Chevron and other companies exit Egypt's Red Sea concessions, redirect resources
CAIRO, April 18 (Reuters) - A number of multinational oil and gas companies including Chevron have exited their Red Sea oil and gas concession blocks after making no finds and have channelled their resources elsewhere in the country, the Egyptian petroleum ministry said.
As part of its efforts to become an energy hub, Egypt awarded oil and gas exploration concessions in the Red Sea for the first time to Chevron, Shell and Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund Mubadala Investment Company in an international tender in 2019.
"Companies have spent millions on their concessions within the agreed time frames," ministry spokesperson Moataz Atef told reporters on Thursday.
He said: "One company spent $34 million on a contract that initially stipulated it will invest $10 million on exploration, but found no results," without naming said company.
Chevron confirmed it has relinquished its operated 45% stake in Red Sea Block 1, located in the northern Red Sea.
'Chevron remains committed to working together with the government of Egypt and our partners to support the growth of Egypt's energy sector through our exploration programs in the Mediterranean,' spokesperson Sally Jones said in a statement on Friday.
Chevron operates the block along with other shareholders including Australia's Woodside Energy. Shell operates Block 3 with others including Woodside Energy and QatarEnergy.
Atef did not name the other companies that he said had relinquished their Red Sea blocks. Shell declined to comment. Mubadala, Woodside Energy and QatarEnergy were not immediately available for comment.
The petroleum ministry spokesperson stressed his ministry still believed the concession areas could be fruitful.
He said both Shell and Chevron had applied for new concessions in the Mediterranean Sea, reaffirming their commitment to Egypt's oil and gas sector, without giving further details.
Chevron spokesperson Jones said it had interest in three other exploration blocks in Egypt, including two as an operator in the Mediterranean.
In January 2024, Egypt's gas production was 4.6 billion cubic meters of gas. Despite pushing for further increases, production remained on a downward trend, recording 3.6 billion cubic meters in January 2025, data from the Joint Organisations Data Initiative show.
Regarding energy supply, Atef sought to give assurances that Egypt would be able to meet rising electricity demand this summer.
"By the summer, we will have three to four floating storage and regasification units to help stabilize the supply of natural gas," he said, adding that LNG shipments have been secured, while an emergency plan is in place to address any unexpected demand spikes.
Last summer, Egypt faced power shortages exacerbated by high cooling demand. The country resorted to load-shedding and imports costing around $1.18 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Acorn carbon capture: Crunch talks as Scotland wind farm chiefs poised to wrestle over seabed
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have been told to 'get a grip' of the energy transition after it emerged crunch talks are being held between wind farm bosses and those developing Scotland's Acorn carbon capture project because the two proposals want to use the same area of seabed. The Scotsman can reveal that bosses behind Scotland's proposed carbon capture project in St Fergus are holding discussions with wind farm chiefs as two key energy developments are poised to overlap in the North Sea. The area is located around 47 miles off the Aberdeenshire coast, with both projects having been granted permission to use the same strip of seabed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Shell and Scottish Power are brining forward the MarramWind proposals Concerns have been raised the proposed Acorn carbon capture and storage (CCS) project, which has been pushed forward after the UK government handed it £200 million of funding in Rachel Reeves's Spending Review earlier this month, will partially overlap in the North Sea with the MarramWind floating wind development. Two licences for same plot of the seabed Crown Estate Scotland issued licences to Pate Blue Dot for the Acorn storage site, as well to Shell and Scottish Power for the MarramWind project that will produce around 3GW of renewable energy. The Acorn storage site, called its 'foundation store', will make use of the seabed, where the harmful carbon will be injected deep into the rocks. The MarramWind project proposes up to 225 floating turbines that will also be moored to the seabed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But those behind the Acorn CCS project have insisted any overlap will not derail the long-delayed proposals that will be based onshore at the St Fergus gas terminal near Peterhead - despite a significant part of one of the project's two storage sites falling in the same plot of the seabed leased to the MarramWind project. The MarramWind proposals and the Acorn CCS storage site overlap on the seabed | Crown Estate Scotland The Acorn CCS project is expected to have capacity to store up to 10Mt of CO₂ per year. If all goes to plan, both the Acorn and the MarramWind projects are expected to be up and running in the early 2030s. SNP ministers under fire A scoping report produced as part of the MarramWind proposals, published in January 2023, highlighted 'seabed obstructions', including 'carbon capture storage projects'. Scottish Labour North East MSP Mercedes Villalba said: 'The lack of oversight from the Government here is staggering. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour MSP Mercedes Villalba "It is frankly absurd that under the SNP's watch, two incompatible projects can be granted seabed rights on the very same plot. This is yet another case of the SNP selling off Scotland without a care for the consequences.' She added: "Our energy transition will continue to be disorderly, with workers paying the price, until the Government gets a grip on offshore development. READ MORE: Rosebank and other North Sea oil and gas fields could be given green light under new guidelines "That starts with technical due diligence of projects such as these and transparent accounting of what exactly public funding grants are being spent on." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish Conservative shadow energy secretary Douglas Lumsden said the revelation was 'just the latest example of SNP incompetence'. Conservative MSP Douglas Lumsden | supplied The North East MSP added: 'How they have managed to sell the same bit of seabed to two different parties is anyone's guess – but they need to resolve this mess fast, while also ensuring the taxpayers' best interests are served. Acorn deem overlap 'manageable' A spokesperson for the Acorn project said: 'We are aware of recent questions regarding a potential overlap between the Acorn CO₂ storage site and the proposed MarramWind offshore wind farm. 'This is a known and manageable spatial interaction. Any area of overlap is limited and does not affect Acorn's ability to develop, operate, or monitor the CO₂ store. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Acorn carbon capture project will be built next to the St Fergus gas terminal (Photo: Paul Campbell/PA Wire) | Paul Campbell/PA Wire 'Interactions of this kind are not uncommon, and the wind and carbon storage sectors are actively collaborating across the UK to manage them. The Crown Estate's co-locate forum is one example of how such overlaps are being addressed constructively. While this case is in Scottish waters, the same principles of early engagement and joint resolution apply. 'We are also working closely with Crown Estate Scotland, with whom we hold the necessary agreements, to ensure all required arrangements are in place to support Acorn's continued development. 'We remain fully committed to progressing Acorn at pace towards a final investment decision, working in partnership with the UK and Scottish governments and other key stakeholders. We are equally supportive of the successful delivery of all projects that contribute to Scotland's just transition and net zero ambitions.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Belfast-based Green energy supplier, North Channel Wind has announced a major milestone in Northern Ireland's quest for 100% clean energy, following the Department for the Economy's publication of the Offshore Renewable Energy Action Plan A spokesperson for MarramWind said: 'We are engaging directly with Acorn on relevant co-location considerations for a small part of the proposed MarramWind site.' A spokesperson for Crown Estate Scotland told The Scotsman it 'has a responsibility to consider the requirements of a range of sectors'. The spokesperson said: 'ScotWind option agreements were awarded in accordance with the spatial parameters provided by the Scottish Government's sectoral marine plan for offshore wind energy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We have worked closely with the Acorn project and relevant ScotWind projects to facilitate co-existence by including suitable provisions in the ScotWind agreements. These provisions relate not only to the area of seabed immediately related to the Acorn Project area, but also to the wider areas required to monitor operation of the planned Acorn Project storage areas.' Research into 'co-location' 'Crown Estate Scotland's determination to ensure co-location issues are resolved is reflected in our sponsorship of the offshore wind and carbon capture and storage (CCS) co-location forum. The forum's work includes research by scientists at the University of Aberdeen, who are investigating the best approach to testing and demonstrating the co-location of offshore wind and CCS activities in the future.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Crown Estate Scotland are working on the spatial planning of sites and it is the Scottish Government's understanding that any potential overlap of the Acorn carbon capture store and the Marram offshore wind development is limited and will not impact on Acorn's ability to develop, operate or monitor the CO₂ store. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
ITV News
a day ago
- ITV News
Nigerian communities win right to sue Shell over oil spills, but face wait until 2027 for trial
Two Nigerian communities, which began legal action in 2015, have won the right to sue Shell for damages over oil pollution and will go to trial in 2027.
Rhyl Journal
2 days ago
- Rhyl Journal
Nigerian communities set to have oil pollution High Court claims tried in 2027
Members of the Bille and Ogale communities in the Niger Delta, which have a combined population of around 50,000, are suing Shell plc and a Nigerian-based subsidiary of the company, the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria, which is now the Renaissance Africa Energy Company. The two communities began legal action in 2015, claiming they have suffered systemic and ongoing oil pollution for years due to the companies' operations in the African country, including pollution of drinking water. They are seeking compensation and asking for the companies to clean up the damage caused by the spills. The companies are defending the claims, saying that the majority of spills are caused by criminal acts of third parties or illegal oil refining, for which they are not liable. On Friday, Mrs Justice May ruled on more than 20 preliminary issues in the claims, following a hearing held in London over four weeks in February and March. She said that 'some 85 spills have, so far, been identified', but added that the case was 'still at a very early stage'. Her findings included that Shell could be sued for damage from pipeline spills caused by third parties, such as vandals, in efforts to steal oil, a process known as bunkering. She also said that while there was a five-year limitation period on bringing legal claims, a 'new cause of action will arise each day that oil remains' on land affected by the spills. The cases are due to be tried over four months, starting in March 2027. Reacting to the ruling, the leader of the Ogale community, King Bebe Okpabi, said: 'It has been 10 years now since we started this case, we hope that now Shell will stop these shenanigans and sit down with us to sort this out. 'People in Ogale are dying; Shell need to bring a remedy. 'We thank the judicial system of the UK for this judgment.' Matthew Renishaw, international development partner at law firm Leigh Day, which represents the claimants, said: 'This outcome opens the door to Shell being held responsible for their legacy pollution as well as their negligence in failing to take reasonable steps to prevent pollution from oil theft or local refining.' He continued: 'Our clients reiterate, as they have repeatedly for 10 years, that they simply want Shell to clean up their pollution and compensate them for their loss of livelihood. 'It is high time that Shell stop their legal filibuster and do the right thing.' A Shell spokesperson said that the company welcomed the judgment. They said: 'For many years, the vast majority of spills in the Niger Delta have been caused by third parties acting unlawfully, such as oil thieves who drill holes in pipelines, or saboteurs. 'This criminality is the cause of the majority of spills in the Bille and Ogale claims, and we maintain that Shell is not liable for the criminal acts of third parties or illegal refining. 'These challenges are managed by a joint venture which Shell's former subsidiary operated, using its expertise in spill response and clean-up. 'The spills referenced in this litigation were cleaned up by the joint venture regardless of the cause, as required by Nigerian law, working closely with government-owned partner NNPC Ltd, Nigerian government agencies and local communities. 'Clean-up certificates were issued by the Nigerian regulator NOSDRA.' The High Court and the Court of Appeal ruled in 2017 and 2018, respectively, that there was no arguable case that Shell owed the claimants a duty of care, but the Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that there was a 'real issue to be tried'.
