Australia made ‘irrelevant' after US strikes on Iran: Sharma
Australia's former ambassador to Israel and Liberal senator Dave Sharma says Anthony Albanese has made Australia 'irrelevant' after the US launched strikes on Iran and the Prime Minister failed to secure a meeting with Donald Trump.
Speaking to Sky on Monday, Senator Sharma said while Australia never had a 'huge' amount of influence, 'we've largely made ourselves irrelevant through this conflict'.
'I mean, look, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese didn't have a meeting with Trump where this would have obviously come up if he'd had a discussion,' he said.
'We had Richard Marles on the television yesterday calling for de-escalation at the very same time, almost, that US B-2 bombers (were) flying from Missouri (and) were striking nuclear targets in Iran.'
He said Labor had 'dealt ourselves out of a traditional role' as being a contributor and 'major player' in international discussions.
'No one listens to our views seriously anymore in the on these issues, particularly in the Middle East,' he said.
'(On) Israel, the relationship with this government is very bad.
'The United States, we don't yet seem to have a relationship with the new Trump administration, or at least key parts of it.'
Hastie lashes 'flat-footed' Albo
Acting opposition foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie has accused Mr Albanese of a 'flat-footed' response to the US attack and having poor instincts on the issue.
Speaking to ABC Radio National on Monday morning, Mr Hastie said he was happy to see his counterpart Penny Wong had backed in the US on the strikes however the delayed response demonstrated Mr Albanese' mismanagement.
'I'm glad we have bipartisanship on this—that the world, as she said, has agreed Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon,' he said.
'We support action to prevent that, which is why we supported the US strikes yesterday. I think, though, what yesterday demonstrated was that the Prime Minister is flat-footed.
'His instincts aren't great on this, and he should have called an NSC meeting yesterday for an event of such significance. Instead, it's happening this morning.'
Mr Hastie added the strikes 'needed to happen' in order to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
'Iran would not come to the table, and the risk of them getting a nuclear weapon was huge, and it was a direct threat to regional stability and world peace,' he said.
'Intelligence agencies will debate when Iran planned to break out and put all the componentry together and have an actual nuclear weapon.
'But the risk was there, and that's why action was taken, and I think that's the context in which we need to see the strikes that took place yesterday.'
Albo's 'deathly silence' blasted
Nationals leader David Littleproud and independent Jacqui Lambie have also called on Mr Albanese to address Australia's stance on the conflict and US involvement.
Mr Littleproud labelled Mr Albanese not having made a public statement as of Monday morning a 'deathly silence'.
'This was a decisive, strategic act that will make the world safer,' Mr Littleproud said.
'Now, we don't want to see a protracted conflict. And it sounds as though the United States doesn't want to be involved in a protracted Middle East conflict.
'There's no way in the world that we could get ourselves involved in that.
'We do need to be able to defend ourselves first when we've got Virgin pilots finding Chinese ships in our waters. There is an underinvestment here that needs to be rectified.'
Mr Littleproud claimed the move showed the government was trying to 'sit on the fence' due to domestic politics.
Senator Lambie urged against committing Australian forces that were 'not ready'.
'What I do know is that Trump said, 'You've got two weeks', and within 48 hours you took them out,' she said.
'So if there was any sort of relationship still ongoing there that is now gone, that's the first thing.
'I think the other thing is that you Americans said you weren't going back into a war in the Middle East. Well, you just went back in.'
'But what I will say is that we certainly can't back you up this time, and we don't owe you anything.'
'I say this to (Mr Albanese) – we are not fit for purpose to be involved in any war. The most that you can offer anywhere around the world right now is peacekeepers.
'Do not follow the USA into this war for 20 years – (our troops] are not ready.'
'Time for clarity': Ex-PM's call
On Sunday, former prime minister Scott Morrison accused the Albanese Labor government of not showing enough 'clarity' on the Israel-Iran conflict.
'I think there's been far too much ambiguity about this from Australia, far too much ambiguity, and it's time for clarity,' Mr Morrison said.
'And the clarity is we were dealing with a theocratic authoritarian state that had sponsored an attack on close friends in Israel back on the seventh of October, and they have shown their true colours, and Iran is not a friend of Australia.'
Mr Morrison echoed these sentiments while speaking to 2GB's Ben Fordham on Monday morning, saying the evening news was the time to 'ensure that response was made clear'.
'When things are as they are, Australia
'When things are as they are, Australia needs to know where it stands and its allies need to know where Australia stands. I think that's why clarity is so important,' he said.
Following reports Mr Albanese would give comment after a National Security Committee meeting on Monday, Mr Morrison said it could have met earlier but hoped they would 'come out with a very strong statement in support of our allies'.
More to come
Originally published as Liberal senator Dave Sharma says Aus made 'irrelevant' after US strikes on Iran
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Fence sitting and confusion': Iran strikes show the growing gap between Canberra and Washington
The Albanese government is finding it hard to come to terms with the way the world works now and that's particularly obvious in its approach to Washington under Donald Trump. But it's also means the government is caught flatfooted when important things happen – like the weekend's US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, for example. The government's stumbles and confusion are starting to have consequences for Australia's security and for our alliance relationship with America. This is probably going to get worse as the gap between Canberra and Washington grows. The mounting policy differences are in areas that matter to Washington and that are getting harder to hide. Australia has shifted away from the US when it comes to our approach towards Israel, the Palestinians and the Middle East. Mr Albanese left Australia's reaction to the US strikes on Iran to an unnamed spokesperson over the weekend. It wasn't until Monday that foreign minister Penny Wong belatedly said Australia supported the strikes. And not only has Australia shifted its UN vote for the first time in 20 years from support to Israel and the US, but minister Wong has gone further, saying Australia might recognise a Palestinian state before a peace process concludes. The government's default position of being critical of Israel because of the destruction in Gaza has left it flatfooted on efforts to stop the Iranian regime's nuclear program. The result is fence sitting and confusion. It was Monday afternoon before we heard briefly from the prime minister, echoing Penny Wong's words. That's well after other world leaders reacted to the upending of Middle Eastern security. Trump has told us he doesn't make a final decision until the last second. Mr Albanese seems only to know what to say and think well after the event. Australia's confusion seems to be noticed in Washington. It's telling that President Trump contacted UK prime minister Keir Starmer, before the US strikes, but didn't call America's other AUKUS partner, Mr Albanese. At the heart of things is the uncomfortable fact that the Albanese government's instincts and policies are widely divergent from Trump's America. That played to the government's advantage in our recent election. Voter anxiety about the early, chaotic days of Trump's second term let Mr Albanese paint Peter Dutton as the 'mini-Trump' and ride a wave of anxiety back into office. Great for domestic politics, but not great for alliance relations. The larger problem, though, is the growing gap between Australia and America on China as a security threat and on defence investment. The Albanese government has made a lot of domestic political mileage out of 'stabilising' the relationship with Beijing. Mr Albanese has already met Xi Jinping three times – in Bali, Beijing and Rio. In May he announced he would fly to Beijing to meet Xi for the fourth time. Yet six months into Trump's second term, he has yet to meet the US President and we hear he has nothing planned except perhaps at September's UN General Assembly. Beyond the personal level, the Albanese government looks at least as conflicted and confused on China policy as it does on the Middle East. At the National Press Club a couple of weeks ago, Mr Albanese couldn't bring himself to put 'China' and 'security' into the same paragraph when asked was China a national security threat. Instead we got a word salad about complexity, relationships, the broader region and binaries. He's out of step with the majority of Australians who polling shows see an aggressive China as a security threat to Australia and the region. For Washington, China is the priority security challenge. Mr Albanese has added to Australian weakness on security by dismissing American calls for us to invest enough in our own security. He's made spending two per cent of GDP on defence into some kind of statement of sovereign strength, when he must know that won't even pay for the conventional military he plans, let alone eight nuclear submarines. To American eyes and ears, this is a heady brew that undercuts Australia's reliability as an ally. It can only make hardheaded folk in Washington wonder why on earth America should weaken its own Navy by handing over nuclear submarines from its own fleet to strengthen Australia when we seem determined to free ride on American taxpayers and American power. And far from working closely with the US and its other regional partners and allies to deter China, we seem willing to discount the threat and double down on our trade dependency on Beijing. After all, AUKUS exists to deter Chinese aggression. If Australia doesn't share that purpose, then AUKUS no longer makes sense. As we get further into Trump's second term, Australia and the US are drifting further apart. That might make many critics of the Trump administration happy, but the growing gap between Canberra and Washington undercuts our decades long reliance on the US for our security. And it seems the Albanese government is yet to notice. Michael Shoebridge is a contributor and the founder and director of Strategic Analysis Australia
AU Financial Review
2 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Meet the real life Batwing that bombed Iran's nuclear sites
The B-2 Spirit bomber is one of the world's most advanced aircraft and played the starring role in Donald Trump's early Sunday morning air raid on Iran's nuclear sites. The Pentagon revealed seven aircraft were involved in the stunning strike, delivering their bunker-buster bombs to target the underground nuclear enrichment plant at Fordow, in a marathon 37-hour operation.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
War in the Middle East is dangerous; Albanese missed his opportunity
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's belated abandonment of Australia's neutral stance on the US joining Israel's attack on Iran is a continuation of the defensive and slow-footed reaction that has marked his record over the 18 months since the Middle East reignited. With US President Donald Trump posturing for days on taking military action against Tehran, Albanese had adequate preparation time. Yet, when the attacks came, the prime minister stayed silent on support. Instead, his office issued a statement by an anonymous government spokesperson calling for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy. Such lame silence opened the door for the opposition's canny acting foreign affairs spokesperson, Andrew Hastie, to seize the initiative and back the US strikes and scramble the government onto Monday morning television programs, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek eventually confirming that the government did indeed support Trump's strikes. Albanese then emerged on Monday to declare that, while the attacks were unilateral action by the US, 'Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and we support action to prevent that'. He should have said it loud and clear on Sunday. That is not to say the prime minister was letting down our ally by not automatically endorsing American action. The US has been so erratic of late that we do not owe it that, not least because so many unanswered questions flow from the weekend. The legality of the US action is wide open to interpretation and Trump's declaration that Iran's nuclear program had been 'completely and totally obliterated' sits awkwardly beside assertions a day later by senior US officials they did not know the fate of Tehran's stockpile of near-bomb-grade uranium. Further, the UN's nuclear watchdog confirmed all three Iranian facilities had been badly damaged, but said it was not yet in a position to assess the impact underground and Iran has told the International Atomic Energy Agency there has been no increase in off-site radiation levels at the three sites. Trump's withdrawal in 2018 from the Iran nuclear deal reached by seven countries after two years of gruelling negotiation may have helped push Tehran down its current obstinate path. But in the 10 days of war with Israel this month, Iran has received little but verbal support from allies and is perhaps now the most isolated it has been since the 1979 US embassy hostage crisis.
