HC issues notice to Haryana on Punjab's plea against order to release additional water

The Punjab and Haryana High Court Wednesday issued notice to Haryana seeking its response on a petition filed by the Punjab government seeking recall or modification of its May 6 order directing the state to release 4,500 cusecs of additional water to Haryana for eight days.
The notice was issued by the bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel.
Senior advocate Gurminder Singh Garry, appearing for the Punjab government, alleged that the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB), Haryana and the Centre had misled the court by concealing critical facts. He said Haryana has already drawn 105 per cent of its agreed quota—3.13 million acre feet (MAF) against 2.987 MAF—and that the situation prompting the emergency release no longer exists. Repair works on the Western Jamuna Canal, which was cited as the reason for the additional withdrawal, have been completed and the water sought was only for the period from April 24 to May 1, it said.
Punjab also argued that BBMB had no authority to issue an order on April 30 allowing additional water release, as the matter had already been referred to the Centre under Rule 7 of BBMB. The state objected to a May 2 meeting chaired by the Union home secretary, reiterating the direction for release, claiming only the Union power secretary has jurisdiction as per BBMB rules—a position later acknowledged by the Centre in a May 9 clarification.
The Punjab government further contended that the court was misled into believing that a formal decision had been taken by the Centre, when in fact only a press note was shared during the hearing. It also objected to a May 8 communication from the BBMB chairman warning of contempt action for non-compliance, calling it a misrepresentation of the court's order.
Representing the Union government, Additional Solicitor General Satya Pal Jain dismissed Punjab's petition as 'totally baseless,' arguing that there was 'no legal ground' to recall or modify the May 6 order. 'The order passed by this court is very clear. The only remedy is to challenge it in accordance with law, not to seek a review without any basis,' he said.
Jain told the court that two decisions had been taken—one by the BBMB on April 30, and another by the Union home secretary on May 2. 'It is strange that the State of Punjab is neither complying with the decisions taken on April 30 and May 2, nor is it challenging them as per law,' he submitted. He clarified that the Union had not acted unilaterally on Haryana's April 29 representation. 'We did not entertain Haryana's representation and instead asked that the BBMB convene a meeting, which was duly done on April 30,' he said.
Haryana Advocate General (AG) Pravindra Singh Chauhan, opposing Punjab's plea, said the state's current requirement now includes water for cotton sowing. 'The demand is now for irrigation. The court's…order should not be kept in abeyance,' he said, noting that Punjab was refusing to follow its first direction to provide security at Nangal dam and not interfere in BBMB operations.
The AG alleged that Punjab's own minister had obstructed the functioning of BBMB, which had led the court to initiate contempt proceedings earlier.
BBMB counsel and senior advocate Amit Garg argued that the Punjab Police should have escorted the board chairman to Nangal to perform his duty instead of escorting him out. 'They are supposed to act in aid of your lordship's orders. They are finding a way out to wriggle out of those orders.'
The Haryana AG further argued that Punjab's only aim was to delay the implementation of the order till May 20, when the kharif sowing season begins. 'Whatever water I am getting now is not from Punjab's share—it is based on technical committee recommendations,' he said.
The matter is now posted for hearing on May 20.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hindu

an hour ago

• The Hindu

Deve Gowda writes to PM seeking procurement of mangoes by NAFED to bail out Karnataka growers

Former Prime Minister H. D. Deve Gowda has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan seeking that the Centre instruct National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. (NAFED) to procure mangoes under the price deficiency payment (PDP) and market intervention scheme (MIS) to bail out Karnataka's mango growers who are in distress due to crash in prices of the produce. In separate, but similarly worded, letters dated June 22, Mr. Gowda brought the plight of mango growers to the knowledge of both Mr. Modi and Mr. Chouhan and said that mango was one of the major horticultural crops in Karnataka, cultivated over an area of 1.39 lakh hectares, particularly in Bengaluru Rural, Bengaluru Urban, Chickballapur, Kolar, and Bengaluru South (formerly Ramanagara) districts, with an estimated production of eight lakh to 10 lakh tonnes during the rabi season. However, due to weather vagaries and diseases, the mango yield has dropped to less than 30% this year, he pointed out. 'From May to June this year, heavy arrivals caused unsustainable price fluctuations. Prices fell from ₹12,000 per quintal to ₹3,000 per quintal, while the cultivation cost itself is ₹5,466 per quintal. This has financially stressed farmers, with many small and marginal mango growers unable to cover basic costs, leading to protests,' Mr. Gowda said. He expressed concern that Andhra Pradesh's ban on Totapuri mango varieties entering Chittoor district, adjacent to Karnataka, has disrupted the supply chain and resulted in a risk of post-harvest losses for Karnataka's border area mango growers. This has created tension among the mango growers, leading to protests in many districts, especially in Kolar and Chickballapur, he pointed out. The Chief Minister of Karnataka and the Chief Secretary have asked Andhra Pradesh to revoke this ban immediately. Additionally, the State government has requested the Centre to start procurement through Central agencies such as NAFED and the National Cooperative Consumers' Federation of India Ltd. to aid farmers and alleviate rural distress, he noted. 'I request the Central government to instruct NAFED to procure mangoes under the PDP and MIS. This will support farmers by ensuring fair prices through direct purchases from farmers and through farmer producer organisations (FPOs),' he said. 'I trust that the Central government will promptly take appropriate actions to support Karnataka's mango growers by providing adequate financial benefits under various schemes,' he said.

Hindustan Times

an hour ago

• Hindustan Times

Jai Ram raises questions over Phina Singh project's tender process

Jun 22, 2025 08:10 PM IST Former Himachal chief minister and leader of Opposition Jai Ram Thakur on Sunday accused the Sukhu government of looking for ways to indulge in corruption in the Phina Singh irrigation project funded by the central government. Himachal Pradesh leader of Opposition Jai Ram Thakur (File) Thakur said that the manipulations being done by the Sukhu government in the tender terms are causing a loss of crores to the state. 'By banning joint ventures, the Sukhu government is not only flouting the rules but also pushing many big companies out of the tender process. As a result, several companies were excluded, reducing competition. This pre-planned game paved the way for the government's favoured companies to step in and act together,' he said. He said this situation arose because the government banned joint ventures and excluded many companies from the tender process. Had more companies participated in the bidding, the tender could have been awarded at 25 to 30% less, potentially saving the state ₹ 75 to 90 crore, said Jai Ram. He further said that in light of these revelations, the government should immediately halt the tender process and investigate all allegations. The long-awaited Phina Singh irrigation project in Kangra district, which was started in 2011, was included under PMKSY in July 2024 by the Centre. The project aims to interlink Kalam Nallah and Chaki River — two tributaries of the Beas river flowing through Nurpur. It also involves constructing a concrete gravity dam across the Chaki river. Water from the dam is to be transported through a 4,307-m tunnel to irrigate 4,025 hectares across 60 villages in Nurpur.

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

T S Singh Deo questions Amit Shah over US travel advisory on women's safety in Chhattisgarh

RAIPUR: Former Chhattisgarh Deputy Chief Minister and senior Congress leader T S Singh Deo on Sunday has sparked a political firestorm, questioning Union Home Minister Amit Shah on a recent US travel advisory, which warns American citizens, particularly women, against traveling alone in India, with a specific caution against visiting Naxal-affected regions like Chhattisgarh. Taking to X, T S Singh Deo cited the advisory and asked, 'The US govt has clearly stated that women should not travel alone in India, especially in Chhattisgarh. Why? Because rape, violence, and terrorism are out of control.' Calling it a serious global embarrassment for India, he said the advisory is an indictment of the law-and-order situation under both the Modi govt at the Centre and the BJP-led state govt in Chhattisgarh. ''Beti Bachao' has been reduced to just a slogan and posters,' Singh Deo wrote. 'This is a collective failure of both govts that has now tarnished the nation's image on the international stage.' He further challenged Home Minister Amit Shah, who was in Raipur for official engagements, including laying the foundation of forensic institutes, to go beyond speeches and conduct a serious review of internal security and women's safety, areas that fall directly under his ministerial responsibility. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo 'When the Home Minister is here in Chhattisgarh, he must address why such alarming advisories are being issued about our state,' Singh Deo added. Singh Deo didn't stop at the advisory alone. He stepped up attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's global leadership claims, calling them 'hollow,' and alleged that even 'Modiji's closest allies are now exposing the truth behind the façade of the so-called 'Amrit Kaal'.' 'If urgent reforms are not brought in, India under Modi's 'New India' slogans will continue to be met only with warnings and humiliation on the global stage,' he warned. What Does the US Advisory Say? The US Department of State's travel advisory specifically cautions its citizens—especially women—against traveling alone in India, citing rising incidents of rape and sexual violence, particularly in tourist hotspots, transit centers, markets, and shopping malls. The advisory further warns against travel to Naxal-affected regions including Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Bihar, West Bengal, Odisha, and eastern Maharashtra, due to the ongoing Maoist insurgency. It also discourages visits to Manipur, citing violent unrest and high crime rates. The US government emphasized that its ability to provide emergency assistance in rural and remote areas is limited, further underscoring the risks for solo travellers, especially women.