France spent €90,000 countering research into impact of Pacific nuclear tests
France's Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) has spent tens of thousands of euros in an effort to counter research revealing that Paris has consistently underestimated the devastating impact of its nuclear tests in French Polynesia in the 1960s and 1970s.
Days before a parliamentary inquiry presents its report on the tests, documents obtained by the investigative outlet Disclose, and seen by Le Monde and the Guardian, suggest the CEA ran a concerted campaign to discredit the revelations.
A 2021 book, Toxique, which focused on just six of the 193 nuclear tests that France carried out from 1966 to 1996 at Moruroa and Fangataufa atolls, drawing on 2,000 pages of declassified material and dozens of interviews, concluded that they contaminated many more people than France has ever acknowledged.
The latest documents show that a year after the book's publication, the CEA published 5,000 copies of its own booklet – titled 'Nuclear tests in French Polynesia: why, how and with what consequences?' – and distributed them across the islands.
As part of an operation costing more than €90,000, the commission also flew a four-man team by business class to French Polynesia, where they stayed at the Hilton hotel, to meet local dignitaries and give interviews to the media.
The CEA's booklet, printed on glossy paper, claimed to provide 'scientific responses' to the 'allegations' contained in Toxique, whose authors it said did not have 'the same level of expertise'. It claimed contamination had been limited and that France always behaved transparently and with respect for local inhabitants' health.
The publication of Toxique – based on the investigation by Disclose, Princeton University's science and global security programme and Interprt, an environmental justice research collective – caused a furore in France, prompting visits to French Polynesia by a minister and the president, Emmanuel Macron, who acknowledged France's 'debt' to the region.
In one 1974 test alone, the scientific research found, 110,000 people – the population of Tahiti and its nearby islands – could have received a radiation dose high enough to qualify them for compensation if they later developed one of 23 different cancers.
Toxique alleged the CEA has long underestimated the radiation levels involved, significantly limiting the numbers eligible for compensation: by 2023, fewer than half the 2,846 compensation claims submitted had even been judged admissible.
The parliamentary inquiry, which has so far called more than 40 politicians, military personnel, scientists and victims, is due to report before the end of May on the social, economic and environmental impact of the tests – and whether France knowingly concealed the extent of contamination.
The CEA's military division, CEA/DAM, the inventor of France's atomic bomb, has repeatedly called this a 'false assertion'. But France's nuclear safety body, the ASNR, has since acknowledged 'uncertainties associated with [the CEA's] calculations' and confirmed to the parliamentary inquiry that it was impossible to prove people received radiation doses lower than the compensation threshold.
The CEA said in a statement that the aim of its booklet 'was to provide Polynesians in particular with the elements to understand' the tests and their impact. It said the booklet applied 'the necessary scientific rigour' to explain 'the health and environmental consequences of the tests' in a 'factual and transparent manner'.
Vincenzo Salvetti, a former head of the CEA/DAM and a member of the 2022 mission to French Polynesia, denied the booklet was intended as the CEA's official version of events or a response to Toxique.
He said previous CEA publications – particularly a 2006 report that the Toxique researchers calculate underestimated the actual radioactive contamination levels of one nuclear test by a factor of three – had been 'much too technical'.
Salvetti confirmed, however, that the booklet stated that the health of Polynesia's inhabitants had been a 'constant concern' of the French state and that France had behaved throughout 'with a transparency without precedent or international equivalent'.
Nonetheless, the inquiry has heard that the CEA/DAM has so far declassified only 380 documents in the four years since Macron demanded 'greater transparency' around the tests and their consequences – compared with 173,000 declassified by the army.
Jérôme Demoment, the director of CEA/DAM, told the parliamentary inquiry earlier this year that it was 'highly likely, if we were to have to manage [nuclear tests] today, that the system put in place would respond to a different logic'.
Forty-six of France's nuclear tests were atmospheric, exposing the local population, site workers and French soldiers who were stationed in Polynesia at the time to high levels of radiation before the testing programme was moved underground in 1974.
Radiation-related thyroid, breast and lung cancers, as well as leukaemia and lymphoma, are prevalent across the islands. For its part, the French army has said up to 2,000 military personnel could have been exposed to enough radiation to cause cancer.
'The notion of a 'clean bomb' has generated controversy, which I fully understand,' Demoment told the parliamentary inquiry. 'No nuclear test generating radioactive fallout can be considered clean.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
In London and Paris, we've experienced vicious backlash to climate action. But we're not backing down
As mayors of two of the world's great cities, we see every day how the climate emergency is already reshaping people's lives, affecting the people and places we love. From deadly heatwaves and devastating floods to rising inequality and health crises driven by air pollution, the costs of inaction are not theoretical; they are measured in lives taken, homes destroyed and business revenue lost. Ten years ago, the Paris agreement was signed, marking a turning point in the global fight against climate breakdown. But today, progress is being undermined by a deeply concerning threat: a surge in climate deniers and delayers spreading virulent disinformation. We mustn't let this hope disappear as the world gathers in Belém at the end of 2025 for Cop30. This is not just a difference of political opinion or healthy debate. It is a coordinated, well-funded campaign to delay action, erode trust and protect the profits of the fossil fuel industry, which profits most from the status quo. These narratives find fertile ground on social media, where algorithms prioritise outrage over facts. They also thrive in moments of crisis and confusion, playing on existing frustrations among communities who don't feel their voices are heard by those in charge. In Paris, online disinformation campaigns have repeatedly targeted efforts to promote active travel, reduce air pollution by reducing car use and expand clean energy. These attacks don't only come from anonymous online accounts; they are often amplified by populist politicians and partisan influencers. As a result, policies designed to clean the air and protect public health have been distorted into culture war flashpoints. For example pedestrianising Seine's riverbanks was opposed by powerful lobbies but the results talk for themselves: since 2011 air pollution from cars has been reduced by 40% in the city. In London, the expansion of the ultra-low emission zone (Ulez), a policy proven to cut pollution and save lives, was relentlessly targeted by disinformation campaigns. These messages were seeded by anonymous accounts, supercharged by bots and then repeated across partisan media. The campaigns combined existing fears about the cost of living with more sinister and racially motivated tropes, leading to a surge in attacks online against politicians and supporters, abuse of TfL staff doing their jobs installing Ulez cameras, and eventually dangerous and destructive acts of vandalism. In the face of this tide of disinformation we will not be intimidated. Cities such as London and Paris continue to show that fair, fast climate action can improve daily life: making streets safer, air cleaner and homes more affordable to heat. But if we are to protect these gains, we must tackle climate disinformation by ensuring everyone understands and feels the benefits of these success stories. That's why, as leaders of C40 Cities and the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy (GCoM), we are committing to tackle disinformation not just with facts but with fairer, better policies rooted in people's everyday realities. We are building capacity across city networks to support trusted messengers, train local leaders and develop new tools to proactively counter misinformation. But we also need others to act. We are calling on national governments, journalists, educators and tech companies to step up. We welcome efforts such as the EU's Digital Services Act, which requires online platforms to counter the spread of illegal content, including disinformation, and lays the groundwork for holding platforms accountable. But much more is needed. For example, the UK's Online Safety Act could be strengthened by explicitly recognising climate disinformation as a form of harmful content. Social media platforms are publishers and should be held accountable for hate speech and libel, as well as tackling the abuse of their platforms by anonymous bots giving a false impression of grassroots support. We also need school leaders to ensure that media literacy and climate science are taught hand in hand, so the next generation is equipped to spot falsehoods and demand action. And we urge journalists and editors to prioritise evidence-based reporting on climate policy impacts, not just the politics surrounding them. Disinformation flourishes when trust breaks down. Ultimately, fighting disinformation is not only a matter of public relations, it is about public leadership. We must rebuild the foundations of trust. That means listening to communities, addressing concerns head on, and showing through action that climate policy can improve lives today, not just decades from now. The fightback against climate disinformation is gaining momentum. Brazil's Cop30 presidency and the UN have made information integrity a top priority at the upcoming summit in Belém. Now it's time for cities and national governments alike to lead. Just as the last 10 years of climate action was forged by the Paris agreement, the next decade will be defined by how well we protect the information systems upon which our democracies depend. To do this we must prove to everyone that the action we are taking is worth it. Cities are where that trust can be built. Sadiq Khan is mayor of London and co-chair of C40 Cities. Anne Hidalgo is mayor of Paris, global ambassador for the Global Covenant of Mayors and vice-chair of C40 Cities
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Ukraine-Russia war live: Moscow's wartime toll hits grim milestone while massive drone attack injures five in Kyiv
Nearly one million Russian soldiers have been killed or injured in the Ukraine war, according to the British defence ministry and an American think tank. The defence ministry says over a million Russian soldiers have died or suffered injuries during the war, which started on 24 February 2022. The estimates align with a study by the American think tank Centre for Strategic and International Studies. The think tank estimates Russian deaths at around 250,000 and total casualties, including the wounded, at nearly 950,000, the Guardian reported. The Ukrainian death toll it puts at between 60,000 and 100,000 and total casualties up to 400,000. In continuing hostilities, an overnight Russian drone attack on Kyiv killed five civilians, sparked fires in residential areas and damaged an entrance to a metro station, Ukrainian authorities said on Monday.
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Provence puts full stop to gender-neutral language
The front line in a French-language fight over gender equality has shifted south to Provence, with a ban by the conservative-led regional council on institutions using 'inclusive' speech. In the build-up to the summer festival season, Renaud Muselier, president of Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (Paca), the third-richest of France's 13 regions, has ordered public agencies to stop using terms adopted by the left and feminists in recent years that give equal importance to men, women and non-binary people. The politically loaded system, mainly used only in written form and rejected by President Macron as clumsy and confusing, uses a 'median dot' to include masculine, feminine and plural forms when referring to people. Traditionally, the masculine form prevails, as it does in most gendered European languages. Under the inclusive system, a group of male and female students becomes 'les étudiant·e·s' instead of 'les étudiants'. The third person becomes a newly coined hybrid word, 'iel', instead of 'il' or 'elle', with 'iels' as a new neutral plural. Job adverts for staff sometimes seek 'un·e collaborateur·trice·s' and businesses email their 'cher·e client·e·s' (dear customers). Germany, Spain, Italy and other EU states are facing similar language campaigns. The Paca council, which subsidises the region's busy arts world, including the Avignon theatre festival and the Cannes film festival, has begun cutting funds to institutions that ignore an April charter 'forbidding inclusive writing in the regional public administration and all subsidy applications'. Marine Le Pen, the leader of the hard-right National Rally, hailed the Paca charter as a victory for common sense. The first victim was Kourtrajmé, a small, award-winning cinema school for underprivileged youngsters in Marseilles, which lost its €70,000 annual subsidy in April. The school had persisted in using terms that it knew were 'about left-wing activism', Muselier's spokeswoman said. In a response similar to the reaction to President Trump's anti-diversity moves in the United States, the region's cultural institutions, including its festivals, are discreetly revising their websites and communications to avoid offending the local strictures, le Monde newspaper reported. The region's family planning agency had also modified its website. 'Very few organisations are talking openly about it out of fear of suffering the same punishment as Kourtrajmé, but in the training, social and cultural sector, the pressure from the region is well known,' it said Marie Antonelle Joubert, the director of the cinema school, said: 'I am stunned to see that, because we use a language that displeases politicians, they refuse to finance a unique school that enables … youngsters from Marseilles to join the cinema industry.' The regional politicians were stuck in the 20th century, she added. Jean-Marc Coppola, the left-wing deputy mayor in charge of culture in Marseilles, the capital of the Paca region, called the regional move 'a blow against freedom of thought'. Françoise Nyssen, a former minister of culture under Macron who is president of the Avignon Festival, said the question was difficult. 'Inclusive writing can sometimes be complicated for people with dyslexia and developmental disorders,' she said. The conservative-led French senate passed a bill in 2023 outlawing the use of inclusive language in official documents but the draft fell by the wayside when Macron called snap elections to the lower house last year. The centre-right minority government led by François Bayrou, has no plans to revive it.
