Syabu trafficking: Sarawakian escapes the gallows, jail term reduced
Published on: Friday, June 20, 2025
Published on: Fri, Jun 20, 2025
By: Jo Ann Mool Text Size: The charge under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act, carries the death sentence or imprisonment for life and whipping of not less than 15 strokes if not sentenced to death, on conviction. Kota Kinabalu: A 31-year-old Sarawakian, who was sentenced to death for trafficking 2,129.1gm of syabu, escaped the gallows and was ordered to serve 20 years' jail and 10 lashes of the cane, instead, on a lesser charge of drug possession. Court of Appeal Justices Datuk Azman Abdullah, Datuk Azhahari Kamal Ramli and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin, on Thursday allowed Anthony Chan Wei Onn's appeal against his conviction and death sentence.
Advertisement The appellate court, in a unanimous decision, held that the High Court Judge had committed an appealable error in applying the presumption of possession at the end of the prosecution's case and applying the presumption of trafficking at the end of the defence's case. Azhahari held that the double presumption had gone against the principle in the case of Muhammad Hassan against PP, warranting appellate interference by the court. 'On this ground alone, we are of the opinion that the conviction under section 39B(1)(a) is not safe. 'However, from evidence adduced during the trial, we find sufficient evidence to support the conviction under section 39A(2) of the Dangerous Drug Act. In the circumstances, we set aside the conviction under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drug Act and substitute it with the conviction under Section 39A(2),' said Azhahari in delivering the decision.
Advertisement On the sentence, he said the court had considered the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the weight involved in the present case, and had taken into account the sentencing trend as submitted by both the counsel and the prosecution as respondent. The court sentenced the appellant to 20 years' imprisonment with 10 strokes of the cane and ordered the imprisonment sentence to run from his date of arrest. On May 25, 2023, Chan, an air-conditioner repairman was found guilty by the High Court here of committing the offence on July 12, 2019, at 6.20pm at the J&T Express premises Jalan Lintas, here. The charge under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act, carries the death sentence or imprisonment for life and whipping of not less than 15 strokes if not sentenced to death, on conviction. Earlier, counsel Hamid Ismail, representing Chan, raised three grounds in the appeal and submitted, among other things, that the trial judge had committed three material errors relating to the statutory presumptions. 'Firstly, the trial judge breached the principle of double presumptions. Secondly, the judge changed the presumption during the course of the trial. During the prosecution stage, the judge invoked presumed possession. 'But at the end of defence case, the trial judge invoked presumed trafficking. This shows uncertainty in the judge's mind on the applicable law. 'Thirdly, the trial judge made no indication at the end of prosecution case when ruling that a prima facie case had been established whether the defence was called on presumed possession and actual trafficking or vice versa,' said Hamid. 'If this Court accepts this ground, the appeal should be allowed and the conviction under Section 39B should be set aside and be substituted with conviction under section 39A(2),' he added, saying based on the trend of sentencing, 20 years is a proper period of imprisonment and 10 strokes of whipping. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
4 hours ago
- Daily Express
Drugs: Man freed from two charges
Published on: Saturday, June 21, 2025 Published on: Sat, Jun 21, 2025 By: Cynthia D Baga Text Size: The offence, under 39A(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act (DDA) and read together with Section 34 of the Penal Code, is punishable under Section 6 of DDA, which carries a jail term of between five years and life imprisonment, and whipping at least 10 strokes of the cane, on conviction. Kota Kinabalu: A 25-year-old, charged with two counts of having drugs, was freed from the charges after full trial. Sessions Court Judge Dayang Ellyn Narisa Abang Ahmad discharged and acquitted Mohd Jamri Basir, after ruling that the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt against Jamri. The court made the decision at the end of the defence stage. On the first count, Mohd Jamri was accused of having 158.6gm of cannabis at 10.30pm on May 15, 2020 at Angkasa Apartment in Jalan Tuaran Bypass, here. The offence, under 39A(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act (DDA) and read together with Section 34 of the Penal Code, is punishable under Section 6 of DDA, which carries a jail term of between five years and life imprisonment, and whipping at least 10 strokes of the cane, on conviction. On the second count, he allegedly had in possession 6.64gm of syabu at the same place and time. Advertisement Mohd Jamri was charged together with another accused Syafika Abdul Suaib who was discharged and acquitted from the charges without her defence being called but Mohd Jamri was told to enter his defence. The trial had commenced on Dec 7, 2022 and about 10 witnesses were called to testify during the prosecution's stage. During the defence's stage, the defence had called three witnesses to testify in the hearing. Mohd Jamri was represented by counsel Dominic Chew. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Borneo Post
5 hours ago
- Borneo Post
CSO Platform for Reform: Make MACC fully independent to restore public trust
KUCHING (June 21): The government must establish a fully independent Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to carry out impartial investigations and prosecutions of all corruption cases, including those involving high-ranking officials, said CSO Platform for Reform. In a statement today, the coalition stressed that only a truly autonomous MACC can help restore and strengthen public confidence in Malaysia's anti-corruption efforts. It also called for a clear separation between the roles of the Attorney-General (AG) and the Public Prosecutor (PP), independent from the Prime Minister's Office, to ensure that prosecutorial decisions are made without political influence or interference. 'This essential structural reform will uphold the rule of law and ensure that justice is carried out fairly and transparently. By distinctly separating these functions, both the AG and PP can perform their duties with full integrity, thereby strengthening the credibility and impartiality of Malaysia's legal system,' it said in a statement today. The call comes in response to the recent Kuala Lumpur High Court decision to grant former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) on three money laundering charges related to SRC International, a former subsidiary of 1MDB. CSO Platform for Reform also called for a strong and unwavering commitment from all levels of government, including both state and federal authorities, to actively combat corruption in all its forms. It emphasised that the government must respect and protect the rights of all groups and individuals who peacefully demand anti-corruption measures through demonstrations and public assemblies. 'Upholding the right to peaceful protest is essential for a vibrant democracy and allows citizens to express their concerns and advocate for transparency and accountability without fear of repression or intimidation. Ensuring these rights strengthens civic engagement and supports the broader fight against corruption in Malaysia.' CSO Platform for Reform pointed out that Najib's DNAA in this high-profile 1MDB-linked case highlights ongoing challenges within the country's legal system in addressing corruption involving powerful figures. 'Despite his conviction and imprisonment on other related charges, this development reflects the complexities and procedural hurdles that can affect the timely and thorough prosecution of such cases. 'The use of DNAA in this context underscores concerns about the pace and effectiveness of legal proceedings in corruption trials, which can contribute to public skepticism and affect confidence in the justice system,' it explained. According to CSO Platform for Reform, corruption remains a widespread issue affecting all regions of the country, posing a serious threat to the health and stability of Malaysia's democratic system.
The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
A-GC denies flawed prosecution in Najib's second SRC case
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) has dismissed as baseless allegations that it carried out a 'flawed prosecution' in the second SRC International Sdn Bhd case involving Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. In a statement, the AGC reiterated its firm commitment to upholding the rule of law and stated that it would continue to fulfill its responsibilities under the Federal Constitution with integrity, fairness and respect for the judicial process. However, the AGC acknowledged the decision by High Court Judge K Muniandy to grant Najib a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) on three charges of money laundering involving RM27 million in funds from the company. 'The case was registered in the High Court on Feb 7, 2019, and scheduled for trial on five occasions: June 2020, July to August 2021, March to April 2022, September 2024 and April to May 2025. 'However, all trial dates were postponed due to the Movement Control Order caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, requests by the defence, or applications by the prosecution itself,' the statement read. According to the statement, the prosecution's requests for postponement were due to the ongoing trial of the first SRC case, which proceeded at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court until its completion on March 31, 2023. At the same time, the trial proceedings for the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) case had also begun while the first SRC case was still ongoing. 'Both cases involved overlapping material documents required for the second SRC trial. 'As these documents were critical to the second SRC case, the prosecution had no choice but to wait until they were available, which was until the 1MDB trial proceedings were completed. 'It must be emphasised that the material documents are available but are currently being used as evidence in the ongoing 1MDB trial,' the AGC said. The AGC further stated that the prosecution had requested additional time to gather all relevant material documents to be presented as evidence in the second SRC trial. 'This delay was not intentional but was to ensure the integrity of the documents as evidence in the trial is preserved,' the statement read. Earlier today, Judge Muniandy, in granting Najib a DNAA on the three charges, stated that the case had been pending for six years since 2019, without any witness testimony being presented, having faced multiple postponements, which indicated that the prosecution was not ready to proceed with the trial. On Feb 3, 2019, Najib claimed trial to three charges of money laundering by accepting illegal proceeds amounting to RM27 million through his three AmPrivate Banking accounts at AmIslamic Bank Berhad, AmBank Group Building, Jalan Raja Chulan on July 8, 2014. The former Pekan MP was charged under Section 4 (1) (a) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001, which is punishable by a maximum fine of RM5 million or imprisonment of up to five years, or both upon conviction. Najib is currently serving a jail term in Kajang Prison for the misappropriation of RM42 million in the SRC International funds case. On Sept 2, 2022, he filed a petition for a royal pardon, which led to the Pardons Board halving his jail term from 12 to six years and reducing the fine from RM210 million to RM50 million on Jan 29, 2024.
