Georgia man indicted after allegedly threatening Sens. Ted Cruz and Deb Fischer
A Georgia man was arraigned Monday on charges of communicating threats in interstate commerce in connection with threatening sexual violence against Republican Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Deb Fischer of Nebraska, federal prosecutors said.
Robert Davis Forney of Duluth left voicemails in January threatening sexual violence against the two senators, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia alleged. Forney, 25, is also accused of threatening Cruz's family.
Forney's arraignment before a U.S. magistrate judge follows his indictment by a federal grand jury in Georgia last week, prosecutors said.
Spokespeople for Cruz and Fischer did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday night.
U.S. Attorney Theodore S. Hertzberg for the Northern District of Georgia condemned political violence against elected officials in a statement.
'Threatening our elected officials and their families is an act of violence that undermines our entire democracy,' Hertzberg said. 'Political discourse and disagreements never justify resorting to vile attacks against our nation's leaders.'
FBI Atlanta Special Agent in Charge Paul Brown offered a similar sentiment, saying in a statement that there 'is no place for political violence or threats of violence in the United States.'
U.S. Capitol Police, which is also investigating the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday night.
The arraignment follows a growing trend of political violence against elected officials.
A Minnesota man was taken into custody on Sunday night in connection with the fatal shooting of Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, and injuring another Democratic state lawmaker and his wife in what authorities have called 'politically motivated' attacks.
U.S. Capitol Police said in February that threat assessment cases had grown for a second consecutive year in 2024, highlighting its investigation of 9,474 concerning statements and direct threats against the members of Congress, their families and staff last year and 8,008 threats in 2023.
Following Saturday's Minnesota attacks, the Senate is holding an all-members briefing on Tuesday focused on security for lawmakers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Ranked choice ballots give voters more options — but make ballots harder to fill out
On Tuesday, New York City will hold primary elections for mayor and other local offices. It will be the second time the city is using 'ranked choice voting' to select the Democratic and Republican nominees for its top office. Under New York City's ranked choice rules, rather than cast their votes for just their top candidates, voters can rank as many as five preferred candidates from first through fifth. Enabling voters to rank candidates gives them an extra degree of input in a primary, but it also requires ranked choice ballots to be more complicated. In a typical non-ranked choice election, candidates have single buttons or bubbles next to their names on the ballot. In a ranked choice election, voters need the ability to select candidates as their first, second, third, etc. choices. On New York's Democratic mayoral ballot this year, that translates into 60 bubbles, spread across 12 rows and five columns. The grid style of ballot is more complex than a non-ranked one, adding new ways for voters to mismark or mistakenly fill out their ballots. While the rate of rejected ballots tends to be fairly small in ranked choice races, it happens about 10 times more often than in non-ranked races that appear on the same ballot, according to our recently published peer-reviewed research article in the journal Political Behavior. Voters can mistakenly select the same candidate for multiple rankings (called 'overranking'). They can select candidates for their first choices, leave the column blank for their second choices and select other candidates as their third choices ('skipping'). Or they can select multiple candidates as their first choices, for example ('overvoting'). Only overvoting is possible on a non-ranked ballot. By analyzing over 3 million digital ballot records from over 150 ranked choice races in New York City, San Francisco, Alaska and Maine, the research shows that in a typical ranked choice race, about 4.8% of voters mismark their ballots in at least one way. The most common type of mismarks were overranks (selecting the same candidate multiple times) and skips (leaving a ranking blank but selecting a candidate for subsequent ranks). New York City used ranked choice voting for its elections for mayor and other local offices in 2021, as well as for City Council races in 2021 and 2023. Averaging across those races, the analysis finds about 6.1% of New York City voters mismarked their ballots in at least one way. In the 2021 Democratic primary for mayor, the rate was 3.9%, while in the 2021 Republican mayoral primary, it was 6.9%. How often are mismarked ballots rejected from being counted? While mismarked ranked choice ballots are more common, they do not necessarily translate into uncounted votes. For example, in tabulating results, the New York City Board of Elections moves to the next valid ranking when it encounters a skip or an overrank. Overvotes, however, can result in ballots' being rejected — depending on where on the ballots they occur. Imagine a voter who overvotes the second ranking (by selecting two candidates as the second choice). If that voter's first-choice candidate ultimately wins the election, the overvote in the second ranking would not result in the ballot's being removed during tabulation. But if the first-choice candidate is eliminated during the tabulation process, the invalid overvote for second choice would cause the ballot to be removed from the vote count. Although about 5% of voters mismark their ballots in ranked choice races, only about 1 in 10 ballots with mismarks are 'rejected' during vote tabulation. Who mismarks their ballot? Studying ballot image data tell us how a ballot was filled out — but not the identity of the voter who cast it. That poses a challenge for understanding whether certain types of voters are likelier than others to make mistakes on their ranked choice ballots. In New York City, digital ballot records document the precinct from which each ballot came. That allows for comparisons among mismarking rates across 5,000-plus different precincts. In the 2021 Democratic primary for mayor, mismarking rates in precincts where nearly all voters were Black, according to census data, were, on average, 3 percentage points higher than in precincts with almost no Black voters. Similarly, precincts with predominantly Hispanic voters had mismarking rates 4.4 percentage points higher than the rates in those with very few Hispanic voters. Education and poverty also predicted mismarking rates on ranked choice ballots. Voters in precincts where nearly everybody has bachelor's degrees mismarked their ballots at a rate 3.3 percentage points lower than voters in precincts where almost none have college degrees. Precincts with more people living below the poverty line had more mismarked ballots than more affluent precincts.
NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Polls show Trump's big bill is unpopular as Republicans stare down their deadline for passage
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is facing political headwinds for his 'big, beautiful bill' as Republican leaders hope to begin votes on it in the Senate this week. Specifically, five new surveys indicate that the GOP is losing the battle of public opinion on a major piece of legislation they're aiming to pass by July 4. Nonpartisan polls released this month show that voters have a negative perception of the bill. The House-passed version, which is facing modest revisions in the Senate, would extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts while slashing taxes on tips and overtime, and enact a series of spending cuts to Medicaid and other programs. A Fox News poll found that 38% of registered voters support the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' based on what they know about it, while 59% oppose it. The survey found that the legislation is unpopular across demographic, age and income groups. It is opposed 22%-73% by independents, and 43%-53% among white men without a college degree, the heart of Trump's base. A Quinnipiac University poll found that 27% of registered voters support the bill, while 53% oppose it. Another 20% had no opinion. Among independents, 20% said they support it and 57% said they oppose it. A KFF poll found that 35% of adults have a favorable view when asked about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' while 64% have an unfavorable view. Just 27% of independents said they hold a favorable view of it. A survey from Pew Research Center found that 29% of adults favor the bill, while 49% oppose it. (Another 21% said they weren't sure.) Asked what impact it would have on the country, 54% said 'a mostly negative effect,' 30% said 'a mostly positive effect' and 12% said 'not much of an effect.' A poll by The Washington Post and Ipsos found that 23% of adults support 'the budget bill changing tax, spending and Medicaid policies,' while 42% oppose it. Another 34% had no opinion. The bill reduces Medicaid spending through new work requirements and eligibility rules. Overall, the House-passed version is projected by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office to increase the national debt by $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. 'The great, big, beautiful bill will grow the economy like it has never been grown before,' Trump, who has pushed hard for its passage, wrote earlier this month on Truth Social. In a recent NBC News Decision Desk poll asking Americans what issue matters most to them, 51% picked 'maintaining current spending levels on programs like Medicaid,' 21% picked 'continuing and expanding income tax cuts and credits' enacted by Trump in 2017, and 28% picked 'ensuring that the national debt is reduced.' The Senate is eyeing some changes to the House's bill, but nothing that alters its basic structure. For instance, the Senate is weighing less aggressive cuts to clean energy funding and more aggressive Medicaid spending reductions. Senate GOP leaders are hoping to hold a vote on the package this week. They can only afford three defections, assuming all Democrats oppose the bill, and several Republican senators have raised an array of concerns with it. The final product that passes the Senate will also need to go back through the House before it can go to Trump's desk for a signature. 'It needs work. And they don't have 51 votes,' Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told NBC News, taking issue with a provision that changes how providers are taxed. 'They've got to fix the provider, the rural hospital issue. ... They cannot defund rural hospitals.' There are some nuances in the polling. The Washington Post-Ipsos survey found that extending the 2017 tax cuts 'for people of all income levels' was popular among adults by a margin of 49%-26%, but extending them specifically for incomes above $400,000 was unpopular by a margin of 30%-49%. The Post-Ipsos poll found that 52% of Americans supported work requirements for able-bodied adults to receive Medicaid, while 33% opposed them. But that policy became unpopular when voters were told that the CBO estimates 8 million people would lose health coverage as a result of the bill: 63% said that is unacceptable, while 18% said that's acceptable. (The latest version of the bill is projected to result in more than 10 million losing their coverage, according to the CBO.) The Quinnipiac poll found that just 10% of voters want to decrease Medicaid spending, while 40% want it to stay about the same and 47% want to increase it. In recent days, the Senate bill has been scrubbed by the parliamentarian, the chamber's in-house referee tasked with ensuring all the provisions comply with the rules for the so-called 'budget reconciliation' process Republicans are using to pass it. The process allows the majority party to bypass the Senate's 60-vote threshold, effectively cutting Democrats out of the process. Some pieces of the bill have been knocked out in that process, according to a Democratic budget aide, including a provision to cut federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) spending and require states to shoulder a larger burden. That will be subject to the 60-vote threshold and removed from the bill, along with a controversial policy sought by Republicans to restrict the power of courts to issue injunctions against the federal government. Other provisions that were dropped include cuts to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and repealing authorizations under the Inflation Reduction Act. Senate Republican leaders hope to roll out the remaining provisions of the bill this week and begin voting on it, with the target of passing it by July 4. No votes have been scheduled yet. For now, Senate Republicans are crafting the bill with the goal of finding 51 votes in the chamber, even if that makes it unpalatable to the narrow House majority. For instance, they're slashing a $40,000 cap for state and local tax deductions down to $10,000, which a critical group of House Republicans in high-tax states have made clear is a nonstarter for them. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, slammed what he called 'major backsliding on the IRA green new scam subsidies' in the House bill, calling the more modest cuts a red line for him. 'I'm not going to vote for a bill that does that,' Roy told reporters. That sets up a confrontation with the House, where Republicans also have a narrow majority, in order to craft a version that can clear both chambers. Meanwhile, Democrats are planning to make the bill a centerpiece of their message to voters in the 2026 midterm election. 'It's no wonder the so-called moderate House Republicans continue to lie about their Tax Scam: the Big, Ugly Bill is wildly unpopular with the American public and they know their vote for it will lose them the majority next year,' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Justin Chermol said in a statement.
STV News
5 hours ago
- STV News
Trump says he is open to regime change in Iran
President Donald Trump has called into question the future of Iran's ruling theocracy, seemingly contradicting his administration's earlier calls to resume negotiations and avoid an escalation in fighting. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' The posting on Truth Social marked something of a reversal from defence secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing on three of the country's nuclear sites. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said. "The damage to the Nuclear sites in Iran is said to be 'monumental.' The hits were hard and accurate. Great skill was shown by our military. Thank you!" –President Donald J. Trump — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 22, 2025 Secretary of state Marco Rubio warned on Fox News that any retaliation against the US or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the regime at risk'. Trump's warning to Iran's leadership comes as the US has demanded that Iran not respond to the bombardment of the heart of a nuclear programme it spent decades developing. The Trump administration has made a series of intimidating statements even as it has simultaneously called to restart negotiations, making it hard to get a complete read on whether the president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran that began earlier this month. Up until the president's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging by Trump's vice president, Pentagon chief, top military adviser and secretary of state suggested a confidence that any fallout would be manageable and that Iran's lack of military capabilities would ultimately force it back to the bargaining table. Hegseth had said that America 'does not seek war' with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes have given Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington. But the unfolding situation is not entirely under Washington's control, as Tehran has a series of levers to respond to the aerial bombings, which could intensify the conflict in the Middle East with possible global repercussions. PA Media Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon on Sunday (Alex Brandon/AP). Iran can block oil being shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, attack US bases in the region, engage in cyber attacks or double down on a nuclear programme might seem like more of a necessity after the US strike. Trump, who had addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, returned to social media on Sunday to lambast Republican Congress member Thomas Massie, who had objected to the president taking military action without specific congressional approval. 'We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)' Mr Trump said as part of the post on Truth Social. At their joint Pentagon briefing, Hegseth and Air Force General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said 'Operation Midnight Hammer' involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance. General Caine indicated that the goal of the operation — destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan — had been achieved. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' he said. PA Media An electronic billboard beams an image of president Donald Trump alongside the message 'Thank you, Mr. President' referring to the US involvement in the war between Israel and Iran (Bernat Armangue/AP). Trump asserted on his Truth Social platform that Iran's nuclear sites sustained 'monumental damage' in the American attack, although a US assessment on the strikes is still underway and Iran has not said how much damage was done in the attack. 'The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!' he wrote. Israeli army spokesman Effie Defrin said: 'the damage is deep,' but an assessment with the US continued. 'We are very close to achieving our goals' in removing Iran's nuclear and missile threats, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said late on Sunday. The Israeli military confirmed other attacks late on Sunday, which included strikes on Hamedan and Kermanshah in western Iran, as well as strikes in Tehran, Iran's capital. Israel also hit what its military described as a missile production site in Shahroud. Iranian state media reported air defence systems were firing in Tehran early on Monday, while explosions could be heard in the nearby city of Karaj. A social media account associated with Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, published a propaganda post on Monday portraying missile strikes on a darkened city with a giant skull bearing the Star of David on it. 'The punishment continues,' the poster read. PA Media Protesters carry signs during a protest in New York on Sunday against US strikes on Iran (Olga Fedorova/AP). Israeli strikes on Iran have killed at least 950 people and wounded 3,450 others, according to the Washington-based group Human Rights Activists. The group said of those dead, it identified 380 civilians and 253 security force personnel. In Israel, at least 24 people have been killed and more than 1,000 wounded. While US officials urged caution and stressed that only nuclear sites were targeted by Washington, Iran criticised the actions as a violation of its sovereignty and international law. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said Washington was 'fully responsible' for whatever actions Tehran may take in response. 'They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities,' he said at a news conference in Turkey. 'I don't know how much room is left for diplomacy.' China and Russia, where Araghchi was heading for talks with President Vladimir Putin, condemned the US military action. The attacks were 'a gross violation of international law,' said Russia's Foreign Ministry, which also advocated 'returning the situation to a political and diplomatic course.' A Turkish Foreign Ministry statement warned about the risk of the conflict spreading to 'a global level'. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom was moving military equipment into the area to protect its interests, people and allies. His office said he talked on Sunday with Trump about the need for Tehran to resume negotiations, but Mr Trump would have posted his remarks about regime change after their conversation. The leaders of Italy, Canada, Germany and France agreed on the need for 'a rapid resumption of negotiations.' France's Emmanuel Macron held talks with the Saudi Crown Prince and the Sultan of Oman. Australian foreign minister Penny Wong told Channel Nine news that her government endorsed the strikes, but said 'ultimately we want to see de-escalation and diplomacy'. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
