One killed in clashes as Kenyans protest death of blogger in police custody
Hundreds of men on motorbikes, armed with whips and clubs, have attacked protesters in downtown Nairobi while they were demonstrating against alleged extrajudicial killings, following the death of a blogger in police custody.
One person was killed on Tuesday as the assailants violently attacked and dispersed the demonstrators. A Reuters journalist saw the man's body on the ground with a bleeding head wound. But it was not clear how he had died or who the man was.
The swarm of men on motorbikes could be heard shouting 'No protest' in footage shared by local broadcaster NTV.
Amnesty International's Kenya chapter condemned the attack, writing on X that the 'use of militia will escalate confrontation, lawlessness and chaos'.
The incident came more than a week after the death of Albert Ojwang, a 31-year-old teacher and blogger. He died just two days after being arrested in the town of Homa Bay in western Kenya for allegedly criticising Eliud Lagat, the country's deputy police chief.
A Kenyan police officer has been arrested in connection with Ojwang's death.
The protests caused by his death reflect a wider concern about police violence. Rights groups say more than 60 people were killed by security forces last year during demonstrations in June and July against a controversial financial bill that would have increased taxes.
Speaking about the clashes on Tuesday, which also saw police fire tear gas at protesters, Ndungi Githuku, of the civil rights group Kongamano La Mapinduzi, said Kenya was turning into 'a lawless country'.
'We see hundreds of paid goons, with whips and weapons, crude weapons, coming to brutalise our people,' he said.
One of the demonstrators, Hanifa Adan, who was a leading voice in last year's Gen Z-led protests, told AFP that the men on motorbikes had 'overwhelmed' her and others.
'They cornered us and beat us with whips and the police were just watching them do it,' she said.
Demonstrations were also held on Tuesday in Kenya's second-largest city Mombasa, with the crowd holding placards saying 'Stop killing us'.
Public anger grew after an autopsy revealed that Ojwang had not fatally injured himself by banging his head against a cell wall, as the Kenyan police had originally claimed.
The government's pathologist found that his injuries, which included blunt force trauma, were 'unlikely to be self-inflicted'.
Kenyan President William Ruto admitted on Friday that Ojwang had died 'at the hands of the police', calling his death 'heartbreaking and unacceptable'.
The country's leader promised to 'protect citizens from rogue police officers'.
In the past four months, more than 20 people have died in police custody in Kenya, according to the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA).
As part of the investigation into Ojwang's death, two senior police officers and a civilian have so far been arrested.
Lagat, the deputy police chief, announced on Monday that he was temporarily stepping down from his role.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Is Trump planning an ‘Africa visa ban'?
United States President Donald Trump could significantly expand his travel ban list in the next few weeks to include 36 more countries, 26 of which are in Africa, US media reports say, citing internal government documents. With 10 countries already included on Trump's initial list, citizens of 36 of Africa's 54 nations could now be banned, fully or partially, from entering the US if the new list takes effect. This would make Africa the most-banned region of the world when it comes to travelling to the US. The visa bans are part of Trump's promised immigration crackdown, which has been in motion since he took office in January, and which has already seen citizens of 19 countries in Africa and the Middle East banned or severely restricted from entering the US. In a memorandum sent to US representatives in the affected countries on June 14, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the governments of those countries had been given 60 days to meet standards dictated by the Department of State. The memo also requested that those countries provide an initial action plan in line with meeting those measures by June 18. That deadline has now passed. It is unclear if any of those countries have submitted the requested plans of action. Here's what we know about the possible Africa travel bans and who could be affected: Of the 36 new countries mentioned in the reported memo, 26 are in Africa: Angola; Benin; Burkina Faso; Cabo Verde; Cambodia; Cameroon; the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC); Djibouti; Ethiopia; Egypt; Gabon; The Gambia; Ghana; Ivory Coast; Liberia; Malawi; Mauritania; Niger; Nigeria; Sao Tome and Principe; Senegal; South Sudan; Tanzania; Uganda; Zambia; and Zimbabwe. Others on the list are in the Caribbean, Asia, the Pacific and the Middle East: Antigua and Barbuda, Bhutan, Cambodia, Dominica, Kyrgyzstan, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Syria, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu. Countries which fail to address concerns raised by the Trump administration adequately could be recommended for a ban as early as August, the memo says. Seven African countries were included on Trump's first list of 12 countries completely banned from entering the US from June 4. They are Somalia, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Libya, Eritrea, Equatorial Guinea and Sudan. Three others – Sierra Leone, Burundi and Togo – were named on a separate list of seven countries which now face partial restrictions on their citizens, meaning some limited US visa categories are still open to them. This brings the total to 36 of Africa's 54 countries on a potential ban list for travel to the US. Saturday's memo gave a wide range of reasons for a potential ban on the countries affected. It did not provide justifications specific to each country, but cautioned that countries had been flagged for separate reasons. Some of the countries are designated as 'sponsors of terrorism' or have citizens who were 'involved with acts of terrorism in the United States', according to one reason given. Others, as per the memo, do not have a credible 'government authority to produce reliable identity documents', have unreliable criminal records, or sell citizenship to people who do not live in their countries. High rates of visa overstays by citizens of some countries were also cited as reasons to curb travellers, as well as a lack of cooperation by states when it comes to taking back citizens who have been deported from the US. Affected countries could address US concerns by agreeing to accept back deportees – even those originating from other countries – or agreeing to become a 'safe third country' that will take in people seeking asylum in the US, the memo stated. Mineral-rich DRC proposed such a deal to the White House in March. In early June, when the first travel ban list was released, Trump stated in a video message released by the White House that a recent attack on a pro-Israel rally in Boulder, Colorado, 'underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted'. Suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national who has also lived in Kuwait, has since been arrested and charged with a federal hate crime and several other state charges. His wife and five children are presently detained by US immigration officials. Egypt is now being considered for a ban, although Kuwait is not on either list of countries facing visa bans. This is not the first time Trump has banned citizens of other countries, which critics point out tend to be non-white and low-income nations. During his first presidential term, a controversial and highly-challenged policy, which came to be known as the 'Muslim ban', saw seven Muslim-majority countries on a red list that later expanded to include some low-income African nations. Former President Joe Biden rescinded the ban when he took office in 2021. About two million of the US's 44 million immigrant population come from African nations, according to data from the US-based Migration Policy Institute. Nearly half of African immigrants migrated to the US after 2010, according to the US Census Bureau, and represent the fastest-growing immigrant bloc in recent years. Many African immigrants are highly educated with one or more degrees, and represent the largest immigrant group in the labour force, the bureau reported. About 61 percent are naturalised US citizens. Here's a breakdown of immigrant numbers by country between 1960 and 2023, according to data from the Migration Policy Institute: Trump's travel bans are likely to cause a great deal of uncertainty for people who already live in the US, experts say. Michelle Mittelstadt, director of communications at the Migration Policy Institute, told Al Jazeera at the time of the first travel ban announcement: 'For citizens of these countries living in the US who are not naturalised citizens, the travel ban most likely will freeze them in place, as many will be fearful that they might not be permitted re-entry if they leave the US temporarily.' Mittelstadt added that the travel ban could split families, 'given the inability to travel legally to the US or apply for a permanent or temporary visa, as well as the immobility this will confer on many citizens of these countries who are already in the US'. According to Statista, about 588,177 visitors from Africa travelled to the US in 2024. A historical breakdown by country is not available. This year, no African country is on the list of the top 20 countries visiting the US, according to data from the US Department of Commerce. About 100,000 visitors have been recorded so far, from the African continent, mostly from: Nigeria's Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar warned this week that the US could miss out on essential and rare earth mineral deals if it bans citizens of West African countries. 'This would be most unfortunate if it comes to pass because we are a region of opportunities ready to do deals,' Tuggar, who currently chairs the regional bloc Economic Community of West Africa's (ECOWAS) council of foreign ministers, said in a meeting with his counterparts. He cited Nigeria's reserves of oil and gas. The country is also rich in tantalite and uranium. Sarang Shidore, director of the Global South programme at US think tank Quincy Institute, told Al Jazeera that visa bans were akin to 'building walls' between the US and targeted regions. 'Africa, particularly, is important to the United States as it is a site of natural resources, a growing market, and a talented population,' Shidore said. 'If Washington wants to restrict migration and travel from the continent, it should find other, non-militarised ways of demonstrating US commitment to stronger relations with African states.' Trump has indeed appeared to be keen on striking deals for rare earth minerals, crucial for the manufacturing of smartphones and electric vehicle batteries. For example, Washington and Beijing are set to sign an agreement that will see China provide rare earth elements and minerals crucial for manufacturing tech gadgets and weapons, in exchange for continued access to US schools for Chinese students, according to a social media post by Trump last week. Last month, the US also announced an agreement with Ukraine over rare earth minerals in return for assistance in rebuilding the country once the war with Russia is over. When the first travel ban list was announced at the start of June, Chad responded to its inclusion by suspending visas for US citizens. In a Facebook post, President Idriss Deby said: 'I have instructed the government to act in accordance with the principles of reciprocity and suspend the issuance of visas to US citizens.' According to the most recent figures from the US Department of Homeland Security, nationals of Chad had the highest visa overstay rate, at 49.5 percent of those arriving in the country. Other affected African nations have struck a more conciliatory tone. Sierra Leone's Information Minister Chernor Bah said in a statement that his country was ready to cooperate with the US. 'Our attitude to this is, what more can we do? How can we collaborate with our US partners, with whom we have and believe will maintain a very good relationship,' he said. Trump's initial proclamation in early June said Sierra Leone, which is now subject to partial restrictions, 'has historically failed to accept back its removable nationals'. Somalia's ambassador to the US, Dahir Hassan, said the East African country wanted to work with the US. 'Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' he said. Trump's proclamation described Somalia as 'a terrorist safe haven' and stated: 'Somalia lacks a competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures.' The African Union, meanwhile, in a statement on June 5, called on the US to adopt a more constructive approach and to dialogue with African nations to maintain what it said were historically strong ties. 'The African Union respectfully calls upon the US Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned. The Commission appeals for transparent communication, and where necessary, collaborative efforts to address any underlying issues that may have informed this decision,' the AU statement said.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Two jailed for 30 years over 2019 Kenya hotel attack
A Kenyan court has sentenced two men to 30 years in prison for aiding al-Shabab fighters who were behind a deadly attack in Nairobi that left 21 people dead in 2019. On Thursday, Judge Diana Kavedza Mochache ruled that Hussein Mohammed Abdile and Mohamed Abdi Ali played a critical role by helping two of the attackers escape from a refugee camp using fake identity cards. The pair also provided financial assistance to the group. 'Without financiers, facilitators and sympathisers, terrorists cannot actualise their activities,' the judge said during sentencing, stressing that their support made the attack possible. 'The convicts may not have physically wielded the weapons that caused harm to the victims, but their facilitation directly enabled attackers who were heavily armed with guns, grenades and suicide vests,' Kavedza said. 'This was not a crime with isolated harm; 21 lives were lost,' she added, acknowledging statements from survivors about their ongoing psychological struggles. 'The emotional scars of the attack run deep,' she said. Abdile and Ali were convicted last month for facilitating and conspiring to commit a 'terrorist' act. Both men denied the charges and now have 14 days to appeal. The assault on the upmarket DusitD2 complex in the Kenyan capital began on January 15, 2019, when gunmen stormed the compound and opened fire. Security forces launched an operation that lasted more than 12 hours. The government later announced that all the attackers had been killed. Al-Shabab, an armed group linked to al-Qaeda, claimed responsibility, saying the assault was in retaliation for then-United States President Donald Trump's decision to recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital. The siege was the first major attack in Nairobi since the 2013 Westgate mall massacre, which killed 67. In 2015, al-Shabab also attacked Garissa University, killing 148 people. Since Westgate, high-end venues in the capital have ramped up security, including vehicle and pedestrian checks. The DusitD2 complex, like Westgate, catered to wealthy Kenyans and foreign nationals, groups often targeted by al-Shabab. The Somalia-based group has repeatedly struck inside Kenya, aiming to force the withdrawal of Kenyan troops from Somalia, where they are part of a regional force battling the rebellion.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Why US troops are concerned about Trump's deployment
US President Donald Trump has deployed hundreds of troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against immigration raids. It's been widely considered to be an illegal deployment. Meanwhile, hotlines to support service members have been seeing an uptick in complaints and questions. What happens when those in uniform are ordered to confront the very people they swore to protect?
