US will strike North Korea if South attacked with nukes, South's spy chief nominee says
South Korea's nominee for spy agency director said on Thursday he believed the US would strike North Korea with nuclear weapons if Pyongyang launched a nuclear attack against South Korea.
Lee Jong-seok made the comment during a nomination hearing in answer to a question if he believed Washington would strike the North and put Americans at risk from a country even if Pyongyang has deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles.
'Yes, that is my belief,' Lee said, after saying the hypothetical scenario of South Korea coming under the North's nuclear attack is directly related to the security alliance between the two countries.
North Korea has for years pursued a nuclear programme and is believed to have stockpiled fissile materials to build atomic weapons though it has not tested a missile mounted with such a weapon.
Lee is nominated to lead South Korea's National Intelligence Service under new liberal President Lee Jae Myung who took office on June 4.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
4 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Supreme Court allows US victim suits against Palestinian authorities
WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES - The US Supreme Court cleared the way on Friday for American victims of attacks in Israel and the occupied West Bank to sue Palestinian authorities for damages in US courts. The court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision in a long-running case involving the jurisdiction of US federal courts to hear lawsuits against the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Americans killed or injured in attacks in Israel or the West Bank or their relatives have filed a number of suits seeking damages. In one 2015 case, a jury awarded $655 million in damages and interest to US victims of attacks which took place in the early 2000s. Appeals courts had dismissed the suits on jurisdiction grounds. Congress passed a law in 2019 -- the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) -- that would make the PLO and PA subject to US jurisdiction if they were found to have made payments to the relatives of persons who killed or injured Americans. Two lower courts ruled that the 2019 law was a violation of the due process rights of the Palestinian authorities under the US Constitution but the Supreme Court ruled on Friday to uphold it. "The PSJVTA reasonably ties the assertion of federal jurisdiction over the PLO and PA to conduct that involves the United States and implicates sensitive foreign policy matters within the prerogative of the political branches," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote. The PA announced in February that it would end its system of payments to the families of those killed by Israel or held in Israeli prisons, responding to a long-standing request from Washington. In 2018, during his first term as US president, Donald Trump signed into law rules suspending financial assistance to the PA as long as it continued to pay benefits to Palestinians linked to "terrorist" entities, according to the criteria of the Israeli authorities.
TimesLIVE
17 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Europe seeks to revive Iran diplomacy, US considers strikes
European foreign ministers were to meet their Iranian counterpart on Friday, seeking a path back to diplomacy over its contested nuclear programme despite the US considering joining Israeli strikes against Iran. Ministers from Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, plus the EU's foreign policy chief spoke to Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi to agree on the meeting earlier this week and have been co-ordinating with the US. 'The Iranians can't sit down with the Americans whereas we can,' said a European diplomat. 'We will tell them to come back to the table to discuss the nuclear issue before the worst-case scenario, while raising our concerns over its ballistic missiles, support to Russia and detention of our citizens.' The talks were due for mid-afternoon in Geneva, where an initial accord between Iran and world powers to curb its nuclear programme in return for sanctions lifting was struck in 2013 before a comprehensive deal in 2015. Separate talks between Iran and the US collapsed when Israel launched what it called Operation Rising Lion against Iran's nuclear facilities and ballistic capabilities on June 12.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Afrikaners must be part of the national dialogue
Leaving conservative Afrikaners out of South Africa's National Dialogue could reignite old tensions and deepen instability at a critical political moment. A group of Afrikaners gathered outside the American Embassy in Pretoria to deliver a memorandum to US President Donald Trump. Picture: Nigel Sibanda /The Citizen It is obvious that, in many ways, South Africa is a vastly different place from when politicians and civic organisations sat down to negotiate a peaceful end to apartheid and a transition to a majority-rule democracy in the early '90s. However, in some worrying respects, there are aspects of our current situation which mirror those of that era. As the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa) gathered in Kempton Park in 1991, it was clear the end was in sight for the National Party government. International pressure was mounting and the country was teetering on the edge of the abyss of a civil war. In a sense, the ANC is facing a similar 'end of days' scenario to the Nats, having lost electoral support and facing challenges from both sides of the political spectrum. It is also facing, rightly or wrongly, international censure because some foreign governments – led by the Americans – believe whites are being persecuted. ALSO READ: Amerikaners founder denies claims of 'struggling' South African 'refugees' in US Another parallel is that, so far, those representing conservative Afrikaners don't appear to have been brought under the umbrella of the National Dialogue announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa. These right-wing groups have led the charge against the ANC and have gained a receptive audience overseas. Afrikaners like Ernst Roets, who has strong relationships with international conservatism, are proposing a form of federal government arrangement which, they claim, does not amount to a revival of the 'Volkstaat' concept… although it seems to be so in all but name. Whether Ramaphosa and the other participants in the National Dialogue like it or not, that issue cannot be ignored. If it is, the way is open for further racial polarisation and instability – and even worse down the line. What the dialogue must not become is an expensive talk shop. Our country is falling apart and it needs to be fixed. NOW READ: Trump-Musk breakup: Will 49 'refugees' return to South Africa?
