Beyond The Rainbow: 5 Essential Tips For Supporting LGBTQ+ Employees Beyond June

Protest defending the human rights fro LGBTQi people
Every year, June brings rainbow logos and statements in support of LGBTQ+ employees and community, and this year is no different.
Pull back the curtains on these public signals of support, you find companies are pulling back on their support for internal and external pride events – and a legal landscape rife with challenges and cultural backlash exacerbating workplace stress for LGBTQ+ employees.
According to the Center on American Progress, 36% of LGBTQI+ adults experienced discrimination in 2024, compared with 17% of non-LGBTQI+ adults, while almost half (47%) of LGBTQ employees reported experiencing discrimination or harassment at work during their lifetime. For transgender employees, the situation is even more dire.
The legal landscape has become downright hostile for transgender communities. This year alone, over 900 anti-trans bills have been introduced across 49 states, with over 100 signed into law. Legislative action's impact has also seeped into work, with 47% reporting workplace discrimination or harassment in the past year and 75% of transgender employees having experienced workplace discrimination at some point in their careers.
These laws, many of which employers need to be in compliance with, target everything from gender-affirming care and bathroom access to name and pronoun use. Meanwhile, LGBTQ+ discrimination charges have surged by over 144% since 2013, creating both moral imperatives and business risks for employers who fail to act.
For many LGBTQ+ employees, work may be the only place where they feel somewhat protected. This creates both a massive responsibility for employers and a real opportunity to make a difference. Here are five essential strategies for organizations serious about supporting their LGBTQ+ workforce beyond the rainbow logo.
Jennifer Laurie, a former Chief People Officer and founder of the Equitable HR Guild, offers five recommendations to employers, noting 'organizations have both a responsibility and an opportunity to become sources of genuine protection and support.'
LGBTQ+ workplace safety starts with explicitly naming protections and enforcing organizational policies.
Laurie says, 'The goal is not just to say the right things, but to build workplaces where people can exhale and feel safe being fully themselves.'
Companies have to go beyond generic diversity or anti-harassment statements to establish clear, specific policies that protect employees based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. This is increasingly important as federal interpretations shift and state-level laws create new threats.
At a minimum, effective infrastructure includes robust reporting mechanisms, swift response protocols, and consistent accountability measures - regardless of sector and size of organizations.
The true measure of the efficacy of good policies and practices according to Laurie is, 'when harm occurs, LGBTQ+ employees know they will be believed, protected, and not penalized for speaking up.'
For their peers in the HR world, this means training people and culture teams on LGBTQ+-specific issues, establishing clear investigation procedures, and ensuring follow-up care for affected employees.
Ernst and Young's research highlighted in Harvard Business Review shows that 97% of participants who rated their organization highly on LGBTQ+ inclusion expect to remain with their employer for the next year, while organizations with poor inclusion face higher turnover, reputational damage, and legal risks.
Access to safe and dignified healthcare remains a critical concern, particularly in states with bans on gender-affirming care and adult anti-trans legislation that seeks to make this care unavailable.
Organizations need to anticipate and address gaps in coverage, especially when insurers deny claims or employees navigate hostile state laws. This might include offering out-of-network reimbursements, travel stipends for care access, or hands-on support navigating insurance claims.
Beyond healthcare, Laurie suggests, 'benefits packages should reflect diverse family structures and relationship types'. This may look like recognizing chosen family arrangements, providing inclusive parental leave policies, and ensuring that all employee assistance programs are LGBTQ+-affirming.
HR leaders can ask themselves if policies meet people's specific needs without requiring them to advocate for themselves constantly.
'While the burden shouldn't fall on LGBTQ+ employees to drive change', Laurie notes that 'when organizations create a culture of trust and safety, employees may be willing to share feedback or flag gaps - especially when it's clear that leadership will take action. HR leaders can use that input to evolve support systems in response to changing needs and legal landscapes.'
People managers have an outsized influence over employee experience, and the extent to which LGBTQ+ employees feel safe at work - even in fully remote teams.
40% of LGBTQ+ workers report having to withhold their identity at their job due to fear of being stigmatized or facing violence, often based on their immediate supervisor's behavior and competence.
Even in spaces where they should feel safe, they do not. Kimfer Flanery Rye, the founder of Inclusion Equals, is increasingly hearing 'employees fearful of associating with an Employee Resource Group (ERG) or affinity group because they worry it might 'out' them.'
Can we imagine accepting an abysmal score and a patent lack of employee safety in any other aspect of enterprise?
Laurie is deeply aware of the cultural shifts. 'There is less visible allyship, more tolerance of homophobia and transphobia, and a widespread feeling that the protections we thought we had are not as solid as we believed. People are feeling exposed, isolated, and unsure of who will stand with them if something happens, at work or beyond.'
In their opinion, managers don't need to become identity experts, but they must know how to create respectful environments, respond to harm, and support their teams without placing the burden back on affected employees.
We need to keep normalizing inclusive language, correcting missteps immediately, and avoiding the temptation to freeze or avoid uncomfortable situations.
The best training is one that covers practical scenarios: What do you do when you witness harassment? How do you create team norms that include everyone from day one? According to Laurie, 'inclusion isn't an extra responsibility—it's a core management competency that organizations must develop systematically.'
Queer and transgender people's bathroom use has been used to create division by conservative bad actors.
Here's the thing, no employee should be left to negotiate basic dignity on their own. Clear, affirming policies for bathroom and facility access are a must, even for organizations with remote or hybrid teams.
Physical safety extends to everyday workplace design: Do name badges and ID systems reflect chosen names? Are company events and gatherings designed with diverse attendees in mind? These details matter enormously for daily comfort and inclusion.
Kirk Mead, the founder of Carrington Group invites us to think about 'social safety' when planning for LGBTQ+ employees. He says, 'Social safety is a negotiated set of conditions cultivated and cared for through community with those we wish to experience it.' He adds, 'I cannot make something safe for you if I have not made it safe with you.'
Organizations can no longer assume domestic travel is safe and need to proactively think proactively about travel accommodations for LGBTQ+ employees. With varying state laws and some locations such as Texas and Florida pose real safety risks. Laurie shares, 'offering travel opt-outs, additional safety planning, or alternative arrangements demonstrates genuine care for employee wellbeing.'
Planning should also extend to virtual spaces, including video call etiquette, name display protocols, and digital platform accessibility.
Silence is never the neutral choice.
Especially when employees' rights and safety are under attack.
Organizations that benefit from LGBTQ+ talent and leadership have a responsibility to speak up when harmful laws and rhetoric target these same communities. Laurie notes, 'this doesn't mean issuing statements about every political development, but it does mean recognizing when legislation directly affects your workforce and choosing not to look away.'
Public advocacy can take many forms: supporting advocacy organizations, opposing discriminatory legislation, joining business coalitions for equality, or simply making internal statements that acknowledge current challenges. In the past year, 35% of LGBTQ+ workers have heard negative comments about LGBTQ+ people at work, making visible leadership support even more crucial.
If public advocacy isn't feasible, organizations can still acknowledge what's happening internally through thoughtful communications to staff, leadership modeling in meetings, or creating space to discuss the impact of current events. Employees notice who speaks up and who only shows support when it's convenient.
Elyse Gordon, Director of Programs at Emerging Practitioners in Philanthropy, says this can occur in a myriad of ways, "For managers, it could mean tracking the news and being proactive with messaging to your team so they know you're paying attention; for leaders, it can mean offering a supportive lunch and learn or processing space for employees who are navigating the current political environment. LGBTQ+ employees and allies notice when these are missing. The silence is deafening."
Organizations should understand that consequences of inadequate action are not only severe for employees, but will be harmful in the long run for the organizations themselves; for individuals , it means showing up to work in survival mode, constantly scanning for threats, and often hiding essential parts of their identity leading to burnout, isolation and talented people opting out of leadership opportunities or leaving entirely.
For organizations, the costs include broken trust, higher turnover, reputational damage, and missed opportunities for innovation. More fundamentally, workplaces that fail to protect LGBTQ+ employees become sources of harm rather than safety—a reputation that's difficult to repair once established.
Creating truly inclusive workplaces for LGBTQ+ employees requires sustained commitment that extends far beyond Pride Month proclamations. It demands policy changes, skills development, resource allocation, and leadership courage. Most importantly, it requires recognizing that in this moment, doing nothing is not neutral—it's a choice that employees notice and remember.
Angie Nuevacamina, Redmond City Councilmember emphasizes, 'Culture change doesn't happen at the margins—it starts at the top. When executive leaders visibly engage in a meaningful way, allocate resources, and hold themselves accountable, it signals that LGBTQ+ inclusion isn't optional or seasonal—it's a core organizational value.'
The organizations that step up now, when support matters most, will not only protect vulnerable employees but also build the kind of workplace culture that attracts and retains top talent regardless of identity. In an era of mounting challenges, employers have the opportunity to become trusted sources of safety and affirmation.
The question isn't whether you can afford to act—it's whether you can afford not to.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CBS News

24 minutes ago

• CBS News

Former Detroit home of Rosa Parks in line for historic district designation

A proposal is pending for the former Detroit home of Civil Rights Movement activists Rosa and Raymond Parks to be named a local historic district. The Detroit City Council Planning and Economic Development Standing Committee will hold a public hearing to consider the proposal. The designation is intended to honor the flat in the 3200 block of Virginia Park Street where Civil Rights activists Rosa and Raymond Parks lived for 27 years. "Their activism in Detroit helped shape the Civil Rights Movement," the Detroit Historic Designation Advisory Board said on its social media post. A public hearing, which is part of the designation process, will begin at 10:35 a.m. June 26 at the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center on Woodward Avenue. Detroit's local historic districts are meant to be associated with people or events that are a significant part of Detroit's history, or have artistic or historical significance. Once a local historic district is established for a site, any exterior alterations to the building must go through the Historic District Commission. Rosa Parks, who was already active in the Civil Rights Movement, became known for her refusal to follow the Jim Crow-era laws in Montgomery, Alabama. Specifically, she refused to give up her seat on a bus and move to the back of the vehicle on Dec. 1, 1955. Her arrest in that incident helped spark the Montgomery bus boycott. After the boycott, Rosa and Raymond Parks moved to Hampton, Virginia, and then settled in Detroit. He died in 1977. She died in 2005.

Bloomberg

31 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

Bloomberg Surveillance: Israel, Markets, Supply Chains

Watch Tom and Paul LIVE every day on YouTube: Bloomberg Surveillance hosted by Tom Keene & Paul Sweeney June 20th, 2025 Featuring: 1) Dan Williams, Bloomberg News reporter, on President Donald Trump signaling he would give diplomacy a chance before deciding whether to strike Iran, dialing back on recent comments that suggested military action could be imminent. 2) David Katz, President and CIO of Matrix Asset Advisors, on why he is hopeful there will be some clarity in the current conflict in the upcoming months. After that, however, we will then return to the week to week and month to month uncertainties with Tariff and the current tax and spending bill that's making its way through congress. 3) Alisa Rusanoff, CEO at Eltech, on what risks lender are currently facing in the shipping space. 4) Lisa Mateo joins with the latest headlines in newspapers across the US, including a WSJ story on how side hustles nowadays are more about necessity than a passion. Plus, a Bloomberg report about Capital One's New JFK Lounge Makes a Play for Premium Travelers

Fox News

33 minutes ago

• Fox News

Chuck Todd claims Biden's team set him up on purpose to fail at debate

Chuck Todd says he'll never be able to shake the belief that former President Joe Biden's team purposefully set him up to fail against Donald Trump during last summer's campaign-altering presidential debate. During the latest episode of "The Chuck Toddcast," the ex-NBC anchor told The Atlantic's Mark Leibovich that he's sure that Biden's inner circle scheduled the first presidential debate last year in June so that the former president would look bad and the party would ditch him in time to run his replacement. "Look, I will go to my grave believing that the debate was intentional for that," the host said. Biden's disastrous performance in last summer's presidential debate is widely seen as the death knell for the former president's re-election campaign. Less than a month after the spectacle, where Biden looked weak and cognitively challenged, he announced his withdrawal from the campaign and endorsed then-Vice President Kamala Harris to replace him as the nominee. Biden's cognitive decline has been under more scrutiny in recent months as CNN anchor Jake Tapper and Axios reporter Alex Thompson's newly published book, "Original Sin", alleged that members of Biden's White House engaged in a cover-up of the president's condition. In the clip flagged by The Daily Caller, Leibovich prompted Todd's declaration by bringing up a previous conversation they had about some members of Biden's inner circle using the debate as an opportunity to punch through the cover-up and show the world that Biden was unfit for office. The journalist mentioned "the idea that there were actually people within the White House, within the Biden campaign who thought it would be a good thing to create some kind of daylight for the world to see what they were dealing with on a day-to-day basis." Todd followed up by saying that no matter what Biden's former senior adviser Anita Dunn and campaign co-chair Jen O'Malley Dillon say, he thinks they were trying to expose his frailties. "Anita Dunn and Jen O'Malley Dillon will deny it till they're blue in the face, and if I were in their shoes and I did it, I'd deny it until I was blue in my face, OK?" Todd said. "Of course, you'd deny that," Leibovich agreed. Todd added, "It's like whoever the hell helped Reagan delay the hostage release, OK? It's never going to be admitted. It's too convenient," referring to the January 1981 release of American hostages held by Iran, after Jimmy Carter had already lost his re-election effort to Reagan. Going back to the alleged plot to expose Biden, Todd continued, "There was no other reason. This idea, 'Well, we needed to shake up the race.' In late June? Who shakes up a race in late June?" "They knew when the nomination was going to be and they knew they needed to deal with this with an opportunity to make a change if it was necessary," Todd added. "I will always believe this." Reps for the former president did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital's request for comment.