Newry: Will new road be 'key infrastructure' or 'insanity'?
Some people say it will be a "key piece of infrastructure", while others call parts of the plans "insanity".Now a public consultation on the Newry Southern Relief Road has come to an end.The road would link the main A1/N1/M1 Belfast to Dublin road with the A2 Warrenpoint to Newry dual carriageway.If it goes ahead, the project is expected to cost between £110m and £130m, much of which is due to come from the Belfast Region City Deal (£93.4m).
Those in favour of the road say it will reduce congestion in Newry city centre, stimulate the economy, and improve access to Warrenpoint port.But opponents have raised concerns about a fixed bridge crossing Newry Ship Canal, while residents of the rural Flagstaff and Fathom areas do not want a major road sweeping through the countryside.
Michael Savage from Newry Chamber of Commerce spoke to BBC News NI in the centre of Newry, standing by a stretch of road that perhaps best represents the rationale for the relief road.A junction there sees HGV traffic from Belfast, Dublin, and everywhere trying to make its way through the relatively narrow Kilmorey Street on its way to and from Warrenpoint port."From day one the chamber has been fundamentally behind the delivery of this very key piece of infrastructure for this region," Mr Savage said."We fully support the southern relief road, and we want it delivered as quickly as possible."It's about relieving the lungs of the people of Newry and removing thousands of HGV vehicles coming from Warrenpoint port out of the city centre and also creating great access for the development of our port to the eastern seaboard and the A1 corridor between Belfast and Dublin."
'Truly transformative'
Mr Savage said it would take thousands of HGV movements each year out of the city centre.The preferred route is around 2.5 miles (4km) long, but the geographical layout of Newry means it is far from straightforward.That is because the Warrenpoint dual carriageway effectively runs flush with the shoreline on the County Down side of Carlingford Lough. To get to the Belfast-Dublin road (on the Armagh side of the lough), the new route must rise quickly up the steep inclines of Flagstaff and Fathom, with a river and canal in between.As a result, not everyone is happy with the plan.
Brian Clelland, a member of the Newry 2020 campaign group, which was originally established to drive plans for a City Park, takes issue with the plan for a fixed bridge across the ship canal.He said it would block the canal, which is nearly 300 years old and is the oldest working canal in Ireland."The Southern Relief Road in its current form will block that permanently, so they'll destroy access to Newry for tall ships and, in fact, most masted vessels," he said."It's also well known that the Dublin government is building the Narrow Water bridge just outside Warrenpoint, and the insanity of it is that they are spending millions to have a beautiful opening bridge that would allow tall ships up, but the Southern Relief Road that is being built by Stormont is building a fixed bridge that would block tall ships."
Higher up along the route is Roisín Morgan, who has lived in the Flagstaff area for most of her life. Ms Morgan said the road would destroy the rural area."The ground I'm standing on, we're going to lose," she said."The road is going through several plots of land, and it's going to come up through the field below us."They have to dig down, so there'll be a lot of blasting through granite if the road goes ahead, which I hope it won't be."Then it goes into Benson's Glen, which is a historic woodland; there are trees there that are hundreds of years old."Ms Morgan said the proposals would "put 7,000 vehicles a day coming up this hill"."I know they are talking about the air pollution in Newry, but they should be reducing air pollution, not moving it," she said.
'Whether or not to move forward'
The new Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins is from Newry, and in the past she has spoken about her preference for a lifting bridge over Newry Canal as part of the project.A Department for Infrastructure spokesperson said: "The minister will... consider responses as part of the consultation process, including whether or not to move forward to public inquiry."They said Kimmins was unavailable for interview.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Plans for bridge to connect two parts of Truro scrapped
A planning application for a bridge to connect two parts of Truro has been scrapped and could be replaced by a cheaper alternative. The Truro Town Deal Board axed the plans which would have seen the bridge - known as a lifting bridge - connect Truro's Boscawen Park with Newham. The proposed new design would be for a bridge which would have a pivot point on the western quay. The estimated amount for the original plans were between £6.25 and £6.86m, and the new amount would cost between £5.36m and £5.86m. 'Huge challenge' The new project has also been awarded about £812,000 in Cornwall Council match funding, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said. A revised planning application for the updated bridge design is expected to be submitted in the autumn. Should planning permission be granted, construction could start in spring 2027, for completion by the end of 2027 or early Stanhope, chair of the Truro Town Deal Board, said: "The board has faced a huge challenge in the delivery of our plan against rising costs of construction and materials. "We therefore welcomed the opportunity earlier this year to revisit the design and mechanism of the bridge with the view of reducing costs."
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Donald Trump is saving California from itself
Gavin Newsom has changed direction once again. After a brief feint as a Maga-whispering moderate, California's governor has 'woken up' in the wake of the LA immigration riots to become the self-anointed leader of the anti-Trump #Resistance. Just weeks ago, Newsom had launched a podcast, inviting Right-wing firebrands like Charlie Kirk, Michael Savage, and Steve Bannon as his initial guests. Progressives detested this shift. But now that he has effectively denounced Donald Trump as a 'dictator', The Daily Beast and MSNBC have been quick to celebrate his reinvention. The progressive clerisy's homepage, The Atlantic, recently dubbed Newsom 'the nation's foremost Trump foil'. Although changing colour might help with this chameleon's bid for the 2028 Democrat presidential nomination, it's not good news for the long-suffering people of California. The working and middle classes don't benefit from his performative talk of avoiding tariffs and ignoring federal immigration law. What Newsom should be looking at is how to bolster California's struggling economy, which lags way behind rivals such as Texas and Florida in crucial areas like job creation. And that would mean making peace with at least some of Donald Trump's agenda. To be sure, the president's tariffs appear to be hurting California's ports and tech companies dependent on overseas manufacturing, but the state clearly needs some sort of economic paradigm change. Virtually every high wage sector has lost jobs since 2022, including business services and information, the supposed linchpins of the state's economy. All this occurred before Trump's chaotic tariff barrage. Trump's commitment to investment in new military technology and space exploration, as well as reshoring manufacturing more generally, also opens enormous opportunities for California's heavily Latino blue collar workers. Should Newsom choose to embrace the president's policies, that is. Consider space. Boosted by a huge surge of investment, space industry global revenues are up tenfold since the early 2000s, from $175 billion (£130.4 billion) in 2005 to almost $385 billion (£286.9 billion) in 2017. By 2040, the industry's annual revenues globally are projected to surpass a trillion dollars. California has a 19 per cent international share in the sector, as well as 40 per cent of the industry in the US. With Trump's backing, that could grow even further. California already enjoys by far the country's largest cohort of aerospace engineers, typically earning salaries around three times the national average. Many are employed by large contractors, but the most exciting developments can be seen in places like El Segundo, which calls itself 'the aerospace capital of the world', and Douglas Park, next to the Long Beach airport. If Newsom would wake up from his dogmatic slumbers, he would realise that 'deep tech' firms in space and aerospace likely have a far better future than traditional consumer and media-oriented firms like Salesforce, Meta, and Google. In part due to artificial intelligence, all have announced major cutbacks. Even many 'creative jobs' – actors, writers, journalists – could be threatened by AI generated content. In contrast, hardware engineers, skilled machinists, and the builders and designers of spacecraft, drones, space mining operations and new engine systems could share an expansive future. The aerospace boom is being driven by more than just a few brilliant geeks backed up by H1-B visa indentured servants. Aerospace firms have their share of PhDs, but they also employ welders and other production workers. In a state that has been very hard on blue collar workers, this should be embraced, even if it reflects Trumpian priorities. There are further opportunities for California among Trump's policy objectives. The president wants to revive the US shipbuilding industry, and California was once critical to constructing America's 'arsenal of democracy'. One place that could benefit is Solano County in the Bay Area, which once was home to Liberty ship production. Even virulently anti-Trump Hollywood could see advantages. This Newsom-aligned industry is now losing employment at a fearful rate, down more than one-third over the past 10 years, with 18,000 full time positions disappearing in just the past three. Tariffs may not be what the industry needs – it's already too dependent on cheaper, highly subsidised foreign productions – but the people who work in it would benefit if California and the Trump White House devised an incentive package to reverse off-shore production. And then there is housing, a prime concern for most Californians. The federal government is the nation's biggest landowner and owns roughly half of California. Republicans have floated the idea of selling federal lands as an option for closing the deficit. Federal lands adjacent to the state's large urban areas also could create, in selected places, an opportunity for new housing that could dodge many of California's currently stifling regulations. But perhaps Trump's biggest gift would be to push California politics back towards the centre, including on immigration. Due to Trumpian cutbacks, Newsom is being forced to abandon his dream of providing free health services to all undocumented immigrants. Now that the state is suffering a severe deficit, Washington is unlikely to send money to preserve Newsom's dreamscape. Of course Newsom blames the current budget deficit on Trump, although he does not explain why many other states, including archrivals Texas and Florida, enjoy surpluses. California would do far better if its governor focused on how to take advantage of Trump's initiatives. After all, Maga will be in office at least until 2028. Californians can enjoy the fruits of Trump's policies even as they grumble darkly about him.
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Newry: Planning permission granted for £17m civic centre
Planning permission has been granted for a £17m civic centre in Newry Mourne and Down District Council project has been the subject of extensive objection, including from the Catholic Church who are concerned about its proximity to the near 200 year old Newry centre is part of a broader city regeneration scheme that includes a 15 acre park, a theatre and a road bypass and is supported by the Belfast Region City council say the wider scheme will increase vibrancy and footfall in the city centre and stimulate further Thursday's decision objectors say they will consider whether to judicially challenge the decision. The project seeks to relocate 215 council staff in the city onto a single site on what's currently a multi-story car park in the Abbey Way area. As the council operates a hybrid working model the building is expected to cater for 162 staff on a daily basis. The building would provide space for council meetings, weddings, office and meeting rooms, and an innovation the planning process the project has received more than 2,600 objections relating to traffic and parking, need, design, scale, flood and ecology concerns and the processing of the application. A decision on planning approval has been deferred on a number of May, a proposed approval was deferred after objectors highlighted concerns in relation to the way the project's planning application had been the overriding objection to the scheme has been in relation to the removal of car parking spaces adjacent to the city's cathedral and main shopping street, Hill building, which is more than 5000 sqm would be around 45 minutes from the cathedral. On Thursday, the council's planning committee heard representations from the project's promoters and team behind the proposal said the project was sympathetic to the gothic style cathedral in terms of design and choice of materials. It was highlighted that the current multi-story carpark where the building is to be located is poorly used and 136 spaces would be retained immediately say this isn't enough to cope with demand during weddings, communions and funerals at a near 200 year old Cathedral or to serve Hill Street businesses and shoppers. Objectors have also questioned aspects of the project's planning application in terms of what they perceive to be errors, gaps and missing or outdated planners said they were satisfied with the information provided and recommended morning's meetings were split in two. An initial meeting hearing evidence in support and objection and a second meeting which saw planning committee members vote on the matter. At the beginning of this second meeting committee members took legal advice in closed session. When the meeting reopened, Alliance Cllr Cadogan Enright withdrew from the meeting."I think there's other councillors here should be doing the same," he put to a vote committee members approved the scheme by four votes to one with one abstention. Outside the chamber, Sinn Féin's Cllr Declan Murphy said he believed the civic centre and the other regeneration schemes will drive investment."This has been scrutinised more than any other application that has been in front of me," he said. "Everyone had their view heard. Our view was that we were satisfied with what has been proposed."Newry will be transformed over the next five years – with the civic centre, the southern relief road, the city park, the new theatre and streetscape a huge amount of public and private money is being invested."This will attract more investors to the area and it will be transformative," he added. The SDLP's Cllr Declan McAteer agreed."That one part of Newry stood out to me as it was completely dead," he said. "As it is it is an absolutely ugly carpark. We can put something in, a centre that people can focus on."The innovation hub also fills a gap on the Belfast-Dublin axis and will really put Newry on the map. And if there are problems around parking we can resolve them." However, Canon Francis Brown from the cathedral said he was disappointed with the decision."All the parishioners are opposed to this building," he said. "It's far too close to the cathedral which is 200 years old. We're all very disappointed."Andy Stephens of Matrix Consulting has been representing the objectors at planning meetings. He says consideration will now be given in relation to what happens next."It's not the end of the road," he said. "Obviously there is a decision that has to be issued. We'll take a look at that and then take advice and see what the outcome of that advice is. "The only remedies in Northern Ireland for third parties is to judicially challenge – there's no third party right of appeal like in the south. We've three months to launch those proceedings."
