Keir Starmer's grooming gang cowardice
Photo by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street
A prime minister who only acts when forced to do so by others inspires neither confidence nor respect. But this is something we have seen repeatedly with Keir Starmer and this Labour government. The latest – and arguably most egregious – example is the U-turn on holding a full national inquiry into grooming gangs.
In January, Starmer accused politicians calling for such an inquiry of jumping on the 'bandwagon of the far right'. Robust debate, he said, 'can only be based on the true facts'. But the facts today are as they were six months ago; as they have been for years. Thousands of vulnerable girls have been groomed and raped by groups of men, disproportionately of Pakistani heritage.
We knew from Alexis Jay's report in 2014 – 11 years ago – that 1,400 children were sexually exploited in Rotherham alone between 1997 and 2013. And that was a 'conservative estimate'. Stories first appeared in the media in 2007, by Julie Bindel in the Sunday Times Magazine. The late Andrew Norfolk of the Times published hundreds of articles from 2011 on child rapes perpetrated across England.
Some of those closest to the Prime Minister privately warned him last year in stark, emotional terms about the scale of the collective failure to protect the most vulnerable girls; that some of the responsibility lay with Labour-run or Labour-dominated local authorities – in Rotherham, Rochdale and elsewhere; that this was one of the most shameful episodes of British history. And yet.
As Louise Casey points out in her National Audit on Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse, released on 16 June, 'we are talking about multiple sexual assaults committed against children by multiple men on multiple occasions; beatings and gang rapes'. Earlier this month, survivors of the abuse spoke to BBC Newsnight. Kate (not her real name) was raped 'almost daily' by 'multiple men a day'. Fiona was plied with drugs and violently raped from the age of 14, shortly after she was taken into care. Chantelle was also in the care system when she was first abused and drugged at 11 years old. The perpetrators of these crimes were all gangs of British Asian men.
That Starmer had to ask troubleshooter-in-chief Casey to decide whether a national inquiry was needed is cowardice. For the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, to declare on the day Casey's report was published that the systematic rape of girls marked 'a stain on our society and a failure of those who were meant to protect them' – only after someone else gave the government permission to say so – was pure chutzpah. Even when confirming his change of heart, the Prime Minister made no compelling case of his own for why these crimes needed proper examination. Rather, Casey had 'come to the view there should be a national inquiry' and he would 'accept her recommendation'.
But this shameful U-turn is part of a wider pattern of this government effectively subcontracting out difficult decisions to others. It looks weak, directionless and lacking in conviction as a result.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Having refused to take a consistent position on the clash between women's rights and the rights of trans people, it was left to the Supreme Court to rule that 'sex' in the Equality Act meant 'biological sex'. The official Labour line had been that no clarification was needed, even when the case was scheduled to be heard. Senior party figures saw the issue as a 'distraction'. The best Starmer could muster in response to the judgement was to say he was pleased it had brought 'clarity'. But what about the issue, Prime Minister? Where do you stand? Do you support the judgement, or does it prompt a rethink in the law? If Starmer and senior cabinet ministers think the ruling was wrong, they should say so. Stop hiding behind process. Lead.
Into this mix of inaction, we can throw in the decision to return the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. Had the government not done so, the Defence Secretary, John Healey, said, 'Within weeks, [it] could face losing legal rulings.' Framing it this way – in effect, 'the courts made us' – hardly screams political conviction. It's the same on Palestinian statehood. Recognition of a Palestinian state is a manifesto pledge, but according to Sky News's Sam Coates, 'the UK will only recognise a Palestinian state once other countries also do so'. And then there's the cut to pensioners' winter fuel allowance: despite insisting it was the right thing to do – for 11 months – Chancellor Rachel Reeves later bowed to public pressure to reverse it.
Politicians must be allowed to change their minds. Admitting you were wrong, being open-minded and receptive to new evidence are signs of strength. But that is not what's happening with this Prime Minister and his government. Time after time, they seem unable to make a positive argument for either action or inaction. Each Labour government since the war has made a strong moral case for its reforms. Attlee and Bevan with the NHS. Wilson and Jenkins on decriminalising homosexuality. Blair and Brown on international development and child poverty. When will this government do the same?
The danger is that into the void come others – Reform especially – who seem more 'authentic', better in touch with what many Britons think and feel. With a big majority, Labour can afford to be bold and principled. To govern is to choose. But those choices should be choices of direction and policy – not of who to ask to make those decisions for you.
[See more: Is Trump the last neoconservative?]
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Israel-Iran conflict: Fresh attacks as Trump sets two-week deadline for U.S. action
What we know NEW WAVE OF STRIKES: Israel and Iran continued to exchange strikes today, a week into their war. Israel's military said it targeted areas in western Iran, while a building was hit in the southern Israeli city of Beersheba. EUROPE-IRAN TALKS: Iranian Foreign MinisterAbbas Araghchi will be in the Swiss city of Geneva today for talks with his British, French, German and E.U. counterparts in an effort to end the conflict. The U.S. envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, will not attend. TRUMP CONSIDERS U.S. ACTION: President Donald Trump said he was still considering a U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear sites. 'I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' he said yesterday, according to the White House. HUNDREDS KILLED: Israeli strikes have killed at least 639 people in Iran since the conflict began a week ago, The Associated Press reported, citing a Washington-based human rights group. The Iranian health ministry says more than 2,500 people have been wounded. The death toll in Israel from Iran's retaliatory strikes remains at 24.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Taxi drivers buying cars in one city due to 'easy' regulations putting people
Drivers are flogging cars including black cabs on social media with licences already attached from Wolverhampton where it's believed that the rules to obtain a taxi licence are far more easier than other areas Motorists are flocking to social media to snap up vehicles, including black cabs, already registered in the West Midlands city of Wolverhampton, where it's perceived that licensing requirements are more lenient than elsewhere. There are now grave worries that some taxi drivers could be skirting stringent safeguarding checks, particularly in areas previously rocked by child sexual exploitation scandals, according to The Times. The newspaper initially brought the issue to light back in 2018, revealing that Wolverhampton had become the go-to authority for drivers across England seeking to secure a minicab licence. And the problem is only escalating. Data from the Greater Manchester Combined Authority reveals that, as of this year, over one in 10 taxi licences in England were issued by Wolverhampton council. Baroness Casey of Blackstock recently highlighted the loopholes allowing private-hire drivers to operate anywhere across the UK as a significant safeguarding risk for youngsters, reports the Express. Has the government agreed new taxi rules? Ministers have agreed to all 12 of her suggestions and vowed to act "at pace" to put an end to this practice. However, campaigners argue that the government needs to do more, demanding stricter licensing checks nationwide. While drivers must pass checks - including a DBS background check - regardless of where they are licensed, some local councils impose much higher standards than others. Rotherham, scarred by the harrowing revelations of the 2014 Jay report which uncovered the grooming of 1,400 girls, often via taxis, has since clamped down with stringent taxi licensing rules. The borough council's response included making CCTV compulsory in all cabs, setting a clear definition for what makes a "fit and proper person," and requiring a perfect score on a safeguarding test for licence applicants. However, these robust measures are being undermined by a law passed in 2015 under David Cameron's leadership, allowing private hire drivers to operate nationwide, irrespective of where they got their licence. How many taxi drivers are licenced from other areas? Greater Manchester's mayor Andy Burnham has raised the alarm that nearly half the private hire drivers in his jurisdiction hold licences from other areas. Investigations by the Manchester Evening News last year revealed a staggering 8,952 drivers in the region were licensed by Wolverhampton council, located some 80 miles away, accounting for 35 per cent of its private hire fleet. In a similar vein, the Liverpool Echo disclosed that in 2024, Wolverhampton issued close to 500 licences to drivers residing in Liverpool postcodes. A Facebook advert for a Prius highlighted the issue, with the seller noting: "People like the council in Wolverhampton - it's easier to get a badge. The test there is easy. In Manchester, it's very hard. That's why people go to Wolverhampton." How much does a taxi licence cost? The cost of a taxi licence varies dramatically across councils, with Rotherham charging £210 for a one-year licence while Wolverhampton charges a mere £49. Social media is rife with cars being sold complete with a Wolverhampton taxi licence, though new owners must still secure a personal licence from the council to drive them legally. This week, Casey issued a stark warning that despite most taxi drivers being law-abiding, "as a key part of the night-time economy, taxis have historically been identified as a way children can be at risk of sexual exploitation." She further stated: "Local authorities issue taxi licences in line with statutory guidance as a means of combating child sexual exploitation, but they are being hindered by a lack of stringency in other local authorities and legal loopholes which mean drivers can apply for a licence anywhere in the country." What does Wolverhampton say about taxi licences? Meanwhile, a spokeswoman for the City of Wolverhampton council emphasised that safeguarding is their "number one priority in taxi licensing," proudly noting that it is "the only local authority which checks drivers on the Update Service DBS status every day." She explained: "It is illegal for the council to refuse applicants a taxi licence on the basis of where they live. Under the current law, applicants are able to apply to any licensing authority for a licence. It is also illegal for licensing authorities to impose a limit on the number of private hire licences they issue. The council does not gain financially from taxi licensing, as the fees are legally ringfenced for spend only on related activities. "Our early adoption of digital technology has allowed us to offer a simple and efficient online application procedure, with the requirement that drivers attend in person for training and strict assessment before an application can be processed." The Department for Transport was reached out for a response.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Online attacks on MSPs cross the line of decent debate as hate almost triples
Even if we disagree fundamentally with some of our MSPs' political positions, they deserve to be safe at work, Record View says. The number of abusive social media posts directed towards MSPs has almost tripled in the past year. According to research, MSPs have been on the receiving end of 23,500 abusive posts – an increase from 8000 the 12 months before. No matter your views on the performance of our politicans, this is unacceptable. While robust debate should always be welcomed – and our MSPs should expect a fair amount of anger from constituents – this onslaught of online hate must end. Even if we disagree fundamentally with some of our MSPs ' political positions, they deserve to be safe at work. But it makes it almost impossible for them to engage with voters when they are on the receiving end of so much online abuse. Some will argue MSPs should just get on with it and these hateful messages are nothing more than keyboard warriors letting off steam. But we all know nasty bile poured out online can seep into the real world. We saw the worst of this in 2016, when Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered just a week before the Brexit referendum. If we want politics to make our lives better and spark real change, then we need to engage with ideas and real debate. We should disagree with our politicians. We should argue with them. We can think outside the box and put forward radical ideas. But the minute we start to abuse, threaten and hate those we disagree with, a line has been crossed. There is no excuse for it and those who engage in such tactics deserve nothing but disdain. Stay sun-sible Scots will be baking in the hottest day of the year so far today – with the temperature in Jedburgh set to top Tenerife. With the mercury soaring as high as 29C, many of us will be heading for beaches and parks to enjoy the great outdoors and a few drinks. With that in mind, many pubs are ordering in extra beer barrels to keep up with demand. But although the sun has been a rare visitor so far this summer, it would be wise to keep everything in moderation. Sunbathing, like alcohol, is best enjoyed with a sensible head on. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Health chiefs in Glasgow have warned sun-worshippers to keep hydrated and make sure to cover up if out in the heat for long spells. The warm and dry weather will also increase the risk of wildfires, so people are being urged to take care with open fires and disposable barbecues. Whatever you get up to this fine weekend, be safe and don't forget the sunscreen.
