Political violence escalates in US as Minnesota lawmaker, husband killed
Minnesota, June 17 — From the pulpit on Sunday, Father Joe Whalen urged his parishioners to avoid the extreme partisanship and hatred that appeared to be behind the killing of Democratic Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman.
It was a message Whalen felt his congregation needed to hear, even at the Catholic church where Hortman once taught Sunday school, and in a state known for the political civility of a bygone era.
In his homily at the Church of St. Timothy, Whalen told his parish to adhere to the Christian message of peace and warned against responding to political discourse with unkindness or anger, especially when cloaked in anonymity online.
'We can choose all that by our words, by our thoughts, by our actions, or we can walk a different path, and we can invite the cycle of retribution,' Whalen said. 'We know what we need to do.'
Whalen spoke one day after a gunman killed Hortman and her husband — a crime Governor Tim Walz described as a 'politically motivated assassination' — and shot and wounded State Senator John Hoffman and his wife. The suspect, identified by police as 57-year-old Vance Boelter, remains at large.
The shootings mark the most sustained period of political violence in the US since the 1970s. Reuters has documented more than 300 politically motivated violent acts since supporters of President Donald Trump attacked the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Last summer, Trump, a Republican, survived two assassination attempts during his election campaign. In April, an assailant set fire to the official residence of Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat.
Yet the shootings outside Minneapolis shocked many, arriving during days when protests over immigration roiled Los Angeles, a US senator was forcibly removed from a press conference, and a rare military parade rolled through Washington.
Not only did the shootings highlight the spread of political violence, but they also took place in a state perceived by many as a haven of civility and bipartisanship, a stereotype captured in the phrase 'Minnesota nice'.
While Minnesota leans blue in state-wide races, its legislature is evenly split between the parties, requiring compromise. Both Hortman and Hoffman were known for working across the aisle.
'Minnesota has a unique reputation, and I think it's somewhat merited. We have typically, at least politically, not been as excessive as other places,' said David Hann, former chairman of the state Republican Party. 'But I think that has changed.'
Compromise in politics
Several parishioners said the racial justice protests following George Floyd's 2020 murder, which included looting and violence, shattered any illusion of immunity from polarisation.
'The violence is here,' said Carolyn Breitbach, 81, after attending Sunday Mass. 'I think people are interested in their own agenda. They want to take things into their own hands and make things right.'
One of Hortman's last acts as a legislator was a compromise. She cast the lone Democratic vote for a bill cutting healthcare benefits for adult undocumented immigrants — a provision her party opposed — to secure a state budget deal. Hortman, the Minnesota House's top Democrat, teared up as she explained her vote.
Larry Kraft, a Democratic colleague, said he has seen rhetoric coarsen in recent years.
'How can it not? The discourse everywhere is becoming harsher and more partisan,' Kraft said. 'That said, I think we do a reasonable job in Minnesota of bridging that. We just did with the budget that we passed.'
The 2024 election further heightened tensions in Minnesota. Then-candidate Trump and his allies targeted Walz, Vice President Kamala Harris's running mate, over Minnesota's expansions of abortion and LGBTQ+ rights.
Harris won the state with 50.9 per cent of the vote to Trump's 46.7 per cent. However, Trump narrowed his margin of loss from 2020, signalling a shift to the right. The last Republican to win Minnesota was Richard Nixon in 1972.
Trump condemned the Minnesota shootings but told ABC News on Sunday he had not called Walz, criticising him as a 'terrible governor' who was 'grossly incompetent.'
Democratic state legislator Erin Koegel, a St. Timothy parishioner, accused Trump of fanning divisions.
'He's the one who is lighting a fire,' said Koegel, adding that she was disappointed her Republican colleagues in Minnesota were not 'stepping up to say that this isn't right.'
White House comments
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson accused Democrats of exploiting the 'senseless tragedy' to 'blame President Trump — a survivor of two assassination attempts — who is unifying the country and making America safe again.'
Koegel pointed to Hortman as a model politician, recalling how she tied committee leadership appointments to promises of civility.
'That was something she always preached,' Koegel said. 'Even with divisive issues for debate on the floor, she always reminded us not to be angry or mean. We need to debate civilly.' — Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
‘Freak Offs' and trauma bonds: Sean Combs's trial hinges on abuse vs. consent claims
Defence argues hip-hop mogul's ex-girlfriends consented to 'Freak Offs' Prosecutors argue Combs used coercion and threats against ex-girlfriends Expert testimony on 'trauma bonds' challenges defence's consent argument NEW YORK, June 23 — Prosecutors at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial showed over the past six weeks ample evidence the hip-hop mogul physically abused his former girlfriends and directed them to have sex with paid male escorts, but Combs' defence is likely to highlight instances where the women participated willingly in making its own case to the jury, legal experts said. Prosecutors are expected to rest their case against Combs, who founded Bad Boy Records and is credited with popularising hip-hop in American culture, on Monday in Manhattan federal court. The defence is expected to call witnesses of its own this week. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to two counts of sex trafficking as well as charges of racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution. The sex trafficking counts carry the highest potential prison sentence if convicted — a mandatory minimum of 15 years, and a possible life sentence. To convict Combs of sex trafficking, prosecutors must prove the sex acts were commercial in nature, and that Combs used force, threats, fraud or coercion to compel his girlfriends to take part. The defence argues that both former girlfriends, the rhythm and blues singer Casandra Ventura and a woman known in court by the pseudonym Jane, were willing participants in the sex acts. 'There's got to be a linkage between the force, fraud and coercion and the participation in the sex act,' said Sarah Krissoff, a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan. 'There is some murky testimony and evidence in there regarding that, and the defence is certainly going to hammer that.' Prosecutors say that for nearly two decades, Combs forced two of his ex-girlfriends into ecstasy-fuelled, days-long sexual performances, sometimes known as 'Freak Offs' with male prostitutes in hotel rooms while he watched, masturbated and sometimes filmed. His defence lawyers do not deny that the sex acts took place, and acknowledge that Combs was abusive in domestic relationships. But during cross-examination of the government's witnesses, the defence brought jurors' attention to sexually explicit text messages in which the women expressed affection for Combs. Both women testified that they at times took part in the sexual performances to make Combs happy, and that they participated well after brutal beatings by Combs, who was also known during his career as Puff Daddy and P. Diddy. Defence lawyers will likely use that evidence to try to convince even a single juror that Ventura and Jane took part consensually, said Krissoff, now a partner at law firm Cozen O'Connor. To convict Combs on any of the five counts he faces, the 12-member panel must unanimously conclude that prosecutors proved their allegations beyond a reasonable doubt. 'Trauma bonds' Prosecutors argue the longevity of Ventura's and Jane's relationships with Combs does not mean they consented to take part in the sex acts. Both women testified that Combs beat them, threatened to cut off financial support, or publicly release explicit videos he had taken of them. Experts who said the testimony from forensic psychologist Dawn Hughes could be key in undermining the defence argument that Ventura and Jane took part in the 'Freak Offs' consensually. Testifying as an expert witness on May 21, Hughes said victims of sexual violence can form a 'trauma bond' with their perpetrators that can make it difficult for the victims to leave an abusive relationship. 'Such compelling testimony from the victims, corroborated by the other evidence in the case of Combs' abuse and control, will be very difficult for the defence to try to overcome,' said Stephen Reynolds, a former federal prosecutor and current partner at law firm Day Pitney. — Reuters

Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Clock ticking: Debt fears, Medicaid cuts stall Trump's US$2.8t ‘Big Beautiful Bill' ahead of July 4 deadline
Trump, US Senate Republicans face test as 'Big Beautiful Bill' deadline looms Republicans face resistance over tax-cut bill due to debt concerns Senate parliamentarian's decision crucial for bill's passage Medicaid cuts in bill opposed by some Senate Republicans WASHINGTON, June 23 — US President Donald Trump and his allies in the Senate face a political free-for-all over passage of his sweeping tax-cut and spending legislation, which Republican congressional leaders hope to enact in coming days despite growing resistance from different party factions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Speaker Mike Johnson and administration officials are pressing Republican lawmakers to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act so Trump can sign it into law before the July 4 US Independence Day holiday. But hardline Republicans have redoubled their push for additional spending cuts after an official forecast that the bill would add at least US$2.8 trillion (RM12 trillion) to the US$36.2 trillion US debt. Other lawmakers, looking to minimise the impact of cuts on social programmes including Medicaid, have also voiced adamant opposition to the bill's language. Republicans control the Senate by a 53-47 majority and the House by 220-212. One Republican from each chamber has opposed the legislation from the beginning due to the debt. Thune aims to begin Senate action by the middle of this week and complete passage by the weekend, sending the bill back to the House for final approval. Trump is expected to turn up the heat on senators this week, according to Republican lawmakers who view him as 'the closer.' 'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done,' Trump said in a social media post on Sunday. Lawmakers are still waiting for the Senate parliamentarian, the chamber's nonpartisan gatekeeper, to decide whether the legislation qualifies for the privileged status needed to circumvent Democrats and the 60-vote Senate filibuster and pass it with only 51 votes. 'The Senate Republican bill is, simply put, bigger cuts, bigger betrayal,' Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said. 'It makes even deeper cuts to healthcare. It destroys American clean energy. It raises costs on working and middle-class families. And it rewards those at the very top,' he said. Pushback Some Republicans are pushing back on Thune's schedule in hopes of gaining more time to negotiate bigger savings. 'There's no way. There's no way,' Senator Ron Johnson, a leading fiscal hawk who wants to cut federal spending back to pre-Covid pandemic levels, said when asked if he could support the bill this week. The Wisconsin Republican said he is coordinating with fellow hardline Senators Mike Lee and Rick Scott, who want to glean additional savings from green tax credits and the Medicaid healthcare programme for lower-income Americans, respectively. 'If we had all the money in the world, why would you make a change? We don't. We're running US$2 trillion deficits,' Scott told reporters. The legislation has yet to pass muster with the Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan referee who has said Republican efforts to restrict food assistance, curtail the ability of judges to block government policies, slash funding for financial watchdogs and reverse Biden vehicle policy, violate budgetary rules. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said last week the House version of the bill could lead to a US$2.8 trillion increase in the federal deficit over the next decade. The deficit hike would reach a total of US$3.4 trillion, if the cost of rising interest payments due to increased borrowing needs were included, according to the agency, which took into account the bill's potential impact on economic activity. The report contradicted Republican claims that tax cuts would lead to buoyant economic growth and pay for themselves by generating higher revenues from increased business activity. In a Senate floor speech last week, Thune cited a White House Council of Economic Advisers projection the legislation would increase federal revenue by US$4.1 trillion, saying it would more than offset the CBO's deficit estimate. Medicaid hit A revised Senate version of the legislation would reduce Medicaid provider taxes from 6 per cent to 3.5 per cent by 2031 in states that expanded the programme to able-bodied recipients under the Affordable Care Act. That provision is opposed by several Senate Republicans who say it would undercut funding for rural hospitals. 'They cannot defund rural hospitals,' said Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican who has positioned himself in the debate as a champion of Medicaid. But Republicans signaled the time for negotiations would soon come to an end and predicted that wavering members would ultimately support the legislation. 'Some people are going to have to settle for a ham and egg sandwich without the ham. That's just the way it is,' said Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana. — Reuters


Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
DeepSeek aids China's military and evaded export controls, says US official
US lawmakers said DeepSeek transmits American users' data to China through 'backend infrastructure' connected to China Mobile. WASHINGTON : Artificial intelligence (AI) firm DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations, a senior US official told Reuters, adding that the Chinese tech startup sought to use Southeast Asian shell companies to access high-end semiconductors that cannot be shipped to China under US rules. Hangzhou-based DeepSeek sent shockwaves through the technology world in January, claiming its AI reasoning models were on par with or better than US industry-leading models at a fraction of the cost. 'We understand that DeepSeek has willingly provided and will likely continue to provide support to China's military and intelligence operations,' a senior state department official told Reuters in an interview. 'This effort goes above and beyond open-source access to DeepSeek's AI models,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to speak about US government information. The US government's assessment of DeepSeek's activities and links to the Chinese government have not been previously reported and come amid a wide-scale US-China trade war. Among the allegations, the official said DeepSeek is sharing user information and statistics with Beijing's surveillance apparatus. Chinese law requires companies operating in China to provide data to the government when requested. However, the suggestion that DeepSeek is already doing so is likely to raise privacy and other concerns for the firm's tens of millions of daily global users. The US also maintains restrictions on companies it believes are linked to China's military-industrial complex. US lawmakers have previously said that DeepSeek, based on its privacy disclosure statements, transmits American users' data to China through 'backend infrastructure' connected to China Mobile, a Chinese state-owned telecommunications giant. DeepSeek did not respond to questions about its privacy practices. 'The company is also referenced more than 150 times in procurement records for China's People's Liberation Army and other entities affiliated with the Chinese defense industrial base,' said the official, adding that DeepSeek had provided technology services to PLA research institutions. Reuters could not independently verify the procurement data. The official also said the company was employing workarounds to US export controls to gain access to advanced US-made chips. The US conclusions reflect a growing skepticism in Washington that the capabilities behind the rapid rise of one of China's flagship AI enterprises may have been exaggerated and relied heavily on US technology. 'DeepSeek has access to 'large volumes' of US firm Nvidia's high-end H100 chips,' said the official. Since 2022 those chips have been under US export restrictions due to Washington's concerns that China could use them to advance its military capabilities or jump ahead in the AI race. 'DeepSeek sought to use shell companies in Southeast Asia to evade export controls, and DeepSeek is seeking to access data centres in Southeast Asia to remotely access US chips,' the official said. The official declined to say if DeepSeek had successfully evaded export controls or offer further details about the shell companies. DeepSeek also did not respond to questions about its acquisition of Nvidia chips or the alleged use of shell companies. When asked if the US would implement further export controls or sanctions against DeepSeek, the official said the department had 'nothing to announce at this time'. China's foreign ministry and commerce ministry did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. 'We do not support parties that have violated US export controls or are on the US entity lists,' an Nvidia spokesman said in a prepared statement, adding that 'with the current export controls, we are effectively out of the China data centre market, which is now served only by competitors such as Huawei'. Access to restricted chips DeepSeek has said two of its AI models that Silicon Valley executives and US tech company engineers have showered with praise – DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1 – are on par with OpenAI and Meta's META.O most advanced models. AI experts, however, have expressed skepticism, arguing the true costs of training the models were likely much higher than the US$5.58 million the startup said was spent on computing power. Reuters has previously reported that US officials were investigating whether DeepSeek had access to restricted AI chips. DeepSeek has H100 chips that it procured after the US banned Nvidia from selling those chips to China, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, adding that the number was far smaller than the 50,000 H100s that the CEO of another AI startup had claimed DeepSeek possesses in a January interview with CNBC. Reuters was unable to verify the number of H100 chips DeepSeek has. 'Our review indicates that DeepSeek used lawfully acquired H800 products, not H100,' an Nvidia spokesman said, responding to a Reuters query about DeepSeek's alleged usage of H100 chips. In February, Singapore charged three men with fraud in a case domestic media have linked to the movement of Nvidia's advanced chips from the city state to DeepSeek. China has also been suspected of finding ways to use advanced US chips remotely. While importing advanced Nvidia chips into China without a license violates US export rules, Chinese companies are still allowed to access those same chips remotely in data centres in non-restricted countries. The exceptions are when a Chinese company is on a US trade blacklist or the chip exporter has knowledge that the Chinese firm is using its chips to help develop weapons of mass destruction. US officials have not placed DeepSeek on any US trade blacklists yet and have not alleged that Nvidia had any knowledge of DeepSeek's work with the Chinese military. Malaysia's ministry of investment, trade and industry said last week that it was investigating whether an unnamed Chinese company in the country was using servers equipped with Nvidia chips for large language model training and that it was examining whether any domestic law or regulation had been breached.