‘Ayatollah Khamenei Is A Red Line': Shia Muslims In UP Protest Against Israel
Last Updated:
Protests in Lucknow were marked by emotional slogans, fiery speeches, and collective prayers for Iran amid tensions in the Middle East
Tremors of tensions in the Middle East were felt in India on Sunday as thousands of Shia Muslims took to Lucknow's streets late on Sunday night, torching Israeli flags and denouncing US threats against Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei.
At the heart of the protest was the Dargah Hazrat Abbas in old Lucknow, where nearly 2,000 people gathered past midnight as part of the annual 'All India Centre Board of Azadari" meeting—a pre-Muharram convention typically focused on procession planning and community coordination. But this year, it turned into a thunderous display of political dissent.
Chants of 'Israel Murdabad", 'Netanyahu Murdabad", and 'Ayatollah Khamenei Zindabad" echoed through the shrine complex. Protesters waved Iranian flags and placards condemning what they called 'Israeli aggression" and 'American hypocrisy". The war in Gaza and increasing threats against Iran, they said, had pushed them to speak out.
Speaking to News18, Meesam Rizvi, mutawalli (caretaker) of the Dargah, said: 'Every year, we organise this meeting to coordinate Muharram processions peacefully. But this year, we couldn't stay silent. Israel has spilled the blood of innocents—women and children in Gaza—and now they are threatening the spiritual leader of our faith. Ayatollah Khamenei is a red line."
Rizvi added that Israel is 'losing the war" and hence relying on US to pressure Iran. 'Netanyahu knows he cannot face Iran alone. Iran is not like the Arab regimes who kneel. Iran resists, and that's what we admire."
The protest was marked by emotional slogans, fiery speeches, and collective prayers for Iran. Hundreds of Shia community leaders from across India had arrived in Lucknow for the gathering and lent their voices to the cause.
Just days earlier, another powerful protest was held at the historic Asafi Masjid after Friday prayers, led by senior Shia cleric Maulana Syed Kalbe Jawad Naqvi. The protesters burned Israeli flags, raised slogans against US President Donald Trump and Netanyahu, and accused Indian media outlets of defaming Iran's Supreme Leader.
Maulana Jawad said: 'Ayatollah Khamenei is not just Iran's leader—he's the religious guide of the entire Shia world. If even a single hair on his head is harmed, we will make sure Americans and Israelis find India's land too narrow for their feet."
He added: 'We Shias do not hide in bunkers. We raise flags of resistance or fall as martyrs. Cowards like Netanyahu hide in bunkers."
The clerics also raised questions about India's current foreign policy approach toward Israel and Palestine. Maulana Jawad invoked Mahatma Gandhi and former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, both of whom had supported the Palestinian cause, and rejected the legitimacy of the Israeli occupation.
'India has always stood with the oppressed. From Nehru to Vajpayee, India opposed Israel's illegal occupation. That legacy must not be abandoned," he said.
Several other clerics echoed similar sentiments. Maulana Ehtesham Abbas Zaidi said: 'Israel is a terrorist state responsible for the destruction of an entire region. By attacking Iran, it has confirmed its nature."
Maulana Raza Haider Zaidi, deputy Imam-e-Juma, said: 'Only slaves of Israel are silent today. Every free human is praying for Ayatollah Khamenei's protection. The
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
US and UK warn their citizens in Qatar to ‘shelter in place' amid Iran retaliation threats
Amid fears of Iranian retaliation following US strikes on its nuclear sites, both the United States and the United Kingdom on Monday (June 23) advised their citizens in Qatar to 'shelter in place'. 'Out of an abundance of caution we recommend American citizens shelter in place until further notice,' the US Embassy in Doha said in a statement. Soon after, the UK Embassy followed with similar advice: 'Following a US security alert for US nationals in Qatar, out of an abundance of caution, we recommend that British nationals in Qatar shelter in place until further notice.' While neither embassy cited a specific threat, the coordinated messages have heightened public concern in a region already on edge due to the escalating Iran-Israel conflict. Iran's military on Monday (June 23) reiterated its threat to strike back, warning of 'serious, unpredictable consequences' for the US following the recent attacks on its nuclear facilities. The latest warning echoes a growing chorus of Iranian officials vowing a firm response, deepening fears of a broader regional conflict. Responding to the alerts, Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari sought to reassure residents. "The security situation in the country remains stable," he said in a statement, noting that the embassy advisories did not indicate a specific threat. 'Qatar is ready to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of its citizens and residents,' he added. Qatar is home to Al Udeid Air Base, the largest American military installation in the region and the forward headquarters of the US Central Command (CENTCOM). The base houses around 9,000 US troops and plays a critical role in operations across the Middle East. Given its strategic location just across the Persian Gulf from Iran, Qatar is seen as a key player in any unfolding military dynamics. In neighbouring Bahrain, which hosts the US Navy's Fifth Fleet, the American embassy said it had 'temporarily shifted a portion of its employees to local telework.' Bahraini authorities had already instructed most government employees to work from home 'until further notice,' citing 'regional circumstances.'
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Qatar assures security after US embassy issues advisory to its citizens following Iran bombings
Following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, the US Embassy in Qatar issued a safety advisory to its citizens, urging them to stay indoors. In response, Qatari officials asserted that the security situation is stable and under control, dismissing any specific threats. Qatar is actively engaged in diplomatic efforts to de-escalate regional tensions and emphasizes the need for dialogue. The authorities in Qatar affirmed that the security situation in the country is under control. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Hours after the United States issued an advisory to American nationals in Qatar over safety concerns, the authorities of the gulf nation affirmed the security situation is under control. The US Embassy in Qatar on Monday, June 23, 2025, sent emails to its nationals asking them to remain indoors until further to the US embassy advisory, Advisor to the Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari asserted that these notices do not give any indications about the presence of any specific or credible threats within the its advisory to American nationals, the US Embassy recommended that they shelter in a place until further notice. The embassy also clarified that the message was issued 'out of an abundance of caution' and did not provide any further advisory was issued after Washington bombed Iran's three nuclear sites in the wee hours of Sunday, June 22, 2025, further escalating tension in the Middle reassured both citizens and residents that security services are closely monitoring the situation and are completely prepared to take any necessary action to safeguard public safety."These advisories do not necessarily reflect the existence of specific or credible threats. We would like to reassure the public that the security situation in the State remains stable. The relevant authorities are closely monitoring the situation and remain fully prepared to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety and security of citizens, residents, and visitors. The public will be kept informed of any developments that may warrant notification or action, and we stress the importance of obtaining information from official sources," Al Ansari wrote on Qatari official further stated that the country continues to make active diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East and maintain regional security and stability by engaging with key stakeholders and regional and international on Sunday, June 22, 2025, reacted to the deteriorating situation in the region and the US bombing in Iran and expressed the urgent need to halt military operations, Qatar said that the country's government is closely monitoring developments with deep concern in the aftermath of the recent attacks on Iran. It asserted that there is a need to immediately return to dialogue and diplomatic channels to resolve outstanding issues.
New Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump thrives on the idea of war, it seems to bring out the Julius Caesar in him
We are suffused with misinformation, falsehood, and lies. Very often, justifications are provided after the event. The Israeli attack has failed to damage or seriously annihilate the Iranian nuclear programme. So it changed the entire process and said that regime change was the intention. Iran and the US had five rounds of nuclear talks. In the first four rounds, the Americans accepted that Iran could do a degree of enrichment. The percentage, however, was not mentioned in the public domain. But in the fifth round in Rome, Americans abruptly insisted on zero enrichment, knowing fully well that the Iranians would reject it. But both the parties still agreed to the sixth round. That is when Donald Trump went public and said, 'I have given them a deal. I've offered it to them. I've given them 60 days. They better make up their mind.' I feel it will be investigated later on because even the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) allowed a degree of enrichment. The nuclear non-proliferation treaty has also allowed enrichment. This is a highly technical matter. In the case of the JCPOA, whatever the Iranians had above the prescribed limit had been shipped off to Russia. That's right. My view is that the Israelis deliberately initiated the conflict so that the sixth round would not take place because they feared a deal. This is more or less now consensual. More and more people are saying this. What did Trump do? Instead of expressing doubts about the preemptive attack, Trump called it excellent. He gets a charge from the idea of war. He wants to do business. He's a dealmaker. But somehow, war, destruction, killing, and assassinations seem to bring out the Julius Caesar inside him. Trump loves to strut as a general. You saw that he took the parade and stood there feeling good about himself. He later stated that he had a big plan, and it was not just a ceasefire. He said he wanted the unconditional surrender of a country (Iran) with which his country was not at war. This is farcical. Now, there is another load of absolute rubbish, and that is that the Iranian people are hostile to their regime. Now, whether anyone is hostile or not, in any country, you have a wide variety of opinions. But the minute you threaten that country, they all come together. If you remember when the Iraqis attacked Iran in 1980, they were under the impression it was a broken country. The armed forces were broken. The regime had barely taken charge. Their institutions were not in place, and everything was very confusing. The minute the Iraqis crossed the border, the country became one. They were able to hold their own. You could find parallels in the Iraq experience of 1980 to 1988. Look at the damage that the Iranians suffered, day after day, week after week, and month after month. The entire international community supported Iraq. They allowed them to use chemical weapons. And yet the Iranian did not surrender. It is only right at the end that they agreed to a truce, which he called a bitter challenge. You cannot destroy a regime based on war. What you are going to do is not a regime change. It is the destruction of Iran that is an end in itself. It would be similar to what Americans did in Iraq. Americans sent them back to the old stone age, literally. Iraq took 20 years to recover. But do remember that the assault upon Iraq gave birth to Zarqawi and the Islamic State. And that was a scourge. Look at how the American occupation was undermined by the very forces that emerged because of the occupation. The Iranians have an Islamic Republic. But it is not monochromatic. It has a wide variety of people who have been at its head. They have had people such as Rafsanjani, Khatami, Rouhani and Pezeshkian. I think the current President Pezeshkian was truly committed to changing the scenario at home and having a new diplomatic initiative abroad. Israel thrives on Iran-US conflict and is a major instigator of it. Indeed, I would say that the Israelis were terrified that Pezeshkian might actually do an outreach to the Americans and just possibly come to an arrangement.
