Posh doggy daycare Pets and Pats: Owner Angela Beer faces sentencing, council says her RMA breaches were to make money

In the end, Judge Sheena Tepania reserved her decision after hearing Auckland Council seek fines of $140,000 while Beer's lawyer Bronwyn Carruthers KC argued a more reasonable starting point would be $20,000.
Council's lawyer Laura Bielby told the court the breaches of Resource Management Act enforcement orders were 'intentional' and 'deliberate'.
The enforcement orders were, she said, council's attempt to get the business to a place where it would be operating lawfully.
'The defendant, having agreed to the orders... moved pretty quickly to not comply. This is a case that warrants specific deterrence. The council really has exhausted all its options.
'The defendant knew exactly what they needed to do to regularise the operation and it was a choice not to do that.'
Bielby said it was a 'deliberate and calculated decision, perhaps for commercial reasons' to continue to exceed the allowed dog numbers because more dogs 'resulted in more profit for the business'.
This was a position rejected by Carruthers who said Beer had been taking active steps to move the business from Dairy Flat and that some breaches related to actions by staff.
One example she pointed to was a photograph that showed a staff member with a dog in one of the fields from which dogs were prohibited under the agreement with Beer.
Carruthers said there were breaches that involved staff members and their own dogs which – while not compliant – were of a different character to that which the council alleged.
She said there was no evidence put before the court by council to support its claim Beer was acting for profit.
Rather, she pointed the judge to a line in an affidavit from Beer in which the doggy daycare owner said: 'I have not profited from it.'
'Yes, there has been revenue generated but that is not profit.'
Carruthers said an additional fine – on top of the earlier $77,750 levied against Beer and her company for the earlier breaches – could bring an end to the business.
She told the court that her client might be unable to pay a fine. Judge Tepania invited evidence of that, which Carruthers said would not be provided.
Beer has styled her business as a luxury day in the countryside, targeting dog owners living in Auckland's well-heeled inner suburbs.
Auckland Council was told it would be a 'boutique' facility when it granted a retrospective consent in 2017 allowing the business to operate, years after it had started taking in dogs.
Each weekday morning, a fleet of vans branded Pets and Pats would circle wealthy Auckland suburbs, collecting dogs for a day in the grounds around the manor-like home Beer rented in Dairy Flat, enjoying what the company's website billed as a 'private canine country club'.
The day out would cost dog owners upwards of $50 a head but council inspectors found it cost neighbours something money couldn't buy – the peace and quiet of country life that drew them to the area in the first place.
The rules she agreed to allowed the business a maximum of 60 dogs on the property between 11am and 1.30pm during the week. Winter allowed for an extra hour, to 2.30pm, granting time to wash dogs down before they were returned home.
That limit was found to have been repeatedly broken with inspectors finding 83 breaches between December 2021 and May 2022.
Beer and her company were convicted on those charges, appealed and lost, and were waiting on a final sentencing when Auckland Council filed another tranche of charges, this time over multiple breaches between June 2023 and April 2024.
Advertise with NZME.
Council documents show there were, again, dozens of breaches of the consent – this time carried out while Beer and her company were awaiting sentencing on the earlier conviction.
Throughout this period, Beer had name suppression, meaning the charges against her, the conviction entered and the fresh charges could not be made public. Neighbours, desperate for action, found themselves starved of information when the suppression drew a veil across the court process.
Beer moved from the Bawden Rd property around June last year, moving her Pets and Pats business to former stables in Kumeu.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

1News

19 hours ago

• 1News

Mayor rejects dog taskforce amid calls for action from residents

Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown has rejected requests to establish a mayoral taskforce on dogs, saying it would duplicate initiatives already in place. The decision comes despite increased pressure from Manurewa residents, who feel that roaming dogs were making their neighbourhoods unsafe. Brown acknowledged the rising concerns about roaming dogs, especially in South Auckland. But he insisted that the council was addressing the issue through existing programmes. Brown supports the work of the Regulatory and Safety Committee, chaired by Councillor Josephine Bartley and supported Councillor Daniel Newman from Manurewa and the local board. The committee focused on improving public safety and managing dangerous dogs. ADVERTISEMENT Brown and Bartley had also communicated with relevant government ministers, advocating for legislative changes to strengthen enforcement powers. The council's Long-Term Plan has allocated further funding to hire more animal control officers, improve enforcement, trial desexing programmes in high-risk areas, and seek reforms to the Dog Control Act. Brown said a data-led approach to targeting areas in need, including free desexing services in south and west Auckland, is key. He also recognised the Manurewa Local Board's efforts to fund more animal control staff and is looking for ways to expand the capacity of local shelters. Residents report ongoing issues Despite these efforts, Manurewa residents contend that the problem remains unresolved. At a public meeting hosted by MP Arena Williams, several locals shared alarming stories about dangerous, roaming dogs in their streets and parks. Brendan, a concerned resident, recounted, 'I was fixing up my boat, and from around the corner a huge dog suddenly advanced on me. Lucky, I was able to drive it back using a rope." ADVERTISEMENT Victoria, a local dog owner, is frustrated, saying the issue has forced her to stop walking in her neighbourhood. "I'm afraid to go to my local park. I bought a house here and want to make it my home, but I'm driving to other suburbs to walk my dog. It's holding me back from making friends and putting down roots." Another resident Ryan says response times from the council have worsened. "I've been calling the Council, but response times have gotten worse. I wonder if, after a certain time, traps could be used in problematic places." Williams continues to advocate for a mayoral taskforce on dogs and is working closely with central government. "Central Government are holding local Government back. They need to legislate for change, fund frontline Council services, and back the communities carrying the burden of inaction," she said. She also thanked the SPCA, Brown, and Bartley for supporting a new initiative that offers free dog desexing, microchipping, and vaccinations in high-need areas like Manurewa. Auckland Council says desexing is one of the core requirements of responsible dog ownership. (Source: Frontline groups seek urgent support ADVERTISEMENT Jo Coulam, a volunteer with the Saving Hope Foundation, said they were overwhelmed and have seen little change since the council's pilot programme began. She said the system is not reaching the right whānau early enough and lacks meaningful follow-up. Her team continues to use donations to fund desexing when they can. "As far as the dog crisis goes, to us nothing has changed," she said. "We still see roaming dogs everywhere, and we're still getting calls every day about puppies being born. We've had over probably nearly 300 requests this month alone for us to take people's dogs. "People are scared their dogs will be taken. They want help, but they're scared because their dog isn't registered or desexed." Coulam said a recent event at Rawirit Community House brought dog owners together, providing support, flea treatments, deworming, and information on council-funded desexing. "We've met thousands of families desperate to have their dogs de-sexed to end the cycle of unwanted puppies," she said. In one remarkable case, she shared that a dog was finally desexed after having 26 puppies in just seven months. ADVERTISEMENT On the pilot programme's efficacy, Coulam said, 'They need to get the people like the people that come to our food drops and our desexing talks, those are the ones you want to get because their dog, while they're not problems yet, they will become problems and they'll become the roamers. 'That's the scale of the problem if you don't act early.' Council outlines comprehensive plan Auckland Council's General Manager of Licensing and Compliance, Robert Irvine, emphasises the seriousness with which the council treats the issue, especially in high-risk areas like Manurewa. "Dogs can make wonderful additions to our whānau, but they come with commitments," he said. "Desexing is one of the core requirements of responsible dog ownership." He said the council has invested about $5 million in additional funding for animal management. This includes hiring new staff, implementing public education campaigns, targeted desexing, proactive enforcement, and developing a new animal shelter. The council continues to collaborate with the SPCA and community groups, and advocates for reforms to the Dog Control Act. ADVERTISEMENT Irvine said desexing vouchers are not available for public application. Instead, officers issue them during engagements or when releasing impounded dogs. He said there was no formal follow-up process for voucher use. "The focus of this initiative is on support and prevention, not punishment," he said. "Our goal is to ensure residents feel safe and supported when accessing services. "The onus is on the recipient to book and attend the appointment. We've not been made aware of any issues regarding a lack of follow-up." LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

RNZ News

2 days ago

• RNZ News

Hawke's Bay residents outraged over council's proposed water rate hike

The hike is due to a proposed regional water entity to replace the Three Waters Policy. Photo: RNZ/Alexa Cook A group of Central Hawke's Bay residents are accusing the council of causing 'geriatric poverty' because of a proposed water rates hike of $5000 dollars per household over the next decade. In the quiet township of Takapau, a group of angry residents have banded together to fight the council's proposed water rates increases. (Left to right) Takapau residents Carl Tippett, Owen Clough, Lincoln Taylor, Christine Ross, Carmel Thompson, Kim Mathewson and Diane Sweeney. Photo: RNZ/Alexa Cook Kim Mathewson told RNZ she's outraged about the entire council process, and fears the devastating impact it'll have on their community. "There will be geriatric poverty here. That's really sad when someone thinks 'can't turn on the heater because of the power bill, I can't buy food because I have to buy the rates'. What kind of country are we living in? "Does this council have any social conscience? Because the way it is right now it appears they don't," she said. Kim has crunched the numbers on her own rates bill and said if, or when, water rates reach the council's forecast of $7000 a household by 2035, it will simply be unaffordable because it takes the total annual rates bill to about $9,500. "That's $180 a week per household of rates alone, plus $100 insurance, plus your power bill... if you're on a pension you're pretty much going to be left with $50 a week if you're lucky. No one can afford that," she said. Lincon Taylor owns Takapau business Taylor Made Gates and said under the CHBDC proposal he's facing a water rates rise of more than $25,000 a year for his business and the four properties he rents to his workers. "It's a huge increase. I find it hard to understand how the figures add up, what the council is trying to achieve, and who is paying for it," Taylor said. He said the regional model was probably needed, as Hastings and Napier could help make it an economy of scale for borrowing money, but worried about smaller rural communities like his. "I hope it doesn't turn around and bite small communities too hard because they can't afford it. "I'm proud of the fact that Takapau township has become a retirement village effectively... but they are the ones who are going to be affected the most. To add $4000 to their rates is going to be horrendous," Taylor said. Under the CHBDC proposal, Taylor Made Gates owner Lincoln Taylor estimates his water rates bill will increase by about $25,000 a year for his business and the rental properties for his workers. Photo: RNZ/Alexa Cook Carmel Thompson manages the CHB budget service and helps over 300 families and pensioners with their spending. But with the inevitable water rates increase, she's concerned about how her clients - both homeowners and renters - will make ends meet. "We have a lot of elderly women on our books and those living off only the pension are already struggling with the rates so I hate to think what will happen if we end up with these huge water rates, I'm not sure how these people will manage. "The elderly on pensions are our new poor. Everyone in the community is suffering though, it's really really sad," Thompson said. Fellow Takapau resident, Carl Tippett agreed. He moved from a rural property into the village of Takapau, but was now looking at moving away. "This is the beginning of the death of small towns right throughout New Zealand. If this goes ahead then people like us, over 65's, will not be able to afford to live... I feel angry. "We're at the end of the rope not the beginning. Frankly it's too late... there should have been a much longer consultation," he said. Owen Clough felt the council and government had failed to properly consider the huge impact on its residents if water rates skyrocket over $7000 by 2035. "There's no social thought about what is going to happen. No one has sat down and said 'can they afford afford this, can the country afford this?', because the answer is no," he said. Takapau pensioner Diana Sweeney was frustrated by the same issues, and questioned whether CHBDC was doing enough to lobby the government for help. "The lack of responsibility to this community by previous councils, the buck has to stop somewhere. The council needs to be our voice, we are a small town and we count. They need to spend our money responsibly," she said. A feeling echoed by Christine Ross, she's also part of the group and is one of 208 people who made submissions on the 'Local Water Done Well' proposals. "I can't afford to pay an increased rate on a single pension, it'll be almost 50 percent of my pension each week being spend on rates and I don't have it. "I won't be able to afford to live here, or anywhere at this rate. I'm horrified, I don't understand why the council isn't working for us, to help us," she said. CHB Mayor Alex Walker told RNZ the 'Local Water Done Well' was government's policy and framework. "The costs outlined in the current model are confronting, however council is actively working on options to reduce this cost, as outlined in the report to Council on 5 June. "We take every person, in every community seriously. Takapau was the first community in the district to get major water treatment plant upgrades in 2019," she said. CHBDC Mayor Alex Walker. Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook CHBDC said it had the "perfect storm" of water problems in the region, with years of underinvestment, increasing regulations and an intimidating list of three waters infrastructure that needed upgrading or replacing. 85 percent of total council debt is related to the three waters programme with 25 percent of the drinking water piping network and 40 percent of the wastewater piping network at high risk of failure. Two water reservoirs are over 100 years old and need replacing, seven water treatment plants need $47 million of upgrades, and six wastewater treatment plants are not compliant and urgently need upgrading to the tune of $112 million. Central Hawke's Bay residents feel their council hasn't been transparent about the forecast future water rates hike. Photo: RNZ/Alexa Cook The Mayor said the council had consulted with the community for five weeks and had 10 meetings including two in Takapau. "Affordability. Affordability. Affordability. It is our key challenge and Local Water Done Well does not convincingly deliver that for us yet. Our community can see it and they are, quite rightly, not happy," Walker said. She said the council was continuously talking to government about the district's challenges and opportunities. "We have made multiple approaches to government, including seeking financial support and leading early work across the region on the Hawke's Bay Model in 2019. "Local Water Done Well is the government's approach to address the challenges districts, like ours, face which sets out that ratepayers not government pays for water assets like any other utility, such as electricity or gas," she said. Residents don't just have an issue with the cost, but also with what they said was a lack of consultation with residents over the massive water rates hike being proposed. Kim Mathewson told RNZ the council had known about the proposal since December, but only informed residents in May. "They're not being transparent right now and presenting all the figures. The information they gave us at the community meeting was like a power point presentation for a business, it didn't give you the facts. "It didn't highlight the $7000 increase and it was so small at the bottom of the page... to me that's not being transparent... it's being dishonest," she said. But mayor Alex Walker said the council had been transparent, and the financial rules presented in December have rapidly changed and are no longer correct. "That we were approaching consultation has been flagged in the media, and the regional work towards LWDW has been reported on repeatedly over the last few years. "We have had constructive conversations with people across the district. Most people are aware we are fighting for them, not with them, to make the district a better place and figure out an affordable solution," Walker said. However, residents want to see CHBDC lobby the government for more funding, to try and reduce the burden on ratepayers. "They have to fight the fight with the government. I've said to them: 'when you first saw this why did you not come to us, we are your biggest ally and you chose not to use us'. "We could have been fighting this fight two years ago. The consultation period has been too short, but I do know it's been the same for every community," Kim Mathewson said. Under the new 'Local Water Done Well' scheme, the Central Hawke's Bay District Council consulted with its community on three options: A regional controlled organisation (its preferred option), a stand-alone district council controlled organisation or an in-house delivery unit. However, under the scheme there are also two other options that weren't presented to CHB resident; a mixed council and consumer trust owned model, and a consumer trust owned organisation where assets are transferred from council to a trust. "They should have showed us all the options and presented them much better," Kim Mathewson said. However, CHBDC said it was only able to legislatively comply with three options, which was what it presented to the community in the Consultation Document, and this was explained on its website. Having now heard the public submissions on the proposed options for water services, the council will deliberate these at its meeting on July 3rd. All councils have to submit a 'water service delivery plan' to the government by September 3rd 2025. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Scoop

2 days ago

• Scoop

Local Opposition To Central Otago Goldmine Conducts Public Meetings

Opponents of a proposed Central Otago goldmine have ramped up their campaign this week, with public meetings in Dunedin and Wānaka. Australian company Santana Minerals has signalled plans to seek a fast-track permit for a mine between Bendigo and Ophir, where it estimated it could extract gold worth $4.4 billion. Lobby group Sustainable Tarras Inc raised concerns about the mine's visibility on the landscape - particularly the inclusion of one large, 1000x850m open pit mine, three smaller satellite pits and a tailings dam. The group also expressed concerns about large quantities of cyanide being stored upstream of the Clutha River, and the potential impact the project would have on the region's tourism and viticulture. Chair Suze Keith said about 50 people turned up in Dunedin on Tuesday and more than 100 had registered for the meeting in Wānaka on Thursday night. Speakers included academics, environmental advocates and Labour Party MP for Dunedin Rachel Booking. Ms Keith said the idea of the meetings was "to make a bit of noise". "We don't think that a project of this scale and of its nature is well suited to fast-tracking decision-making," she said. "It might make the decisions come out quickly, but we've got 10 years of operation of this thing and then we've got the perpetual liability of a toxic tailings dam." Santana Minerals has held its own public drop-in sessions at Tarras and Cromwell to discuss the project, with two more planned in coming weeks. The company said the fast-track application aimed to accelerate decision-making, "but it did not override the requirements of the Resource Management Act or other applicable legislation". Keith said the process had fuelled concerns about limited public input. "People are really interested to understand where it is and what it comprises, because a goldmine is not just a mess of a open hole on the ground, it's got a whole lot of other moving parts to it," she said. "What are the implications for the immediate area and the wider area in terms of what it would mean if it does go ahead?" Satana Minerals said the proposed mine was expected to have low visibility, due to surrounding landforms, and environmental considerations were "central" to project planning. It said the processing plant would be located in the lower Shepherds Valley, "strategically sited to leverage natural topography, thereby minimising potential impacts from noise, light, dust, and visibility". Its tailings dam would be built to the highest safety standards, including resilience to a 1-in-10,000 year seismic event, it said, and the company described the work to support its consent application as "one of the most intensive and comprehensive studies ever conducted on the Dunstan Mountains". Several key ecological reports were still underway and the company planned to lodge its application "at the earliest opportunity".