Sly Stone taught pop stars how to dress wild

In 1968, the Temptations were still performing in matching suits and the Beatles had just shed their pin-neat tailoring for the whimsical trappings of Carnaby Street.
That same year, Sly Stone and his newly formed band, multiracial and mixed gender, posed in outfits as wild as those groups' seemed scripted: hippies and dandies and bohemians in peacock prints, optimistically borrowing garments and accessories from the Middle East and South Asia.
Even amid this style splendor, Stone stood out: In the middle, he was stoic as a toreador prefight, his chest bare beneath an embroidered vest and a pile of chains. On his legs was a pair of breeches over knee-high socks and gladiator sandals. In one look, he combined ancient Roman battle gear, the snobbery of equestrianism, a then-trendy fervor for Indian styles and a prescient taste for hip-hop's gold chain obsession — a seemingly nonsensical mix that altogether, with Stone's prodigious touch, just worked.
Stone dressed the way he made music. He grabbed at influences but understood them intuitively, never superficially, which allowed him to create songs — and outfits — that were so original that they made you feel good before you even understood what was happening to you. Jimi Hendrix shared and almost certainly influenced Stone's flamboyance, wearing large hats and decorating his bare chest with a long scarf and jewels. But if Hendrix was soft and romantic, with his tie-dyes and bell-bottom jeans, Stone was more mercurial, integrating glam, Edwardian melodrama and African diasporic styles into his foundation of funk. He wore his big sunglasses not, as Greta Garbo did, to shield, but to invite your gaze.
Stone wanted your ears and your eyes. For a 1969 television performance, he dressed in a satin ocher blouse with a Draculoid collar, tying up the front to expose his chest and fabulous abs, seducing the audience at the piano with 'Hot Fun in the Summertime.' A few minutes later, he stood up for 'I Want to Take You Higher,' revealing that the shirt's bishop sleeves were festooned with lengthy black fringe that shimmied as he punched his arms through the air like a preacher sermonizing.
We may not have seen that live fusion between clothing and music — not a marriage of music and aesthetic, as David Bowie pioneered, but a synergy between a song's message and a shirt's purpose — again until Beyoncé stepped onstage during her Renaissance tour in 2023, razzing her audience with mirrored alien wear as she wiggled between those robot arms.
Before Stone, you could either assuage your audience with clothes — as many of Motown's acts did, as Black artists who sought to appeal to White audiences — or scare them, as Hendrix did with his ripped jeans, or Janis Joplin with her unkempt hair.
Stone sketched out a third possibility: Your clothes could open up your music. His band was not focused on looking 'cohesive' visually; rather, its members' disparate and sometimes clashing ensembles emphasized their universe of inspirations. His own ensembles had the same smooth tension.
The hippie style that Stone took to an intergalactic other place was about rebellion: that you could reject the values of your parents, of the clean-cut establishment, by wearing your jeans frayed, by not buying new things but patching or mending what was old, by wearing clothes from another time to show you longed for a simpler (if imagined) past.
Stone's style was about freedom — the freedom to mix pieces from different centuries and cultures that seem to have little in common and to make them work, even sizzle. He could put on a rastacap and a black fringe suede suit and it just made sense. When he walked onstage in the mid-1970s, wearing a purple sequin jacket with orange flames and a silver sequin baker boy cap and little silver pants — well, that was wilder than anything the Sex Pistols or the New York Dolls were wearing at that time. Ripped jeans and safety-pinned T-shirts are nice poetry, but they don't require the courage that Stone's clothes did. A male rock star in women's clothes is often a gimmick. A male rock star in clothes that seem to defy the orders of mens- and womenswear but are undeniably sexy? That's bold.
The door Stone karate-kicked open would shape the looks of some of the biggest pop stars of the late 20th century and early 21st. There was Prince and his feminized, feline sex appeal, then Rick James in his total commitment to exuberance. Then Beyoncé, of course, who, like Stone, is less interested in flouting her connections to designers or trends and instead committed to wearing clothes than enhance the experience of seeing her onstage. Perhaps the musicians most influenced by Stone are Andre 3000 and Big Boi, formerly of Outkast, who started off weird — Andre wore a lace-up skirt and T-shirt, and Big Boi a snakeskin short suit, to the Source Awards in 1999 — and then just kept getting freakier even as they became household names.
As he moved beyond his musical prime in the 1960s and '70s and struggled with addiction, he remained glamorous. He wore furs and metallic jeans, Dior sunglasses and a big belt spelling out 'SLY' in silver studs. In 2010, he played Coachella, dressed in a police officer's uniform and a blond wig. It was weird, but it was like nothing else.
Unlike Hendrix or Gram Parsons, who worked with Michael & Toni and Nudie Cohn, respectively, to create their custom pieces, Stone was never associated with a particular designer or store. Nor did he think about clothes the way Bowie or Madonna did — as tools to help create an era or mood that would mark a new stylistic experimentation. For Stone, dressing was something deeper than a designer or an exercise. He didn't just play with style. He lived it.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fox News

7 minutes ago

• Fox News

Bill Belichick-Jordon Hudson drama revealed in new emails

Emails obtained by WRAL show Bill Belichick addressing the controversy over his romantic and professional relationship with Jordon Hudson. The relationship between the legendary coach and the 24-year-old model has drawn national scrutiny after a controversial "CBS Sunday Morning" interview. Hudson declared, "We're not talking about that" when Belichick was asked about how the couple met. Belichick claimed in one email that CBS "secretly" had a camera focused on Hudson despite the model requesting to sit off camera. "Secretly, CBS had a camera focused on Jordon where Lead producer Gabe instructed her to sit," Belichick reportedly wrote. Belichick elaborated on why the question of how they met was not answered. "I met Jordon randomly on a flight to Palm Beach in 2021. That is no secret. Jordon was not dodging the specific question regarding how we met, but rather was preventing the interview from continuing to probe into personal matters," the email said. Belichick also addressed why Hudson was present at the interview to begin with. He believed the interview would be focused on his book, "The Art of Winning: Lessons from a Life in Football." "Jordon was present at the CBS interview because David Kass, the Simon & Schuster publicist, was not there," Belichick wrote, referring to the publisher of his book. "I included Jordon in the book acknowledgments because she was a creative contributor to the book, including having the idea for formatting the 4 special pages in the book." In another email, Belichick addressed reports that he requested to have Hudson copied on every email sent to him. "Jordon and I have both a personal & professional relationship," Belchick wrote in the email. "This is not a secret. Jordon assists me with my personal media, which is why I asked UNC to forward media requests (E.G. CBS 60 Minutes) to her. Jordon has zero involvement in the UNC football program, beyond the degree that my personal media intersects with it." Belichick released a statement saying he was "surprised" about getting the questions about his relationship and that when Hudson had stepped in, she was doing her job. He went on to accuse CBS of creating a "false narrative" with so-called "selectively edited clips." CBS responded, disagreeing with Belichick's version of events. In a separate interview with ESPN, Belichick insisted Hudson is not involved with UNC football. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Forbes

32 minutes ago

• Forbes

Blue Ivy Carter And The New Archetype Of the Firstborn Heiress

Blue Ivy Carter attended the premiere of "Mufasa: The Lion King" at the Dolby Theatre in Los ... More Angeles, California. At SoFi Stadium in April, Blue Ivy Carter did something no celebrity child had managed before by making 70,000 people forget she was Beyoncé's daughter and remember she was a performer in her own right. This wasn't an awkward nepo baby fumbling through inherited opportunity, but a 13-year-old commanding a packed-out stadium with the poise of a seasoned performer and the precision of someone who'd earned her place there. The first time she performed during Beyoncé's Renaissance tour, the world had already decided what kind of child she would be: a beneficiary of fame, privilege and legacy. But she showed, night after night, that she didn't just inherit a name but a standard. She was methodical, poised and almost unbothered—a rare combination for a 13-year-old. She didn't perform like someone trying to prove herself; she moved like someone who already had. What's striking about her gradual rise isn't that she's Beyoncé's daughter, but more so that she represents a new kind of celebrity child: not the overexposed, over-coached darling of Hollywood tradition, but a quieter, more deliberate figure. She doesn't go live on Instagram. She doesn't need to. Instead, she appears in polished doses—at the Super Bowl, in Grammy acceptance speeches, on stage in silhouette—each time reminding us that her presence is never random. Celebrity kids were expected to dazzle early or self-destruct spectacularly for years. Blue Ivy is being raised to do neither. Her appearances are choreographed in the public eye, yes, but also—more importantly—within a larger machine of generational wealth, intellectual property and brand control. The Carters are building something most celebrity families never do: infrastructure. And Blue Ivy is not an accessory to that machine but part of the blueprint. She is, by all appearances, a child with discipline. One who hears criticism and trains harder, one who does the work. She's not a mascot, nor is she merely a moment, but an operator in the making. Blue Ivy represents something unprecedented in American celebrity culture: the first generation of ultra-privileged children with extraordinary access and demonstrable talent. While the "nepo baby" debate has dominated headlines, Blue Ivy has quietly been building a different brand. The difference lies not just in talent, but in how that talent translates into measurable economic value. The Economics of Inheritance At 13, Blue Ivy Carter has already accumulated a resume that would impress most adults. By age 11, she had already become the second-youngest Grammy winner in history. She was also the voice actress in Disney's Mufasa: The Lion King, the principal dancer on two of the highest-grossing tours in music history, and the BET Young Stars Award winner for two consecutive years. These aren't participation trophies but achievements that required skill, preparation and genuine contribution. This distinction is important because it represents a shift in how celebrity dynasties operate since in the past, traditional Hollywood nepotism relied on name recognition and industry connections to get opportunities, and it largely still does. However, the new model, exemplified by Blue Ivy, combines those advantages with rigorous preparation and measurable competence. The numbers matter here, too. Beyoncé's Renaissance World Tour grossed $579 million. The Cowboy Carter tour is projected to exceed $600 million and Blue Ivy isn't just a guest performer on these tours but has become a selling point, with fans specifically purchasing tickets to see 'Manager Blue' in action. Blue Ivy walks onto the field for the Beyoncé halftime show during an NFL football game between the ... More Baltimore Ravens and the Houston Texans, at NRG Stadium in Houston, Texas. Blue Ivy's trajectory forces uncomfortable conversations about fairness that most people would rather avoid. She gets access to choreographers most kids will never meet, high-end voice coaches and opportunities that simply don't exist outside her stratosphere. But watch her handle a wardrobe malfunction mid-performance or navigate the inevitable social media pile-ons, and you realize she's also dealing with pressures that would break most grown-ups. At that point, privilege stops being offensive when it's used as a launching pad rather than a crutch. But the financial metrics only tell part of the story. What's really happening is a prime example of strategic wealth transfer. Beyoncé and Jay-Z have achieved massive success, thanks to their business acumen, and they have turned their brands into capital. Their eldest daughter is their most strategic investment, not because she performs well, but because she is proof that Black wealth can be passed down with structure, and proof that visibility doesn't have to mean exposure. We often talk about generational wealth in numbers—trusts, real estate portfolios and LLCs—but legacy is more than assets and presents itself in naming power, ownership and vision, and Blue Ivy Carter may be the most apparent case study of that kind of power. So far, there have been no scandals, no outbursts and no overexposure. What we have witnessed instead is a kid growing up inside a world her parents built for her—while learning how to run it herself.

Yahoo

36 minutes ago

• Yahoo

George Kittle Reacts to Sam LaPorta's Major Personal Announcement

George Kittle Reacts to Sam LaPorta's Major Personal Announcement originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Sam LaPorta is heading into his third season as a star tight end for the Detroit Lions, looking to build off two impressive campaigns to begin his NFL career. Advertisement In 33 regular-season game appearances for the Lions, LaPorta reeled in 146 catches for 1,615 yards and 17 touchdowns. The former second-round draft pick will now look to continue that impressive production in Detroit's upcoming 2025 season. Off the field, LaPorta has had a busy offseason following Year 2 in the NFL. This past Saturday, the 24-year-old tight end married his longtime partner Callahan Dellinger. LaPorta and his newly-wed wife shared the news of their wedding ceremony with a joint Instagram post on Sunday. "A house built on rock.6/14/25," the couple wrote. Friends flooded the comments section with reactions to this news. One of the most notable reactions was from San Francisco 49ers tight end George Kittle. Advertisement "Congrats !!" Kittle wrote in the comments. LaPorta and Kittle both famously played their college football careers as standout tight ends for the Iowa Hawkeyes. Detroit Lions tight end Sam LaPorta (87) celebrates a play against Tennessee Titans with offensive tackle Penei Sewell (58) during the second half at Ford Field in Detroit on Sunday, Oct. 27, 2024. © Junfu Han / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images 'LaPorta is going to be fantastic. I think Laporta's the best tight end in the draft class. I think the Lions got a complete steal," Kittle said after Detroit selected LaPorta with the No. 34 pick in the 2023 NFL draft. "I like the other tight ends too, but I spent two weeks training with Sam LaPorta, and the way he moves -- oh yeah, he's got the dog in him. He's kind of quirky, he's kind of goofy, too. He's going to fit in well.' LaPorta and the Lions will kickoff their 2025 regular-season schedule with a Week 1 matchup against the Green Bay Packers on Sep. 7. Advertisement Related: Broncos React to Notable Peyton Manning Announcement on Friday This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 20, 2025, where it first appeared.