Senator Linda Reynolds lashes out after corruption watchdog clears Brittany Higgins' $2million payout
Senator Linda Reynolds is 'bitterly disappointed' by a watchdog's finding there was no corruption associated with a $2.4million compensation payout to former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins.
Ms Higgins reached the agreement with the Commonwealth in December 2022 after her alleged rape in Parliament House in 2019, while she was working in Senator Reynolds' office.
The settlement was referred to the National Anti-Corruption Commission by Senator Reynolds, who questioned the handling of the process by then-attorney-general Mark Dreyfus.
'I am bitterly disappointed by the NACC's decision not to investigate the circumstances surrounding the Commonwealth's multi-million dollar settlement with Ms Higgins,' Senator Reynolds said in a statement on Thursday.
The senator claimed she had been given 'no opportunity to defend the serious and baseless claims against me' during a mediation process.
'I fail to understand how the Commonwealth and its lawyers could not appreciate the serious and probable consequences of settling such serious allegations on my behalf... and the message that it would send to the public about the truth of those matters,' she said.
Senator Reynolds said it was one of the issues her Federal Court lawsuit against the Commonwealth over the settlement would explore.
The commission found 'no corruption issue' with Ms Higgins' payout following an investigation.
'No corruption issue arises, and so there is no basis for any further action by the commission,' the watchdog said in a statement.
'There was no inappropriate intervention in the process by or on behalf of any minister.
'The then-attorney-general approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice.
'Documents produced showed that decisions made in relation to the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel.'
The commission said there was 'no material difference' in the legal advice surrounding the payment during the term of the former coalition government and the current Labor government.
The agreement of the settlement amount within one day during mediation was not unusual.
'It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months. None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim,' the commission said.
'A critical consideration during the settlement process was avoiding ongoing trauma to Ms Higgins.'
Ms Higgins alleged she was raped by Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann in a Parliament House office in 2019.
Lehrmann has always denied the allegations.
Charges were brought against Lehrmann in a criminal trial in 2022, but were abandoned after juror misconduct.
A retrial was ruled out because of the potential effect on the mental health of Ms Higgins.
A defamation trial brought on by Lehrmann found that on the balance of probabilities he had raped Ms Higgins.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Bizarre twist after Aussie influencer was accused of poisoning her baby girl for social media likes
A social media influencer who allegedly drugged her baby for donations has had her case delayed due to pending DNA evidence after the prosecution tendered a huge evidence brief. The 34-year-old Sunshine Coast mother is alleged to have poisoned the infant over the course of several months while obtaining social media notoriety and financial gain from claims the child was battling a potentially fatal illness. The case has so many medical documents the woman's solicitor has had to hire specialist staff, a magistrate has heard. She was charged with five counts of administering poison with intent to harm, three counts of preparation to commit crimes with dangerous things, a single count each of torture, making child exploitation material and fraud. Police have alleged the woman –who cannot be named for legal reasons – earned more than $60,000 from a GoFundMe campaign to 'assist' her child. That money has since been refunded to donors. They also alleged the woman went to great lengths to obtain unauthorised and prescription medications to give her child. She allegedly covered for the alleged actions by using leftover medicine for another member of the household. The alleged abuse was detected on October 15, 2024 after the girl was admitted to a Brisbane hospital suffering a serious medical episode. Lawyer Mathew Cuskelly, acting on behalf of the woman, requested an eight-week adjournment at Brisbane Magistrates Court on Monday in order to assess a brief of evidence provided by the prosecution. He said he had hired an additional assistant with a medical background to review 'quite a voluminous amount of medical documentation', according to the Courier Mail. Some of the brief had been provided by the prosecution earlier this month. 'It is quite a large and complex brief,' he said. A prosecutor divulged some material was yet to be disclosed, including material which related to the DNA testing of a pill collected from a hospital and separate materials relating to an alleged breach of bail. The court heard the 34-year-old had not been charged over a breach of bail, but her ex-partner previously made the claim in a statement to police. Mr Cuskelly at the time argued his client had not been involved in any such bail breach and requested Queensland police provide the former partner's statement. Deputy Chief Magistrate Anthony Gett said he would place the case on the DNA call over because of the outstanding DNA material. The list was created last December to manage criminal cases at the committal phase which can get delayed purely on account of pending DNA evidence. The courts adjourned the matter until August 1 for a mention the woman does not have to attend.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Bombshell move from behind bars by Corbie Walpole who set her male friend on FIRE after he made a 'misogynistic' remark
A woman jailed for four and a half years for setting her childhood friend on fire after he made what she deemed misogynistic comments is now appealing against the length of her sentence. Corbie Walpole had originally hoped to receive some form of non-custodial punishment for her senseless crime but was put away for a maximum of seven years and six months. The 24-year-old electrician pleaded guilty in the NSW District Court to one count of burn, maim, disfigure or disable a person by use of a corrosive fluid and learnt her fate on May 22. Judge Jennifer English rejected any suggestion Walpole had been provoked when she attacked 22-year-old Jake Loader in an act of 'destructive and horrifically painful violence'. 'It is never easy to send a young person, particularly a young woman, to jail,' Judge English said, sitting in Albury on the NSW-Victoria border. 'But where appropriate, it is something that must be done.' It can now be revealed Walpole filed a notice of intention to appeal with the Court of Criminal Appeal on June 13, challenging the severity of her sentence. Daily Mail Australia captured some of Walpole's final moments of freedom - photographing the smiling tradie catching up with loved ones over coffee as she frolicked in a park the day before she was locked up. Walpole had faced a maximum sentence of 25 years for setting Mr Loader ablaze as he sat on a chair in her backyard at Howlong, about 30km west of Albury, early last year. The pair met when Mr Loader went to boarding school at St Paul's College at Walla Walla, about 40km north of Albury, and had been friends for at least nine years. Mr Loader, who worked mustering cattle in Queensland, was in Howlong for a short break and joined old friends, including Walpole, for a night out which included celebrating a 21st birthday. Walpole claimed Mr Loader had been baiting her before she poured 5 litres of petrol over his head and used a cigarette lighter to turn him into a human torch. 'He was antagonising me,' she told the court. 'He told me to go to the kitchen where I belong because I'm a girl. I gave it back to him and called him a misogynist.' Judge English rejected any suggestion Walpole - who claimed she had felt 'challenged and disrespected in her own home' - had been goaded into doing what she did. 'I find that the assault upon the victim was unprovoked,' the judge said. Walpole wiped tears from her eyes as Judge English recounted the night that forever changed Mr Loader's life. Mr Loader was 22 and Walpole was 23 when they began drinking with mates about 8pm on January 6, 2024, at Howlong Golf Resort. Two hours later they went to a 21st birthday party at Howlong, then kicked on to a house party at North Albury, and returned to the birthday gathering about 2am. The group's final stop was Walpole's home, where they settled into the backyard about 4am. Some of the revellers, including Walpole, had taken cocaine earlier in the evening and most had retired to the Russell Street house, where Walpole's partner was sleeping, within an hour. Judge English said Walpole had begun drinking at 5pm, downing bottles of cider, schooners of Canadian Club and Bacardi and cola, and cans of Hard Solo. An expert estimated Walpole had consumed 23 to 35 standard drinks over 12 hours and would have had a blood alcohol level between 0.22 and 0.38. In all that time she had eaten only two slices of pizza. Walpole claimed Mr Loader had been antagonising her throughout the evening, trying to wrestle her and wake her sleeping boyfriend. 'He was really pushing my buttons,' she said. 'I was feeling overwhelmed by [Mr Loader's] presence, and I didn't know what to do.' Walpole snapped when Mr Loader said she should be in the kitchen baking scones, rather than out drinking with boys. Walpole had a can of Hard Solo in her hand when she erupted. Walpole got up from an outdoor table and went to her garage where she collected a 5 litre jerry can of fuel, went back to the table, poured the petrol over the seated Mr Loader and waved a cigarette lighter around. 'I'll do it,' Walpole said. 'I'll do it.' Mr Loader replied: 'Go on, do it.' Walpole carried out the threat and Mr Loader was immediately engulfed in flames. Mr Loader, who ran around the yard screaming, tried to pull off his shirt but the melted fabric stuck to his skin. Two male friends extinguished the fire by plunging Mr Loader into a small pool. Walpole held her head in her hands and said: 'What the f*** have I done? He was telling me to do it.' Mr Loader was taken by ambulance to Albury Hospital then flown to The Alfred in Melbourne where he spent eight days in a coma, 74 days in the burns unit, and underwent 10 operations. He had suffered third degree burns to 55 per cent of his body and less severe injuries to an additional six per cent. Those injuries were spread across his back, chest, arms, legs and face. Judge English described Walpole's deeds as 'deliberate acts committed in the presence of others'. 'For those present it must have been truly horrific to be witness to,' she said. 'It was an act of immediate, destructive and horrifically painful violence.' Mr Loader can no longer expose his skin to the sun and his body struggles to regulate its temperature because his sweat glands were burnt off. 'It will affect the rest of my life,' Mr Loader said in a statement read by Crown prosecutor Max Pincott. At a pre-sentence hearing, Walpole wept on in the witness box as she unsuccessfully attempted to explain what she had done. 'I wasn't thinking,' she repeatedly said when asked about her actions. 'I didn't want to injure Jake.' Judge English did not accept Walpole's contention she was unaware putting a cigarette lighter to a man soaked in petrol would set him ablaze. 'I find that position difficult to believe,' she said. Judge English also rejected Walpole's claim she had set out to scare Mr Loader, rather than harm him. 'She threatened to set fire to the victim and she did exactly that,' she said. Further, Walpole should have known the consequences of lighting the petrol would likely be catastrophic - 'which is exactly what occurred'. Judge English found Walpole had engaged in 'nothing short of drug and alcohol-fuelled violence' rather than becoming aggressive due to her depression. Despite Walpole having excellent prospects of rehabilitation and being highly unlikely to reoffend, Judge English said no sentence other than full-time custody would be appropriate for her offending.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Tulip Siddiq calls Bangladeshi corruption investigation ‘smear campaign'
Tulip Siddiq has accused the interim leader of Bangladesh of conducting an 'orchestrated campaign' to damage her reputation. The former anti-corruption minister, who was forced to resign earlier this year following corruption allegations, said Professor Muhammad Yunus is 'interfering with UK politics'. The Labour MP also claimed comments he made in a Sky News interview have prejudiced her right to a fair investigation, and called for the ongoing corruption inquiries into her to be dropped. Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) has opened several investigations into Ms Siddiq alleging corruption in connection with the government of her aunt, Sheikh Hasina, who was ousted as the country's prime minister last year. In March, Prof Yunus told Sky News that Ms Siddiq 'has so many (sic) wealth left behind here' and 'should be made responsible'. As the chief adviser of Bangladesh, he is effectively the country's interim leader. In correspondence sent to Prof Yunus and the ACC, lawyers for the former minister wrote: 'The time has now come for the chief adviser and the ACC to abandon their wholly misconceived and unlawful campaign to smear Ms Siddiq's reputation and interfere with her public service.' Bangladeshi authorities previously said they have evidence to back up their claims of corruption and will pursue action through the country's courts. Ms Siddiq told Sky News: 'I will not be allowing them to drag me into their world of dirty politics and nothing is going to stop me from pursuing the job that I was elected to do with an overwhelming majority, which is representing the people of Hampstead and Highgate. 'So they need to stop this political vendetta, this smear campaign, and this malicious persecution right from the beginning.' The MP had requested a meeting with the Bangladeshi leader during an official visit to the UK earlier this month to 'clear up' any misunderstandings. But he turned her down, saying he did not want to 'interrupt a legal procedure'. In the new legal letter, lawyers for Ms Siddiq say the interim leader had already unfairly influenced the inquiries through previous comments. 'The copious briefings to the media, the failure to respond to our letters, the failure to even ask to meet with and question Ms Siddiq during their recent visit to the United Kingdom are impossible to justify and completely inconsistent with a fair, lawful and serious investigation,' reads the letter. Party banned from elections The correspondence also sets a deadline of 30 June 2025 for the Bangladeshi authorities to reply, stating that 'in the absence of a full and proper response… Ms Siddiq will consider this matter closed'. Last month, Prof Yunus banned the Awami League - the political party still led by Sheikh Hasina - from standing in the coming elections. Earlier this year, it was revealed that Ms Siddiq had lived in several London properties that had links to the Awami League. She referred herself to the prime minister's standards adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, who said he had 'not identified evidence of improprieties', but added it was 'regrettable' that Ms Siddiq had not been more alert to the 'potential reputational risks' of the ties to her aunt. Ms Siddiq said continuing in her role would be 'a distraction' for the government, but insisted she had done nothing wrong.
