotta wait and see what happens.'
Cook added that 'the economic environment could become highly challenging for monetary policymakers.'
Besides changes to economic policy, the response of financial markets, businesses and consumers suggest risks to both price stability and unemployment, she noted.
'The recent post-pandemic experience with high inflation could make firms more willing to raise prices and consumers more likely to expect high inflation to persist,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
From rivalry to realignment, China shifts to seek better fortunes amid trade friction with US
BEIJING: Rather than being fixated on its trade dispute with the United States (US), China is refocusing its efforts towards bolstering ties with non-confrontational partners, including developing nations, to boost trade and investments. Clearly, Beijing is exploring all options to find new markets and export opportunities to mitigate the fallout from the continuing tariff war with Washington, hedging against downside risks by forging links with Southeast and Central Asia, the Gulf, Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Latin America. China's renewed zest to reach out far and wide was not lost on some 119 journalists from all over the world who joined the three-month China International Press Communication Centre (CIPCC) programme in the Chinese capital. It was difficult for them not to notice that Chinese authorities -- deeply concerned over the welfare of the nation's 1.4 billion citizens -- realise the need to intensify efforts to reap more economic opportunities. This was clearly evident after China ramped up its presence in high-level summits, forums and trade expos to woo investments and explore trade opportunities as well as alternative markets after the US tariffs announcement in April. A busy calendar for economic diplomacy The list of engagements includes the Central Conference on Work Related to Neighbours, which set the tone for stronger regional engagement; the Hainan Free Trade Port Investment Conference; and the China-ASEAN Media Forum in Luoyang. Beijing also hosted the China-CELAC Ministerial Forum in May to deepen ties with Latin America, followed by the China-Africa Economic and Trade Expo in Changsha in June. From another perspective, such an evolving strategy opens up new space for ASEAN and the 15-member Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), including Malaysia, to play a bigger role in global trade. After US President Donald Trump imposed sweeping and record-high tariffs on China, Beijing began distancing itself from Washington, turning instead to multilateral platforms, trade corridors, and South-South partnerships From courting Southeast Asia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, to Africa, Central Asia and Latin America, China is actively expanding its global reach. More recently, it also sought closer ties with New Zealand, which will implement on a trial basis a visa waiver in November for Chinese travellers from Australia holding valid visas The ASEAN Advantage The ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur last month, the RCEP Local Government Forum in Anhui and outreach to oil-rich Gulf countries via ASEAN platforms further underscored this new orientation. In this changing global environment, ASEAN and RCEP find themselves in a favourable and complementary position, more so with China's trade with ASEAN already surpassing its trade with the US in recent years. Now, with RCEP in full force, there's even greater momentum for bolstering intra-Asian trade. The Manila-based Asian Development Bank (ADB) estimates RCEP could boost regional incomes by over a staggering US$240 billion annually by 2030. China has signalled its commitment to the ASEAN-led framework, praising the bloc's neutrality and centrality in regional affairs. Chinese investments in ports, tech infrastructure, semiconductors and clean energy across Southeast Asia reflect this shift. Looking beyond the West What makes this shift momentous is not just China's pivot but also the opportunity for developing regions to balance superpower rivalry with multilateral gains. By engaging with Latin America through the CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) forum and consolidating economic partnerships with Africa and ASEAN, China is expanding the Global South's role in shaping trade flows. While the US imposes new tariffs, restricts chip technology and limits access to rare earths, China appears increasingly justified in managing its risks by working with partners more focused on mutual gains. A Foreign Ministry official here aptly quoted a Chinese proverb: "A single win is not good, but a shared win is better." It also reflects China's success in galvanising its human resource of more than 700 million workers through sheer tenacity and industriousness – traits which have entrenched its prowess in manufacturing as a global benchmark. Malaysia's role in a shifting trade landscape Closer to home, for Malaysia, China's shifting tides offer both opportunities and responsibilities. With its strategic location, diverse economy and mature trade infrastructure, Malaysia is well-placed to benefit from redirected Chinese investments and supply chain shifts. The recent ASEAN-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries-China summit in Kuala Lumpur, alongside Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's engagements with China and Gulf leaders, marked a turning point, reinforcing Malaysia's role as a regional connector. Malaysia can attract more manufacturing and tech investments, and as the ASEAN chair, Malaysia also carries the duty to promote unity and openness within the bloc. Nevertheless, rising US-China trade tensions still pose risks to regional stability and global trade flows. Markets did rally after the constructive June 5 phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, offering temporary relief amid heightened tension. Both countries had earlier agreed on a 90-day tariff rollback deal on May 12. Trump signalled interest in visiting Beijing, while Xi emphasised mutual respect. Observers believe this 'trade chill' offers a brief pause. China's pivot toward ASEAN, RCEP and the Global South, upholding their win-win policy or 'Shuāngyíng', will continue unabated. For Malaysia, this moment is a strategic opening—not only to benefit from trade shifts but also to help shape a more balanced and inclusive regional order.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Britain to cut companies' energy bills in new industrial strategy
LONDON: Britain will aim to cut the electricity bills of thousands of companies under a new industrial strategy to be published on Monday, heeding calls from business to lower high energy costs that they say have damaged competitiveness and hindered growth. Under an industrial strategy for the decade 2025-2035, the government plans to cut the bills of electricity-intensive manufacturers by up to 25 per cent from 2027, a move it said could benefit more than 7,000 businesses. The government has made boosting Britain's anaemic growth a key priority. But lawmakers and business leaders had highlighted the sky-high energy costs many companies face as a hindrance to that aim, with industry body Make UK saying government should scrap climate levies imposed on firms. Britain has been under pressure to do more to support its key industries and bolster competitiveness as the United States and the European Union also seek to do likewise, in a trade landscape upended by US President Donald Trump's tariffs. Alongside the strategy, five sectoral plans for areas such as advanced manufacturing, creative industries and clean energy are also set to be published. The Industrial Strategy focuses on eight previously identified sectors of strength for Britain, which also include defence and financial services. The government said it would exempt energy-intensive manufacturers from levies like the Renewables Obligation to boost their international competitiveness. "Tackling energy costs and fixing skills has been the single biggest ask of us from businesses and the greatest challenge they have faced – this government has listened," Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said in a statement. The government said the energy measures would be funded through reforms to the energy system, without raising household bills or taxes. The scope and eligibility for the scheme will be finalised after a consultation. Make UK said the industrial strategy was a "giant and much needed step forward" that also tackled a skills shortage in Britain's workforce and access to capital. The Confederation of British Industry said it was an "unambiguous, positive signal" that would provide a "bedrock for growth" The industrial strategy, Britain's first in eight years, will expand the state-owned British Business Bank's capacity to channel investment into smaller companies, and provide an extra 1.2 billion pounds (US$1.61 billion) a year on skills by 2028-29. The government added it would cut regulatory burdens on businesses, spend more on research and development and speed up planning processes.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
US warns Iran against retaliation as Trump hints at ‘regime change' after strikes
WASHINGTON, June 23 — US President Donald Trump on Sunday raised the question of regime change in Iran following US strikes against key military sites over the weekend, as senior officials in his administration warned Tehran against retaliation. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump wrote on his social media platform. Trump's post came after officials in his administration, including US Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, stressed they were not working to overthrow Iran's government. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon, calling the mission 'a precision operation' targeting Iran's nuclear programme. Vance, in an interview on NBC's Meet the Press with Kristen Welker, said 'our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change.' 'We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out. We want to end their nuclear programme, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here,' Vance said, adding the US 'had no interest in boots on the ground.' 'Operation Midnight Hammer' was known only to a small number of people in Washington and at the US military's headquarters for Middle East operations in Tampa, Florida. Complete with deception, seven B-2 bombers flew for 18 hours from the United States into Iran to drop 14 bunker-buster bombs, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, told reporters. In total, the US launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and more than 125 military aircraft in the operation against three nuclear sites, Caine said. The operation pushes the Middle East to the brink of a major new conflagration in a region already aflame for more than 20 months with wars in Gaza and Lebanon, and a toppled dictator in Syria. Damage to facilities With the damage visible from space after 30,000-pound US bunker-buster bombs crashed into the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear site, experts and officials are closely watching how far the strikes might have set back Iran's nuclear ambitions. Caine said initial battle damage assessments indicated all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact. UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi was more cautious, saying while it was clear US airstrikes hit Iran's enrichment site at Fordow, it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow, the site producing the bulk of Iran's uranium refined to up to 60 per cent, had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack. Vance told NBC the US was not at war with Iran but rather its nuclear programme, and he thought the strikes 'really pushed their programme back by a very long time.' Trump called the damage 'monumental,' in a separate social media post on Sunday, a day after saying he had 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites, but gave no details. Tehran has vowed to defend itself and responded with a volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and destroyed buildings in its commercial hub Tel Aviv. But, perhaps in an effort to avert all-out war with the superpower, it had yet to carry out its main threats of retaliation, to target US bases or choke off the quarter of the world's oil shipments that pass through its waters. Caine said the US military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. The United States already has a sizeable force in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops in the region, including air defence systems, fighter aircraft and warships that can detect and shoot down enemy missiles. Reuters reported last week the Pentagon had started to move some aircraft and ships from bases in the Middle East that may be vulnerable to any potential Iranian attack. Not open-ended With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch foe, Trump has done something he had long vowed to avoid — intervene militarily in a major foreign war. There were sporadic anti-war demonstrations on Sunday afternoon in some US cities, including New York City and Washington. It was unclear why Trump chose to act on Saturday. At the press conference, Hegseth said there was a moment in time when Trump 'realised that it had to be a certain action taken in order to minimise the threat to us and our troops.' After Trump disputed her original assessment, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday said the US had intelligence that should Iran decide to do so, it could build a nuclear weapon in weeks or months, an assessment disputed by some lawmakers and independent experts. US officials say they do not believe Iran had decided to make a bomb. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, asked on CBS' Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan whether the US saw intelligence that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had ordered nuclear weaponisation, said: 'That's irrelevant.' Hegseth, who said the Pentagon notified lawmakers about the operation after US aircraft were out of Iran, said the strikes against Iran were not open-ended. Rubio also said no more strikes were planned, unless Iran responded, telling CBS: 'We have other targets we can hit, but we achieved our objective. There are no planned military operations right now against Iran — unless they mess around.' — Reuters
